November 8, 2008
Posted: 04:07 PM ET
President-elect Obama spoke recently with the president of Poland.
President-elect Obama spoke recently with the president of Poland.

(CNN) — U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has made "no commitment" to plans for a missile defense program in eastern Europe, despite a report on Polish president's Web site, an Obama adviser said Saturday.

Obama spoke to President Lech Kaczynki over the phone about continuing military and political cooperation between the two countries and possibly meeting in person soon, both sides said.

"President-elect had a good conversation with the Polish president and the Polish prime minister about the important U.S.-Poland alliance," said Denis McDonough, Obama's senior foreign policy adviser.

However, Kaczynski's office on its Web site says that during the same conversation, Obama told Kaczynski that he intends to continue plans for a missile shield in eastern Europe.

Obama's adviser denied the report.

"President Kaczynski raised missile defense, but President-elect Obama made no commitment on it. His position is as it was throughout the campaign: That he supports deploying a missile defense system when the technology is proved to be workable," McDonough said.

Russia is infuriated by U.S. plans for the missile-defense installation, which includes basing missile interceptors in Poland. The interceptor rockets would be linked to an air-defense radar system in the Czech Republic.

The United States has tried to mollify Moscow by stressing that the missile shield is directed at rogue states, such as Iran, and the number of interceptors in the shield would be "easily overwhelmed" by Russian forces.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, in his first state-of-the-nation speech since taking office earlier this year, warned this week that Russian missiles will be deployed against the planned system.

"The Iskander missile system will be deployed in Kaliningrad region to neutralize, when necessary, the missile shield," Medvedev said. "We are also planning to use the resources of the Russian naval fleet for these purposes."

U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Medvedev's announcement that Russia would deploy missiles in response to the shield is "disappointing."

Updated 4:07 p.m. with McDonough statement

Filed under: Barack Obama • Popular Posts


Jay   November 9th, 2008 12:05 pm ET

To the media, Please STOP showing black people every time there's something to say about Obama!!! As long as the media keeps showing blacks on TV it is going to remain about race. Try showing the faces of everyone who support Obama. Asians, Hispanics and Caucasians. We too voted for Obama.

brian   November 9th, 2008 10:59 am ET

I love how many idiots are already attacking Obama just because they are still teary-eyed over Palin's loss. Idiots.

Chris   November 8th, 2008 11:08 pm ET

Obama hasn't even taken office and he is already getting pushed around on the world stage.

Ron , West Coast   November 8th, 2008 9:15 pm ET

Our newly elected president will now have to repair, and mend a lot of fences Geo. W., and Dick Cheney ruined over the last eight years….
Barack Obama, and Joe Biden are our leaders now. That is , on and after Jan. 20th, 2009 …….
We`ve finally gotten intelligence, and humility back in the White House ……
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA …………

Roberto Valdés   November 8th, 2008 9:05 pm ET

This is the kind of situation in which we are eager to see Obama's "tough diplomacy" in action. Will he succeed? We'll see…

S Callahan   November 8th, 2008 8:54 pm ET

President elect Obama is on his toes and the international community is testing not realizing this man thinks through his decisions. Calm down Russia and Poland…the world's citzens made it loud and clear it prefers peaceful solutions.

Scott L   November 8th, 2008 8:52 pm ET

Of course not, his plan is to disable the American military might and shift those dollars to mini cars and green programs.

He better start shifting the national guard to start securing our northern and southern borders and shoot to kill anyone not following border patrol orders.

Let's see how quick liberals wish GW was back in office WHEN the next attack occurs. Biden already thinks it will happen in a few months…

Juan   November 8th, 2008 8:52 pm ET

Barry probably just got confused and thought he was agreeing with Nancy Reagan. Either that or Lech just misunderstood one of his many "uhs" as a "yes."

Robert Maxwell   November 8th, 2008 8:51 pm ET

The radar sites in the Czech Republic and the missiles in Poland were among the absolutely worst ideas to come out of the Bush administration. The Czechs and Poles had to be bribed into accepting the deal, which they first rejected. (They'd be one of the first targets in a missile exchange.) The US had to agree to beef up Poland's military with American taxpayers' money. The missiles themselves have a poor record. They are enormously expensive. They protect us from nothing and they provoke and alienate Russia, who offered us the use of sites within Russian borders. Of course this sort of boondoggle should make the CEOs at Raytheon and General Electric very happy. One of the first things any new administration ought to do is dump the worst plans of its predecessor. Cancelling the program will be interpreted not as a sign of weakness but of logic. I can't see anything but good coming from ending this reckless enterprise.

Tod in CA   November 8th, 2008 8:48 pm ET

No shields, no escalation. Missile power is a matter of national pride. We're never going to be invincible, so don't invite trouble.

bill for barack   November 8th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

President-elect Obama was right in saying that we have one President alreadyand that now is his time to lead the country without trying to compete with his successor.
The time will come when President Obama can – and – will set his own policy.

RGG   November 8th, 2008 8:18 pm ET

Obama should improve relations with Russia. He should not go back to the cold war era.
Bush was tying his silliest best at provoking Russia by installing missiles systems in Poland and the Check republic. It was probably an electoral trick to help the Republicans.

te   November 8th, 2008 8:16 pm ET

THe russians need to stop thinking like its the 80s

Mike   November 8th, 2008 8:12 pm ET

The weakness of an Obama administration is already evident, and they haven't even moved into the White House.

Expect China to annex Taiwan, Russia to annex Azerbaijan and all the totalitarian regimes to have a free hand for the next 4 years.

Maybe Obama will take this position of Russia's to the UN?

phil   November 8th, 2008 7:39 pm ET

CNN leave obama alone . you guys should give him a break . he is just getting off a long campaign, allow him to settle down . dont report things that we no is not true. everyone shld help obama succeed in this trying times.

Speider   November 8th, 2008 7:35 pm ET

Haven't we learned that missiles and nuclear weapons are as obsolete as is the global warfare of the past? Nations have certainly learned that we are tied by the economics of each other nation and dispute and instability in one nation affects all. The fears of Soviet or Chinese troops sweeping across continents or nuclear missiles raining down on the heads of one nation is as obsolete as the battleships that can be sunk with one 200 mile-range exocet missile.

Our struggle will be with small, unstable dictatorships and perhaps our intervention in Iraq was the first of many to reign in these dangers to the rest of the world but even there we have seen that conventional warfare is not as effective as counter-insurgency.

A few less nuclear subs and battleships will not make us weaker, nor will the addition make us stronger. Using our heads to watch, expect and decide on the actions needed to counter terrorism and destabilization in the world is our new military/political defense.

maynard hopkins wi   November 8th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

GET READY FOR THE ENDING OF TIME. IF OBAMA DOESN,T DO IT THEN NANCY P. WILL

Moe, NY   November 8th, 2008 7:11 pm ET

I think a "Missile Defense Program" in Eastern Europe is a great idea…hope it becomes a reality. Just think, if the whole world was covered with "Missile Defense Program", perhaps it would be the end of war as we know it! Countries trying to bomb other countries would have a harder time doing it! I could live with this!

Larry   November 8th, 2008 6:51 pm ET

This is what happens when people voted their emotions and not with their brains.Now money isn't going to be the issue,terrorist and world war 3,and staying alive.Thank you for electing President Obama,your choice has made our enemies vary happy.

Don't you feel safe now that the world loves us???

Perusing-Through   November 8th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

One President at a time, people! One President at a time.

Nannie Bouroughs   November 8th, 2008 6:49 pm ET

If President-Elect Obama is NOT going to pursue the King George regime's agenda of putting our troops, our personnel and our technology in every country on the planet, it is clearly a wise choice. Other nations around the globe are fast becoming increasingly tired of having a USA footprint and everything else that goes with it in their countries. The true beauty of Democracy is that it is learned by example, not by invasion and occupation.

[Although, like NAFTA, which Obama is NOT going to change, I fear the current denial is really just more political speak for American consumption.]

We have more than we can handle after 8 long destructive and incompetent years of King George right here in the USA…

AMERICA FIRST!

The Pecan State Pundit   November 8th, 2008 6:47 pm ET

Liberalism has had bad luck with wars. Woodrow Wilson's domestic program was undermined by World War I. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal was scuttled by World War II. Harry Truman's Fair Deal was torpedoed by the War in Korea. Lyndon Johnson's Great Society – the most ambitious of them all – was decapitated by the war in Viet Nam.

We need to focus on the domestic agenda and try to stay out of major military commitments, if possible. Of course, we cannot stand idly by and witness genocide or the overthrow of a democracy by a totalitarian force, but we should be very aggressive in our efforts to stop such actions from happening.

It is urgently important that the US get on with the repair and renewal of its infrastructure, regulating the economy so we can avoid the economic downturns that Conservative leaders allow the "free market" to create, and educating our citizenry. This is a complicated new world, and we're going to have to think through some complicated problems – or witness the end of civilization as we know it.

3strikes   November 8th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

he doesnt look presidential at all, he just looks like a clueless and inexperienced empty suit socialist. now lets see all th nobama democraps defend their messiah in

3

2

1

GO!!!

jim b   November 8th, 2008 6:23 pm ET

Bush's anti-missle system is just more welfare for the rich, in this case defense contractors peddling an unproven technology. The pressident. Bush and Cheney themselves probably know it is useless for anything but redistributing the wealth to their friends. Far fetched? No, not really. for the team that took us to war to provide non competitive contracts to Haliburton, this is childs play. The next administration needs to handle the problem with skill and delicacy, as the whack jobs on the right will be happy to use this to thwart the will of the American people.

popeye   November 8th, 2008 6:20 pm ET

We need to wake up!
What would we do if Russia put a "defense shield" in Cuba?
Can you say "Bay of Pigs".
This whole idea is simply poking a stick in Russia's eye.

Therestofus   November 8th, 2008 6:15 pm ET

That one, the pompous, smart aleck from Chicago. He is not the president YET. So shut him up!

katrina f.   November 8th, 2008 6:14 pm ET

I wish Obama the best luck while he is head man of the U.S.A

Mike   November 8th, 2008 6:13 pm ET

Hey obama genius. THE TECHNOLOGY HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN. Can't believe these people are going to be running our country. It's a shame.

Eileen   November 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Don't believe a thing Obama says or is purported to have said. He will say whatever he wants to suit the moment, and sometimes says one thing, but then leaks something else from his aides and friends. He's trying to cover every base, so he can do absolutely nothing of substance and yet still claim he is saving the day. In the end our country will be a sitting duck for terrorists.

Evie the evile Evelyn   November 8th, 2008 6:06 pm ET

Tic-Tac-Toe … who wins? No one … are we too stoooopid given Dumbya to realize this? war = win less … and the roaches win … are you on OUR side or the bugs.

Human = you are my friend … evie the evil evelyn … read this – my friend – YOU are … deep breath and get over it … OK?

Don from Miane   November 8th, 2008 6:04 pm ET

President elect Obama should tell Russia to pound sand if they don;t like the missile defense shield. Its time America stood up to all of the world leaders who can;t really do anything but rattle their sword and threaten this or that. There's nothing wrong with telling russia we are going to buld the defense shield and while we're at it telling Iran that we will not allow them to have nuclear weapons. these two countries will probably be the first to test the President elects resolve. I say stand firm in your resolve and convictions. After all what can Russia or for that matter Iran really do about it? President Obama might just be the 2000's JFK in his resolve to the Russians. Neither Russia or Iran wants any part of a military confrontation with the US.

Chris   November 8th, 2008 6:03 pm ET

I think the press is something to keep an eye on here. I think what we're going to see is the media elite start to turn on Obama now that he is privy to top secret information regarding foreign policy; something that he did not have access to before winning the vote. His stance on certain foreign diplomatic issues is going to change (as it normally does) as he receives info from generals on the ground in the Iraq & Afghanistan theaters and leadership from East Asia and Eastern Europe. The media is going to try and rip him apart for doing his job…you just watch. Cowards.

Evie the evile Evelyn   November 8th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

Time for US (the world) to stand up and say … WE ARE … now get a grip.

Eddie Blake   November 8th, 2008 5:55 pm ET

I cna't beleive what you LIBS have done. Sharia law will be here by the end of 2009.

Ron   November 8th, 2008 5:53 pm ET

Best thing to do is look at all of Bush's decision and revise them. You know all decision republicans made were dumb.

g ontario canada   November 8th, 2008 5:51 pm ET

i dont think the us would be allowing russia to put amisiles respones shield on there border

Cody   November 8th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

Medvedev is acting foolishly. Obama's support for the missile shield is not strong anway, but by rattling his saber before Obama even takes office, Medvedev is making it politically much harder to work out a peacable solution. He should have waited to see how Obama would move forward on this.
That said, perhaps the missile shield is just not worth the trouble it would bring with it.

Gary   November 8th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

why does it always seem that when a comment from anyone in the Obama team is even slightly viewed as negative to the administration, its instantly rejected by said administration?

oh boy   November 8th, 2008 5:41 pm ET

Here we go. Just like he did in the campaign. Say one thing, then deny he said it, and then say something else. The media and the citizens of the US allowed him to get away with it. But when your on a world stage it is a little harder to get a way with. God help us.

william   November 8th, 2008 5:40 pm ET

Russian policy takes instruction from the game of chess. This declaration is equivalent to a 'knight fork' — if we do not deploy, we look weak and Russia scores a point elevating their standing and diminishing ours. If we stay, they can agitate internally to divert the Russian people away from the economic and political discontent that is brewing there. In other words, 'win-win' for them and 'lose-lose' for us.

The defense against a knight-fork is to create a different problem, like putting the king in check or threatening their queen — they can't fulfill their aims of getting us to choose between two unpleasant alternatives.

Time to think of a new point of leverage — shouldn't be all that hard.

Shannon   November 8th, 2008 5:39 pm ET

what happened to the earlier story where he was sticking to the plan. Does Obama control the media now, print an unflattering story about him and it's pulled and his version is put up. Come on CNN, what is the story!

Al   November 8th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Obama is a real leader. If some people have ideology ticks or want to earn obscene money on military contracts it does not mean that president should spend our tax money on such crap.

Here's a missle: no room for gays in the Obama tent.   November 8th, 2008 5:38 pm ET

Blacks are good enough to get married, but not gays, according to Obama. He did not support gay marriage in California and blacks by 70-30 did not support it either. Is this one minority suppressing another minority?

David Stein   November 8th, 2008 5:18 pm ET

…and it starts to get complicated.

Mike   November 8th, 2008 5:13 pm ET

"Deploy when proven to be workable?" His advisors should get informed. Or stop pretending they are not informed.

The US missile defense system is already is deployed. And is quite workable within the limited scope of threats it is designed to protect against. If he upcoming administration keeps using the word "workable", then their only intention is to reduce missile defense back to a research project, nullifying many years of positive progress in deployment and testing, via a huge budget cut.

The 9/11 event did not involve a WMD, just airplanes. Just one nuclear-tipped missile impacting a US city will dwarf that by several magnitudes.

Christian   November 8th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

Good morning ladies and gentleman. I am writing this comment because I would like some more consideration toward my comment. My daughter came up to me yesterday and said daddy can I ask you a question and like any father I asked whats up? She said how come the media keeps refering to obama as the first black president? I answered I dont know why the media and others refer to him as a black president because he is a biracial president neither white nor black but biracial. She then said well daddy does that make me black because I am like him (biracial). I said no sweetheart you are a biracial child neither white nor black but your own seperate ethnic group. The conversation went on. My concern is that of the 300+ million americans the almost 2% of biracial will become lumped into a category that they do not belong. President Obama is neither black nor white I feel that the media is putting out a message to the people of the US that is false and causing other americans to view
biracial (black/white) to be grouped as black. I really wish the media would correct this problem and address it. I am a concerned parent of a biracial child (black/white) I just dont agree with the approach when it comes to Pres. Obama as being a black president when in fact he is biracial.

Lynnieann   November 8th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

When did Obama become all black ? Correctly, he is a Mulatto and should be referred to as that !! And why do all the press shots of excitement only show black people? Has Obama's white half suddenly been lost ?

ran   November 8th, 2008 5:10 pm ET

Now the BS starts from those who wants to keep our country from going forward. I only hope this time both the people and the media rejects this kind of garbage this time.

Maggie Muggins From Selwyn   November 8th, 2008 5:06 pm ET

Putting Missile defence systems next to Russia will create problems just as it would if Russia built similar installations in Cuba.

Then add to this the systems are likely not working like they are supposed to work and would just be an added expense and political aggravation. Hopefully some careful thought will go into these types of tactics.

robespierre   November 8th, 2008 5:05 pm ET

Fun is just beginning as the barbarians at the gates perceive Obama as a patsy. Frankly, I don't think he is, but we'll see. On the humerous side of this issue, look at the end of the new play about Obama et al, THE AUDACITY OF AMBITION. For those with post-election boredom, this riotous play is the cure!

The Blessed One   November 8th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

President-Elect Obama has done more in 3 days than the entire current administration done in 7 years.

I even saw the UK Parliament Questions to the Prime Minister all ready to work with President-Elect Obama.

Those that didn't vote for Obama, the DOORS are CLOSED! President-Elect Obama will lead the way and the world will watch this great man not only make history in the US but around the world.

The Conservatives Rush to NOW prise President-Elect Obama, TOO LATE, no blessings for you!

anglopole   November 8th, 2008 4:51 pm ET

all i can say is if obama play to russian game then he lost my confidence in him as an african /european who knows how russians see africans and even those who live amoge them.

so obama fullfill the plan that america signed with poland and its other allies
thanks

Frank   November 8th, 2008 4:50 pm ET

Here is the first sign that Obama is going to weaken our superior fighting power, as if he is not aware of the rogue nations out there developing all sorts of nuclear and biological weapons!!!! Carter was a moron from the Democrats that destroyed the middle east and the peace in the world by his stupid foreign policies, including toppling the regime of the ex-Shah of Iran! Now Obama is going to continue in his footsteps and open the doors for those rogue nations to exercise their violence on our country! They had always said that radical Islam will destroy our country from within and not from abroad, and here is how they will do it!!!! Who do you all think paid millions and millions of $ towards his campaign? Our good hearted nation is composed of naive fools!!!!!

Aleksandar   November 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Obama is taking it easy with Russia as he should. He is clever to distant himself from the shield for now in order to by some time and get some maneuvering space.
He needs to sit down with Medvedev in order to bring Russian and American interests and positions as close as possible.
USA, Russia and China should be the axis of world stability. And this can only be achieved by discussion.

Democrat voting for McCain   November 8th, 2008 4:40 pm ET

Waffle, waffle. Hedge, hedge. Whatever you do, don't make any decisions. At least he's consistent.

Tomkat in Seattle   November 8th, 2008 4:39 pm ET

Don't antagonize Russia. This could potentially turn into Cold War 2.0 or WWIII. Russia and most of the world is rightly very distrustful of the United States thanks to the Bush Admin. With the Bush Admin. putting weapons Poland, it makes people in Europe also nervous. What if Canada put missiles at the borders north of New York, saying that they were just defending themselves from possible incoming missiles from communist Cuba. Sound foolish? That's probably how the Russian government feels too. Stand down please President Elect Obama! Diplomacy first, diplomacy second, instead of military force as the only option. M2C

-Tomkat-

AIPAC and mossad floating trial baloons   November 8th, 2008 4:37 pm ET

before they can decide

whether they can perpetuate their grip on US foreign policies

overtly or covertly

under the guise of the Obama administration.

kick back and watch how they try to wiggle their way back into washington.

they've already planted their moles in key positions.

Kristen   November 8th, 2008 4:33 pm ET

Dear CNN, there is a difference in trying to MAKE news and trying to REPORT it. You are dangerously close to the first.

SD   November 8th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

What is the deal with the Russians??

This is NOT an Obama issue, by the way.

With so many problems plaguing the world today……global warming, diseases, natural disasters…..you'd think the Russians would give up on their tired ways of bullying others and being civilized.

We have nothing to fear even if we had no missle defense sheild, because you can bet on your life that if the Russians ever tried to launch missles our way, they'd be repaid the favour twenty times over.

I think Obama will have to come up with some creative Kennedy-esque like bargaining to get the Russians to cool their jets. Otherwise, missles to fight missles is nothing more than a death sentence for both sides.

Robert   November 8th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

This is one really immature and naiive guy. Look at his comments regarding Nancy Regan. There will be plenty of material for all the late night comedians….and just think – what a dismal reflection of what a Harvard Law Degree gets someone. Bush will end up looking good after 4 years of this bozo!

jamie   November 8th, 2008 4:26 pm ET

A Democrat not supporting defence, that a new one…LoL

mitch   November 8th, 2008 4:24 pm ET

why should we spend billions on a defense shield that does nothing but piss russia off. after our 'escapade' in iraq, and lobbyist ties between the mccain campaign and the georgian government,its no wonder russia's pissed at us. the illegal war in iraq gave russia all the precedent they needed to respond the way they did. president barack can use bush's 'shield as a bartering tool to restore relations and thaw the chill between us. man, i like this new president!

Kerry   November 8th, 2008 4:14 pm ET

He's still President-elect. Hasn't even been a week yet. Don't these countries understand that we have one government and one President at a time.

David Newport, OR   November 8th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

I support Obama, but we have a president until January.

Rich Lady   November 8th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

Where's the promise of Peace?

Al Mellen   November 8th, 2008 12:19 pm ET

The united states putting missiles in Poland is a mistake. Remember what happened when the Russians wanted to put missiles in Cuba,,,,,,,,90 miles from Florida. America wanted no part of that action. We were worried as to what the consequences might be. If i were a Russian i would not want American missiles next door to my country. This was another one of George Bush's not too brainy ideas. America does not need another cold war with Russia. The Bush administration was forever preaching fear in our country. Hopefully those days are gone.

baker   November 8th, 2008 12:17 pm ET

Is this the "change" everyone was voting for? Maybe Obama won't be so bad after all.

Chris   November 8th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

Meet the new boss…same as the old boss…. :(

Meka   November 8th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

PRESIDENT OBAMA . . . MAN WITH INTELLIGENCE, DIPLOMACY, TACT AND GRACE.

AMERICA WINS!

M. WINNERS   November 8th, 2008 12:16 pm ET

The missle shield is just one more of the many, many half-baked ideas of a failed Bush foreign policy.
The shield system is still under development and has not yet proved it's reliability/accuracy.
Without question the US should re-think deployment of an unproven system to foreign soil.
Technical questions not with standing, in all fairness to both the US and Poland, the Poles should have a national referendum vote as to whether or not they want our system on it's soil in the first place.

Obama/Biden   November 8th, 2008 12:14 pm ET

Good judgment call to keep that misile plan because there evils out there who thinks that they going to have a free ride under your administration.

alexia - france   November 8th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

There it goes again !

Scott   November 8th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

The more I hear if his policies, the more I like the man, Something tells me that Pres-elect OBama is going to do great things for this country. World leaders are going to find that this man is no pushover.

His backing of the missle defense system, no nukes for IRan, and his williness to listen to his commanders on the ground in Iraq, as far as a troop withdrawal all show signs of a good leader.

Rahm is NO freaggin Change!   November 8th, 2008 12:10 pm ET

AIPAC played both sides in the election cycle,

with a ready list of their agents for either side.

and now quickly planting them in the key positions of the obama administration.

that's gonna bring a whole lotta change to washington, right?

NOT!

Tim   November 8th, 2008 12:07 pm ET

President Bush, er I mean Obama, is a neo-con

Ha ha ha ha ha

FreeNLovIt   November 8th, 2008 12:00 pm ET

I dont understand this thing, can someone explain it to me? Why do we have to aggravate Russia?

Dawn   November 8th, 2008 11:59 am ET

We may be the United States of America, but the World look to us for help from hostile Countries. This is to show that President-elect is NOT going to be a push over, but yet not going to start a war with Russia. Remember he needs to talk to the leaders and talk with deplomacy. Remember there is Camp David Summits with Foreign Leaders. I think that he can do that, Remember VP Elect Biden?

I think that he could make it happen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bless this Country with a whole lot peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We've Got Your Back Mr. President   November 8th, 2008 11:58 am ET

Anyone that continues to spew negative bloggs against President-elect Obama is either an immature child …. or a TERRORIST wanting America to continue it’s slide away from greatness. I say CONTINUE because Barack has been handed a ROYAL mess.

Sensible posters (Republican, Independent or Democrat) … get behind your President … get behind your country … get behind your flag & your Constitution … if you don’t you are UNPATRIOTIC .. UNAMERICAN …you know, all those labels the GOP tried to smear the dems with during the campaign. Folks, hold those that try to undermine the Obama Administration responsible for their treason. Castigate them.

For if their hatred, if their mean spirited words, succeed in ANY WAY in hampering the effectiveness of our NEW PRESIDENT … and let’s say another terrorist attack occurs … in some small way, they have contributed … they have conspired … with the enemys of the state.

Democrats are often labeled as soft. Well this is a new day and Obama has my backing to lock up anyone that can even be remotely tied to showing moral or financial support to those that would set our country back.

Bloggers … you will either be a helpful part of the solution or a harmful part of the problem … take your pick. We can’t afford to tolerate children or terrorists any longer.

Rahm is NO freaggin Change!   November 8th, 2008 11:58 am ET

AIPAC is grabbing every key posts in Obama administration.

yeah, that's gonna bring a whole lot of change to washington, LOL!

We've Got Your Back Mr. President   November 8th, 2008 11:57 am ET

Anyone that continues to spew negative bloggs against President-elect Obama is either an immature child …. or a TERRORIST wanting America to continue it’s slide away from greatness. I say continue because Barack has been handed a ROYAL mess.

Sensible posters (Republican, Independent or Democrat) … get behind your President … get behind your country … get behind your flag & your Constitution … if you don’t you are UNPATRIOTIC .. UNAMERICAN …you know, all those labels the GOP tried to smear the dems with during the campaign. Folks, hold those that try to undermine the Obama Administration responsible for their treason. Castigate them.

For if their hatred, if their mean spirited words succeed in ANY WAY in hampering the effectiveness of our NEW PRESIDENT … and let’s say another terrorist attack occurs … in some small way, they have contributed … they have conspired … with the enemys of the state.

Democrats are often labeled as soft of crime. Well this is a new day and Obama has my backing to lock up anyone that can even be remotely tied to showing moral or financial support to those that would set our country back.

Bloggers … you will either be a helpful part of the solution or a harmful part of the problem … take your pick. We can’t afford to tolerate children or terrorists any longer.

hometowndemocrat   November 8th, 2008 11:56 am ET

The Russians are upset with us again…………something new?

Jason   November 8th, 2008 11:53 am ET

His inability for real change won't get him past the first 100 days

Ayse London   November 8th, 2008 11:52 am ET

Russia's attacks against Georgia shows that it has a desire to resume the old style Cold War politics of yesteryear. But if I were Medvedev or Putin I would certainly not under-estimate President elect Obama, or see him as all talk no action – because unlike Dub-ya, this is a President that WILL gain international support.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP