December 3, 2008
Posted: 08:51 AM ET
 The former President has pledged to release a list of donors.
The former President has pledged to release a list of donors.

HONG KONG, China (CNN) – Former U.S. President Bill Clinton said Wednesday he will have "very little" to do with the decisions his wife Hillary will face as secretary of state in the incoming Obama administration.

"I'll just try to be a helpful sounding board to her, but I don't think I'll do any more than that," Clinton told CNN during a trip to Hong Kong.

President-elect Barack Obama announced Monday that Hillary Clinton, the senator from New York and former first lady, was his choice for secretary of state. Bill Clinton said he and his wife have always talked "about everything," and he called her advice "invaluable" throughout his career.

"I really care about all these profound challenges that our country and the world are facing," he said. "But the decisions will have to be ultimately the President-elect Obama's decisions to make about what we are going to do, what our policies are going to be."

Clinton said his wife learned she was being considered for the Cabinet post by reading it in the newspaper. He said he would remain in the background unless Obama "asks me to do something specific, which I'm neither looking for nor closed to."

"I think she made the right decision, but for her it was hard. She adored being in the Senate," he said.

Clinton was in Hong Kong to open a meeting of his Clinton Global Initiative, the non-profit foundation he started after leaving office. The organization, which is aimed at tackling international problems such as worldwide poverty and disease prevention, came under scrutiny while his wife was being vetted for the job.

Clinton said he has agreed to disclose his donors in order to eliminate concerns that supporters were trying to influence U.S. international policy, a move he called "over and above what the law requires."

"If she is going to be secretary of state and I operate globally and I have people who contribute to these efforts globally, I think that its important to make it totally transparent," he said.

Filed under: Bill Clinton


Theresa   December 4th, 2008 8:22 am ET

Clinton – give it a rest. One Clinton at a time is enough!

Brendan H., San Antonio, TX   December 3rd, 2008 2:49 pm ET

Special Envoy to the UN. Bill Clinton had his faults, but being unpopular with all the other nations wasn't one of them. He could have been elected president, prime minister, premier or whatever other title of virtually any country he chose after he left office!

Bill Clinton can mend fences – Quickly!!!

Milhouse van Houten   December 3rd, 2008 2:00 pm ET

The history books will be alot kinder to Clinton than his successor but
he kind of reminds me of an ageing boxer,not being able to cope with-out the limelight and not willing to admit his time is over.

not impressed, CA   December 3rd, 2008 1:48 pm ET

Wasn't this the same Bill Clinton who got impeached for lieing under oath to the American people.? ? How soon we forget.

karen raleigh   December 3rd, 2008 1:45 pm ET

I think he should stay in the background. Obama likes it low-key -no drama -just get things done. He has already met with the Governors and wants transparency for any funds that are given to the states. We will get safe bridges, safe and better schools, lots of goodies for our state and our children. Now we have to have better laws to put rapists and pedophiles away for LIFE .Lets hear more about those issues and less about gays and abortion rights!! Rapists and pedophiles are killers of the spirit and souls' of the victims.

Sue in MI   December 3rd, 2008 1:44 pm ET

But the national debt (not the deficit) was retired under Clinton and we had a surplus. If he can make that happen again, we ought to change the Constitution and bring him back! I could care less about Lewinsky, a woman, not a child, who set him up (he's not blameless, but he never allowed torture, either, nor had 5,000 of our servicepeople killed and thousands more maimed, not to mention 100,000 dead Iraqis and millions of displaced Iraqis.) Bush has committed crimes against humanity and should have been impeached, but for Pelosi's complicity in allowing torture…she doesn't want that to come out, so won't allow hearings.

Christine   December 3rd, 2008 1:43 pm ET

Oh, ewww!

No Hillary = No Obama   December 3rd, 2008 1:28 pm ET

Obama will be the face of the Presidency but Hillary Clinton will be the guts.

Virginia   December 3rd, 2008 1:20 pm ET

Please say it ain't so!! We have one already and she is scarier than most, but he is a train wreck horror film waiting to happen. No, no, no!

Texas Teacher   December 3rd, 2008 1:19 pm ET

I recall the first time Clinton ran for office… he said the country will get two for the price of one… and that if anything, Hillary was smarter than him. Now despite his philandering, that is a gracious statement for any husband to make. Men who fool around often love their wives very much. The other is like an illness… they simply seem unable to resist. No one can say that he is not intelligent and qualified for any role he might play in the administration directly or indirectly.

I'm sure the financial disclosure is no problem for either Clintons. Even in the Republican witch hunt that proved only that he was an unfaithful husband, NOTHING was proved against Bill Clinton.

Bush is the one who should be impeached… right along with Cheney.. but it will never happen. The republicans have teflon skin… and the Media aids them in this feat. After all, what is media… but big business. Sorry, I'm very cynical today…. :)

cool onlooker   December 3rd, 2008 12:52 pm ET

Even if Bill is not getting any role, somehow I feel one of his feet is already stepping into the ground. One of his hands is pressing some buttons here and there, manipulating the administration.

What's new? Power addictor.

Jan   December 3rd, 2008 12:51 pm ET

Thank God for the Clintons–someone knows their way around the white house–those people who voted Obama did not REALLY think there would be change–or did they?

bernj II   December 3rd, 2008 12:42 pm ET

Another question:

"Will the democrats on this blog ever develope a mind of their own or blindly follow their messiah?"

I think …. Baaaaaaa!

Kevin in PV   December 3rd, 2008 12:41 pm ET

I'm a registered democrat but very close to the center. I have mixed feelings about former president Clinton involved in the new administration. Unlike most Republicans I know, I can give him credit where credit is due. During his eight years I thought he was a great president and accomplished much. Unlike most Democrats, I am ashamed of how he left office, and certainly understand Republican anger on that point. He could bring alot of unwanted baggage to what otherwise may be a very promising administration.

I'm mystified as to why so many Republicans have already decided PE Obama will do nothing but run the country the rest of way into the ground. It seems we gave Bush two terms and obviously, the majority of Americans, Republican and Democrat (all but a small core of die-hard conservatives), believe he was not a good leader and did not take the country in the right direction. For goodness sakes, give our new man a chance. We've had good, great and poor presidents of both parties. Why castigate and criticize PE Obama when he hasn't even begun serving the nation? Had we done that at the outset of the Reagan years or Clinton years wouldn't we look sillly now?

R. W.   December 3rd, 2008 12:34 pm ET

To Jay: December 3rd, 2008 11:42 am ET

Learn to spell first. Then, learn to make informed arguments.

Woe   December 3rd, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Now about the Clintons. There is no doubt in my mind, and the mind of many others that Bill Clinton was this country's best President ever. I am hoping to tag President-Elect Obama with that same praise and hopefully more. Hillary will continue Bill's legacy as Secretary of State and what a great SofS she will be. You repugs can say anything you want, but you cannot say that the Clinton years were hard on Americans. Can you say the same for Mr Bush's reign? Who was the real terrorist here? Hmmmmmmm

Tom in Delaware   December 3rd, 2008 12:27 pm ET

To Jay: December 3rd, 2008 11:42 am ET

Oh why bother….nothings going to help you.

Woe   December 3rd, 2008 12:26 pm ET

Do all of you know why America is in the mess that it is in? Greed, lying, cheating whether it be Pennsylvania Ave, Wall Street or Main Street, America is paying for this. And gues what people, it is going to get worse to the point where there will no longer be a USA. Just keep on going down this path and you will see that I am right. GM, Ford, Chrysler…too bad, you should go under. You people who work for them, guess what, the party's over. Deal with it like the rest of the unemployed.

david   December 3rd, 2008 12:26 pm ET

reading the comments is like taking a trip across the US, everyone has
very strong opinions but likely very little real information. why not spend some time actually reading about the past
and trying to come up with a conclusion that isn't what you heard from some talking head on TV. why is it that when smart people take office other people get sideways, is it that the words spoken are too much for the common person to comprehend? I wonder how anyone can criticize a past president that presided over one of the most prolific periods in American history in terms of finance. the Clinton era was filled with EMPLOYMENT, BALANCED BUDGETS, LEAPS IN TECHNOLOGY AND OVERALL PROSPERITY FOR MORE PEOPLE THAN EVER BEFORE. as far as I'm concerned they should have left him in office. Just think about what life would be like if we had not elected BUSH! who cares who Clinton slept with, wouldn't you all prefer it if bush had slept with an intern instead of bankrupting the country both financially and internationally. We all need to buy into the rebirth of this country under the leadership of a man who has risen up to lead us, let's face it, people's confidence and attitude matter more than anything, so let's stay positive and remember what makes this country the greatest on earth, our freedom, which has been sorely compromised by the current guy in office, hopefully we can make it to jan 20th without further Bush errors.

Sweetie   December 3rd, 2008 12:25 pm ET

The Clinton Dynasty will never end!

I won't be surprised at all when their daughter decides to run for office!

I don't think it is a bad thing, Peace and Prosperity will be a welcome "change"!

But we did just "Vote in" another Clinton Administration, just with BO at the Top instead of Hillary!

TexasAnnie *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*   December 3rd, 2008 12:23 pm ET

DO ANY OF YOU PEOPLE EVER RE-READ YOUR COMMENTS BEFORE YOU HIT THE "SUBMIT" BUTTON??
The grammatical errors and spelling mistakes and incoherent thoughts just amaze me.
Here's a thought– take 30 seconds and re-read your post before submitting it!!

