NEW YORK (CNN) - Actress Fran Drescher has expressed interest in being appointed to the U.S. Senate seat that New York's Hillary Clinton is giving up to become secretary of state, a spokesman for the actress said.
No, seriously.
"Fran Drescher, actress, women's health advocate and public diplomacy envoy for the U.S. State Department, announced that she is throwing her hat into the ring of contenders for the senate seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton," Drescher spokesman Jordan Brown told CNN in a written statement late Monday.
Watch: CNN's Alina Cho break down Drescher's interest
Drescher, 51, is best known for her starring role in the 1990s television comedy "The Nanny" and an adenoidal voice that could strip the rust off an engine block - a talent that might come in handy during a Senate filibuster.
But since a bout with uterine cancer, she has become an activist for better health care for women and was named a State Department public envoy on the issue in September. Drescher recently toured Eastern European countries to raise awareness of the issue on behalf of the State Department.
New York Gov. David Paterson will appoint a successor for Clinton, who still must be confirmed by her Senate colleagues for the Cabinet post. That successor would face voters in a special election in 2010.
A spokesman for Patterson did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday morning.
Speculation over Paterson's choice reached a frenzy over the weekend after reports that Caroline Kennedy, daughter of assassinated President John F. Kennedy, had phoned to discuss the position.
Paterson said Monday that Kennedy had called him and "asked a few questions," but dismissed other reports as "gossip."
"And frankly, this is a serious issue which I think is starting to be
treated as some sort of reality TV show," he added.
A senior adviser to Clinton, Philippe Reines, said she would not comment on her possible successors.
"This is entirely Governor Patterson's decision and we're respecting the privacy of his process," Reines said.
From CNN Politics
© 2011 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| Advertising practices | Advertise with us | About us | Contact us | Work for us | Help
I would be highly supportive of Caroline Kennedy for the position.
Given that there are no requirements other than age set forth in the Constitution about being a Senator, she's welcome to state her case. If I were Patterson, I'd have a binder with all of the possible people that are interested in the job. Talking with all of them would take a while, but when all of the talking is done, then you are ready with someone as soon as Clinton stands down.
I'd be happy with the Nanny, however, the kennedy's are expecting a pay back. That family is something else.
That's diabolical. Patterson's bought himself a breathing space, if nothing else. By the time they're done quivering in their boots over the thought of a Drescher filibuster, they'll accept anybody else Patterson may consider with heartfelt relief.
Fran might be really good in the Senate, but the thought of listening to that voice reading from the Washington, DC, phone book is enough to give me the willies.
You must be kidding...
C'mon Miss Fine!!!!
Gimme a break.
Not gonna happen ... Caroline Kennedy vs Fran Drescher .... um ... let's see.
Don't get me wrong, as a read blooded American boy, there were aspects that I REALLY REALLY liked about her character ... but everything has it's place.
I"ve never felt the Congress, the Senate, the Cabinet, the Whitehouse or the Supreme Court was anyplace for ANY athlete, actor or actress .... unless they were a Rhodes Scholar... that includes Ronnie Raygun, Fred Thompson, Arnold Schwartznegger, Fred Gundy, Heath Schuler, or Fran Drescher.
carolyn kennedy would be the best choice for senator clintons replacement.
The hostess with the mostest!
Is this some kind of joke? Fran has been following Palin too long. See what happens when you let one moron run for office? It opens the floodgate of fools.
Fran, I loved you as the Nanny, however, that doesn't mean I want you as a Senator.
Not Fran D.
Not Caroline K.
NO MORE HOLLYWOOD STAR TYPES.
Only SERIOUS candidates need apply!
Of all the qualified people in NY to take Hillary's senate seat It's laughable that Fran Dresher thinks she has a chance.
What is our senate turning into.... a laughing stock?
I don’t doubt her sincerity, but this selection should be treated with the utmost respect and Governor Patterson needs to think about selecting someone that could possibly win the seat in 2010 and perhaps beyond.
Being a New Yorker....so far only two promisinng candidates for me....Kennedy or Gillabrand
In 1926, when Jack Warner's brothers were trying to drag him and the
studio into "talking pictures," he famously retorted: "Who in the hell
wants to listen to an actor talk?"
Fran the Nanny? Good grief!
One intelligent, serious, hard working woman to replace another ... Fran gets my vote!
Now that is change I can't live with!
Her laugh makes me cringe, it can be the trademark for our country after the honeymoon...
Hey why not? She certainly can't do any worst than Chuck Shumer and the other democratic senators, and she's far easier on the eyes than Pelosi and Hillary.
She'd be a very effective Senator. Everyone would give her whatever she wanted just to keep from hearing that horrible whiny voice!
Fran, I love ya, but please.. This is ridiculous.
At first, I thought, "you've got to be joking." But the more I thought about it, I thought, maybe she could be a good appointment. Although a comedic actress originally, she takes these issues very seriously.
Of course, I also like Caroline Kennedy. Either would please the left wing of the party. Of course, Caroline would appeal to those of us who remember her father's time in the White House – and exactly where we were when we heard that horrible news.
I would rather have Fran than Kennedy. Have you ever listened to Fran D. talk politics. She's impressive! I'd much rather have her than Caroline Kennedy whose only qualification is that she's a lawyer and JFK's daughter. I'm sure her big mouth uncle will have his paw prints all over this trying to persuade Gov. Paterson to give her the seat. Kennedys crack me up.....they think the can do anything or get anything they want just because of their familial name! NO KENNEDY! Besides, have you ever heard her speak publicly...what a yawner! She sounds like that teacher (Ben Stein) in Ferris Bueller's Day Off..."Anyone, anyone". BORING! Nobody wants to listen to that. Now Fran D. on the other hand....I'd listen to her and actually be interested in what she has to say. That woman is very smart and very insightful!! Don't let the comedian thing fool you, folks!
I like the "Kennedy" name better.
What about Steven Colbert? Shouldn't he be considered too?
Great. She's even more annoying than Sarah Palin.
Perfect candidate. The US has become a Nanny state. Fran has the qualifications necessary to execute the office of Senator of NY (heck, she has more qualifications than Obama!).
Now, if we can just appoint Fonzi as Car Czar and perhaps Matt Damon as the new DEA chief we can get this economy back on track. Anyway, if it doesn't work we can always turn back to Barney Frank and Chris Dodd for help – they are experts at economic distruction.
My apologies to Senator Reid and Nancy Pelosi – but you two are so 1980's and far to outdated to matter in the New Age of Obama and the Zero Qualification But Well Intentioned Generation.
What's next? Britney Spears???
That is the most ridiculous idea ever. I am not a N.Y. resident, so I really have no business commenting, but Fran Drescher is no more qualified to be Senator than I am. I actually liked the idea of Caroline Kennedy, but the more I see and hear about her, I wonder if she has the "cojones" to do what is needed to be actually elected to the seat.
Oh good grief you've got to be kidding me.
Please decide how many t's are in Pat(t)erson.
I'd like to throw my hat into the ring. Let's do it. A no holds barred, cage match, winner takes all. We'll make a mint on pay per view!
I sure would not vote for her!
Oh my lord, I hope she is joking....her voice alone would would send them running from the Senate!!!
Oy veh!
The Governor needs to get a hold of this and appoint person with solid credentials quickly. Caroline Kennedy (name only) and now a aging actor?
Both her and Kennedy need to go away and people need to wake up. Rich and famous and/or parents who were...those aren't qualifications for holding office.
Why don't we just send a hat over to Hollywood and have everyone rich imbecile we can find put their name in it? I mean really, apparently the only qualifications you need in this country for holding office are money and fame...maybe a last name like Kennedy too, that seems to help. And while we're at it, why don't we all just stop caring about our children and help Brangelina take care of hers...they're more important than your own kids anyway. And oh yeah, let's fight cancer...not because it matters, but because some famous person has it...AIDS too. UNITED STATES OF HOLLYWOOD.
The idea of Fran serving in Senate should make Caroline Kennedy look far better to all of the nay-sayers. Caroline Kennedy has the education, the background of a family that is very political, and was raised with a sense of public service. Fran is a TV personality. Come on.
JUST GIVE IT TO KENNEDY, POSSIBLY SHE WILL BUY IT IF YOU DON'T
SHE MAY OUTLAST HER UNCLE
Sure she does. She has about as much chance of getting that one as Sunny von Bulow.
To those trashing Ms Drescher, you only know her from a television sitcom. In REAL life she is not The Nanny. My goodness, you people cannot even differentiate between television and reality.
Amber: So let's automatically disqualify anyone from public office whose family has a legacy of political service! Great idea!
NOT.
You sound like just another frustrated Nov 4 voter. You probably are also among the 20% in this country who think Obama is not handling the transition effectively. He will have accomplished MORE by the end of the day on Jan 20 than our current president has in the 8 years since we elected Al Gore.
"I like the Kennedy name better" (President Obama/VA, wrote).
This is exactly my point. We elect officials on aesthetics...what is pleasing to the ear and eye. Caroline Kennedy is only being considered because of her familial name. Likewise, Obama beat Hillary because he was more aesthetically pleasing and "cool" than she appeared.
Americans are shallow and this proves it! I"m so sick of this...I wish I could leave and go to England or Austrailia. Grow up people and quit basing everying on aesthetics! Ugh...you make me want to puke.
Why settle for the "Nanny" when we can have the "Supernanny!?"
Jo Frost for Senate!*
*provided she has US citizenship.
Not sure I could handle that.
It's unfortunate that some has-been celebs, like Frannie the Nanny are even trying to ride Obama's coat tails into Washington. This election seems to be very similar to California's a few years ago. Arnold Schwartzenegger, a porn star and a midget (pardon the politically incorrect term) were running for governor – take your pick. Although her means-well humor was publically accepted as funny about ten years ago, I still don't believe a position in government is her bag.
Wow, are these people serious? Now I remember why I left New York. If only I 1) Has a famous family or 2) Had a sitcom in the 90's, I too could be a Senator. What ever happened to having people representative of the actual populace and that actually have some experience. New York is pitiful if this is the best we can come up with. I have known people smarter than either of these candidates. Kennedy should stay in her guilded mansion her family gave her and Fran should continue doing the good work she is doing, its a lot more than she can ever hope to get done in the Senate.
Oh why not, she's as qualified as any other democrat. And the rest of the senate deserves to hear her whine on a continuous basis, it would do them good.
I have a lot of respect for her. She fought cancer and won. However, I really have an issue with her whiny NJ voice. Unless she can learn sigh language I think she should go in to retail.
Dear Mr. Patterson – Me too! Me too! I need a good job because Hillary and all the other NY Democrats constantly ignore anywhere west of the Hudson!!
Scott Tucson wrote:
"Hey why not? She certainly can't do any worst than Chuck Shumer and the other democratic senators, and she's far easier on the eyes than Pelosi and Hillary."
Are you serious Scott? While I agree on Frans beauty, she probably can do just as a good of job as any senator. But come on, Republicans are the bigger problem since they cant seem to focus on the work at hand. They are too busy taking money from oil companies, making friends with Jack Abramhoff, toe tapping in airport bathrooms, or propositioning their Congressional underage pages. I will take the Democrats ANY day of the week over the corrupt Republicans. And then to claim moral superiority on top of it is just plain laughable. Bring on Fran or Caroline!
How fitting...The Nanny for the nanny state.
Thanks.. but no thanks Fran. i like Caroline Kennedy better.
I vote for Fran as long as she promises not to LAUGH ! ! !
I would be concerned with a potential candidate who only has a highschool education running for the Senate. I don't know if she even graduated highschool. Her bio only lists that she attended Hillcrest Highschool.
It is laudable that she is involved in woman's medical issues, but there is more to being a Senator then just having a pet project. What will she do when she has to evaluate something that has nothing to do with woman's medical issues?
The primary responsibilty of a Senator is to make laws. A Senator should have some education concerning legal matters, in my opinion.
Ms. Kennedy is much more qualified for the position than Ms. Drescher.
I thought "silly season" was over.
Might as well, Hillary didn't do anything for us here in New York the welfare state.
Fran may have great ideas and probably would be a great Senator but would you really want to listen to her voice and that whiny laugh for years to come?
Caroline Kennedy – YES!
Fran Drescher – GET OVER YOURSELF.
Before you all post your poo poos on this and make typical knee jerk reactions, if you've never heard her speak on political issues, including health and child advocacy, you would be very surprised as to how increadily informed and yes, well spoken she is on the subjects. She is not the character she portrayed on the Nanny. She is the totall opposite. That said, however, I would prefer someone like Caroline Kennedy who is not only more qualified, but has the political capital of her family to deliver for NY.
She was working on a TV show in Flushing, Queens,
'Til her network kicked her out in one of those crushing scenes.
What was she to do? Where was she to go? She was out on her fanny...
So over the bridge from Flushing to the Senate's door.
She was there to lobby make-up, but Harry Reid saw more.
She had style! She had flair! She was there.
That's how she became the appointee!
Who would have guessed that the girl we've described,
Was just exactly what Governor Paterson prescribed?
Now the father finds her beguiling (watch out D.C.!).
And the Republicans are actually smiling (take that Kennedy!).
She's the lady in yay when everybody else is voting nay...
The flashy girl from Flushing, the Senator named Fran!
Ted Kennedy supported Obama at a very crucial juncture in the primaries, this would be viewed as a pay back even though Obama is not the one to make the decision. Right wing talk radio will be all over this.
We NEED someone from upstate NY!!!!!!!!!! One need not look any farther than Galisano for some one that cares about somewhere besides NYC.
Caroline Kennedy...please!
Why not Fran Drescher? You can't judge a person because she speak with a nasalily type voice. That is redicious! If that were the case than half of America wouldn't qualify for positions.
She has emerged from "The Nanny" as a serious activist for cancer and I have heard her on interviews and she is one intelligent lady. She is up on all the issues.
Remember Ronald Regan, Sonny Bono, etc. Don't judge a book by its cover.
Go Caroline!
Ummm...that's not really her real voice or laugh, so for those of you who would oppose her simply because of that, I guess you will have to come up with something else.
Why not? Experience doesnt matter anymore. If you are a liberal and a known "personality", thats all thats needed.
For you people criticizing her, remember she is an American citizen just like the rest of us and has the right to run for this position. If she gets elected it is by the will of the voters and you have no room to complain, so just let actions take their course.
Ah, rule by the stars of Bread and Circuses. It makes me nostalgic for the good old days of the Roman Empire.
aaaaahhhhhhhaaaahhhhhaaahhahhah
If Fran Drescher meets the constitutional requirements to run for NYS Senate there's no reason Gov. Patterson should rule her out with out first vetting her.
If it was an election year Caroline Kennedy would have name recognition in her favor. Just because she is a Kennedy, Gov. Patterson should not give her any special consideration.
Oh yes! Another actor that thinks they know something about foreign policy. Maybe she can hold a press conference like Babs did after Clinton was elected. What a joke!
I don't think she stands a chanxce against Caroline Kennedy or others that the Governor Patterson has to choose from.
Fran has just as much experience as Lady Clinton and Caroline combined...after all Lady Clinton had tea and cookies with the wives of many foreign leaders.
If Fran's in we'll have the shortest filibusters in history!!
Why not Fran? So what if she's an actress and has a funny voice. We've had (elected) politicians playing footsie with men in airport bathrooms.
Fran has done a lot more for women's health than Caroline Kennedy has ever done. Who cares about Caroline's name. What are we doing, shopping for a name-brand handbag over here?
And what's with getting another Kennedy into office. Um, I thought we got rid of that sort of thing back in 1776.
It never ceases to amaze me how we ousted the royal family yet the American people can't seem to get enough of political families. We may as well bring back the king and queen.
anyone who thinks FRAN friggin DRESHER is qualified or should get this U.S. SENATE Seat becuase she is a "Health Advocate" is a low grade moron. It's going to dicey enough with another inexperienced Pres. in the White House, now people think a HOLLYWOOD actress should be a senator???
No wonder we're going down the tubes.
Frankly, I think that it is an insult to the process that the next Senator from New York will be appointed rather than elected. I think this is causing some consternation in the public and this might be from where the "gossip coverage" of this seat is coming.
Oh that voice but i love your humor.....
Come on! First Arnold Swartzenegger, Jesse Ventura, Al Franken and now Fran Drescher, give me a break! These people should stick to what they know. No wonder the world does not take us seriously!
this is becoming a comedy hour. caroline kennedy is the best choice for the job and will carry on her family legacy. the nanny would only make the position a reality show and frankly after sarah palin we have realitied out!
NO WAY!!!!
Caroline Kennedy will be a better fit!!!!
i'll take fran d over kennedy any day. fran is looking out for us. watch one of her interviews. yeah, she's an actress, but to be honest, aren't all politicians? fran is sincere and everything she says comes from the heart. you know she has a heart. give her a chance. dont just say no because of that tv show. a lot of things have happened to her throughout her life. i think she should be given the position and given the chance to show us what she can do for new york.
Even though I would prefer C. Kennedy, I would take Fran D. over Palin any day; Drescher is certainly more qualified than Palin.
That voice alone should disqualify her.
And what would be so wrong with Bobbi Flekman in the Senate? Her role as a promoter with Polymer Records back in the day gave her great national exposure. Add to that the fact that she was charming when she needed to be and a straight-shooter when the situation demanded it.
All kidding aside, what's so wrong with a concerned citizen (who also happens to be an actress/comedienne) wanting to play a role in our national government?! I would be inclined to trust that sort of candidates motivations moreso than any other political climber. Once upon a time there was no such thing as a career politician. Senators and representatives served their terms in Washington DC because it was in the public interest. Then, after their terms were up they went back to their home states and their real lives.
Just because you're a well known actress doesn't mean that you are qualified for the position. But hey, if our current president can be stupid and still elected Commander and Chief, than why not Fran. She may be a whole lot smarter than Bush.
No.
she has every right to run for the position, she is just a thinking human being like you and me. although i do agree that her voice would drive me insance if i had to listen to her testify. like nails on a chalkboard
If Shara Palin can run for VP, then Fran Drescher can run for the Senate. Good for her to strive to do public service and much to my shock, she may could just turn out to be very effective in that role. Fran Drescher is far lacking in qualifications to justify being appointed to the Senate; unlike Caroline Kennedy who is the obviouse choise.
No more wacky than Al Franken in MN.
Sonny Bono, Gopher from Love Boat and Cooter from Dukes of Hazzard have served in the House of Representatives. Al Franken ran for the Senate. Now the Nanny wants to be a senator. What is it about Congress that attracts comedians? Hmmm.
Why not? She is just as qualified as Caroline Kennedy. For that matter, why not appoint Babs Streisand, Tim Robbins or any other person with name recognition? Or maybe, just maybe we should expect someone who has an actual record of accomplishment. ......Naaah, why start now?
Is Fran Drescher any less qualified than Caroline Kennedy?
Well if Sarah Palin was a viable candidate for VP...why not Dresher for the senate?
I myself would much rather the seat be filled by Kennedy.
How great would this be for television? Imagine the skits that could be done on “Saturday Night Live”….I would watch every week!!
Would only be an improvement over any Kennedy. Even JFK was not all that
God no, I can not stand her voice. It is squeeky like Palins...
My vote is for Caroline Kennedy.
I do not see any reason why Fran Drescher should not be allowed to show interest in the position simply because she was an actress. Plenty of high ranking public officials (Re: Reagan, Ventura, F. Thompson, Schwarzenegger) all were show-biz before leading in the public eye.
Qualified is a relative term. Does a name make you more qualified?
Have you ever heard her talk ... PERIOD??
Gosh that voice is annoying.
Oh my!
Not Caroline Kennedy!
Why not?!! Seems you can't trust anyone on those high seats anymore. We need some new blood in there and make things happen. I'd vote for Fran over a Kennedy. Maybe she doesn't have enough know how BUT she can learn. I'm sure alot of them in there have learn hands on.
She's just as qualified as any other Democrat in Congress. She probably thinks she knows how to run the auto industry too. Overall I'm happy about all the Representatives and Senators Obama is moving to the Executive branch. Unfortunately it looks like their replacements will be just as bad. What a bunch of morons.
Caroline Kennedy is more than a name! Take the time and read her resume, and stop sounding ignorant and undereducated!
Fran? Please! You have never convinced me that you are a serious actress; I have no confidence in you being a serious candidate for that prestigious office! Trust me; I mean no disrespect, but you are not in the ball park!
Don't laugh, there was a time we laughed at Arnold Schwarzenegger!
You go it Franny, just don't use that annoying voice from the "Nanny!"
She may do a better job than her predecessor.
CSpan's ratings would go up.
I'm glad that Scott seems to think looks are the standard by which we should judge women's qualifications for major public office. Paris Hilton for senate! How could we go wrong?
No–she's another Palin!!! Caroline Kennedy–Yes, yes, yes!!!! She's ready to take up where her Dad left off!!!
I would like to see Fran Drescher be the next senator from New York. I have heard her talk politics and she is a very smart, well spoken woman. I think she is just as qualified as Caroline Kennedy. I think the Kennedy name has been used enough. If a Kennedy is qualified for a job, fine, let them run as a legitimate candidate. Don't try to push the name by getting an appointment.
Fran would be much better than Kennedy. I would hate to see the seat go to Caroline who has so bitterly opposed Senator Clinton's bid for President. Much rather see Robert Kennedy than Caroline!
Fran Drescher as junior senator from New York; I think her resume comes up a bit short.
Good – The last thing we need is another Kennedy in Washington.
Me too .... I just sent in my request to Mr. Patterson!
My fellow bloggers .... please pull for me!!
Okay, I thought Kennedy was ridiculous. But the Nanny? Come on people. This is not like a reality show, it is a reality show. This is a slap in the face of all the serious contenders who have experience. And it's a slap in the face to Hillary. I may as well run for the office myself. Give me a break.
OH, P-U-L-E-A-S-E !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just shut up and go away .
Fran "09
No experience in politics. No management experience. No known capacity to lead. If I was a New Yorker, I would be furious that she even thought she was capable of representing me.
No.
I would rather cop my own head off with arusty machete than have ANOTHER Kennedy in the Senate. Kennedys are teh family of 'mysterious' deaths, corruption and greed.
For all of you union workers out there – remember what John and Bobby did to Hoffa? The corruption of the Kennedys makes Hoffa look like a saint.
Puleeze....don't "Palen " the position !!! ..... It should go to Caroline Kennedy .....do your homework......she is educated , intelligent and has been active in many good causes all her life...in a quiet low key manner.....and being a Kennedy can't hurt !!
I say give it to her, she is not ambitious, nor did she endorse a candidate hoping to get a payback.....like Caroline and that big headed Kennedy man did...anyone but them....did they not tout, CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN...aka...no more Bushes...no more Clintons.....so eat your heart out Kennedy's....no more Kennedy's!
Well....Obama got elected and he had no experience either.
Please give us a break – we have more than enough wackies in the Senate. It is time that we elect individuals that can comprenhive a bill and then be able to see that the bill will not damage the people of this country. Just look at the staus to this country today – we have a President that doesn't and cannot understand anything that would help main street – just things that would benefit his rich friends – wall street and oil companies.
I think she is more qualified then the other nim rod the Dems are pushing for in Franken.....You dems truly are the laughing stock of politics
What's with all of these actors seeking Congressional seating? Do they think politics are a joke?
From the party that gave us Bonnie Fwank, Dodd, Pelosi, Reid and Franken she would be an improvement
That "nanny" voice is all you can say about an intelligent woman? Ms Drescher only used it for the TV show. Have you ever heard her Real voice? It's smooth and pleasant to the ear.
Judge this young woman by the ideals she believes in and the work she has done.
Ms Kennedy only has "the name"; no substance. A typical Kennedy!
Wow! What a bad idea! What about appointing Triumph the Insult Dog instead, or Mork from Ork?
Wait..."The Nanny" was a comedy?
Oh great – another TV star that wants to play politics. She has no experience like some other guy – oh yeah, that would be Obama.
I would so NO, just because her voice is so annoying. Sorry, but it is:-(
Don't laugh about Fran Drescher. She's a very astute business woman. She wasn't just the zany actress in The Nanny, she was also the executive producer of that show as well as others. She's sort of a Lucille Ball kind of person– she could be a total screwball on screen playing a part, but behind the scenes she's a smart & tough business woman. I'd never thought of her as a political candidate, but why not? She's as bright & as qualified as many of the others either seeking that seat or already filling other Senate/House seats.
With no disrespect to Fran, since I do not know the woman, please, could we take politics out of the comedy hour and get serious.
I am holding out for Paris Hilton.
Anything is possible! In the US! But I would choose Caroline over Fran on the experience issue. Caroline has a life made up of politics. Despite her soft spoken exterior, I'm sure she wouldn't seek this job because she thinks it would be easy. She knows the ins and outs which would be very helpful and her dedication is unquestioned. On the other hand, Fran has no political experience and would not serve NY well, despite her well meaning intentions. Having had cancer does not qualify you for the Senate. She should use her celebrety to raise awareness and money. In the Senate her cause would fall on deaf ears.
If she has the credentials...I'd like to hear her argument...but, I'm thinking she's going to have a hard time against the Kennedy establishment.
Fran Drescher has been active in politics since her show was over. She has been a staunch advocate for women's health, and has been a public diplomacy envoy for the US State Department. Her knowledge of politics and foreign affairs far outweighs that of Gov. Palin. Drescher is an extremely smart woman, who has made millions in investments and was known as a very shrewd business woman. She has very little personal baggage, and would be given the postion on her merits, as opposed to as a familial favor. I would prefer an incredibly smart independent woman in this office than a political insider.
This is kinda funny. How come other jobs have qualifications that are specific, like certain degrees and what not. I think a bacc education and grad/law/medical education OR 8 years military should be the minimum requirements as well as a minimum of 2 years of direct public service, or 4 years as a professor or something where you impact minds or help the community. Not star power, looks, not "highly nasal laughs", "gotcha gee gollies" or "joe anybodies". It's nuts that Fran should be Senator. I did like the show The Nanny but come on now. What do you all think about that? If it comes down to these two, I will take Kennedy any day. She is still more astute and honestly, since we have to hear politicians talk, her voice is more pleasant. Haha.
Jaye,
What is laughable is that you (New Yorkers) elected Hilary Clinton a non-New Yorker to represent you. Fran is a smart women, and would be for New York.
I'm for Fran - those who voted for Hillary knew her stand to get us universal health care. My husband has cancer, I have hoped that her replacement would be someone who would care about cancer and our health system. I do not think Obama is ready to go to universal care yet so I would like to see someone in the Senate who is open to it. Thank you.
Heck, why not. Just another Hollywood entertainer/non-supporter of the US. She can join the ranks of Barbra Streisand, Bruce Springstein, Jane Fonda, etc.
"Only serious candidates need apply. . . "
You mean like serious CAREER politicians, the kinds the Republican party has been breeding for generations and who have run this country into the ground???? KUDOS to change and KUDOS to Fran for throwing her hat into the ring.
Anyone who HASN'T heard her talk politics needs to youtube search her....you will be impressed.....
Why not? She's as qualified, if not more, that any other Senator from New York the past twenty years..................
What a joke, and that annoying laugh....
You would think in that entire article they would have outlined Fran Drescher's educational background to support her qualifications for the position, other than her involvement as an advocate for women's health issues, etc. Surely some routine educational standards must be in place for this position, but I didn't see that she had them!
UNITED STATES OF HOLLYWOOD.
Cut the crap.
Yeah, well I want to sing like Patti LaBelle too, but that isn't going to happen either.
All persons who are qualified should be allowed to throw their hat in the ring, including Fran. I hope that if Caroline Kennedy is picked to replace Hillary, that she is picked fairly ,and not because her Uncle bribed the NY governor.
What qualifies Kennedy over anyone else? Seriously? She hasn't earned the right but hey, I guess the time has come for Obama to repay all of his favors. This is what happens when you install a celebrity in the White House instead of someone truly deserving.
Is she aware that New York requires that she would have to do some real work to be electable in a couple of years?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.......I needed a really GOOD laugh today. Now I'm shaking my head. With all due respect, Fran Drescher in the Senate.......I don't think so.
Oh, heck no. Who next? Florence Henderson?
Will Smith........yes the "Fresh Prince of Bel-air" actually said that he could have a shot at becoming President!!!
Hollywood celebrities are full of themselves and think the entire country wants them involved in everything.
Actors are over rated attractive people who should mean nothing to the average American.
**she's actually a lot smarter than her character would ever suggest, and probably smarter than many current senate seats...
Why do actors think they can be politicians too? Whatever.
Since Caroline Kennedy didn't support Hillary ... and the voters actually voted for Hillary twice ... why would you replace her with someone who doesn't agree with her. The replacement should be someone who shares the same ideas and values ... after all, that's what the voters wanted. Other than coming out in support of Obama early on, what has Kennedy done?
Everyone seems to forget that people joked about Reagan running for President because he was an actor. And look what happened: he turned out to be the greatest President we've had in decades.
Uh, puhleeeze.
Caroline Kennedy would get my vote
Fabulous! I'll vote for her! Fran's a real New Yorker and we could use a few more of them in DC.
Kennedy did support Obama which I give her credit for, but I don' t think she'd make a good senator. I think she's too quiet. She's been reticent to speak or get publicly involved in politics before now and I haven't see anything to convince me that she would stand up for us as Senator.
I always thought she was a real hottie despite the voice. Voice and looks shouldn't matter though, as long as she does better than HILLARY........which shouldn't be very difficult.
She is more qualified than Caroline Kennedy...
If her real voice is not as it is in The Nanny then it is OK but if it isn't then imagine having a Senate debate with that voice turns everything into a joke. That is too funny to take her seriously.
Why not, there's really no difference experience-wise to her and Hillary Clinton 8 years ago when she ran for the seat.
oh no. first you people bash sarah palin on every aspect of her life and now you're gung-ho about fran drescher and caroline kennedy. fools.
While Caroline Kennedy may have helped sprinkle the family name around to help elect Barack Obama, to me, she the warmth and appeal of dry toast. She has always struck me as an elitist, someone not of the people. She is cold and aloof as her late mother, giving the impression that she is above the rest of us. While she might have name recognition and star power, I can't see how she could carry out constitutent relations well.
Fran Drescher may be the other extreme, but having heard hear speak articulately on serious topics, she comes across as much more real and engaging.
While I can't say that I endorse Drescher, I must say that the Kennedys exude an entitlement to these plum jobs...and it's off-putting.
If you have listened to her you would realize this is one smart woman who knows her poitics.
She is savvy and she knows how to handle herself. I say more power to her and I wish her the best. We do not need another kennedy in the senate.
I say to FD, you go and I hope you win!
No, sorry. As admirable as her work on health issues may be, she is not qualified to be a senator.
Maybe ARod is available
Her nasal twang will definitely do wonders for the State of NY
fran dresher would be an awesome senator she went to 15 doctors and they kept telling her there was nothing wrong when she had cancer !!!!!!!!! this is how bad our health system is. just triage they let the old die and only save the young. caroline doesn't need the money she inherited millions. fran dresher is not rich !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Come on folks. The laugh and the voice are part of the role she played. She doesn't really sound like that.
I do prefer Kennedy but Fran is not that bad a choice. These days anyone willing to go through what it requires to serve the public deserves our respect. It is an ugly job with low pay for the public humiliation you get.
You life gets dragged through the mud.
Oh good! She could run now and then beat Palin for President in 8 years. Two annoying voices and one whose shown she has a brain. The other can return to being governor of the Caribou state.
I say great - and people should get to know her accomplishments and skills. She's got a compelling life story, is highly intelligent, and commited to important issues.
COOOOOOOOOL !!!!!!!!!
Fran Drescher is a woman to be reckoned with. She is highly intelligent. And that voice? IT WAS FAKE! Good grief, she was character acting, give it a break.
Someone mentioned keeping everone in a binder and taking their time, going through it. GREAT idea. Give all the contenders serious consideration.
Merry CHRISTmas!
Call up Oprah and appoint her! This country is really going down hill !
Fran would be a great pick. She's brilliant and very much up on political topics, especially healthcare.
Those that don't like Caroline though, need to look deeper. She has stayed out of the lime light, raising her kids, and so forth for years... however, she is also a brilliant woman, and has been in charge of various charities and events over the course of her life. She is also quite capable of being a US Senator.
Either woman would be a brilliant choice for New York. Both are very independent moral people with strong values.
Oh.My.God.
Don't we have enough problems as it is???
Dont give it to her I whether have Caroline Kennedy,,,,,,Caroline Kennedy for Senate in NY
Fran Drescher is an accomplished and very intelligent woman who is already involved in government activity. She absolutely should be taken seriously. However, I think that Caroline Kennedy would be an excellenent choice.
Fran D. is a very smart lady and an effective advocate for women's health. i would rather have her than C. kennedy anyday.
Why not, if Arnold Schwarzenegger can do it, with, "I'll be back"!
Why not ,she's just about as qualified as Caroline Kennedy, i.e. not at all.
Ilike the idea of her nagging the repugs out of filibusters, and any other stupid crap they try pulling this year. You know what I say lets do it.
Why not? She was an actress in another life. The only people in this world that can govern don't happen to be lawyers. That's what the majority of our current Congress is and you see where that's gotten us.
What made Hillary Clinton so eminently qualified? A law degree? Please!
I believe she is intelligent and at least as qualified as Caroline
Kennedy...to boot she really sounds like a "new Yawka" ...
If Arnold Schwartzenegger is being considered as energy secretary
we should be careful not to have double standards about speech and accents.. Obama is articulate enough to carry any flaws in that department. This admnistration will be about so much more
I like both of these possibilities... refreshing and honest....
bispartisan and energetic !
Oyyy....we have enough actors in the senate who are not nessa very good at it. JUST SAY NO TO FRAN-NANNY.
Somebody tell Drescher that being a politician is not like working in Hollwyood...you just don't do whatever the heck you feel it. Plus, she's an advocate for health services and the State Department? You know, there are outstanding persons who can be well sufficient advocates for this country and Ken Griffey J:R being one of them, is a good sign for this country...
I can't stand to hear her speak her voice is so grating.
I'm tired of Kennedy's need some new blood
"No, seriously?"
"strip the rust off an engine block?"
C'mon CNN. Just because an actress wants to go into politics, you can't take her seriously? These kinds of editorial comments in a news story are inappropriate. What about Reagan, Eastwood, Bono, Paulson, Franken, Ventura, Schwarzenegger? All of these Hollywood types were able to transition into politics and be taken seriously, why not the Nanny named Fran?
Just the idea that Caroline Kennedy and Fran Drescher are suggested as Hilary Clinton's replacements tells us what bad shape our government is in.
Texas Annie -As much as I admire Lucille Ball I would not want her representing me in the US Senate either. And she was from upstate NY. Why would someone from outside NY state think they need to pick OUR new senator anyway, we are quite used to our own carpetbaggers, the Clintons and the Kennedy Clan, thank you. I'm sure our Governor will decide on who the Clintons' want, he is a Democrat after all.
Phil in KC, and of course it should all be about pleasing the left wing of the Democratic Party. What about the 85% or so of the public who are not left wing Democrats? Kennedy is nothing but a family name. How about picking someone who is actually qualified. Oh that's right, experience and qualifications don't count do they? Just judgement.
I see a tight three way race shaping up between Drescher, Rosie O'Donnell, and Joy Behar.
I think she would be great. She is a lot more than the character she played on that show. Very bright, very driven, and very loyal to the idea of making things and people work like they are supposed to. Go Drescher!
As a New Yorker from upstate, I'd really like a real live upstater as our new Senator. Not the Nanny, not Caroline Kennedy.
Get over the Kennedy's already!!!!!!! All that glitters is not gold. Joe, a scheming womanizer, JFK, a scheming womanizer who nearly had us obliterated by nuclear war, RFK, a scheming womanizer, Ted, a scheming womanizer. Is anyone seeing a pattern here. Now answer the question "what's in a name?"
Well as usual, everyone is talking about what doesn't matter..gender,her voice, her tv show..let's talk about her position on the issues. Health care, the envoroment and everything else that's been ignored the last two terms by the worst administration in history.
Your opinion and vote does matter but make it about her qualifications and ideas to make this country a better place for everybody!
Fran as NY Senator?? Oh, Mr. Sheffield!!!
I nominate Steven Colbert.
Could they have found a worse picture of her? I can't tell if that's her or Paula Abdul.
Good lord – just when you thought palin was the laughing stock.
Can you imagine her in a filabuster?????
Maybe she's a good choice, her voice would drive the opposition into submission.
Much rather have Drescher in the public view than Palin. One is intelligent and well spoken, the other is a dud.
Let's keep Hollywood out of politics. We need to get serious about who we allow to represent us. Politics should not be a popularity contest.
Just because a person is an actress/actor doesn't exclude them automatically from having an intelligent and thoughtful mind with appropriate skills. Acting is a creative outlet, it takes talent and skill, but there are many an actress/actor who have a more analytical brain and fiscal experience then some of the elected officials I've seen during my 9 years of political study.
If she is the better candidate, then pick her. If she is not, then don't. It really comes down to just picking the best candidate of the available lot.
This is not news. When the governor makes his decision, then and only then will it be news. This is gossip, CNN.
And the big media just continues to pull out the long knives...
"Drescher, 51, is best known for ... an adenoidal voice that could strip the rust off an engine block...."
I'll bet that the author of this particular piece of condescension doesn't have a clue that Drescher can speak in a normal tone. But it's just one more example of the Mainstream Media (some would call it the Drive-By Media) spraying out their opinion and then running away before they get labeled as the elitists they are.
A quick question to the Media. When was the last time you saw Caroline Kennedy outside the Kennedy Compound other than at a rare political event since JFK Jr. died in 1999? Answer – Almost never. She was a figure head chief executive for the Office of Strategic Partnerships for the New York City Department of Education, in order to fund-raise, but that doesn't qualify her for a US Senate seat.
Al Franken should be available to run again soon. Get ready to count (and recont) the votes.
Say it aint so? First Jesse and Arnold now Franken and Dresher? Lets all step back and realize these are not the right steps. It isn't our fault that celebrity careers are limited. They should have thought about that before torturing us with terrible comedy. I speaking to you Franken. Why did they even let you on SNL?
To Amber: Why are you bitter against Caroline just because she has the Kennedy name...Look at the Bush name First the father, then the son GW and now his other brother (Jeb) here from Florida plans on running for the Senate...Caroline has never been tied up in scandals like the Bush's...I'd bet that you are one deprived woman yourself...Go moister yourself because it seems that something has dried out on you...BTW K-Y jelly works great...
Ummm, no. Please, God, no.
I want Fran Drescher to replace Clinton.
What is the job of a senator? The answer is to ACT. Let her in, she'll do fine. However, a Kennedy – hm. She'll get it.
I say give her a chance. If she has what it takes than so beit. Why is it when an actor or celeb type attempts to do something like this, all of you come down on them as if they are not capable of representing people. For all of you saying she is not qualified, are you? And if you THINK you are, why are you not trying to offer your services for our country. Easy to sit all day and type criticisms about others. If she thinks she is qualified, go for it.
Laughable!
I think Stephen Colbert should try to get that seat, he's a funny man with political aspiration.
NOOOO..her voice....NOOOOO
For those of you who don't know Fran Drescher, she has been very involved with the Democratic Party and the Jewish community; providing her time and money to many non-profit organizations, so she actually might not be a bad candidate. Of course, I do like Caroline Kennedy too, so this will be a tough race!
Actually I think shes much brighter than Sarah Palin. So why not
OMG you have got to be kidding me? Has anyone heard this chick talk I mean SQUAWK? Her voice will cause sessions of Congress to be cancelled because of inner ear nerve deafness. That voice would blow the CSPAN boom mikes! EEK noway, besides she has NO experience remotely close to being a US Senator!
Caroline Kennedy would be my choice if there is the choice between Caroline Kennedy and Fran Drescher.
Well,..."The Nanny" is a comedy. This could be a great reality show! Besides, New York has a habit of giving away their Senate seats to people who aren't even from New York...so I suppose that this wouldn't be out of character for New York. Otherwise, the idea is absurd! Then again, she may be as qualified as Hillary Clinton was when she first became a Senator from New York. They are certainly both annoying!
I think that New York would be a lot better off with Kennedy or Cuomo.
Caroline Kennedy – What a dud! I vote for Fran.
In a year where Joe the Plumber can become a political figure I suppose we should expect this. Paterson is going to want someone who can hold the seat in 2010 so would look for a rising star or shrewd pick (Cuomo) rather than a gimmick. "This is a serious issue which I think is starting to be treated as some sort of reality TV show" – well said Mr. Governor.
if palin can make a buck or two, why not the Nanny?
'that wasn't her real voice. That was just part of her act. She is an intelligent, savy woman who deserves consideration. I believe I would prefer to see Caroline Kennedy, though. Caroline has many, many excellent qualities that would lead her to excellent service.
i would say NO, i can't even watch her tv show.
Welll, if Fran has already served as envoy of the State Dept., that makes her more qualified than Caroline Kennedy!! Used to be the name was always Caroline Kennedy Slossberg. Now, to emphasize her family connections, they only refer to her as Caroline Kennedy. Caroline has done nothing in politics until this year's convention and getting chosen by Obama for his VP committee. Growing up around others in politics does not qualify somebody for the Senate any more than growing up around a surgeon qualifies one to go in the operating room and do surgery. Bill needs to reconsider.
I love you Fran, but your voice would give the Senate headaches on a daily basis.
Also, are we sure you're not only throwing your hat in just to stir up some controversey?
What is she trying to do, give the pea brain from Alaska competition?
That's all we need, ,a bunch of stupid scatter brain idiots making government decisions that will affect all of us in our country.
she has one large hill to climb, of Palin proportions
No way. No how. New Yorkers can not be that stupid.
Hello, people! Fran's an actress! That whiny Nanny voice is AN ACT! In real life Ms. Drescher is very knowledgeable and highly articulate. Give her a chance!
Well, she meets the #1 criterion for true consideration, she's not a white guy.
What about Joe the Plumber?
wow! how cool! i'd vote for Fran!
Another joke.
I don't want to see another Kennedy put into office just because of her name and no real knowledge. any body would be better wether it's Fran or Mickey Mouse.
Man, she's great to look at, but once she opens her mouth . . . . .
Like nails on a chalkboard.
Why not, anything is better than a Clinton.
Did you catch the bit about Obama's buddy in Illinois trying to sell his vacant senate seat? The good stuff begins.
Again this proves the Democrats have nothing in the tank and running on fumes.
I'll be glad when that party comes to an end and we can rebuild this country the way Ronald Reagan envisioned it to be.
As he said "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!"
What ever happened words like, "qualified – experienced..." etc.?
More and more, it looks like this seat is a "prize" for celebrities, or people named Kennedy to continue their dynasty. There's talk on TV that Jeb Bush "if he wants it" will get FL in 2 years.
That being the case, if seats are handed out that way, perhaps Chelsea should put in her "rightful claim" to it as well. A Clinton Dynasty.
She may be "The Nanny" to other, but she'll always be Bobbi Fleckman to me!
Is she a Palin look alike?
Please God...no.
Wow, now everybody wants that senate seat. Well I might as well put my name into the race....Karen from PA. I will move to NY if needed.
Caroline Kennedy all the way! We need a Kennedy in there!
Just do what they're doing in Illinios and sell the appointment to the highest bidder
CB2 says: "her voice is so annoying" I seem to remeber this profound, researched, highly educated opinion said about Hillary too.
Can we please move the women-in-politics bashing beyond the Bevis and Butthead mentality?
It's like 2008 – when will it be OK for an outspoken woman to be taken seriously? I know Obama's staff really worked the sexist angle against Hillary but let's get beyond that, OK?
I think Fran would be a great contender! She's bright and has the ability to take on the Senate!
why not its America and everyone has a choice....I think Caroline has been thru enough let her enjoy some life for a change
The Nanny Fran voice will keep them awake in Congress for sure!!!
I love her fashion since. Go for it Fran!!!
Texas Annie: I agree with you.
Lots of folks will write a hurried zinger response based on the television show that she starred in. But few will actually research what her politics are as the article gives only a brief overview.
Filling Hillary Clinton's seat would be a daunting task for anyone. That is a given. Senator Clinton’s successor will need to be up for the task, be that Fran Drescher or whoever else that it may be.
Not meaning Caroline because she isn't included in what i'm writing....but everyone puts so much on the Kennedys ...hey I was born and bred in Ma.......but they have more in their closets than any family I know and whats in their closet is all corrupt
Party guys over here and everybody is invited!
Teach that Gov and is gonna be our Batcave now...yes, Batcave, not city, LOL!!
Maybe people learn like that...
She doesnt live in New York. Giving her the Senate seat is like letting her sister Nadine (nurse) perform Surgery. Stick to doing fund drives
with Rosey.
Looks like Palin opened the sluces for every pretty face to apply for government office. But it would be hard to imagine that these other pretty faces are as vacuous as the Mooseburger Queen....she and the [R] party have set the bar way, way LOW.
Listen, let's not paint a person into a box here. She has done other things with her life, good things, since being on that TV show. Give her a little more credit.
That said, I like Kennedy for the position.
Why is this even a news story? Come on and cover something worthwhile.
I can't believe so many people can't seperate a character from the actor/actress playing it. I haven't followed Fran's life, so I don't know if she already is highly involved in politics or issues, but even if she isn't, Caroline Kennedy is no more qualified than I am to be a senator. She comes from a political family. Anything else? I have nothing against the Kennedy's, but lets not fall for the trap of name recognition.
Well..I lost for words. What's her creds?
Hey cb2, Her voice might be anoying, but then having to look at Hillary is much worse.
Of course the New Yorkers are pulling for Caroline. She is a Kennedy isn't she?
I would think Fran would be absolutely wonderful in the seat. She has my vote!!!!!GO FOR IT FRAN!
As a resident of Upstate NY, it saddens me to see so little said about potential replacements from upstate. But of course, we don't have the name recognition of Kennedy and Drescher. Sadly, we have a couple candidates with real live qualifications! Those seem to get overlooked when the media only focuses on star power. Take a look at Brian Higgins. As our congressman, he has done INCREDIBLE work for Western New York. Also, Byron Brown, the mayor of Buffalo. Here are two men with REAL political experience, and not just a fancy name. I HATE that substance will again lose out.
I cant beleive that Im going to say this but I would rather see a Kennedy in Clinton's seat than this airheaded hollywood debutante
Is she even a resident of New York? I thought she lived in Malibu!
In general, celebrities should be seen and not heard.
OMG i HATE this ladys voice its so fkin annoying...... god please do not let her be a politician...
anyone notice she looks really High in this picture? Musta smoked some of Bill Clinton's private stash
Why choose that picture to run with the story? It's a terrible photo.
C'mon her unparallel level of whininess makes her a model Democrat.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The Standards and qualifications of becoming a Senator are
"just have a pulse?"
Cmonnnnn!
Don't dismiss her too easily. Look into her record. I love the idea of Caroline Kennedy, but Fran Drescher has actually had more public service experience and would be a great advocate in this position. There are plenty of actors who have been elected or appointed to high profile political positions – why not her? It sounds like sexism is rearing its ugly head once again.
You Have got to be kidding right?
No more Clintons, no more Bushes, no more Kennedies.
EVER.
I think it should go to Tom Davis, who was Al Franken's comedy partner from SNL. Then if Franken makes it, they could do some of their comedy routines at news conferences, and be the warm up act at State of the Union speeches.
Both Fran Drescher and Caroline Kennedy have done extensive volunteer work over the years. I've heard Drescher speak on behalf of cancer victims, and she's a good, intelligent speaker. Kennedy has written a number of books, has a law degree, and has helped raise money for many groups in New York City.
To call them "do-nothings" is unfair, and, dare I suggest, sexist?
I'd like to see either of them in the Senate. The Senate needs new ideas and not people who've just been "doing politics" their whole lives.
AWESOME! Hope Gov. Petterson gives her a chance! She's got what it takes!
Fran would make an excellent senator. If you listened carefully, her show was full of wonderful common sense and wisdom. There is much about New York you can't learn unless you grew up in the state.
Fran has worked very hard in her life and it hasn't always beenwithout trauma. The things that have happened to her deepen a person. These things make a person look outside them self and understand the workings of the whole.
Well, thankfully the brain-trust of chauvinistic ignoramuses posting here won't be the ones making the decision.
"READ"-blooded American commenting on intelligence? HA! That's a good one....
It amazes me the stupitity that people show as they seem to think the character anyone plays on TV, movies , etc is the REAL Person. Hey people .....TV and movies are fictional characters.....Yeah Really.... they are fictional. Sorry to shock you. Turn off the TV once and a while and turn on your brain
Two words Fran, Sarah Palin. Go home and obsess over gaining half a pound.
Miss FINE!
She'd be great. One heck of a lot better than so many of those idiots on the Hill now, that's for sure!
Either one would make me throw-up. Congress is a joke now.
It makes total political sense:
The acting talent of the Governator, combined with the brains of Sarah Palin.
I'll bet she's on the ticket in 2012 along with some ancient republican war hero...
I believe that Ms Drescher should wait and run openly for the seat in 2010; the governor should appoint some one with more expreience. Let the Voters decide how competent she is... she might surprise people...
LOL, so Hillary's Senate seat is going to be a circus like the governor's race in CA, it's going to be fun to watch.
I'd rather have someone with experience, but it sometimes seems outsiders are skeptical, and their dreams for change are charged with hope. I'll give her a 6 on the 1 to ten scale. But please, get a voice coach.
Hey, let her run. I don't think she talks like she did on the show. I bet she'd make a terrific Senator. I agree with what TexasAnnie and Amber said. If you run, Ms. Drescher, mazel tov!
What is it with people who judge people before they have even heard what they have to say. From all I can find Fran Drescher is a very astute buisness woman. Sarah Palin has also had many accomplishments in her political career. Why is it that certain people discount anyone who does not have a harvard law degree. They have been running the country for years and here we are. Maybe its time to let clear thinking common sense people have a shot. Ater all they are for the most part the people who wrote the constitution of this great nation.
Anyone who thinks this is silly or a joke doesn't really know anything about Fran Drescher and is just thinking about a character she played years ago. You may choose to disagree with her politics, but "silly" she is not.
We're talking about replacing Hillary Clinton here. What were her qualifications coming in? I was married to the Governer of Arkanasas, that because of a rogue 3rd party candidate (Perot) was able to steal the white house from an extremely popular President (remember Dessert Storm). I then became first lady and tried to get universal healthcare enacted in the first year, then didn't do anything (including leave my husband) for the next 7 years. Then when his two terms was up, I moved to New York and was able to win the Senate election because Giuliani dropped out at the last minute for health reasons, despite the fact I never lived in New York before.
But, Kennedy does have a pretty good argument for taking the seat "My last name is Kennedy".
have u people even bothered too look into her credentials cause it seems that most the negative comments here are being based on her character in a TV SHOW. A TV SHOW. I'll say it one more time...a character in a TV SHOW. Now i'm not gonna say she's qualified or the right person but I can't really say that because she was the nanny or her voice is this or that she can't be a senator, maybe it'd be a good idea to find out first before you deny yourself the right to have someone who could potentially help your state. I heard from some sources that she is a very intelligent woman and has some good idea but i mean she was the nanny so maybe that doesnt matter..really???
As a Republican, I say to the Democrats: PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE let this lady have the senate seat. PLEASE!!!
It's interesting that Fran has a job with the government. Didn't know that. I'm sure she is an intelligent woman, and capable, but I would like to see Kennedy get this senate position; she has it in our genes, she understands and keeps up with politics, and she is a lawyer.
I wonder if she would be interested in being governor of Illinois?
I LOVE Fran Drescher and think she would make an excellent Senator for my state!
TexasAnnie said:
"Don't laugh about Fran Drescher. She's a very astute business woman. She wasn't just the zany actress in The Nanny, she was also the executive producer of that show as well as others. She's sort of a Lucille Ball kind of person– she could be a total screwball on screen playing a part, but behind the scenes she's a smart & tough business woman. I'd never thought of her as a political candidate, but why not? She's as bright & as qualified as many of the others either seeking that seat or already filling other Senate/House seats."
You're 100% correct.
And regarding the voice, she did put it on a bit for the character. (It's called acting people!) Her real voice is similar but not nearly so annoying.
How much is she willing to pay!
Does she still have that annoying voice and laugh? (YIPES)!!
ME TOO,
I want to take a whack at it. My long entertainment gig in comedy and band at our local pub has prepared me enough to take on senate seat.
What say you Voter?
The Kennedys have run their course. It's time for new blood in Washington politics.
By the way, the "Nanny" with the annoying voice is NOT real and is NOT running for the Senate– it's Fran Drescher, an inteligent woman with a very pleasant voice and brilliant mind.
I can't imagine, nor do I want to imagine, a Senate with both Al Franken and Fran Drescher. This Hollywoodification of our political system is a disturbing trend. Don't get me wrong, she was hilarious in This is Spinal Tap, but that's not really what I'm looking for in a Congressperson.
Actors, remember "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV." Words to live by.
Charismatic and politically active, she's no different than Sarah Palin, except that Fran Drescher is not an idiot.
NO, NO, pick me pick me. Are we just a stepping stone to every elite rich, celebrity. I loved the Nanny and Fran, But, lets get real here in New York for a change.
I weep for the future
Has anyone read Fran Dresher's book on her cancer experience? I read it when I was diagnosed with uterine cancer and she comes across as a big baby who thought that she should have all of this special treatment because she was a tv star. She is stupid and very immature and certainly not fit to be a senator.
WHAT A JOKE, FIRST CLINTON NOW THE NANNY!!!!
I would take the binder idea a step farther.
Take all the binders of all the wishful candidates and throw them up a flight of stairs. The one that gets the highest should be appointed.
Love her to pieces and she is a true advocate for health care, but I gotta say..............just when you thought Sarah Palin's voice was annoying...........
New York could possibly use a sense of humor...
Seriously, Fran has done quite a few things without a lot of media spotlight, and is an intelligent and well-spoken woman on serious issues. The "voice" on the sitcom is not her real one, although she can use it with good effect when a reporter annoys her! I don't know enough about her politics to judge her ability to be a Senator, but I'm going to warn our GOP neocons to be careful what they say about "personalities" in public office. Shaky limb there, for the party that elected the Teminator to Governor of California, the Gipper to the Presidency of the US, and "Gopher" Fred Grandy as Representative to Congress from Iowa.
Personally, I prefer Newt Gingrich. He would make a great Senator and, anyway, it seems that none of our elected officials actually live in the states they represent.
Gimme a break! Sounds like chalk on a blackboard! New York State can and must do better than this blowhard.
I heard that Mr. Belvedere was expressing interest too. I hope they both let Murphy Brown interview them.
New York is as big of a joke as Moronasota with Al Frankenfurter, the dkhead.
These celebrities need to get a grip on their egos. California elected the Terminator and now there is the termination of jobs & programs. Politics and celebrity share a common strain of egomania.
I would support Fran or Caroline. However, I think Caroline will blow her out of the water.
Well, I guess it finally happened; pigs are flying, at least seeing seats in the Senate. Was Axl Rose busy? Can anyone believe this slimeball is serious?
Seriously, are there only a few intelligent people out there? Do you think the CHARACTER Fran played on TV is her for real? The voice was a put-on for the role, she has a very nice voice in real life, and even if that were her real voice, what has that to do with anything? She's a very smart businesswoman, and I'd take her over Caroline Kennedy any day. Caroline Kennedy is the laughable candidate in this situation.
First "Stuart Smalley" (aka Al Franken) in Minnesota and now "The Nanny" in NY. The GOP is a lot worse off than I thought if the Dems can get these two in office. It must be the year of the obnoxious actor.
What is your fasination with the Kennedy's. Good grief people. Try using your brain, it may hurt at first but you will get over it.
caroline kennedy has a much nicer voice.
Senator "Nanny"???? LORD HELP US ALL!!!!!!!!
If the NewYokers need an intelligent person, they have to support Caroline Kennedy as the replacement for HRC. I hope NY governer think about intelligent people to run the country!
Oh my god.. please no! Can you imagine hearing that voice during senate meetings... arguing points? I think this is a stunt to scare people into begging for Carolyn Kennedy
So, glad I do not live in New York. Hey, if spouses can fill in for their counterparts when they've died or gone on to something better, why not Bill. At least he has held an elective office or two.
Is there anyone out there who is actually qualified and wants the job? I can't believe this is what our politics has come to – The Illinois governor trying to sell Obama's seat and now Caroline and Fran looking for the NY seat. Is it any wonder our Congress is bereft of leadership. Ladies and Gentlemen welcome to my nightmare....
Whatever floats your boat, New York. The rest of us don't care.
Oh god. Message to Mrs. Clinton>>>> Please do not resign your job , if these are the people we are going to stuck with.
I think the governor should sell the seat to the highest bidder.
She would be great.
Aren't Sonny Bono, Nancy (Miss Jane) Culp, Fred (Gopher) Grandy enough to convince us that the last thing we shaping policy and legislation is another washed up Hollywood actor?
Well heck - why not Rosie O'Donnell or Roseanne Barr? If you are going to drag the bottom of the barrel, might as well go all the way.
If she is qualified, she should be considered. We have a tough time in this country separating reality from fiction when it comes to actors. The "Nanny" is a role, and it certainly does not define Ms. Drescher.
I support Caroline Kennedy at this point, but anyone interested should have an opportunity to make their case.
She's as qualified as Sara palin
Are there some unemployed people with some administrative experience wanting to be considered for this position-celebrities, I wouldn't think are the best people for the job of Senator.
Better than a career politician.
I've actually heard her speak about her desire to pursue politics, but did not know that she was so serious. This would be a huge move from having a heart's desire to actually occupying a senate seat. But no way, no how can she ever be compared to stupid Sarah Palin, never! She may not necessairly qaulify for the position, but she dosen't deserve to be called names like Sarah Palin, that's fowl!
Don't be so shallow and make stupid cracks about her voice (especially since she didn't even use her natural voice for The Nanny!); she knows her stuff, really seems to care about people and so far has been a good diplomat. I'd take her over yet another member of the "royal family."
Why would she want Hillary's seat...personally, I think she has a better looking seat than Hillary's.
Carolyn Maloney is the best choice to replace Clinton. She has experience and credibility. She's not just a dynasty name.
Wouldn't you just love to see a debate between Palin and the Nanny at some point in the future? That would be "must see" TV.
Al Franken, Jessie Ventura, Ahnold the Terminator, I can see clearly now, Palin,,,,,,,,,,,the list goes on. The commedian's that are in office now, haven't done much better have they?
Hey we have had a president who was a worse actor, and we have had other actors as senators, why not Fran?
Fran Drescher and Caroline Kennedy are the Liberal versions of Sarah Palin.....very likeable, very sweet, very pretty,....and totally unqualified for the job.
Jenn, Springfield MA
Fran Drescher and Caroline Kennedy are the Liberal versions of Sarah Palin.....very likeable, very sweet, very pretty,....and totally unqualified for the job.
Jennifer Springfield MA
I think she has what it takes. Everyone doubted Hillary and look at what she accomplished. Fran Drescher is just as ballsy and smart, and I believe she can do a lot for the state.
If she doesn't get the New York nomination, she can always try for the vacant Illinois seat. I heard it's up for sale.
I don't think either one of them are qualified!
Fran Drescher is the only choice, as Urkel from Family Matters is currently working on another project believe it or not.
Do not discount Fran Drescher simply because she had a starring role on a television sitcom. She's a bright, savvy woman who is more than capable. And the voice she used in the sitcom is not her real voice – it's called acting!
With so many career politicians being accused of corruption or already convicted I'd welcome someone like Fran.
Good. We need intelligent women in government. While I'm about it.
Sarah Palin????????????????????????????????????????????no
INTERESTING, SHE CAN JOIN THE REST OF THE JOKER'S IN SENATE
I am trying to be open-minded, and not blame her a) for being a celebrity b) playing an annoying part. That said, I saw her interviewed on Larry King during the Obama vs Hillary period, and she seemed stupid. Granted I am anti-Hillary, but of all of the pro-Hillary supporters I saw interviewed, Fran Drescher was the least articulate and (seemingly) the least qualified to give an opinion. Now the Senate???
NO KENNEDY'S = NO POLITICS
PUT KENNEDYS BACK IN POLITICS PLEASE.
What a clown–it's not funny, Fran. Why not DO something to EARN publicity, instead of cheaply kiting on a news event?
Sleazeblall. Shame on you.
I'm fine with Fran Drescher wanting to be the Senator of NY. And Caroline is great too. Both are strong women and I'm not going to discriminate Fran's voice either. We are who we are, that's the end of it.
I don't think you can judge someone based on a character they played. She isn't a dummy. Let's hear what she has to say. If she is Palin-like forget it; if she is Clinton-like well that's not a bad thing.
I really think celebrities need to stick to what they do best... act and sing. Their lives have reached a pinnacle and they want to do more so they go into politics. It's selfish and not for the people. Frankly, it's almost disgusting.
Ahhhhhhhhhh!
I was born and raised in Brooklyn and even I cannot stand her accent!
You go girl! Fran Drescher is not any thing like the ditz she portrayed in the Nanny. She is a smart lady who knows what she is talking about. If Al Franken can run and be taken seriously, then why not Fran Dresher? Is this another example of double standards in politics? You have my vote Fran!
It sucks that Americans don't already know the other side of Ms. Drescher. She's actually much more knowledgable and savy than the average citizen.
Well, they are both actresses, and I mean, c'mon, she can't do any worse thean Hillary did. Has ANYONE looked at what Hillary has done in her Senate run? Nothing. All she did was position herself for a position of power. Remember she was not going to run for President? Why do you all get suckered by this woman?
Why not? She is no more annoying that most New York liberals.
What a Joke. Then again, does Arnold Swartznagger ring a bell.
I just cant take Fran Drescher seriously. Sorry, but I may hate her voice more than I hate Sarah Palin's.
I support Caroline Kennedy for the position.
Let's be serious, shall we?
Oh good grief are you serious! I think the US Government has put enough idiots in office..lets hope this doesn't happen..
Just another entertaining day from congressional and state leaders....it never ends. Why should we ever expect it to end??
Her real voice is NOT the one she used on television,...but it is still pretty annoying.
That said, what are her qualifications?
How will she work with others, regardless of their polictical affiliation.
Even if she is "a very astute business woman", what makes her more qualified?
That is what we should be asking.
This is a big senate seat, and I'd like someone with a bit more experience to fill the role until someone provides some information or reasons why she should be seriously considered.
What has Caroline Kennedy ever done that would make her qualified to be a US Senator?
Has even one person besides myself bothered to consider that you are not filing the seat with a character in a TV show but with The Very Real Fran Drescher. Google her and while your at it Google Caroline Kennedy.
Then you would be qualified to state an intelligent opinion instead of most of what we read above.
It's really no wonder our country is in such trouble when so many people can't even tell the difference between a TV character and the smart, talented, intelligent, REAL woman who brought the role to life. Get a grip on reality people!
Carolina Kennedy, Drescher, Franken: these are not the people that the public has "pigeon-holed" into their one dimensional public roles. They are educated, experienced, and capable. This is not reality TV. It is real life and they are real people with serious skills. Get away from the TV long enough to recognize the difference please.
P.S. FRAN ROCKS !
Wow, the inmates really are running the asylum!. With a dumbed- down populous not even realizing the peril they are in, can the end be far behind? Not long in my estimation.
"The Nanny" was a comedy but then, so is politics!! and her running for the Senate seat is about as hilarious as who this country put in the White House! WHAT A JOKE!
If an individual feels confident in their skills and ability to perform in this position, I say go for it. As much as I would love to see the Kennedy legacy continue...
Look at President elect Obama...if you believe you can do the job...
GO FOR IT!!!
My hats off to Ms. Drescher and Ms. Kennedy...may the best woman win!
Just what we need – another actor/actress in the government! You'd think that people would have learned after seeing what Gov. Arnie has done with California.
Trifling and RIDICULOUS. She was interviewed a couple of times during the Primaries and once maybe during the general by Larry King and this qualifies her to run for Senate? 'fraid not, Frannie. What makes celebs think they can be politicians after a minute as a "pundit"? The only celeb with the brains, chops, dedication and actual CONCERN about something as serious as what senators would take on is Robert Redford, and he wouldn't take a job like Senator, since he is so devoted to the environment and the land itself.
2 words for ya.....Sonny Bono
AMBER IS REALLY A REPUBLICAN, ANYONE WHO HATES THE KENNEDY'S IS A REPUBLICAN!
Fran D is not what you think she is. She is not a stupid women. She is very smart and savvy. She is very smart on alot issues, especially women's issues. I have seen her in many interviews when talking politics and she is no dud! She speaks very well with intelligence. Her voice was a character that she was playing, that is not her real voice. So stop with the whinney voice thing. Youtube her and you will hear her real voice. I would vote for her over Caroline K. Caroline K can only ride on her name. That's it!! I think we have had enough of Kennedy's to last a lifetime.
hmmmm, Caroline Kennedy, Fran Drescher (picture weighing the merits of one vs. the other in your opposing hands)...KENNEDY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The fact that a comparison even needs to be made is silly, but I had to use a visual aid to exaggerate what a joke even considering Drescher vs. someone like Kennedy is.
@ The Pecan State Pundit – Colbert the person lives in NJ and would therefore be ineligible. Colbert the fictional character depicted on tv by the real live Colbert lives in CT and would therefore also be ineligible.
Not sure where Jon Stewart lives though... That could be interesting.
As for Drescher, she's a savvy, articulate, and intelligent business woman and her "real voice" is very normal sounding. She has a bit part in Saturday Night Fever and you can hear her almost normal voice there (I think she laid the accent on a little extra heavy but no nasal).
Anyhooo – why not? And if there is ever a filibuster I'm sure her recital of the phone book would actually be funny – especially if she pulled out all of her various voices and accents.
She gets my vote under one condition......NO TALKING OR LAUGHING!
Chava –
You're sadly mistaken about Fran Drescher's voice ...
Her REAL voice IS the nasally twang ...
She went to elocution school to learn "how to" talk without it ...
But, she chose to use her real voice because it's the one that producers want her to use ...
Gov Paterson should pick Rudy Guiliani ... At least he lives in New York as opposed to Ms Drescher (whose main residence is in Los Angeles) ...
I'll trade you John Kerry and a bag of bubble gum for ......all I know is 01/20/2013 can't get here fast enough.
Fran Drescher is NOT her character(s).
Caroline Kennedy is NOT her father OR her mother.
'Nuff said.
Also, where was her voice when Speculations first began? It's like she didn't get her blind ambition until Caroline Kennedy's name was mentioned! Is she really a democrat, or is she playing one?
Only two candidates get my vote:
Jerry Nadler (the amazing brainiac effective congressman from NY), or
Fran Drescher, the amazing smart accomplished health advocate.
What hath Palin wrought?
She's more qualified than Sarah Palin
How about getting some upstaters in the mix. Put Rep. Higgins in for Hillary!
I think folks need to listen to her before you judge her. You maybe surprised.
I recently heard her speak about being named a State Department public envoy and quite honestly I was impressed. She is a very intelligent woman and handled herself and the interview very well. Maybe she can give Palin a few pointers..
I dono, I think the thoughts of a Fran Filibuster could force tons of Repubs to resign. Could this be the first step towards a 100% Democratic Congress?
She's no less qualified than some people who want the job. Paterson needs to appoint someone who's actually been north of NY City. Clinton may have been a carpetbagger when she first decided to run for the office, but, she at least has been to every county in NY several times a year – unlike many people who want the job.
Please don't... I think she's cute in an annoying sort of way. I'd hate to have have to stop liking her because she may have some hippie political bend.
She has just as much experience as Obama. NONE
SHE HAS A REGULAR VOICE PEOPLE. She was acting when she uses "the Nanny" voice. I say give her a chance. Let her do the talkshow circuit to see what she has too offer. Lord knows if folks can give Sarah Palin a chance...anyone should get a shot.
She's be great !
she needs to demonstrate that she is more than her characters
The nanny should keep her day job. I follow politics considerably, and I HAVE NEVER, NEVER heard of Fran Drescher doing any work to benefit others. On the other hand, Caroline Kennedy has been committed to raise funds for New York City public schools and other important endeavors with the most dignity, serenity and poise.
Neil Diamond was right, she is "Sweet Caroline", but effective I must add. Caroline will be the greatest senator NY deserves.
Let's support Caroline Kennedy all the way for many, many years to come.
The fact is any one that hates the KENNEDY's just happens to know them very well.
if you like them so much how would you like to go for a car rife with Teddy?
l cannot stand her voice. Oh and yes her real voice sounds the same. One time she was on Larry King and that is the same laugh very annoying. l really think that, it is just a joke.
That senate seat was for JFK, Robert K, and it should go to Carolyn Kennedy.
To Amber:
I think being a lawyer is leaps and bounds more of a qualification then what anything Fran could muster.
I will take Caroline Kennedy over the Nanny.
She would make a great Progressive US Senator and she has my support.
She has at least as much experience as the former occupant of the junior Senator's seat from Illinois.
Fran is awesome! You go girl.....Fran would have been a better choice for president, than obama. Her and Sarah Palin should run together. They are both GREAT women. Women power rules!
To Dignity & Intelligence in Office Please – Fred Thompson was in politics and held an elected office before he went into television.
Why so much hate on this board towards Fran Dresher. She may not be the best pick, but she is better then many out there. Why not pick someone who isn't a career politician who has done something good for other people.
Sure Fran was "The Nanny" – a character she played on a TV show. But this woman also has business acumen and has used her brains and success to really help others. More than can be said about many of our politicians today. In addition to women's health, she has been and advocate against violence – having been a rape victim herself. I wouldn't mind seeing someone in a senate seat who has actually done something that directly affects others than some of the other jokers that are up there.
What about Cjarlie Rangel, the ponderous Mario Cuomo, perhaps you could dig up Adam Clayton Powell.
I just have 2 words... Cou-gar!!!!! (ok, 2 syllables) Wow, it's a crazy time in politics when Fran Drescher is actuall being considered for a seat in the U.S. Senate. She definetely looks better than the rest of the stiffs you always see. Fine by me.
WOW. I'd love to see a contest between her and Palin. Everyone would be conflicted - wouldn't know WHO to vote for!!!!!!!!!!!!
Honestly, this should be decided via a special election now. All we're seeing is power play after power play where governors can skirt the laws by picking jokes like Caroline Kennedy or The Nanny.
Put the power of whom should represent citizens in the hands of citizens. If not, governors would love to become rich by picking their state's next senator (see Illinois).
Fran why dont you run for town council first instead of trying to jump to the top of the ladder first.
This can't be allowed to happen. If it does, it may set a precedent, and the next thing you know we'd get Jessie Ventura as governor of Minnesota and the terminator as governor of California!
To Joseph IRAQ WAR VET - Hmmm, you mean the way Hillary jumped to the top of the ladder by running for SENATOR FROM NEW YORK??? You mean that way?
The anthesis of a leader. She can't even act well.
What a joke! Caroline kennedy for NY Senator (qualifications: straight A's in Kindergarten) and Fran (NO qualifications). And the media was SOooo concerned Palin was not qualified!
As long as you can do the job effectively...I'm okay with either Ms. Fran Drescher or Sweet Caroline Kennedy becoming New York's new Senator.
How about someone who has worked for a living and will uphold the U.S. Constitution?
Oh, wait, that would eliminate most prominent Democrats, and a lot of Republicans as well.
If I hear the names Bush, Kennedy, Gore, or Clinton one more time I'm going to gag. (And I'm already sick of hearing Obama's name.) Let the NY Governor pIck someone no one has ever heard of, please.
I would have the Governor appoint JFK Jr. Yes, he's dead, but that would probably be an advantage for the taxpayers. You don't have to pay for bills that aren't introduced!
Caroline Kennedy all the way!!!!!!!!!!
I do not know much about Fran Drescher ,other than playing a nanny on tv,to comment about this issues! gov patterson will have a hard decison to make! Houston Tex!!
She would be worse than listening to Sarah Palin, both have very annoying voices.
Well Fran would certainly have as much experience as B.O LOL
What a fun place the Senate would be with Fran Drescher and Al Franken. C-Span would be as fun to watch as Saturday Night Live!
While we're at it, I might as well throw my hat in the ring. If Hollywood can do it, I surely can. Give me a freakin break here people. Next thing you know, the dog from the Taco Bell ads will be running. I can only take so much fun.
Thank God!! Finally a woman with a better voice to listen to than Hill...
Who woulda thunk that Fran's nasal whine would be more welcoming to the ears than Hillary's obnoxious nasal whine and/or laugh? Just replay all her cackles and you be the judge!
I'd rather look at Fran any day over the woman who sent Bill into the arms of how many women??
Fran Drescher is obviously an inteligent and astute business woman. When I have heard her speak on women's health issues or political matters, she seems both thoughtful and well informed. Is it so unbelievable that she could have political aspirations? Why is this any different than Ronald Reagan or Arnold Schwarzenegger? Sonny Bono went to the House of Representatives and Fred Thompson to the Senate. The only difference is that Fran is a woman. This kind of thinking is demonstrated by the comment that she is "easier on the eyes than Pelosi or Hillary". Fran Drescher is certainly as well qualified as many current US senators. Jim Bunning, the current KY senator who was a professional baseball player, immediately comes to mind.
Just look at Minn. That bozo tryning for the Sen seat. He thought he WAS a comedian. The only experience he has is lambashing the Rep's with his foul mouth. The residents there must have their head in the snow too long.
Jesse "The Body" Ventura was a very good Governor for MN.
Arnie's taking care of CA.
And how many "serious" polititions have been brought up on charges lately? hmmm...
Why not? I think she should get as much as a shot as anyone else.
I think Fran is a very intelligent woman, but I also think she shouldn't get into politics at the top of the level; maybe she should start out as a council woman or mayor first to get her feet wet.
Can't be any worse that the case for Minn.!
She's got style, she's got flair, and she's there. Why not?
You would have Fran start at the town council WHY?
And where did Hillary start? Decorating governor's mansions, replacing Whilte House silver ware, running hither and thon in gov't jets. Oh, yeah, and dodging bullets in scary fictional places.
Get over yourself. She wasn't qualified to run for Prez. You GIMME A BREAK, Joseph War Vet. Dude, Hilll came with no political qualifications other than the coat tails of her spouse. She will be an excellent Sec of State, in my opinion–But she learned OJT- ON the Job, and has never run for any office I've heard of.
I guess Caroline will get it becuz she also breathed White House air.
Pleeze- Be fair and honest, at least.
No one needs that laugh in Congress
Actress Fran Drescher has the skills to cleanup Washington, well maybe the laundry, the floors, etc, etc, etc. Seriously, I don't see the qualifications, I loved "The Nanny," she was hilarious, but a senator?
Fran if you still got those legs, you can still work in Hollywood. If you do that, I'll stand up and salute you every week. Forget politics, Fran, your talent lays elsewhere.
If we were supposed to take Sarah Palin seriously, I see no reason why Fran shouldn't be considered. You go girl!
I thought senators were elected by the people, not appointed by the governor. Look at the mess this privilege is causing in Chicago with their governor attempting to sell the seat–he considers it worth selling to the highest bidder.
lol she's better than Caroline thats for sure
I don't think so.
I would rather have Fran Drescher anyday than another Kennedy.I think we had enough of uncle Ted..
All movie stars and lawyers ought to be banned from any political office. They offer nothing. This country is in serious trouble because of inept lawyers (over 90% of our congress is an lawyers) trying to make laws on subject matter which they know nothing about. Then then listen to consultants who bribe them to follow "their" ill ideas – and this country suffers as a result.
I prefer Caroline Kennedy. Why does Fran want the seat?
Joseph:
And exactly what office does Caroline hold?
Fran would be an excellent addition to teh Senate. She has more personal integrity and character than Reid and his group of Senate thugs by far. Who knows? She might be the best thing that's happened to the senate in a long, long time!!
OMG...could you imagine a Fran Drescher filibuster??? It would make my dogs howl in pain (not to mention ME).
Next up: Governor Jim Belushi (D-IL). Heard the job's gonna be open.
No annoying nasal voice plz!!!!!!!!! I rather have a dignified woman like Caroline Kennedy!
Go Nanny Fran! Show 'em what you got!!
Amber, you mean she has a recongnizable national name like say Bush!!!! The father was too bad, but the son!!!! OMG what a disaster
I saw Fran on the Larry King show awhile back and this lady is one smart cookie. She is not the nutty character she played on TV. I think she would be a fine senator for New York. She's definitely better than many of the so-called politicians that are in the Senate and the House.
Ah ah ah ah ah ah ah AHHHH...that laugh...that laugh! Can't wait since I live nowhere near NY.
The Pecan State Pundit December 9th, 2008 9:18 am ET
What about Steven Colbert? Shouldn't he be considered too?
--------------------–
Stephen Colbert lives in north New Jersey not New York state. He just tapes his show in New York City.
It looks like the senate is on its way to star DOOM!
Can you imagine that laugh echoing through the walls & halls of the Capitol Building?
hey Joseph, most of america hates the Kennedys