CNN

[...] Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein on the appointment of her friend Leon Panetta as CIA director: “I was not informed about the selection of Leon Panetta to be the CIA Director. I know nothing about this, other than what I’ve read. My position has consistently been that I believe the Agency is best-served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time.” [...]

Bush kept us safe?
But not safe from himself!
Bush kept us safe?
Some Americans are so tone deaf! lol

Are some Americans still so asleep asleep as to not recognize that the worse attack on the mainland HAPPENED ON BUSH'S WATCH ...... ON 911?

3000 Americans were slaughtered on 911 ON BUSH WATCH!

How did Bush keep the tens of thousands of American LIVES, LIMBS & MENTAL HEALTH 'safe' in his UNPROVOKED Iraq bush war?

If I were Obama, what she thought would bother me for about ten seconds. He is not answerable to you Frankenstein; get over it!

Anyone with the Clintons need to know what intelligence means, I hope this lady know what she is talking about. Intelligence thse days is hard to find.

And the President-Elect doesnt choose who is Seated, he chooses a nominee. The Senate has to confirm every recommended appointment, and has a right and an obligation to question each choice and their credentials.

Checks and balances, ya know.
that is why we have a president and not a king.

I think that if Obama wants to help the country, that he should offer to work for a salary of one dollar a year. He should also not spend the tax payers money sending his children to private school that costs over 30,000 dollars a year. Every other parent in the United States has to pay for their own childs education. Lastly maybe Obama should try staying in a less expensive hotel while waiting to take control.

Diane Feinstein has been in the Senate forever.

She has a right to voice an opinion and the Clout of Seniority to Stand on it.

I think Obama can handle and respect thoughtful criticism.

I kind of like the whole American idea of debating our differences.

I see ACORN on every board...ACORN did not "steal the election." Have they even been charged with anything? All they do is register voters; they don't vote for them, for God's sake. You need ID that matches your voter registration info–how many people faked that?
The only recent election that was stolen was 2000-by the Supreme Court. Gore won the popular vote, and they GAVE it to Bush. In 2004, there were plenty of irregularities in Ohio, but Kerry chose not to put the country through another farce of a recount, and let it go.
I realize Republicans are used to getting their own way, but this time, you lost, and the country will, hopefully, return to some semblance of a country that respects its citizens, the citizens of the world, and our Constitution. Bush should have been impeached two years ago, but Pelosi was in on the torture meetings, and afraid for her own butt. So he's slid until now.

Feinstein has never liked and will never like Obama or anything he does. She is a Hillary supporter who can't get over the fact that she loss. FYI Diane to get respect you must give respect. Get over yourself Obama is the president and therefore he gets to choose and the senate confirms or not. Your dark side is showing and it's not becoming.

Reality check, I am no fan of Bush, but to lay this at his feet is a joke that has gotten dumber as the years went on and unlike your hero Bill Clinton who IGNORED multiple bombings on HIS WATCH, Bush did something:

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." - Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." - Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

These are actual quotes from Clintonista's who supposedly knew a little bit about what was going on, I have MANY more quotes from LIBERALS and OTHER Countries who talked a good game that I could post but CNN doesn't have the disk space needed,

Bush is a dolt, but he did MORE in eight years to protect us than Billyboy did and they BOTH ended their tenure with a recession.

That my friend is the real "reality".

the ones with hands on experience screwed up big time on WMD and they have cost the U.S. lives and money . shame on them . maybe he'll be better . he can't be worse

And who put you in charge Diane? I didn't realize the decision was yours.......

Who is this chick?......Please!!!

EVERY OBAMA PICK IS PART OF AN OVERALL STRATEGY!

Obama has picked the best campaign staff and won with little executive experience and you want to question his moves, now?

What may seem puzzling to us is what Obama intended. Come Jan. 20th..his picks and strategy will all fall into place.

Stay tuned...I trust Obama's strategy.

I, for one, feel that Panetta was following Bush/Cheney or should I say Cheney/Bush orders.... Just as I believe he will follow Obama's agenda! Maybe I'm wrong.... I don't think so, however.

I have never seen an incoming President whom everyone everywhere felt owed them – literally. This was an election folks, it took millions to get Barack elected. All those in D.C. think he needs to keep them informed first and their input should be of the upmost importance.

if the cia director job requires management, then the individual does not have to have intelligence/cia experience. Clearly, Panetta has management experience as he was chief of staff for clinton. In addition, he is aganist torture and has no ties to the cia community. this is important because most of the people in the cia community has ties to the current administration who believes in torture. Panetta is a good pick.

How DARE Obama make a choice without running it by the esteemed Sen. Feinstein! You'd think he was, oh I don't know, the president-elect or something.

Well, he's the one who gets to pick names and she gets to disagree. Sounds a bit like sucking on sour grapes though when she complains that she was 'not informed.'

I never for a moment thought I would be overly appreciative of any of Obama's picks but exactly what qualifies Panetta to run the CIA?

Reality Check, you really need to do a reality check; you've been reading and absorbing too much liberal propoganda from the the Obama website.....Bush kept your sorry behind safe for 8 yrs...let's see how long before Obama allows us to become a doormat...the terrorists support him not because of his questionable background of Islamic contact, but because he's spineless and they know they can run right over him...Thank God he's retaining Gates and Co., otherwise we might as well start building mosques.

Well, Diane, it appears you are in a "Need to Know sITUATION" and apparently, PE Obama didn't think you needed to know. Too bad. Guess you are not as important as you think you are. I just wish you and your cohort, Pelosi, would both see the light and get the H out of Dodge. I know what it's like having you two bozos as senators. I lived most of my life in California and I'm happy to say I NEVER VOTED FOR EITHER OF YOU!!

Sure, Feinstein, let's have one of those folks in the CIA, a so-called professional, who condones Bush policies such as water-boarding, Guantanamo, and creates such accurate great intelligence reports on pre-war Iraq. President Obama is right on to get the house organized and not pick someone inside a messed-up house.

Yeah, look Diane, we all know how much you like torture porn, but it's time to give it a rest.

People on both sides of this are missing the point. I respect Senator Feinstein and President Obama. Can't they disagree about something without people attacking either one? Can't they just be on opposite sides of this question? Obama will of course try to convince congress to accept his nominees. The Senator has a responsibility to question.

The responses on both sides of this blog represent one of the worst legecies of the Bush Administration. Vilifying those who don't agree with you.

Obama has promised to listen to all points of veiw. So far he has done nothing to hint that he will not. Lets let personal attacks be a thing of the past and focus on what is right instaed of who.

We have a"grown up" heading to the White House now. Let's follow his example.

Wow...he has little hands on experience...that's why Obama picked him! Someone that's as inexperienced as he is!~

Poor little girlie got her feelings hurt ?
Time to go back to the kitchen, honey, and leave governing this nation to the men.

Poor choice. Poor judgement. There are only three vital responsibilities of the Federal government. At the top of the list is national defense. This is a very dangerous choice.

Seems to me that it might have been a good idea to have listened BEFORE talking. Not such a good idea to second guess in her position before listening. I don't think Obama needs her approval to make the selection. Just saying...

Hooray for Senator Feinstein. Obama's all inclusive fetish is wearing thin. Somebody needs to teach this TOTALLY INEXPERIENCED JUNIOR SENATOR that you need to appoint qualified people, especially to head the CIA.

Obama is going make a bunch of giant blunders as he learns the job of President over the next 2-3 years.

This is a joke, isn't it? Who cares what Feinstein the torturer wants. She should be thrown off the committee altogether.

"Hey Now January 5th, 2009 5:14 pm ET

And the Senate would be best served by having term limits to avoid career hacks like Feinstein."

You're so right.

Sometimes an institution can become ingrown and unable to reform itself. If that is the case bringing in an outsider could be the best way forward. Those of us who do not know the details should remain open-minded and stop pretending as if we know what is best.

Wouldn't it have been more ethical for her to have conversed with the PE about this instead of talking to the press first? I don't see how this will help unite our country's citizens.

"My Friends, let me tell you", January 5th, 2009 7:41 pm ET

"Diane,didnt anyone tell you your days on that committee could be numbered"

FYI. She was just appointed Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Com. by Harry Reid. Obama has no say in the matter.

What kind of leverage does the CIA have on Feinstein?!?!

The intelligence community is waging a fierce publicity battle to retain its insular, unregulated authority, however, a new administration is the best time to purge the CIA of the undemocratic elements that have promoted domestic spying, torture, the fictionalization of national intelligence and other policies designed to oppress and wage aggressive war. I hope Panetta can manage to do some of this... And I hope a good progressive challenger for Feinstein's next Democratic primary battle can be found to unseat one of the most mediocre Senators next to Harry Reid!

Lets see, who is going to be the President here? Is it Diane Hillary Feinstein, or Barack Obama. Hmm..lets see..the last time I checked Barack Obama was elected as the next POTUS. It's his call for his intellengence chief, and not Ms. Feinstein. She either supports it or she doesnt. But if she is expecting him to clear his appointments with her before he does, then she needs to check herself. I think her wig is getting too big for her head or too tight. Either way, it's sit sitting well. Get a grip Ms. Feinstein. You are not POTUS in waiting, Barack is.

"Proud American" – How does your comment relate to the article? Oh yeah, IT DOESN'T.

Is Bozo in here? I've looked at some of the other rings. Is he in this ring? Am I at the right circus?

Sen.Feinstein is a Democrat btw...thought some you fools might want to know.

IF THIS WASN'T SO FUNNY THAT THE DEMS CAN'T GET ANY THING RIGHT IT WOULD BE TRULY SERIOUS WITH THE WORLD IN THE SHAPE IT IS!

Maria has it right....this is drama for distraction.....

The HONEYmoon is over...

WHO REALLY CARES WHAT THE OLD BAG THINKS?? HER DAYS IN THE SENATE ARE NUMBERED??? WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT OBAMA'S CHOICES,?? HE IS NOTHING BUT A WEASEL FOR THE CLINTONS.. I CANNOT WAIT TO VOTE HIM OUT OF OFFICE AND NONE TOO SOON ....

it just goes to show the emperor has no clothes... his transition has been less than stellar

Typical Democrats-Doesn't ANYBODY in the Democratic Party need any experience to lead this nation in these trying times??

Obama – president -NO EXPERIENCE
Penetta- top CIA--–NO EXPERIENCE

ON AND ON AND ON-NO EXPERIENCE

obama isnt even in office yet and the egos of reid pelosi and feinstein are rearing there heads. no wonder us dems. are always sucking hind tit. there needs to be term limits and wage roll backs.

Good for Mr Panetta,now he can get the goods on Feinstein for all her shaky-deals (steering/underwriting recommendations) with her husbands lucrative government contracts in California.This should keep her in tow, regarding the dispersment of PE Obama's ,"Stimulus Package", disproportionally going to her state,rather than evenly distributed as PE Obama would have it! PS. Mr.Panetta is also from California, but has a superior IQ,with an astute sense of pragmatism.

Obama is bringing new people to US intelligent world, thats is why is picking some new to this agency, lets give him a chance, all those other intelligent gurus fail us, the made the biggest intelligent blonder in US history.

Leon Panetta ?? this is starting to get real scary...who next, madeline halfbright ??

"Get Rid Of This One, Too"

Congress Term Limits . . . 12 year, NO Retirement !

Jenny, keep on making up those funny stories. Diane, it's time to resign.

My Friends, let me tell you, January 5th, 2009 7:41 pm ET

Diane,didnt anyone tell you your days on that committee could be numbered.Your stance on open borders and wide open ports dont make me feel any safer.
______________________________________________________
I bet you were a fan of Bill Richardson for commerce. He was for open borders. How about Napalatano living in AZ I can tell you she is for open borders.

Feinstein brings up legimitate questions in regards to this nominee.

For those who are pointing out the fact that Obama can only nominate and the Senate has to approve so he needs to listen to Feinstein need to catch a clue. Do you really think that Obama has not done his homework on votes for his noms?! How many Senators do you thinkg are already "in the bag" for Obama? I mean really...give the man some credit. If Feinstein is "out of the loop", that says more about her future on the Intelligence Committee than it says about Obama's CIA pick.

Reading these responses crack me up. Senator Feinstein who has a say in this as Obama's nominee needs to be confirmed is all of a sudden worthless, should shut up, should resign. So basically anyone who disagrees with Obama even if its the same party should not be listened to. Really read some of these posts, does everyone really think that Obama should not be questioned at all. Everything he says goes and can do no wrong? You are asking to be disappointed and are abandoning the structure of this great nation.

How in the hell could the Democratic party be imploding before Obama has even taken the oath of office!! Sen. Diane Feinstein is definitely correct on this one though! Hillary sure is building her coalition!! Wonder what dirty pool she has on Obama??

I pray that the right man be in the position. I think you do need someone who understands the minds of these secret men.

I think Senator Feinstein Needs to be replaced . Her record to this point has been lackluster and she can not show any instance where her performance justifies remaining as the committee member.

Hey Reality Check, sounds like you need one.

YOU never forget that your golden boy Clinton was in office for YEARS while Bin Laden bombed us time and again, try reading history.

He had a dozen chances to take out Bin Laden which the CIA told him was planning to strike the U.S. (Guess they got that one right, huh?), but he did'nt because he did not want to hurt his "image", sound familiar, like B.O.

Even democrats are upset at this, yet all you do is bash them because they dared to disagree with the "One".

You truly are a cult.

Okay, fine. Who should be in this spot? Wesley Clark?

Another Clinton clown picked by Obama so the left wing loons will be happy.

I think Ms Feinstein wish it was her.. since she let Obama and Hilary use her livingroom ...to meet

Leon Who??

He's got to have someone in that position with no experience; better chances of him selling us out that way.

Dianne Feinstein is right. You need experience in every field and including presidency. Barack has nothing there so naturally this nomination also has nothing. Besides his cabinet looks like Bill Clinton's cabinet. Is this a change? I thin Diane Feinstein should have stood up when they nominated Barack Obama as their presidential candidate. As we know, Obama Drama has just begun and everybody is watching. This drama will last for the next four years. It is pitiful.

Diane,didnt anyone tell you your days on that committee could be numbered.Your stance on open borders and wide open ports dont make me feel any safer.

#44 = Affirmative Action January 5th, 2009 6:49 pm ET
----------------
Just a reminder, Bush was president for 8 months before 9/11 happened, and it was HIS intelligence guy that kind of screwed up the whole thing. Bush and his administration were advised of the pending dangers, and chose to catch up on his missed reading by going back to kinder garden during the attacks on the WTC. Oh, and good job on his intelligence in regards to those WMD's...BRILLIANT RESEARCH man...really pulled that one off. Oh, and really good job on the war in Iraq...that was genius how we won that war so quickly....oh wait?

Go ahead and believe your delusional, psycopathic banter.
PS: I'm not a fan of this pick, but it really is pathetic how people like you try to duck any blame that your man caused during his horrid eight years in office.

Mike in Syracuse is just like all the other republicans still trying to claim Iraq was an intelligence failure rather than a blatant disregard of the facts by bush and cheney. Keep watching fox news mike, they have your opinion all ready to spoon feed to you.

I respectfully disagree with you Mrs. Feinstein. Obama's pick is supposed to bring a new vision in our intelligence system – is not necessarly someone that has experience in oversee torturing of prisioners SOMEONE NEW WITH A NEW VISION!!!

Al Ram January 5th, 2009 6:02 pm ET

Senator Feinstein if you want a CIA director that you like, please run for the presidency and if you win you will have the chance to appoint one. Else, accept it.
______________________________________________________

Some of you idiots need to realize that she has a say, Panetta still needs to be confirmed!

Republicans please take a deep breathe, stand back and relax. Your time has come and gone, face it you blew it. COULDN'T GET THE JOB DONE. Why don't you do the world a favor go back to sleep for about 16 years, but please shut the hell up.

People Amaze Me, folks were upset that the FEMA director had no experience because he DID A HORRIBLE JOB after Katrina!

It would not have mattered if he were competent.

Mike, Syracuse NY = Oh your the boys in the hood and medal detector racist Idiot. Should have known your a Idiot and can't tell me anything or anyone else.

Many years near the center of power but no experience on the new job. The more knowledge a person attain the sooner they learnt he or she don ,t know as much as they thought about the complexity of our intel..agancy.

Who is the Republican writing all these inaccurate and misleading headlines at CNN.com today?

"Slam"?

Franken "Claims" Victory?

Seriously, dudes, you lost. Give up.

Mike, Syracuse NY = Oh I understand you mean like when we put Republicans in those positions and they couldn't do the job? Oh thanks for educating me. Dear God what would I have done if you didn't tell me. Idiot.

So, Diane, run for president, get elected, and name your own CIA Director.

if any of you have read the 9/11 report, you know that we need a very intelligent "intelligence" person running the CIA. There's no room for mediocrity in dealing with the type of terrorists that took part in 9/11.

I DON'T CARE WHAT THIS OLD HAG HAS TO SAY. SHUTTEE ALREADY.

You are so right on the mark,, Mark. That's why boy george screwed the pooch with intelligence on Iraq, he tried to make his own. Talk about inexperience.

who cares what this woman thinks,she oviously doesn't keep up with whats going on or she would have been better informed.

Feinstein is resisting change already. Obama wants to make changes they do not want. Now Democrats will agree with changes he makes that they want, especially if it involves a Republican but Obama is attempting to make the changes he feels are needed. I suspect PE Obama's worst enemies are going to be his own Democrats. Well Feinstein was not informed in the manner to which she is accustomed. Get over it Feinstein. It is change. Obama is the incoming President and he is trying to put in place the team he needs to work. If you disagree that is fine. Run for the office and should you win then you appoint the people you want into positions and as President you will not have to call others to tell them you are going to do something. I think they will find out when they read it. Get over it Senator Feinstein and move on.

So if the logic people are using here in defense that the person doesn't need experience then why was people upset at the FEMA director after Katrina. I mean cmon why would people get upset about his experience running dog shows.

I guess she felt her toes were stepped on because she didn't get advance notice of the pick......get over it lady, and lets move on.....there is too much to do to get all uptight over a perceived slight.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein does not have the bully pulpit. Why she goes about making public statements as if she were the President make me wonder.Are you on the team or in it for yourself?

Don't lose any sleep over it Senator Feinstein, we will be voting you out of office in two years. Leon Panetta has forgot more than you will have ever learned.

I support President Elect Obama. I believe he is making the right choices – even those which may seem maybe little puzzling at the outset. Penetta for CIA Director..hmmm.....I am waiting to see how this story develops. I was hoping to see Clark have a role in the new administration.

On verra...but onward to 1/20/2009!

Democrats kill me. That's one thing I must give Republicans you can't pay them to tear each other down to the media even when they are DEAD WRONG. Leave it to Democrats. People said they wanted changed, okay. As far as 2012, don't worry, President Obama has it in the bag.

someone needs to let the PE know that CIA doesn't stand for
"Clintons In Again". They did a great job with intel when they were in office (USS Cole, 1st WTC attack, partial 2nd WTC attack, OKC). They did like to go after American citizens though (Waco, Ruby Ridge)... nice pick PE!

Not a fan of the pick. Wake up people, Obama is not king. She does have a say, has to go to a vote. The ignorance of the public is scary!!!

To barbara campbell:

Obama is selecting the same fools that brought us Sept 11. This Panetta guy was Clinton's Chief of Staff and largely responsible for the destruction of our intelligence community, which lead to the attacks. Maybe Kennedy wasn't that far off when he called him Osama!

So!Go sit in the corner bleep,I will call you when I need you.

I love Diane. She was a great Clinton Superdelegate.

I dont see the part where she "slammed" his pick.. looking for controversy, CNN?

Nothing new here, more like a puppet of the 90's. Who's in charge? Obama or the Clintons?

Look Lady! Intelligence Professionals are just people that are really smart and up to date on current events. That doesn't mean an intelligence professional HAS to be in charge of the CIA – the RIGHT person has to be in charge of the CIA. And noone has to let you know anything – Especially the Prez!

I would hardly call this a SLAM. She disagrees with Obama's selection. Big Deal.

Mike in Syracuse- Did you ever think that the reason for the appointment of Panetta is to avoid exactly what happened in the Bush adminstration . "bad intellegence"

Panetta is known as an competent, thoughtful and honest administrator. He will likely be tasked with recalibrating a completely demoralized and misused CIA.

There are many precedents of DIA directors without security background (see HW Bush)

Uhhh...Diane? If you check the Constitution, the president does not work for Congress. He is perfectly within his rights to select whomever he wants for Director of CIA. These snarky comments from you only show you as the self-aggrandizing career hack that you are. If you can't do something positive, then step out of the way. Americans in general are tired of this kind of stuff.

Who cares what she thinks, who is she anyway the maid?

Why is the story (and everyone's comments) about Feinstein's reaction to not being told, and not Panetta's obvious lack of qualifcation for this job? He has not one iota of experience in intelligence or defense, yet he's been nominated to be the country's lead spy. Doesn't anyone else find this strange or concerning? Whether he's a good guy or not, and whether Diane Feinstein approves or not, the selection is borderline dereliction of duty on Obama's part.

ahh well – who needs intelligence when you've got Obama to out-speech our enemies?

Yeah, ya know is it really too much to ask to have someone with:

A. experience in the field they will be in charge of, and

B. someone that is in no way affiliated with Bill Clinton?

I mean really, who is going to be the next SOC candidate, Cindy Sheehan? Is he using a blindfold and a dartboard? At least Mike Brown had experience with something, even if it was raising horses.

A transition team loaded with lobbyists...a cabinet already loaded with entrenched Washington politicians...and now Leon Panetta...yep, change you can believe in!

One more thing ...Diane needs to make her comments to the President Elect first rather than having a press conference. If she wants to pick, she should run for President some day, but that will never happen. Maybe she thought he should have chosen her!!! LOL

Ya ya old lady, stop crying.

Hooray Barbara Campbell! You say it so well. Let's stand behind our President Elect and let him demonstrate his abilities.

Wow!! Feinstein disagrees with Obama?? Obama is a Democrat. What's the problem??? I can see it if she was a Republican, but come on! He hasn't even taken office yet and there is a break in the ranks??? Not good.

Isn't this Obama's decision to make? Who made Feinstein queen?

Panetta wasn't put in to necessarily know intelligence, but more to clean up the problems w/n the organization. They've had so many mistakes there that they need an outstanding administrator!!!

Well said Melissa B ~ California. This article shows a snarky side of Ms. Feinstein that is unattractive. She is still a very powerful politician.

Well, this is exactly why a lot of us voted against Obama, despite his vast experience and extensive connections in Washington and throughout the world. Face it, he has no experience. Inside a good looking, well spoken man, is the same naive guy who never realized Rev. Wright was a racist. Who didn't have the acumen to see a problem (politically) with having friends like Ayers and Rezko. I know, I know... those topics are off limits. It's a buzz kill for the hope & change crowd. But now he has been elected and this part doesn't come on a script. Sad that we live in an age where popular culture guides our politics. We have declined a great deal over the last 50 years. But, it's your world and welcome to it.

This is another poor pick by Obama.
Another person who does not have the know-how to be in position that he/she is appointed for.

Thank goodness Gov. Bill Richardson is outta here! There are a couple more than should follow him out the door as soon as possible..........

Oh boy, change we can believe in!!! All you hope dopers who voted this clown into office will rue the day I am sure of that. Head of the CIA? Give me a break. What a joke this guy is turning out to be. Empty suit, racist, radical, un-american. Yeah, change we can believe in.

I would think ego and pride would take a back seat to pressing issues at this time....Ms Feinstein needs to be cooperative rather than combative....her "I just heard of this....he didn't ask me" sounds petty and childish....I would rather not have someone in that seat that is a "company" man right now....bring in new blood like Paneta that doesn't already have established loyalties and ties to those that went before him and got us into this mess. Maybe Ms Feinstein can help Paneta "learn the ropes"....oh wait, she's the NEW head of this committee....

Feinstein was a little miffed, but a "Slam". Do you people read your own copy?

To Marc

Of course Hillary won, but I'm glad Obama is the Prez. He is the better of the three candidates. He'll manage and they'll work for him.

Genius is eternal patience – Michelangelo

This is the first questionable appointment in my eyes. A man who was chief of staff to lead one of the most intriquite intelligence organization of this country.
Someone mentioned "why would someone need to have experience in intelligence? Would you choose waste management to lead your medical team. Maybe as a analyst coming in but to lead this agency? Donovan the creator of the CIA would turn over in his grave. There are many fine individuals who have served the agency with valor and understanding of the world of intell. It is a total different environment than the corporate or political environment.
Diane Feinstein as the head of the intelligence Committee has a right to question this appointment, it is her job. I voted for Pres. Obama as a Republican but may I remind the folks here we did not vote for a King or and Emporer who can deal freely, we still have congress and the senate in place for checks and balances. This is nothing against Obama but everyone can make a bad decision and no one is immune to it. He needed to get together with some of the folks on the hill especially on this appointment besides the boys from Chicago and his transition team. And all the age discriminatory comments, some day you all will be "old hacks too".

I honestly could care less what Feinstein thinks about Obama's nominations. If she knows everything, then she should have ran for President. I can't stand back seat drivers.

Who cares what Dianne Feinstein thinks? The only way she came to power was when she BECAME (not elected) Mayor of SF (which has completely lost touch with reality) after Harvey Milk and George Moscone were killed. She is irrelevant.

Not a good career move on the part of Feinstein complaining to the media.

She could spend the next 4 years in the equivalent of the Senate's woodshed.

Mrs. Frinstein what you think or feel don't really matter Mr Obama is the next president and he nominates who he wants, so when you get to be the president you can then nominate who you want also.

Those of you insulting Feinstein: How about giving a logical argument against her criticism of the pick? Between a woman saying "The CIA Director should be a person with professional intelligence experience" and someone saying "The person saying this should shut up," whose argument do you think is more convincing and logical?

And "Democratic voter" who posted at "January 5th, 2009 5:30 pm ET," As the article pointed out, Obama did not call her in the first place. She found about this pick through her aides who found out through the newspaper. If the media is how Obama lets her know about his pick, then the media is she can let Obama know what she thinks about it.

The way this is going I cant wait for 2012....then get all the crooks out after you've learned your lesson

To adequately defend and best protect our country from those who would harm us, one would expect those most seasoned and experienced in the intelligence community to be among those from whom a CIA chief is chosen. Though Leon Panetta is an outstanding American, I'm unaware of any such distinctly essential and clearly indispensable experience in his background.

pres. elect. does not have to let you know whom he is selecting. he is the pres. elect. thank you.

This Democratic administration and Congress is looking sillier every day. As in the Keystone Kops. And just to prove the point to us all, Obama has just nominated Al Franken as the Secretary of Comedy. LOL! Thank you all for making Bush look good!

Ms. Feinstein did voice her concerns to BO before he made his choice. His mistake was not informing her of his decision before making it public. After all, she is the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence committee. Another sign that BO does not have total respect for women or the proper political protocol to be president. Ted, John Kerry, talk to your puppet – pull those strings in before he does more damage to the democrats he needs on his side.

Dianne Feinstein is a smart woman. She should be respected as a senior member of the senate. I am proud to have her represent California.

Who cares if Feinstein agree....Last time I checked Obama was the President Elect. I'm sure he is going to make alot of decisions the old crew will not like but change is never easy........ PE the majority of the people are behind you!!!!!!!

Don't judge the man before he is even in office. Just because he doesn't have experience in the intelligence field isn't a foregone conclusion he will not be efficient in performing what is necessary for the position. Anyone going into a new position will be a novice until they have been in that position for awhile. Give the man and all the others he has chosen a chance before screaming "help".

Who's picking all these people Clinton or Obama its going to be Clinton years for the next 4 years and that wasn't great big change huh maybe next he might pick Monica for a title

Nothing inappropriate about a Senator responsible for intelligence matters (Feinstein) becing consulted first, before an appointment was made; nor is it inappropriate for her, as said senator, to voice her objection and the reasoning for it (which she did) Some of you supporting Obama seem to think it necessary to "destroy" verbally any credibility in a belief in the Constitutional doctrine of balance of power. The President represents the Executive Branch, one important part of our government. Senators and House Representatives were originally intended, by our Founders, as representing the most important branch - Congress. So, why not educate yourselves a little more and shoot off at the mouth a little less about issues some of you seem unbelievable ignorant of.

LOL...pretty soon the only person in this administration that is not from the Clinton administration will be Obama. So, Hillary really did win this thing after all!

She can reject this position for all I care, LOL!! What is she gonna do, huh? Give a essay on how to be a member of the CIA?? LOL!!!

Wow, I'm scarred of her, she looks more tough than Gov Palin...

To adequately defend and best protect our country from those who would harm us, one would expect those americans most seasoned and experienced in the intelligence community to be among those from whom a CIA chief is chosen. I'm unaware of any such distinctly essential and clearly indispensable experience in Leon Panetta's background.

Feinstein needs to shut up and keep quiet or she will get the boot. She's another useless politician and we need to bring in people that know how to fix our problems and Barack has done a great with that thus far.

Senator Feinstein, since when does President elect Obama needed your permission? I'm a Democrat and the people that voters choose in California amazes me...Regan, Nancy, Arnold...I agree with Dr. Miami that all elected officials should be termed limited...We always need new and fresh blood in there..We are in the 21st century and have members of congress who are still thinking the way they did in the 19th and 20th century's..Some so old that they need help getting to the podium...LOL

Did the chairman of all of the other committees know of the selections before they were announced? Probably not. She seems to think she was slighted because of her importance but maybe they have a policy of not telling anyone outside of their circle to keep leaks from spilling out. She should be supporting her President now more than at any other time. Did she want the job herself?

What a surprise that Obama doesn't know what he's doing! It takes more than "hope" and a slogan to actually be the president. Look at his resume! (Oh, there isn't one.) Didn't any of you learn ANYTHING from the failure of the Bush presidency? You just elected jimmy carter back into office because he promised everything would be wonderful (again). “Those who don't learn from history, are doomed to repeat it”.

Sen. Feinstein's idea of a worthy nominee was John Roberts for Chief Justice. It should also be recalled that she was an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton as the party's nominee. Thanks, Dianne, for going so far out of your way to criticize publicly our next President. Perhaps you should keep your ego and your unfortunate self-serving opinions to yourself.

Senator Feinstein if you want a CIA director that you like, please run for the presidency and if you win you will have the chance to appoint one. Else, accept it.

Oh, I didn't realize she has to approve. I still think her "I am God" attitute isn't going to help her any. She should have listened BEFORE she spoke out.

Based on what I have seen so far he or really anyone else could do no worse. Maybe we need someone who doesn't have a lot of " intelligence experience" to run the department the right way.

@ Maria

I hardly think Feinstein's bitter blather bothers the rest of the Senate. It's just sour grapes that she didn't get the nod...well, that and a little free press via some fabricated controversy.

I didnt know that the President Elect had to check with Senator Fienstein on the decisions of the people he wants in his cabinet, Not who she feels has the most experience as head of the Intelligence Committee.

If anybody thinks that Obama marches to the beat of a master, you are simply clueless!

And if you think he is inexperienced, you are brain dead!

Feinstein just does not get it......

Obama is not her boy, but her Master!

Respect isn't handed out. It's earned. And I think with her lifetime of experience, she has every right to chastise the incoming President elect. His total lack of respect for her, is evidenced in his lack of communication.

David Axelrod can run your campaign, but now you've got to run your administration.

When will he be vetted?

Giving pretty, rhetorical speeches on race will earn my attention...but not my respect.

You're no messiah.

Why can't everyone just chill and give Obama and his cabinet picks a little time. I mean after all some of you idots gave Bush a second term.....so shut up!!!!!!

Who care what Feinstein say she need to get kick out door feinstein need to be in the unemployment line who do she think she is.

In response to some posts here – the senate must approve cabinet level appointments as well as certain agency appointments – this is to balance the power between the Legislative and Executive branch – it is scary how people feel qualified to dismiss what Senator Feinstein states when she is only doing her job – without senate approval no high ranking cabinet, etc. appointment can be made – It is even scarier how little so many Obama supporters know about how our founding father's set up our three branch system of government and how the "process" actually works

Is this the change that was voted for? Is this the reaching across party lines we voted for? Even Dems are posting here in a very divisive way further demonstrating it is D v R. Well done, President Clinton...I mean Obama. Blind loyalty yet again.

Go Senator Feinsten!

Barack Obama promised to reach across the aisle to make important decisions. Surprise, surprise. So far he's only demonstrated that he willing to across the aisle to appease Republicans while giving the back of his hand to his own party (as in Feinstein) or throwing them under the proverbial bus (as in the GLBT community and the selection of Rick Warren to participate in the inauguration).

Those who are criticizing Feinstein should check their constiution. Panetta must be approved by the Senate – and, along the way, by the Feinstein's Intelligence Committee.

@ Van

Not long enough...but thankfully, he gets to try for another 4 as well.

Who is she (or who does she think she is) to demand that she know in advance and approve of an appointment?

It is bizarre to watch PE Obama filling the cabinet by shoehorning Clinton retreads into positions for they are poorly suited. These clearly are not the best that can be had and it just emphasizes that these appointments are being made as political horse trading and payback. I had hoped for a merit based approach, but those hopes are fading fast. We will all suffer for this continuation of politics as usual.

Or.. in the words of Jerry Seinfeld... the very fact that you're opposed to this makes me think it's a good idea.

Obama just needs someone to collect information for him. The CIA Director does not have the final say. It's Obama.

Difi just wants someone she and her husband know in that position so they can funnel more intel money into her retirement account.

Leon Panetta is a decent and honourable man, exactly what the CIA needs.

TIME TO UNCHAIR THE OLD CROW.

THEN SHE CAN GO IN THE FIELD WITH THE OTHER

CROWS & CROW AS MUCH AS SHE WANTS. ALZHEIMERS

SETTING IN. WE ELECTED OBAMA PRESIDENT, NOT HER.

SHE IS A GREAT EXAMPLE FOR SENATE TERM LIMITS.

I agree with Feinstein. We are in precarius times. We can't have someone "making it up as he goes". This was a poor choice for the head of the CIA.

Besides, terrorists first bombed the World Trade Center in 1993. Clinton's watch. They failed and spent the next 8 years perfecting the next attack, which sadly, went off without a hitch. These people did not just wake up on 9/11/01 and say, "Let's go hijack some planes."

I for one would feel alot safer with another choice in the CIA who will keep us all safe from future attacks.

Go ahead Proud American. Call me an Idiot.

Please, you must not question the GREAT ONE.

Welcome back to the Clinton Administration! No fooling around with cigars Mr. Obama

This is coming from the woman who rolled over time and again for Bush... Go away lady!

Oh dear, Panetta is fine for the position. We need someone who can manage and coordinate these departments. Panetta will do a great job. Obama has three strong KNOTS backing him up (Gates, Jones and Clinton) already. There is nothing to fear. He cant be any WORSE than that other previous director that had gottena MEDAL from Bush.

Good. Bring back the check and balance between these two branches. We missed that during the Bush administration..

Democratic Voter, what's wrong with transparency? Isn't that what the Obameister wanted. Well, he got it!

And - let's see. Bush made ALL the right cabinet choices, right? Remember him? The guy who's STILL in office and STILL in charge and STILL responsible for all things that happen (i.e. "the buck stops here - unless I'm a Republican"). It seems Bush had to REPLACE WRONG CHOICES several times during the past 8 years. Too many to count. Those who weren't replaced mucked up so badly they needed to be replaced.

Give Obama a chance. Stop being the armchair quarterbacks it seems ALL of you think you are. As one brilliant poster said here - if you know so much, why didn't you run for president? You might have gotten 2 or 3 votes - if your relatives are allowed to vote.

Still mad that her choice( Hillary) didn't win. Why would anyone make her head of the intelligence committee anyway?

Democrats eviscerated the CIA and the result was 9-11. So let's appoint a political operative who knows nothing about the Intelligence world to head the CIA.

Geez...usually HISTORY dictates whether a president is great or not...NOT bloggers.

I concur that Leon Panetta, although I like him personally, doesn't have the know how to be CIA Chief.

What a time for inexperience....with all of his good picks, this one is not only surprising, but worrisome.

President-elect Obama demonstrated his judgment, intelligence, and political skills in running the best election campaign in history, defeating the Clinton machine and rising above everything the Republicans threw at him (or made up about him).

He's now applying his intelligence and skills, in consultation with knowledgeable advisers, to the decisions he has to make. Everyone from Dianne Feinstein to ignorant bloggers are second-guessing his decisions, thinking they know better, before he's even taken office.

Rather than bicker over every move Obama makes, let's give him our support at this critical time in history and wait to see how he and his staff go about running the country.

I suspect that most of the critical comments on these blogs originate with Republican talking points or Republican hostility toward Democrats in general. We have become a very angry, divided country over the last eight years.

There's no fool like an old fool.

I find these comments amusing – Most posters fail to realize that the Senate must approve the appointments as CIA director – that is why the President can only NOMINATE the candidate. If this appointment does not get the Senate's approval Mr. Panetta will not get the position – It's called "Balance of Power" – it's what our founding father's fought for to prevent any President from having too much power – sorry Obama supporters – he will merely be President, not King.

@dr.mimi de la cruz,
California already has term limits, so unless Feinstein watches her step now before she runs for a different office in the future, she'll be on the losing end quicker than you can say Eureka!

California is cursed with two idiotic socialist senators. As someone else on this board said, they present an excellent case for term limits. Because George Soros and ACORN stole the elections for the libs does not make them qualified to sit on the intelligence committee.

Ms. Feinstein needs to shut up. She pushed Michael Mukasey on us and has the nerve to complain about anything?

Maybe Feinstein should run for president and win. Then she can pick whoever she wants.

Jenny-
No person in this world could ever make Bush look good.

If people really understood what this position is and what is required for success, they'd be praising Feinstein to high heaven for what she's saying. Putting someone into this top job who is NOT an intelligence professional is going to be a major problem...this is NOT a job for a bureaucrat.

While I also belive Obama should have picked someone with experience in itelligence Its his choice who he picks. Yes it would have been right to inform the itelligence committe chairman of his choice but ultimately Obama makes the final decision for his administration. The Senate will have there day with hearings and will have the ultimate decision as whether to confirm him.

Matt... it's going to be a LONG 4 years for all of us.

JOHN WHITE spell "no" correctly.

Change? Where is the "change?"

We have people in this world trying to kill us every day. I am sure the
"dark" side is excited to know we just appointed a politician to head the CIA! I actually was beginning to feel good about Obama and his
choices until this blunder. God help us all.

Certainly another Clinton Administration veteran will bring new spice to our covert operations, considering their experience in them. Probably bring some pretty nifty fundraising skills, too.

Dianne Feinstein should show a little more respect for our newly elected president and stop her tongue-wagging, before she finds that the Californians who elected her decide that they've had enough of her questionable leadership and badly timed remarks, and end her career as a politician in the Golden State. Maybe she is disappointed she didn't get the job, but when in doubt Dianne–shut your pie hole!

TexAnnie. I bet you've NEVER made any bad comments about Bush right? Things will be coming at Obama faster and faster now. He won't have weeks to think about everything move. He'll have to either react faster, or we all go down. You're starting to see why experience matters. The CIA isn't just another typical political appointee's job. As we saw in Iraq, bad intelligence can cause mistakes. Put an amateur in charge, and you are just asking for trouble.

I don't like this pick either and I tend to agree with Feinstein, who I deeply respect. I wish the Obama team would have contacted her first about this pick. Still, I think that if the Obama team picked this man I want to give him the benefit of the doubt and I think Feinstein should too.

I forgot; who is the President-Elect?

Do you really want to listen to this war-monger???

Oh yes, he will be respected, you don't come out of Chicago politics and be weak. He's bidding his time until inaugeration. After that, I'm sure some of these spotting off cngressmen and women will be told behind closed doors, something akin to the metaphor of the "train", you can ride on the train or you can be part of the tracks, either way the train is comimg through.

Do you really want to listen to this war-monger Feinstein?

WHO IS PRESIDENT ?BILL CLINTON?????

Vote for change, whats' changing? Same old weary faces.

Well...I think california deserves a person of integrity representing them...why isn't Feinstein resigning?

Sincerely,
Californian who HATES Feinstein (what a waste of flesh that lady is!)

HE'S BARACK HE CAN DO KNOW HARM! LETS CONCENTRATE ON THE BIGGER ISSUES PEOPLE. HATERS WILL BE HATERS AND ANYBODY DISSIN OBAMA IS A HATER. GO BARACK THE BEST PRESIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY! WATCH!

@ Tim

If you think Obama does not have "well honed political skills" then you have NOT been paying attention. Seriously. He obliterated the entire GOP...admittedly with a nice dose of help from the last 8 years of GOP control...but he spun the entire political game in this country on its head and is continuing to do so.

It's gonna be a long 4 years for some of you people.

Lucky you Feinstein you objected to this as aSenator, but the moderator of this forum would have nixed you if you posted a comment. long live fascism at CNN

I'm confused did Bill Clinton get elected again?,Seems to be a huge amount of reruns that were not stars in their last jobs.

Wow . . . how arrogant is that on Feinstein's part? I wish I could handle the "official response" to this one......LOL

"Senator Feinstein's advice was not required for PE Obama to make the decision on his next CIA Direstor. Ms. Feinsteins views are well documented and known to the Transition Team. Sen. Feinstein's only input to the decision is the one vote she holds in the confirmation process."

When pressed for details, the spokesman offered this additional observation, "If Ms. Feinstein wants to name a cabinet, she needs to run for executive office."

Good for Al, he did not let Coleman steal his seat. You just cant be nice with Republican politicians, you know what they say, "you give them an inch, they will take a mile."

Not this time.

She's a very liberal, but a very smart individual. I agree with the California Senator's statements. I would never support Barbara Boxer, but I more than definitely agree with her on this issue.

Panetta didn't serve well in the Clinton Administration, so why would he do any better in an Obama Administration?

Oh...and that remind me, here's ANOTHER member of Clinton's cabinet coming into Obama's. Come on President-Elect Obama, be yourself. Don't follow Bill Clinton's horrid path.

SO WHAT DIANE!!!

Sen. Feinstein. You forgot, experience doesn't matter, just judgement. Don't worry, I'm sure they'll have another gallon of Obama koolade to you ASAP.

She "slammed" him? Exaggeration much?

I think what she meant to say was "My position has consistently been that I believe the Agency is best-served by having ME in charge at this time.”

I think ms. feinstein forgot who's the president, and who's the senator. Back off Di.

Penatta was picked for his organizational and business skills. He's a great organizer and I do believe the CIA needs a lot of revamping!!!

She looks like she is having a hissy fit in this picture. Is she still mad that Hillary wasn't the presidential nominee? Just curious what her qualification are .... In 1985, at a press conference, she revealed details about the hunt for Richard Ramírez, otherwise known as the Night Stalker, and in so doing angered detectives by giving away details of his crimes, including displaying actual evidence at the press conference. These revelations subverted their investigation and Ramirez left the San Francisco area to commit another murder before he was finally captured in the Los Angeles area

pretty darn scary!!!!

I DONT CARE

she's just mad because she found out by reading the NY TImes... guess what Sen. Feinstein, YOU are not the one we elected to make there choices!

I've said from the start that i didn't believe the "old guard" dems wanted Obama but they knew he was their best shot at the White House. Repubs didnt want Palin but they needed the christian/womens votes. You can put on a fresh coat of paint but its still an old house....

Methinks someone is angry she wasn't nominated.

I've always said Obama had poor judgement. Here's yet another example.

Ms. Feinstein could have found a better way to communicate with Mr. Obama about her concerns. It's not like there aren't enough communications devices. Last time I looked, phones seemed to work pretty well.

You all are all such experts on everything political. Maybe one of you should have run for President. I'm sure you would have gotten at least 2 or 3 votes.

He was the chief of staff, in the clinton years, so he's got experience.

My understanding, PE Obama dosen't need the approval of Congress in making his Cabinet Selections.

Congress has the authority to "DISMISS" any Appointment, once the Appointment comes before them!

WHERE WAS THE OLD HACK WHEN BUSH WAS TARING

THE CONSTITUTION & OUR ECONOMY TO PIECES ???

It would be better to consult with the committees on the hill

proud American- you don't have to be GOP to read what is going on. You must be an idiot not to see.

Nice. No intelligence "experience". Bush's war in Iraq is loaded with people like this. Probably good people, but don't have the experience for the job. History always seems to repeat itself

Obama's inexperience is showing already.

Even Diane Feinstein knows that was a BAD CHOICE. Why don't they just bring back Slick Willy as President seeing how Obama's has picked all his cabinet members from that administration.

I thought Barry was different than the other lying politicians...his change isn't change.

WE HAVE TO PUT IN SENATE TERM LIMITS.

THAT WOULD GET RID OF HACKS LIKE FEINSTINE WHO

THINK THE PRESIDENT IS AT THEIR BECK & CALLING.

I wish all our politicians would just stop with the knee jerk reactions everytime PE Obama makes a decision. Shut up already and hear the man out.

Thank God someone in Washington has sense! Of course you hire a person with the actual skills and training and experience to do the job they are hired to do...you want an intelligence leader, you look for someone with that kind of background...not someone from a totally different professional background...like economics.

What is going on with these ludicrous appointments...oh, I know...Obama must be repaying big contributors to his campaign by putting people in jobs they aren't qualified for...didn't people say that Bush did that? And wasn't all that supposed to change with a new administration? Big change!

In fact, Obama is making Bush look good.

Mr. Obama has now become so obvious. The puppet marches to the beat. To do this just blew your cover. You are just the posterboy.

Not a big Feinstein fan myself, But I have to agree with her! (ouch that hurts)!

FINALLY...something I and my Senator agree on...

Proud American–why don't you contribute something intelligent for once, instead of your partisan drivel?

Leon Panetta is one of the most intelligence, resourceful, and HONEST people ever to have been a public servant. I welcome his return to public service. There's no one I'd trust more at the helm of CIA. Get over it Feinstein....only reason for you to take this public is you are miffed you didn't get "consulted". The president elect doesn't consult on his picks with congress madam. Get on board or get run over by the train of progress!

Is this the same Feinstein, who was hesitant on what torture is and not.

MAYBE OUR PEBO DIDN'T GET THE MEMO THAT HE NEEDS TO

CONFER WITH FEINESTEIN BEFORE MAKING ANY APPOINTMENTS.

AFTER ALL SHE IS A SENATOR & HE IS MERELY THE PRESIDENT.

Yet another politician with "hoof in mouth" disease! Surprising! It is always best to be swift hear and slow to speak. I take it Ms. Feinstein didn't learn that one!

Proud American, Can you do anything else but call Republicans idiots? Not vetting a choice with the relevant committee chair is an amateur mistake, and won't be Obama's last. It's what you get when you put someone without the right experience in a job that's over his head.

Well Dianne...

When your the President you can make the choices that you think are the best

Until then, just do your job

Ouch.

Why do you need someone with intelligence experience to run our intelligence office? We picked someone without well honed political skills or foreign policy skills to run the country.

The only idiots are Panetta and Obama for thinking Panetta is up to doing this job.

Oops. Forget to kiss the right butts Obama?

More power to you Dianne !

I never thought I would ever agree with her on anything.

Is she worried that he's Catholic? Really – I have to worry about what's Not being said here.

Very odd that President Obama didn't speak with the incoming Chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Something seems wrong with this picture as he has been so transparent up to this point that this appointment seems to go against his previous actions.

And the Senate would be best served by having term limits to avoid career hacks like Feinstein.

operation chaos. i love it!

Feinstein needs to be quiet and LISTEN before she speaks. A sign that PE Obama will not be respected. Pitiful.

Republicans please don't read something else into this. I can just see you Idiots now.

Feinstein? Intelligence? FAIL

Scariest part is that I agree with her. Yikes.