Lauren   December 3rd, 2008 12:22 pm ET

I can not believe all the support Hillary and Bill have. I really can not.

I only have one question to that, where was this support when Obama took on the clinton machine and WON?

Or could it be true, Obama won by being popular, entertaining, lovable.

We hear how great Hillary will be as SOS, and Bill was the greatest,,,, but yet they LOST to Obama.

I do not understand it.

In other words, the best Democrat was NOT really voted into the office of President?

Ron.Toronto. Canada   December 3rd, 2008 12:21 pm ET

CRAZY GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Way to go.You said it all.

CNN = Jerry Springer of News   December 3rd, 2008 12:13 pm ET

GaVoter – You didn't need to clarify you are from the south. Your racist comment did that on its own. The south needs to press fast-forward and catch up to the times. Things move so slowly down there people behave as if it is still the 60's.

No Bush   December 3rd, 2008 12:02 pm ET

Bill, I will consider you for any job in Obama administration…u are just one hardworking, restless mannnn…. u da bestttttttttttttttt!!!!!!!!

mikes   December 3rd, 2008 12:01 pm ET

It looks like Obama wants to fill out the third Clinton term -I guess they can make him and adopted son -Barack Obama Clinton

Long live the DLC and centrist thinking

Dave   December 3rd, 2008 12:00 pm ET

Here we go!!!

enough of this two-party scam.

tess   December 3rd, 2008 11:58 am ET

arrogance -arrogance and more arrogance!! can this man just go away – the country can and will do just great without him! he is the most needy, insecure and pitiful person in public life – love me – please! pathetic bill – GO AWAY NOW!!!!!!!

Lisa M   December 3rd, 2008 11:56 am ET

No please

Randy   December 3rd, 2008 11:56 am ET

I'm still disappointed that we wont have Bill as the first lady……

Christie Avalon   December 3rd, 2008 11:52 am ET

I simply do not believe Bill and Hillary talk about "everything". If they do, she is the biggest abetter of extra-marital stuff that ever lived. Or she watches and gets her own thrills that way.

Ryan George   December 3rd, 2008 11:46 am ET

What are some of these idiots on here thinking saying "Where is the change Dems, you been duped." The change is getting Bush, probably the worst president in history, and his failed administration out. Obama is surrounding himself with smart people who know what they are doing and will give him great advice but ultimately he will set policy decisions. A

Are all these people posting junk like I mentioned above Sean Hannity using aliases???

Larry C. Houston, Texas   December 3rd, 2008 11:44 am ET

CNN, I hope you print this….I have to agree with crazy girl, as after I read what she wrote, she is telling it like it is….

Larry C.
Houston, Texas

mike   December 3rd, 2008 11:43 am ET

hahahaha….gaylon barrow…..hahaha wow you are funny.

trillion dollars in escrow….hahaha….another one who doesn't even know the difference between the national debt and the deficit….and we wonder how dems get elected. hahaha

Jay   December 3rd, 2008 11:42 am ET

i find it hard to beleive peoplen critize Bill for fooling around with an intern, mean while the current President has done the following:

1) Allowed the tourchure of POWs
2) Started a war under false pretenses resulting in what will be close to 10,000 deaths on both sides fo the isle.
3) Taken away personal freedom rights through the patriot act
4) Bodged every natural disaster relief effort
5) Killed the national debt and is responsible for the housing stock market crash.
6) Dick Chenny shot his friend in the face for christ sake..

Bill and Hillery believer   December 3rd, 2008 11:40 am ET

To Mr. PjP and others bashing Bill Clinton: He was one of our best presidents. Our country was at one of its strongest points when he was in office. I personally do not care who he sleeps with. That whole impeachment thing was a right-wing distraction to win the presidency in 2000. Boy did your plan work! Look where we are eight years later! You boy Bush was such a better choice. Our economy is in the toilette, and Mr. Bush just sits there and says he's sorry…….

mike   December 3rd, 2008 11:39 am ET

"You people that talk down on Bill Clinton are Idiots. The man don more … ". And he calls us "idiots"

rachel   December 3rd, 2008 11:34 am ET

Some of you ought to be ashamed. If Obama wants bill's help great. What do you mean Bill can't be around the Obama girls. They are 10 and 7 are you calling bill a child molester? Womanizer yes but not a child molester, besider I thought you guys thought he was racist if that's true there's your theory of interst in the girls.

bernj   December 3rd, 2008 11:30 am ET

Question: Will republicans and the right wing ever stop sounding like idiots?

Answer: Nope

TyWebb   December 3rd, 2008 11:27 am ET

Bill Clinton said he and his wife have always talked "about everything," and he called her advice "invaluable" throughout his career.

Well, I can think of at least two days in his second term this did not happen nor was the advice applicable…

Mark in Arizona   December 3rd, 2008 11:26 am ET

I was hoping President Clinton would be asked to Secretary of State. I hope he has a role in Obama's administration. The great bonus would be Clinton would provide a target for american right-wing extremists pulling attention away from Obama– the architect of America's movement back toward the center, away from the right wing extremism of the past eight years.

Lisa   December 3rd, 2008 11:23 am ET

For all those Republicans and Democrats still talking about Monica and Bill, get over it. That happened over 10 years ago, if his wife forgave him so should you.

Voter   December 3rd, 2008 11:22 am ET

Looks like Obama is the luckiest man alive!

And smart – he's tapped practically every key player in the Clinton Administration, much to the dismay of those who actually bought the "Change" thing.

As for Hillary, although many have forgotten, she DID win the popular vote, and only by disallowing both Michigan and Florida, whose votes had to be cut in half, did the cunning Mr. O manage to elbow his way in.

Of course, he needed the Boys Club to go along with it, and of course, they did. Boys will be boys.

The fun part was that the day before the Dem Convention began, the same boys decided for "unity's" sake, they would give both states all their votes after all.

Voila! a presidential nominee is SELECTED – only to find that the emperor has no clothes! Where are all those shiny, new fresh-faced Change advocates he promised us?

Even Obama can figure out that experience is better than rhetoric when you actually have to DO something…

tom   December 3rd, 2008 11:21 am ET

Let us not forget dear democrats, that Clinton was the reason Bush was elected! And let us also not forget that we were already going into a recession his last year which Bush inherited when the dot.com bubble burst. So you can get off your high horses about the last 8 years…your manical partisanship is equally to blame.

Mike   December 3rd, 2008 11:20 am ET

Dear Sam:

You wrote that Bill was "one of the most carasmatic leaders of the 20th century".

You do realize that the 20th century lasted 100 years. You apparently put Bill right up there with Ghandi, Roosevelt, Churchill, Mao, Lenin, Hitler, MLK, etc.

Lay off the booze dude!

Rick   December 3rd, 2008 11:19 am ET

Sounds like more change, Obama style. Face it dems, you were duped.

Boxer3   December 3rd, 2008 11:18 am ET

Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, will be the fourth in the line of succession to become president in the event of the death of President Obama. Watch your backs Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Robert Byrd.

proudliberal   December 3rd, 2008 11:18 am ET

he would be a much better SOS than hillary!

boered1   December 3rd, 2008 11:16 am ET

Obama already has 73% of positions filled by former Clinton officials

idiot you should go back to school and maybe learn some math this time.. fractions and percentages are not really all that hard… he has selected less than 20% of Clinton's cabinet and NOT ONE OF THEM IS DOING THE SAME JOB! You see one of the ways you get change is to take EXPERIANCED PEOPLE with differing ideas and put them in NEW CIRCUMSTANCES and than LISTEN to all their input this usually gives new ideas than the LEADER (Obama for you idiots that cannot figure that out) makes the decision and gives the direction.. you yes it is change

As for the liar hillary as sos (same old Sh**?) I think it is a great idea, takes her out of the senate (you are welcome NY) and after she proves herself incompetant at that job also he gets to fire her and than the liar hillary and bubba get to fade away… well except from the clinton "news" network (cnn)

Deb in Vegas   December 3rd, 2008 11:15 am ET

Vigla–You need to read the Constitution, Article 1, Section 6 states:

No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

The pay for the SoS has been increased during Hillary's time as a NY Senator. So, for her to be approved as the SoS, Congress would have to figure out a work around to this minor Constitutional detail such as Hillary not accepting the increased pay for her new job.

And as far as those who still believe that President-elect Obama isn't a US citizen because his birth certificate may show he was born outside the US–regardless of where he was born, his mother was a US citizen which made him one by birth. My daughter was born in Germany but she is a US citizen by birth because both I and her father are US citizens by birth.

NY republican   December 3rd, 2008 11:14 am ET

freenluvnit – look what a triumverate did for the Roman empire. You say "what Roman Empire?" I say "right". I find that one President at time can do enough harm, thank you.

Gaylon Barrow   December 3rd, 2008 11:13 am ET

You people that talk down on Bill Clinton are Idiots. The man don more for this country in his Presidency every before him. Like leaving office with thre trilliion dollars in escrow. First President to ever balance the budget. You're wrong about his advising Hillary. She is quite obviously her own woman. She will make her own decisions. If Obama ever had an offer of Help from BILL CLINTON then he would be a wise man to grab at it. This U.S. economy is sinking. No better man for the job than Bill Clinton.

PJP   December 3rd, 2008 11:12 am ET

Oh, come on!! Stay out of any and all politics MR. Bill!!!!!!! You've done enough damage to America!!

Ken from Memphis   December 3rd, 2008 11:10 am ET

I did not support Obama. I have voted Republican all my life. I was very disappointed in the last Bush term. However, Obama won the election. He is our next President. We all need to support him.

JuanM   December 3rd, 2008 11:06 am ET

Shucks
When your racist mouth spews comments such as "token" you are just showing your ignorance. Is that part of the "Change" your messiah is talking about. I noticed that you didn't mention General Powell. Does this mean that he wasn't a token? You're a racist.

Sharon Kitchen   December 3rd, 2008 11:04 am ET

oh my……………..

FreeNLovIt   December 3rd, 2008 10:59 am ET

We have so many problems. We really do need 3 Presidents in the White House at this critical time in our history. If you think about it, Roosevelt only had to battle ONE problem at a time. First, he fought against the ECONOMY and then later, he fought against WWII. So yes, we need THREE presidents in the White House. By reading and hearing about all the problems in the world, it's enough to go crazy.

boered1   December 3rd, 2008 10:58 am ET

so did bubba talk to the liar hillary about doing Monica or is his statement that they talk about everything just another clinton lie?

i suspect that latter..

Stephen Colbert says he will accept a spot in the Obama administration also.. guess that just shows that bubba is also a joke

Concerned in MA   December 3rd, 2008 10:57 am ET

Once again proving that the only "change" we're going to have is that which is stashed in our piggy banks.

Riaz   December 3rd, 2008 10:57 am ET

Best Role: STAY AWAY !!!

Anton   December 3rd, 2008 10:56 am ET

Mrs. Clinton was meant to be President!!!

So wat if BIll will contribute when she is Sec. of State, I want to see him annoy Obama as much as he can for stealing his wifes shot at the Presidency.

obama-mama   December 3rd, 2008 10:56 am ET

Mark is a sicko pervert. What a loser

shucks   December 3rd, 2008 10:52 am ET

The republicans seem to forget that America had enough of Bush and all the old cronies in Washington that clung to the coat tales of Bush and Cheney. WE VOTED THEM OUT!!! Get it? No matter what any of you say, we will be better off with Obama, and the incredible administration he has picked. Bush was into token people just to look good ie: Rice. Obama is actually picking people of substance and sound judgement, and willing to stand up to him. That is the character of a true leader. Not like the dictatorship of Bush / Cheney.

CT Indy   December 3rd, 2008 10:52 am ET

For everyone who said give the bailout money back to the people Google "Gohmert+Tax holiday". This rep from Texas is proposing a fed income tax holiday for January-February. He proposes using some of the remaining bailout money to fund it. This is real relief for taxpayers. Side benefit is employers (big, small, households who employ) also get payroll tax reliefs.

Brian G, Sugar Land, TX   December 3rd, 2008 10:48 am ET

Bill Clinton for court jester!

Proud to be conservative Mitzi   December 3rd, 2008 10:48 am ET

So interesting that you whining Liberals forgive anything done by Democrats like the Clintons and refuse to look at the history of our country's Republicans greatness. Don't you people read? You won, smile and look out in 2010.

Nick   December 3rd, 2008 10:48 am ET

I love how all the haters in this forum talk about how bad a president Bill Clinton supposedly was…. its absolutely ridiculous… its like… you guys elected "George Bush" …..TWICE…. having a Clinton administration is a DREAM compared to what we've had to deal with the last 8 years.

pam Eugene OR   December 3rd, 2008 10:47 am ET

I thought Hillary wore big girl panties now and could do this job on her own.
Bill's ego is out of the park!
I voted for Obama not Clinton. Go home Bill. It is not your turn any more. Oh, and take NAFTA and your other bad deals with you.

NY republican   December 3rd, 2008 10:46 am ET

To "Roofin'" – It's not the "getting his horn tooted" (nice analogy by the way!) that is bothering me about Mr. President Clinton. The thing is I might still have a right leg (lost in Nam) if he didn't "dodge the draft" and stepped up when his country called (instead calling his country to step up when he needed it). Coupled with the fact that he let bin Laden walk causing all the resulting loss of life and limb, then the debacle in Somalia (more unnecessary loss of life and limb) that he and his newly re-hired "advisors" caused there. It seems every one forgets all the bodies and body parts with his name on them, while focusing only on those generated by President Bush.

Bill, Albany, Georgia   December 3rd, 2008 10:46 am ET

I'm wondering if the new Bi-Partisanship plans call for Bill and Sarah getting together over a cigar while staying out Hillary's way!!!

joe smith   December 3rd, 2008 10:45 am ET

great, then the big deal will be complete: we see polanski wants his case dropped, charges dismissed,etc, etc.. just keep the vert out of the US, we have plenty..

Ken in Florida   December 3rd, 2008 10:42 am ET

To those of you who whine about former Clinton administration officials becoming part of the Obama administration not representing "change" miss the point. Change primarily is referring to the policies set by the Republicans in the last eight years. Obama is a Democrat, Presidents traditionally fill their cabinet with members of their own party. Most experienced Democrats where connected to the last Democratic administration (Clinton) The last democratic administration before Clinton was carter in the late 1970's. How many of those folks do you think are ready willing or able to serve now?

John   December 3rd, 2008 10:42 am ET

Yeah lets go back to clinton years. Where Social security was robbed and went broke by clinton to pay the bills. Just like illinois, when obama helped our governor take state pensions funds to pay off bills. then spent more. Now we have more debt. and they want to raise taxes to pay back funds they drained. Go illinois. Obama will do the same to the whole usa.

docb   December 3rd, 2008 10:41 am ET

Enough, who can believe a word out of either clinton's mouth's!..I am distrustful of this pick because there is so much talent out there- we do not need the OLD TIRED Drama of the has beens!!!

but i voted for him and will try to suspend judgement for now

shucks   December 3rd, 2008 10:41 am ET

President Obama would be foolish to not use this mans experience in politics to some degree. I still think he would make a great Supreme Court Justice.

clifford   December 3rd, 2008 10:40 am ET

Bill to Hillary,"Our grand plan is working"!!!!

Dan, TX   December 3rd, 2008 10:39 am ET

I have no idea why people are so negative. Obama is the president. Who would you hire? Your choices would be far worse, which is why I'm not interested in any of your opinions. It appears that only the non-elitists comment here. Which proves why we need elitists to run the country.

John   December 3rd, 2008 10:39 am ET

The facts are in folks. they are waking up to the idea that change is not changes, that Obama is putting together an old administration. Going back in time. 8 years. NOT GOOD FOLKS. this is not change its worse than BUSH. That is why georgia woke up and voted the republican in. Obama lied about change and is scaring the hell out of people.

Maggie from Virginia   December 3rd, 2008 10:39 am ET

Republicans are scared of the Clintons. That's why they keep harping on Obama's selections. Obama is creating an unstoppable movement.

CanIcallyouJoe   December 3rd, 2008 10:38 am ET

I do think that Hillary's appointment to SoS is a bad choice, but that doesn't effect my opinion that having President Clinton on an advisory counsel in an official capacity is inappropriate. Especially, if you have some of the advisers from their own presidency on your staff.

I voted for and support Obama, but anything more than a phone call or casual discussion over current affairs (I couldn't help slipping in that Clinton pun…. apologies..) – anything he'd have to "be in the credits" for – is overdoing it a bit.

Change - Yeah Left   December 3rd, 2008 10:36 am ET

Bill, go away! You had your chance ,and now go away!!

While there is a chance that Hillary won't be able to become SoS, I'm sure that the Dems will just trample on the constitution as a prelude to what PE Osama will do.

Dan, FL   December 3rd, 2008 10:35 am ET

This guy is a discard. I do not know why he and Jimmy Carter getting involved in today's politics. Give us a break. Barack Obama himself is an inexpereienced guy and he needs lot of advisors.

Carl   December 3rd, 2008 10:35 am ET

I got an email from Michael Moore this morning regarding the bailout of the big 3 automakers. That's another topic but one thing Moore said stuck in my mind.
He said, "We need a Marshall Plan to switch us off oil-dependent vehicles and get us into the 21st century.
This proposal is not radical or rocket science. It just takes one of the smartest people ever to run for the presidency to pull it off."

I think this is the most important point. We now have one of the smartest presidents ever about to take office. Why don't we wait till the inauguration and give him some time to see what he can do before we start the criticisms?

Sizali   December 3rd, 2008 10:34 am ET

how

Linda of Atlanta   December 3rd, 2008 10:33 am ET

Rector: THANK YOU

Finally someone else who can read and understand a little constitutional law!!

NY republican   December 3rd, 2008 10:31 am ET

to Change – don't forget – the 90's is also the decade that President Clinton let Usama bin Laden walk on a terrorist charge.

David   December 3rd, 2008 10:31 am ET

Gag me… yuck… phooey. Bill Clinton needs to stay out of things!!!!! Hillary is one Clinton too many.

Mohammad Faraz Hashmi   December 3rd, 2008 10:30 am ET

I belive Obama will be good for US, and clinton is an excellent choice as Sect. of State

GO OBAMA!!!!!!

Finally the end of republican B.S

Scott Tucson   December 3rd, 2008 10:29 am ET

Yeah..the roll Bill wants is Obama's Presidency.

Hillary is just a mere 4th in the sucession line. Maybe Obama ought to skip any future parties that Bill and Hillary may throw where Biden, Pelosi and Byrd are gathered under one roof.

Randy   December 3rd, 2008 10:27 am ET

So, Bill, you and your wife talk "about everthing", huh? Even Monica? Or was this something you started after you didn't have sex with her? Oh, I mean after you recanted and said you had relations with her?

Did some of her "invaluable" advice include keeping your fly zipped up this time?

NY republican   December 3rd, 2008 10:27 am ET

All this talk about Hillary the Great – after "moving" to NY she gets elected Senator saying she's committed to NY state. 1 year into a 6 year "committment" she runs for President. 2 years into this same 6 year "committment" she accepts a job in the Obama Administration.
Is this the "committment" the rest for the U.S. is going to get from the "I'm happy to just be NY's junior Senator" (this is a direct quote from Hillary after losing the presidential primary) ex-Senator Rodham-Clinton? By the way did the same thing happen to her commitment to her family name? What happened to the "Rodham" part, does she no longer need that either?

yellow dog democrat   December 3rd, 2008 10:27 am ET

TO: JoePub December 3rd, 2008 9:38 am ET

wasn't military cutbacks – it was intelligence "misfires" or as I like to put it "too many cooks in the kitchen" and nobody knew what was going into the soup "Communicate"!!!

Helene   December 3rd, 2008 10:26 am ET

NO, NO AND NO !!! I did not vote for Obama to have Bill Clinton back.

Fast Eddie   December 3rd, 2008 10:25 am ET

How quickly the American public forgets! The Clinton administration
was the most CORRUPT in the history of America! If I remember
correctly you agreed with "BUBBA" or you would be dealt with and
wish you had agreed. 22 people in his administration wound up in
jail or dead!

yellow dog democrat   December 3rd, 2008 10:23 am ET

TO: GaVoter December 3rd, 2008 9:36 am E T

hate to tell you GaVoter – your ignorance is showing!

you, sir/madam, are a dishonorable bigot.

crazygirl   December 3rd, 2008 10:23 am ET

To all the complainers here. You better be happy with something, because fact is we have a huge ship that is sinking. Try being a little supportive of the efforts. It may be easy to sit in your chairs and toss eggs at people, but we're in big trouble here. You may not like the Clinton's, but fact is, when they were in office it was a lot brighter days than they are now. Bringing sex into everything is really quite unappealing. Has it ever occurred to some of you, sex sometimes has nothing to do with a thing? Did it occur to you, other countries , via the Internet can read what Americans are writing out here for all to see? Did it occur to any of you, that through the writings you share, the terrorists country can plan through you and your words? When they see an united country, they see opportunity. Are you opening a door to have thousands killed because you had trouble controlling yourselves, your words and lack the support our country definitely needs to get past all this anguish? As much as everyone would like to believe this entire catastrophe is about money and sex, it goes way past it. IF you were observant, you would understand that unlike you, other countries take religion very seriously. Serious enough to kill your families for. It's not like here in America when we only have faith when it is convenient. Or when a catastrophe happens. No one in this country is united They are all simply trying to find ways to tear our country apart & Americans are helping. Filled with as much hate as the terrorists have. Except Americans are underhanded about it. Politicians are taking away your rights one by one & how do we handle it? Sit on a computer and talk filthy dirty sex talk that has nothing to do with a single thing. Talking about Bill's affair? Well, I hate to tell you this, DIVORCE rate is pretty high in this country which says Bill and Hillary had something most Americans don't. The strength to get through the worst! Which is who I want helping make our country a better place. Some of you lacked severe disapline growing up and sadly it now shows! Sad for America! Lucky for Terrorists who want to take YOUR LIVES AWAY!

Jeff from Atlanta   December 3rd, 2008 10:22 am ET

Bill Clinton was an average president at best. Sure he left with things in good shape if you look at the surface. Underneath was the banking bubble ready to burst and a weak military ripe for 911. What did he care, people would blame all that on Bush.

I find it hilarious that people on this blog say Obama is inheriting Bush's mess yet refuse to acknowledge the mess Bush inherited from Clinton. Bush tried to fix the Fannie Mae fiasco Clinton left behind, (research in the Democratic Newspaper, the NY Times), and even submitted legislation to Congress to regulate the industry but was stopped by the Democrats in Congress. Talk about thinking of their party first over the American people. Sure Clinton created jobs, mostly related to the housing industry that rode the housing bubble all the way to bursting.

Read people, don't just follow like blind sheep! I can see why you like Obama. He's a great speaker, but he's done absolutely nothing yet but you still think he's the messiah.

Let's see what he accomplishes and hope he doesn't make it worse. So far I am not so sure based on his comments about what he wants to do. So far it looks like history has taught him nothing, but I am hoping he changes my view.

Matt   December 3rd, 2008 10:22 am ET

@ Major, who said

"Majority of his cabinet members are from Clinton's administration.
Where is the change Obama talked for the last 2 years?
Democrats are running out of resources to fill positions."

I think you have that backwards. The GOP is promoting Palin. If there was ever evidence of running out of human resources, she's the smoking gun. On the other hand, dipping into the human resources that helped make Clinton such a successful president…that's just good sense.

Joel In Corona   December 3rd, 2008 10:20 am ET

Change is coming! Wait for it… It's coming… sometime… one of these days…

Joe M   December 3rd, 2008 10:19 am ET

Uh oh! He's back! Get the hook!

Matt   December 3rd, 2008 10:18 am ET

@ Meh

Yes, people who vote for Palin "have their wits about them." Their wits are strewn all over the floor cuz they fell out of their heads.

Dixie AZ   December 3rd, 2008 10:18 am ET

I was afraid of this. What a big mouth. I don"t want two for one. I want Hillary. Bill, you and Sarah Palin — who likes the limelight more? You don't have to be the bride at every wedding.

Scott NYC Independent   December 3rd, 2008 10:15 am ET

We are all fully aware that Clinton had one of the most impressive foreign policy administrations in this countries history. He will have a role be it official or not you can bank on it.

John from New York   December 3rd, 2008 10:15 am ET

I would gladly accept Bill Clinton in the Senate or in a cabinet position. I think he should seriously be considered.

Tim   December 3rd, 2008 10:14 am ET

Why not. Under Bill Clinton we had no unjust wars, we were safer, had a balanced budget and solvent social security.

CT   December 3rd, 2008 10:13 am ET

"OH BOY!! CAN'T WAIT TO SEE AMERICA BACK IN THE 90′S, WHEN EVERYBODY HAD A JOB AND THE NATIONAL DEBT WAS ELIMINATED." by Change_Has_Begun

You can say that again! I second and third that emotion!!!

60 year old white female and proud supporter of PE Obama   December 3rd, 2008 10:12 am ET

Thank you John for stating the most powerful comment of the day!!

steve   December 3rd, 2008 10:11 am ET

Everyone is saying how billy was great at creating jobs but look at every democratic president has done to our military and left it to a republican president to rebuild. while Clinton was in office the veterans got little or no housing increases, decreased on spending on medical coverage for the vets. these are the people who really keep you free. To me Clinton was worse than any president I served under while in the military!

Lisa   December 3rd, 2008 10:11 am ET

The most important role now could be to travel as a spouse with our Secretary of State…like Tony Blaire's wife said, "A wife[or husband] needs to take a back burner. If it is good advice for Michelle, it is good for Bill. This is Hillary's time to shine and I know Bill has to support her!

Jay   December 3rd, 2008 10:10 am ET

I am tired of the liberals on here and other blogs that feel that it is necessary for the continuation of the Republic that we back off being critical of BO unitl he is President. While that might be good, where were these people when Bush was and still is being savaged? Perhaps his policies might have been seen diffefrently when viewed outside the partisan window. You expect that for Obama, yet refused and still refuse to give it to Bush. You can't have it both ways.

Change we can believe in?   December 3rd, 2008 10:10 am ET

So we are back to the Clinton presidency?

Carl   December 3rd, 2008 10:10 am ET

Change comes from the policies being set not by the people implementing change. Why ostracizing proven and experienced public servants to put someone who doesn’t know jack about nothing like Bush did. It's obvious President-Elect Obama can’t please everyone. All we can ask of the man is that he provide better US policies and mandates in retrospect of the Bush Administration. As far as an elitist for sending his kids to private school, I’m sure he considered their security and their quality of education. I think that’s called caring about your children and being a good parent.

larrywi   December 3rd, 2008 10:10 am ET

Hillary may not even be qualifyed for the position, something she did as Senator may cause her problems here. Why should that interefer with anything, her and her husband are known crooks anyway, so what if she too has some bad baggage, let's bring her on board anyway, after all we are a second, third & forth chance society now, no one is expected to the right thing the first time around!!

Not very bright   December 3rd, 2008 10:09 am ET

I'm not too smart or anything, but if someone takes people who oppose their views, out of the house and senate and puts those people under them where he can keep them in check, isn't that change? What about the new younger people with similar ideas who will replace these people in the senate and house? Is that not change? Again not very knowledgable about politics or the government, but aren't the appointees pretty influential people? Taking them out of the house or senate tempers their voices and lets new thinking, new ideas, and new voices in their place. Is this not change?

Sizali   December 3rd, 2008 10:08 am ET

Clinton was bringing in experience without change. Obama is bringing in change through experience. Its why he is employing most of BC's people with the experince to bring about the change we need. like creating jobs and getting the economy back on track. Stop hating the man, he has been hired to help you.

Rockford   December 3rd, 2008 10:08 am ET

Change_Has_Begun

OH BOY!! CAN'T WAIT TO SEE AMERICA BACK IN THE 90′S, WHEN EVERYBODY HAD A JOB AND THE NATIONAL DEBT WAS ELIMINATED

Clintons highest un-employment was 7.9
The current is 6.75

The national debt was 5.5 Trillion when Clinton left which isn't quite ELIMINATED

But don't let facts get in your way…

KENNY B.   December 3rd, 2008 10:07 am ET

THEY'LL DO GREAT AS LONG AS THE REPUGS STAY OUT OF D.C…..HAIL TO BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON..SO GLAD MARTINEZ IS LEAVING THE SENATE FROM FLA….UGH!!! THOSE NASTY REPUGS…

JLS   December 3rd, 2008 10:07 am ET

Can't wait to see who all those donors are. Should make the confirmation hearings more enjoyable to watch. Can everyone say "Marc Rich"?? I knew you could!!

The Rector   December 3rd, 2008 10:07 am ET

to vigla,
what linda is refering to is a clause in the constitution which roughly states… if a legislater votes a pay raise for a given position in govt, that person is ineligable for said position. It is an obscure rule, but a rule none the less. The easy way to fix it, as has been done in the past, is to decrease the pay to the previous level. That being said the question comes to mind why not donate the entire sallery to help people in need, the Clintons aren't exactly hurting for money, for that matter neither is anyone else in govt. , just something to think about.

Tom in Delaware   December 3rd, 2008 10:06 am ET

Sure – Let's return to slashing our Military and Intelligence Services by 90%, then calling the monetary savings an economic miracle.

Then while we're peacefully beating our swords into plowshares (while our enemies our beating their plowshares into swords) we can let go of all the detainees at Gitmo to spread their wings and happily fly away. (just like he turned down Osama bin Laden twice)

It worked so well before that we got 2 attacks on the World Trade Center….the third attack on our country should be a real charm.

You Liberals sure have selective memories.

Sam   December 3rd, 2008 10:06 am ET

If it isn't apparent now to everyone that the biggest con job in american history has just been pulled then we are one country of stupid people. Bill Clinton has just had himself elected to a third term of President. The fact of the matter is, the clinton's knew Hilary was not electable and bill was obviously not eligible so what do they do? They go find a little known puppet….a little known puppet that they can control and manipulate at every term and thus what do we have…..

President Bill Clinton once again! All I can say is WATCH OUT AMERICA for the Bush's to try the same trick next time.

larrywi   December 3rd, 2008 10:05 am ET

So let's get this right, Billy boy said that he confides in Hillary for advice, so when it comes to not having sexual relations with that Woman, was that from Hillary? That Willie is pretty slick isn't he!

PLB   December 3rd, 2008 10:05 am ET

Bill Clinton will be an excellent source of advice to President Obama. Clinton inherited a hugh deficit and left office with a surplus. If only a silent advisor,Clinton's experience and insite is invaluable to Obama.

Mohammed   December 3rd, 2008 10:05 am ET

Hi all:
what is wrong with the idea that Bill Clinton may have an influence on his wife (soon to be Sec of State) decisions on foreign affairs? As I remember he did screw up a little (eg, intervention in Somalia and mis-jugging Al Qaida) but he could not come close to the mess generated by George W, even he stayed president for 50 years! And peoples, remember: Obama run his campaign, he went into election process,
Obama is going to be the president! If we learned anything yet, Barack is smart and capable leader/politician.
We need to focus on our daily lives, do our best to achieve our own success, help other if we can and let the new administration do its job. America is back and it is a wonderful feeling! God Bless!

Roofin Reality, Houston, Tx.   December 3rd, 2008 10:05 am ET

President Clinton seems to be doing/saying the right things.
He's going to (actually already did) open up his orgnaization to be vetted so that there will not be a conflict of interest.
He's not going to get in the way of Hillary in any way as it relates to her job as Sec'y of state.
He's going to listen to Obama if Obama comes asking for Clinton to do a job in the Obama administration.

What else can you reasonably expect?

IF you don't like him due to getting his horn tooted by a starry-eyed intern, I understand that. But in the opposite direction, look at your quarterly stock report and tell everyone how much u've lost in the last qtr. Now, which issue affects YOU more – the intern issue (Clinton) or the drop in your portfolio (non Clinton)? I think nthe latter affects me more, so that's the issue I'd be worried about. And since Clinton did a marvelous job in getting 20 million new jobs to be produced under his watch, I'm all open for Clinton getting a job in the Obama admin.

GuyinIowa   December 3rd, 2008 10:04 am ET

Cheers to the return of the Clintons! All you haters can eat your heart out. :) :) :) :) :)

paulie_nj   December 3rd, 2008 10:04 am ET

Let's see how long it will take for unbiased CNN to report on the Obama birth certificate story. All though it may not be true, it's still news and should be covered fairly by all MSM sources.

BigVin   December 3rd, 2008 10:04 am ET

It's amazing how all you leftists believe that Hillary has all this experience. This is one of the biggest frauds ever put over on the people of the U.S. Yes, she has been to many countries, but as the wife of a president. Having tea and cookies with the wife of a foreign leader does not constitute foreign experience. As for her service in the Senate, remember she went around the country looking for a slam dunk. She just happened to come across New York with the decrepit Patrick Moynihan retiring. Tne one consolation for myself and fellow New Yorkers is that she will no longer be our senator. Hopefully we'll have someone who truly cares about NY, not someone who is an opportunist who was basically handed the position.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON ALL OF YOU WHO SUPPORT HER!!!

Butch Dillon   December 3rd, 2008 10:04 am ET

Why does everything that happens require a measure of validation from Bill Clinton? I voted for him twice and defended him through his trials while in office, but that was then and now is a very different story. He is not trustworthy. He should be rejected (especially by the wife he disrespected regularly during their marriage).

JuanM   December 3rd, 2008 10:02 am ET

Hahahaha…more of the same. Once again the politicians, bot from the left and right, prove they are one in the same. It looks like most of you kool-aid drinkers trust too much.

Lisa D   December 3rd, 2008 10:01 am ET

GREAT JOB OBAMA!!! Linda check with a mental health professionial…. your party needs help you voted for Palin.

Leon Darden   December 3rd, 2008 10:01 am ET

People please! It is President-elect Obama right now. All you cynics should at least give him an opportunity. I'm not prepared to doubt this man. After all, he is the first African-American president; no small feat. He's following the worst president in the history of the United States. The problems he is inheriting were not caused by him. We elected him to fix them. Get off your moral high horse and realize that the Clinton years were some of the best of your lives and the President-elect Obama has sense enough to put some of those same people in his cabinet. Yes, President Clinton committed adultery. At least the skeletons are out of his closet. What about yours? And Hillary Clinton wears pant suits and she also the most accomplished and intelligent women you'll never be. Obama ran on the premis of hope and change. Where is your hope and where is the belief in your ability to bring about the change he asked of you? C'mon people. It's time to let love prevail after 8 years of hate. love you all.

Scott, Lexington KY   December 3rd, 2008 10:01 am ET

CNN hurts itself when it uses headlines like this. It creates a story out of nothing. The headline leads you to believe Obama IS considering Bill for something. Not the case. Stop with the cheap tactics and stick to your strengths of reporting real news.

stacey johnson   December 3rd, 2008 10:00 am ET

I think that he would make a great adviser in Obama's administration he has the experiance to get the country back in a postiive status

The Anti-Hillary   December 3rd, 2008 10:00 am ET

Jennifer, stop drinking the kool-aid, the campaign's over! What does it say about Hillary that she slammed Obama all the way through and then took a job from him? Sounds like desperation to me.

I expect to wake up one morning and read in the headlines:

"Hillary Clinton Dead. Overdosed on eating crow and humble pie."

tom   December 3rd, 2008 10:00 am ET

Great…bring in an impeached, disbarred sexual predator…

THERE"S CHANGE FOR YOU.

Lynn in CT   December 3rd, 2008 10:00 am ET

Someone pinch me! I bought a flag for the first time in my life and this new administration is the reason we can all become proud again of this country. This is how it's SUPPOSED to be! The good leading the good.

Yes, we can!
Yes, we did!
Yes, we are!

vic nashville,Tn   December 3rd, 2008 9:59 am ET

Buy one get one free

Bill already join in the Obama admisntration

Kay Scott   December 3rd, 2008 9:59 am ET

I'm 83, am I old enough to make a commit? My thoughts have always been about our country. Have seen and lived through quite a lot in my life time. We're pulling together again and we will make it just fine. Obama, a good intelligent leader. Loves our country.

Maryk   December 3rd, 2008 9:59 am ET

If not having my wits about me is the reason I voted the way I did, then I think I can join with the millions of people who voted the way I did by saying, you can keep your wits, I'll go with hope and change!!!

jim, Middletown, Connecticut   December 3rd, 2008 9:58 am ET

I can only guess that all the detractors have forgotten that President Clinton guided this nation through eight years of prosperity and no wars. He did – of course – squander his moral authority with a silly daliance with an intern. But, still, by most measures that count, he was a good president.

As much as I admire President Clinton's abilities, I cannot support the notion of him having an official role in the Obama administration. I believe Obama needs to make his own mark, follow his own ideals, without a lot of second guessing from the populace about the question of how much of what he does – or doesn't do – was impacted by the very persuasive Bill Clinton.

LIP   December 3rd, 2008 9:57 am ET

First and foremost ,for those that taut Bill Clinton and his many success, it should be noted that I believe the Republicans controlled congress at the time. So a balanced budget would be their success also.
As far as Bill helping Obama out, why not. Just keep a tight leash on him and hire a group to monitor him for damage control, as Hillary will be busy lining up new clients for his brisk overseas businesses.

NY republican   December 3rd, 2008 9:57 am ET

To NY – after doing my bit for my country in the undeclared Viet Nam War (maybe Bill's stead). I say why not have the big cheese along with all the crackers. For that matter just have Obama install the whole Clinton Administration (including Bill) and just sit back and watch the whole movie over again. Maybe the impeachment trial will end up differently this time (alternate endings are all the rage these days).

An American   December 3rd, 2008 9:57 am ET

Whoppie do – it will be just like having Bil and Hillary and all the rest of the old Clinton people leading our Counry again. Obama who?

J. McKinney   December 3rd, 2008 9:56 am ET

There isn't much way any thinking person can put down Bill's political savvy. I think Hillary will be a fantastic S of S, and if Bill is her sounding board, it will help her even more. And, those of you who think Obama is the be all, do all, surely you realize the shrewd move it is to hire a lot of Clinton's cabinet, as they are the top Democrats in the country, from a very successful 8 year presidency. Where else can he get experienced, super-intelligent people? Pick some untried person who knows nothing about politics? That would really be "change", wouldn't it? There is a LOT involved in running a country this size, not even mentioning the mess it is in now. We need all the intelligent, experienced help we (and Obama) can get.
I definately wasn't for Obama, with his inexperience–I was for Hillary. But he is impressing me now with his intelligent picks. He DID NOT impress me with his VP pick, but…………
God Bless America. We are going to need it.

JOHN MARTIN   December 3rd, 2008 9:56 am ET

We are Americans.We all need to do our shares to help our economy.
We need to reduce oil energy consumption by investing mor alternative clean air energy.
We are working to design and manufacture our wind power electricity system for our city.

Chris   December 3rd, 2008 9:56 am ET

Get over it, repubs. We had to put up with Condy Rice, and I can't see ANYTHING she's done to help America promote peace overseas. She's kind of blah…no oomph! (although QEII thought she played great piano!)

dick kessler   December 3rd, 2008 9:55 am ET

With Gen. Jones out of the Middle East and after Israeli elections are over, if I were Obama I might very well give Bill Clinton and Tony Blair (who is still a Middle East facilitator) stronger roles in bringing about quiet negotiations between the new Israeli and Palestinian governments, quietly and with Obama's oversight through Jones and Clinton (the Secretary of State) no freelancing

KJL   December 3rd, 2008 9:55 am ET

Bill Clinton's idea of "the background" is probably a little different from yours and mine. His comes with klieg lights and a microphone.

prophet   December 3rd, 2008 9:54 am ET

Heed my warnings! Beware of the "Razorbacks", the givers of NAFTA.

Larry C. Houston, Texas   December 3rd, 2008 9:54 am ET

I think he should take his wife's place in the Senate.
He knows his way around, and can get things done.

Larry
Houston TEXAS

Lauren the Designer   December 3rd, 2008 9:53 am ET

This isn't really news…he said the same thing that I think any open-minded politician who cares about the state of their country would say. Love him or hate him, President Clinton has a favorable political track record and I would hope that he would want to help if he were asked.

Make all the "intern" jokes you want…the US was in a good place when he was in office. I don't take personal lives into account if someone can prove to be a solid leader. (Although I do think it's funny that some Republicans will crow about his infidelities and call him a pig all day long, but then worship at the alter of McCain after what he did to his first wife. People are SO hypocritical.)

Susan   December 3rd, 2008 9:53 am ET

Things were better in our country when Bill Clinton was President. It appears many have forgot about that.

Dave   December 3rd, 2008 9:53 am ET

To Change_Has_ Begun. The national debt was never eliminated! Deficit spending was eliminated because the Republicans took over congress and Clinton was dragged kicking and screaming all the way! You Liberals do what you do best……….. revise history!!!!!

The Rector   December 3rd, 2008 9:52 am ET

…."he won that took smarts"…

No that took money, lots and lots of money. Money from poor people who are going to continue to get screwed, as ever, in our corporate autocracy. He has already said he would bail detroit out and he voted to give wall st. all the money they need to continue living like kings while the rest of us scrape a living out of the garbage dump that is our national economy. Wake up people "they" are never going to give you anything, and Obama is "their" flavor of the month.

janis - Missouri   December 3rd, 2008 9:51 am ET

Obama has earned my respect. His cabinet choices, including Hillary ,are wise and shows he can put petty differences aside to the good of the country.

Michael, Houston Texas   December 3rd, 2008 9:50 am ET

I don't know why you Dems are being so hard on the Clintons. Let's see, budget surplus, lead one of the most prosperous periods in American History, attempted to provide healthcare for all Americans, and I could go on. Now I am not a fan of either Bill's or Hillary's personality but I dont put my confidence in my leadership basedon if they have a good personality or not, I follow them because I believe that they can put policies in place to make my life better. Now I understand the Repubs beef, you people hate the Clintons because of the reasons mentioned. I'd say give Hillary a chance to do the jib first, if she screws up, then talk smack about her. Just like with President Obama (wow I love the way that comes of my fingers), let's see what he does before we start to grade him.

Laura, Boston   December 3rd, 2008 9:49 am ET

I would love to see former President Clinton as Senator but I know that won't happen….so!…..I would love to see him as part of the economic team! He did so much in the 90's to create jobs and balance the budget. I know that will probably not happen in this time but I would like to see at least an attempt made so my grandchildren don't get stuck with the debt incurred during my days on this planet!

Paul   December 3rd, 2008 9:49 am ET

Bill talks "about everything" with Hillary–depending on what your definition of "everything" is.

Brain in DC   December 3rd, 2008 9:49 am ET

Thanks, Bill. Your days are a sweet dream compared with what we are into right now.

I think best choice for Bill is to keep him active with small tactical missions. He's a smart and energetic talent to leave idle. He's especially very knowledgeable on world affairs. However, it is not suitable to put him in a government position, rather a bunch of tactical missions (peace, envoy, …).

JJ in NY   December 3rd, 2008 9:49 am ET

Oh sure……….. just like he didn't INHALE !

The Rector   December 3rd, 2008 9:45 am ET

it looks to me like Obama didn't expect to be pres. so he didn't have anyone in mind to fill the cabinet. If this is what he calls change, then he should check websters. While some of these appointments are ok, this is not what Obama supporters signed up for. You remember the everyman image he so carefuly portraied, well I know alot of people, and none of them spend $60,000.00 a year to send their kids to grade school, sound sort of eliteist to me.

Tiff of lithia springs   December 3rd, 2008 9:43 am ET

Amen to that Barbara.

NY   December 3rd, 2008 9:42 am ET

My opinion…it has nothing to do with personality, who's who, Big Dog's, nothing…I think they and we all know this is all about the insurmountable job of repairing an almost irreparably damaged economy and reputation. US (citizens) and the US government and everyone in-between seem to be on board this time. I heard a saying once and loved it, "WERE ALL IN THE SAME BOAT, LETS KEEP IT AFLOAT” So be quiet unless you have something constructive to say that you have done for this country. Stop whining about who & what and just help!

Change_Has_Begun   December 3rd, 2008 9:42 am ET

Bill Clinton knows how to lead and he can provide Obama support on critical decisions concerning the economy and international affairs.

OH BOY!! CAN'T WAIT TO SEE AMERICA BACK IN THE 90′S, WHEN EVERYBODY HAD A JOB AND THE NATIONAL DEBT WAS ELIMINATED.

xcusme   December 3rd, 2008 9:41 am ET

One Bush was too many. For those who do not see change. Look again. The change is Obama not the cabinet. As he stated "the buck stops here" I sure he will not let Hillary or anyone else run over him. He is a very intelligent man. There is a reason for everything he does. He won that took smarts. Everyone underestimated him.

kimber grace   December 3rd, 2008 9:41 am ET

I think Sen. Clinton will do a spectacular job-she is a brilliant person. Although I did not vote for him, I will commend Pres.elect Obama on this pick, as well as his pick of Gen. Jones. I will always be a huge fan of Sen. McCain, but Obama is slowly gaining my confidence.

Jennifer   December 3rd, 2008 9:40 am ET

I am a Clinton supporter through and through. Hillary Clinton is an inspiration, a positive female role model for my daughters, which there are so few of today. Her role as Secretary of State, combined with the best of the best elected officials appointed by president elect Obama will truly be something for the history books. Let's see if they can make America shine once again.

Michael watching from Canada   December 3rd, 2008 9:40 am ET

Hillary has demonstrated that she has the strength of character to perform her duties as SoS without Bill, but has the wisdom to draw on his experience when needed.

It continues to amaze me how some people prejudge others BEFORE they start their jobs!

Meh   December 3rd, 2008 9:39 am ET

Linda> People who would vote for Palin "have [their] wits about [them]? Funny!

Evie ~ from TS ~   December 3rd, 2008 9:39 am ET

I am excited and hopeful for our future …. coming from our muck and mire dire circumstances … We DO have a chance

60 year old white female and proud supporter of PE Obama   December 3rd, 2008 9:39 am ET

It is hard to determine who CNN's more mesmerized with: Sarah Palin or Bill Clinton!!

GA for Obama   December 3rd, 2008 9:39 am ET

Martin- I don't know where you got 73%. Obama has around 10/50 ppl chosen so far EVEN MINUTELY RELATED to Clinton. Stop being so Clinton-blindfolded and open your eyes.

Ken in NC   December 3rd, 2008 9:38 am ET

The campaign is over and The Clintons are a national Name Sake. I hope Pres. elect Obama will call upon Former Pres. Clinton from time to time to do things to help our country come up out of this hole we are in.

I can even see Pres. Elect Obama bringing Gov. Sarah Palin into his Cabinet as the Sec. of Pooper Scooping for the girls new dog. We must remember people there is work there for everyone. LOL

JoePub   December 3rd, 2008 9:38 am ET

Yes, Bill was a fantastic CEO of our country. Especially with all the military cuts that left our nation unchecked and vulnerable for 09/11.

daniel   December 3rd, 2008 9:37 am ET

I am humored that during Bill Clinton's administration everyone complained that Hillary was calling the shots and now that she has a position of power they're complaining the contrary.

Helen, NC   December 3rd, 2008 9:37 am ET

Bill could be a huge help, but how can you trust him? Barack fortunately has people who will watch him like a hawk.

We know the Clintons only think about themselves, so there will have to be someone onboard who will remind Hillary that she is there to do the people's work. She's not there to drum up more donors for Bill's library.

Mike, Syracuse NY   December 3rd, 2008 9:37 am ET

Bill would be great being in charge of the White House interns.

Brian   December 3rd, 2008 9:37 am ET

It's really too bad that the republican party can't give credit where credit is due. Bill Clinton was a GOOD president. Sure, he got caught and called on his bad choices but as the leader of our country, he created new jobs, balanced the federal budget and the US was respected globally.
Hillary worked very hard on healthcare reform and gained a great deal of experience simply by being so immersed in our government at that level. NOBODY is without their faults. The best thing that we all can hope for is that when mistakes are made, something is learned from them and they are not repeated.
Our country could do far worse (and has for the last 8 years) than to utilize the knowledge and experience of people like the Clintons.
If you don't agree, just read the newspaper and see what the results of the republican party's choice are.

Go to it Hillary!

Petena   December 3rd, 2008 9:37 am ET

Linda please……….give it a break

Vigla   December 3rd, 2008 9:36 am ET

Linda, are you joking? "Tiny little constitutional possiblility?" Why would Hillary be ineligible pray tell? Was she not born in the US?

Yeah, "your wits" supported Bush twice, and got us into this mess. Thanks for that, by the way…

GaVoter   December 3rd, 2008 9:36 am ET

From the makeup of the new White House cabinet Bill is obviously going to be the defacto President. Nothing will get done without his knowledge, and approvement. The only differences are going to be the congressional liberal spenders and house negroes.

Hockey Mom   December 3rd, 2008 9:35 am ET

Bill Clinton is a brilliant man and was an excellent chief executive of our ation. Unfortunately, he also seems to be a megalomaniac with an exceptional sense of entitlement. I wonder if that's an inevitable consequence of eight years of being president…

Puffin   December 3rd, 2008 9:35 am ET

"I think she made the right decision, but for her it was hard. She adored being in the Senate," he said.
__

Right. If she adored it that much then why did she take the SOS job?

STOP THE INSANITY   December 3rd, 2008 9:35 am ET

Enough is enough.

Major   December 3rd, 2008 9:35 am ET

Majority of his cabinet members are from Clinton's administration.
Where is the change Obama talked for the last 2 years?
Democrats are running out of resources to fill positions.

demwit   December 3rd, 2008 9:32 am ET

Interviewing Obama's interns perhaps??

Laverne   December 3rd, 2008 9:31 am ET

Bill, we love you, but we can take only one Clinton at a time. Step back you had your turn, now it is Hillary's time. I sure hope Chelsea decides not to go into politics!

Brenda   December 3rd, 2008 9:31 am ET

To Lois in Ontario Canada:

Worry about your own Country. As far as the Clintons are concerned, one only has to remember what shape the country was in when he left office. The economy was strong, people had jobs, etc.

Worry about Canada and their own problems, not ours.

Spider   December 3rd, 2008 9:30 am ET

Lois-

Hillary Clinton is a U.S. Senator. Did you believe she was going to disappear because she wasn't elected President?

Besides, if you, as a Canadian, don't want to see her, don't watch American politics. You should keep an eye on Canadian politics. By the way, who is your President? Do you have a President or a King? Wait, who cares? It's Canada.

Clinton Fringer   December 3rd, 2008 9:30 am ET

hhahahahahahaahahaa………..loving these comments. :) Our "deer in headlights" president-elect has had to call in the person who should have been the president in anyway and if he's smart he will let Bill Clinton in as well. Now that's change I can believe in.

Puppet   December 3rd, 2008 9:29 am ET

Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter all over again, while the one-term senator Barack Obama is a mere puppet. Everyone has his or her own (secret) ambition, to control and manipulate, out of pride and lust for power, it is sinful human nature. Even Michelle Robinson Obama may have a long-term political plan for herself. What is new? Only Joe Biden is content, with his fate without any real power.

Amber in Orlando   December 3rd, 2008 9:29 am ET

I love me some Clintons! :) Obama will never be as great as either of them. It's not possible.

Mike Cairo,NY   December 3rd, 2008 9:29 am ET

At least we're rid of her in NY :)

Tom of Dallas   December 3rd, 2008 9:29 am ET

Oh come on you sore losing republicans. Why can't you just admit you lost and move on. I can't quite understand how anyone could still be criticizing the Clintons with a straight face. Take off your blinders and look at the last eight years of failure and corruption.

Lauren   December 3rd, 2008 9:28 am ET

Well,

Lets see how all the Sarah Plain critics like my comments here.
If CNN will post them,,,,,,

Please Bill, just go away. Go back to where you belong, on the sidelines. You did your stint, it is over. Retire, get out of the way.

Hillary has always wore the pants anyway, while your tried to get into a few other pair of pants that where not Hillarys.

Just fade away Bill,,,,,,,, go chase skirts like you have in the past.

Biden got the Vice job Billy, sorry, you can not serve again. We already elected Barrack " Clinton " Obama,,,, or so it seems by looking at his cabinet now.

Mike Cairo,NY   December 3rd, 2008 9:27 am ET

They're BAAAAACK :(

Sam   December 3rd, 2008 9:27 am ET

Say what you will…Bill Clinton was one of the most charismatic leaders in the 20th century. He is also a very intelligent leader (unlike the current POTUS)…

Don   December 3rd, 2008 9:27 am ET

The best role for Bill? Replacing Hillary as Senator from NY – Now THAT would be senate leadership!

Sandy - PA   December 3rd, 2008 9:27 am ET

I also am disappointed that we have not seen the last of the Clintons. I don't like Bill, and I like Hillary even less. My problem with Hillary as VP all along was that we would have to put up with not only her, but Bill Clinton, too. I believe that those 2 together would overshadow everything Obama does. It is bad enough that Obama gave such an important position to Hillary – I say we don't Bill along with her.

Joe the Troll   December 3rd, 2008 9:26 am ET

Hey, Republicans….the country was in pretty good shape after Clinton. What shape is it in now? Obviously, Clinton isn't the one we need change from.

If he did what you Republicans want him to do, put inexperienced yes-men into important positions, that wouldn't be CHANGE, it would be a repeat of Bush's stupidity. Republicans keep saying that government is the problem, and when the government is run by Republicans, they're right.

Mark   December 3rd, 2008 9:25 am ET

I was a little shocked that Hillary was chosen for such a position. I guess Obama wants to keep her close by so she won't threaten to run against him in 4 years. And Bill if you all remember can't be trusted to be near the Obama girls. September 11 was planned and arranged on Bill's watch. Of course he did nothing when our ship was attacked (USS Cole) killing 27 US Sailors. We kept getting attacked while Bill was president. So they kept attacking us. So what job does Bill want now?

carol   December 3rd, 2008 9:25 am ET

I don't think we need Bill involved….let Hillary do her job, she will be very good at it I have no doubt.
Bill has had his day in the sun and now it's Obama's time to shine and he and Hillary are the team now, not Bill and Hillary.

sonnett   December 3rd, 2008 9:24 am ET

Lois, Ont, Canada

Mind your own business, we have our problems at home with our politican too.

John   December 3rd, 2008 9:24 am ET

Oh for crying out loud people give the man a chance to be president! He hasn’t even gotten into the white house yet and people are already trying to predict the outcome of things. Hasn't he already proven his ability to change minds and views? Change is in the leadership and what that does with the tools at hand. When a corporation gets a new CEO he often keeps most of the upper level staff. The change lies in how the staff is directed.

Jodie   December 3rd, 2008 9:24 am ET

Good points, Bill Clinton was liked and respected all over the World, not so with G W Bush. He left the country in a positive state with a surplus which Bush used up and spent more. The Democrats have had to put up with 8 years of disasters one after the other. It is time for you to sit back and allow the Democrats the opportunity to bring this country back the respect it needs and to get the USA back to a working country and not a failing one.,

Curtis Walker   December 3rd, 2008 9:24 am ET

Bill Clinton says he'd consider role in Obama administration
is the headline for this story, yet it is all about Hilary Clintons position as Sec of State.
CNN's editorial staff is pathetic. I catch more mistakes on CNN's web site than the entire CNN organization.

Linda of Atlanta   December 3rd, 2008 9:23 am ET

Lois of NC:

Read about some of what Martin gave himself while an elected representative in the Georgia state legislature and you will know why many of us Republicans down here in Georgia will never vote for a Democrat in our lives.

Andrew   December 3rd, 2008 9:23 am ET

My views are more 'real' republican than democrat for sure. Meaning less government involvment/spending, but the Republican Party has moved away from that (who knows why). When you look at United States history it is hard to see why the people have been so against Democrats. The 2 Presidents that have contributed the most to our national Debt have been Reagan and G. W. Bush – REPUBLICANS! Bill Clinton with a Republican Congress is probably the most successful government this country has had since Eisenhower. The US thrived in the 90s with a Democrat at the helm. He would be remembered as one of the best Presidents of all time if he hadn't had an encounter with an intern which had nothing to do with how he ran the country. I may not agree with Public healthcare and terrible spending habits of our government, but its hard to argue that a republican would do a better job than Obama. There is one thing Obama has going for him, he is very smart and surrounds himself with smart people. Can't fault him for that, especially after the last 8 years.

angela   December 3rd, 2008 9:23 am ET

Our country need all the help we can get. If Bill Clinton wants to help, please let him. Also Colin Powell would be a great advisor to Obama if he does not want a position. Go OBAMA!!

Mobius   December 3rd, 2008 9:22 am ET

They're ALL Clintons – aren't you paying attention?

Change. Riiiiiiight. Suckerrrrrs.

Remloc   December 3rd, 2008 9:21 am ET

Obama's already picked the WRONG Clinton.

Now, he might as well pick the RIGHT one, also!

Kyu Reisch, Radcliff, Kentucky   December 3rd, 2008 9:21 am ET

The people who has the fear about The Clinton's are small, low, narrow mind, and stupid idiots. They have the rights to do any position they could, Americans should be proud of The Clinton's. You will never have such a great couple for many Century.

Sylvia   December 3rd, 2008 9:21 am ET

What is wrong with Campbell Brown? Why is she always huffing and puffing about sexism or PE Obama said this or that not to her liking. She does not appear to be a happy person nor an objective reporter. I guess being married to Dan Senor, big time GOP, makes it difficult!

Bill----here's a job for you.   December 3rd, 2008 9:21 am ET

Find Obama's illegal immigrant aunt who is hiding out in the U.S.

She was deported 4 years ago and has lived here illegally at taxpayer expense in Public Housing. She should be on the next boat back to Kenya but all the news organizations, especially CNN, have been ordered to suppress the story.

get on this Bill.

Gail, Pittsburgh PA   December 3rd, 2008 9:20 am ET

Sounds like sour grapes to me-are you suggesting that Hillary can not think for herself?After all we already had Two too many Bush's and you did not seem to mind.Can we give them a chance? If this administration
sucks we will vote them out also

Cynt   December 3rd, 2008 9:20 am ET

I hope Obama does not give him a positon, I still think Bill is upset about theoutcome of the primary when Hillary lost, he can't be trusted.

I have always like Bill but the election changed my mind about him in many ways. Let Hillary be the SOS but bill needs to continue to work with his global progam, not have a position in Obama's administration.

Katherine   December 3rd, 2008 9:18 am ET

All I know is that when Clinton was president people had jobs, we were not at war on two fronts and most of us had change in our pockets; don't forget he was responsible to eliminating the deficit. Frankly, the GOP did everything in their power to discredit the Clintons. Why don't we ever address the fact that the GOP brings out the abortion issue every time there is an election? If Roe vs Wade was going to be repealed wouldn't have the village idiot taken care of it in the eight years he was king? Same old tune. The GOP needs to disband and began a new party.

Robert   December 3rd, 2008 9:18 am ET

The U.S. citizens should be thankful that their country is turning a new page again and with Obama as lead and such highly respected people as Hilary Clinton…… the world will start looking brighter. To those who pick the negative route on their criticisms.(Clintons)………… i really wonder how much you really know what is going on around the world and the depth of U.S. involvment and challenges ahead. Put strong respected people at the front…the new page is turning quicker.

Robert in raleigh   December 3rd, 2008 9:17 am ET

Bill, you are hard to trust, so please don't make all the naysayers right by screwing this up for pres obama

Pat in IL   December 3rd, 2008 9:17 am ET

Good grief…..the nay-saying here is really getting boring. Appointments are being made by people who know the whole picture in the inside track, and the inauguration for their terms hasn't even happened yet. It makes a lot more sense to let it rest and wait and see what happens after the new administration takes office. In the meantime, most of us need to mind our own lives and quit wasting time being sarcastic or posting uninformed comments.

Doug R.   December 3rd, 2008 9:17 am ET

Mike tells us Bill should work in the HR Dept and interview interns. Mike's a funny guy. Maybe you can do that better than Bubba, Mike. There are job openings in the Obama administration.

yellow dog democrat   December 3rd, 2008 9:16 am ET

Great!! I'm all for it – not a bad reference point for all concerned! At least its going to be intelligent thinking for a change. Not all the recommendations provided by so many negative "bloggers"……where are your degrees in political science and foreign policy? Why don't you run for an office and do something for the country instead of sitting in the comfort of your home and saying absolutely nothing? At least you do provide a degree of entertainment.

Rep.   December 3rd, 2008 9:16 am ET

As a republican why wouldn't we want HIllary as our Sec. of State? She has a great reputation world wide and I think thats exactly what we need when we elected a president with very little International Knowledge and experience

Thomas   December 3rd, 2008 9:16 am ET

Yeah I like all the DEmocrats so I love Hillary

Brian from Fort Mill, SC   December 3rd, 2008 9:15 am ET

We all need to separate the candidates' behavior during a campaign from their behavior in their day job.

Both Bill and Hillary got stupid during the campaign. The main reason Barack Obama won the primaries is that he mostly refused to return in kind. However, even he wasn't perfect. (Remember, he also had HIS 3am ad!!)

But Both Bill and Hillary have done an excellent job in the White House and New York. And Obama has done an equally good job in Illinois.

Now that the sparring matches are over, they can go back to normal. I believe that all three will be able to work out their differences and make the changes that we need.

Of course, the first big change has already happened. We got rid of Bush and Cheney. That's an excellent start!!

S Callahan   December 3rd, 2008 9:15 am ET

Is it me, or has CNN ticker gone bi polar…..one end stating he was not being involved, and then alleging he was looking for a role…hmm

I don't see his comment as saying he was looking for a role, only that he is available if needed…………

Kim   December 3rd, 2008 9:14 am ET

Obama made an awesome choice of Hillary Clinton for secretary of state. She will represent us well. As far as her connection to former President Bill Clinton; it is a great advantage.

EVERYMAN   December 3rd, 2008 9:12 am ET

Director of White House Interns, perhaps?

Way to Go Sarah Baby!!!   December 3rd, 2008 9:12 am ET

Sarah Palin went to Georgia over the weekend, brought out the crowds, and swept Saxby Chambliss into the Senate and prevented the Dems. from a filibuster proof majority.

Thanks Sarah and we'll see you in 2012 as Obama fails because he could not revive the economy and could not handle Al Qaeda.

Larry, CA   December 3rd, 2008 9:12 am ET

Who needs you? You have been a pain to USA.

More Clinton   December 3rd, 2008 9:11 am ET

We need them now more than ever,

Jennifer   December 3rd, 2008 9:10 am ET

Linda of Atlanta, Hillary already got the job..that was announced Monday..I don't know why everyone thinks whatever Hillary does in the US government that her Husband Bill will be involved..remember when he was President she had a lot to do with his administration..she helped him..give the woman credit for crying out loud..

The dude   December 3rd, 2008 9:09 am ET

Bill is awesome – he doesn't mean of word of that and every person on the planet knows it – yet we still love him.

Lois, Ont., Canada   December 3rd, 2008 9:08 am ET

I was diappointed when Obama appointed Clinton for Sectretary of State. We will to see 'Madam Pant suit for at least four more years. Will 'Hillbilly' ever go away?!!!

katiec   December 3rd, 2008 9:07 am ET

Bill Clinton is liked and respected throughout the world.
He would be a good, uplifting respresentative for our
country.

Leah from FL   December 3rd, 2008 9:07 am ET

Bill was a fantastic CEO of our country. We need the best in order to yet again get us out of the repub mess.

Barbara in NC   December 3rd, 2008 9:07 am ET

Democrats had to put up with a village idiot running our country into wars and bankruptcy for 8 years. Now Republicans will just have to shut up for the next 8 years. (Not much wit – more like half-wit, to elect a sleeze like Chambliss, GA)

Martin   December 3rd, 2008 9:06 am ET

Obama already has 73% of positions filled by former Clinton officials….he should just increase those "change" numbers and give President Clinton a job too.

lonnette33   December 3rd, 2008 9:05 am ET

Also CNN-Give it rest for God's Sake.

lonnette33   December 3rd, 2008 9:04 am ET

I loves me some Big Dog, but I just want him to let Hillary shine now. It's her time. Let she and Obama do their think. Bill is still the Big Dog and will always be loved by many. If Obama asks him to help in some way then so be it. I think he can provide great help to the Pres-Elect. The Big Dog should offer advice when asked-nothing more. :=)

obama-mama   December 3rd, 2008 9:00 am ET

Oh boy.

Linda of Atlanta   December 3rd, 2008 8:58 am ET

If anyone believes that Bill Clinton will not be involved with the job of Secretary of State if Hillary actually gets the job….. check with a mental health professionial…. you need help!

Thankfully, there is some tiny little constitutional possiblity that she wont be able to become S of S, so that those few of us who still have our wits about us(otherwise know as Republicans) can hope!!

Mike   December 3rd, 2008 8:56 am ET

He should be responsible for Human Resources to interview future White House interns. That's what he enjoys doing most.

Ed, Santa Fe, NM   December 3rd, 2008 8:55 am ET

ONE Clinton is TWO too many….

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

Follow us on Twitter

CNN on TwitterGet Ticker updates the moment they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.
Follow politicalticker

Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP