CNN Political Ticker
1132 days ago

Obama to name 'chief performance officer'

Barack Obama has selected Nancy Killefer to be his CPO, according to two Democratic officials.
Barack Obama has selected Nancy Killefer to be his CPO, according to two Democratic officials.

(CNN) - Two Democratic officials confirm Nancy Killefer will be unveiled as chief performance officer, a newly-created position focused on bringing back fiscal order. The official announcement will be made at 10:15 a.m. in Washington.

Killefer is currently an official at McKinsey & Company.

Full story


Filed under: Obama transition
soundoff (89 Responses)
  1. Susie

    I wish her well, and I hope she knows what she's doing!

    January 7, 2009 09:11 am at 9:11 am |
  2. MD

    The Obama administration is quickly resembling a Third World government, with a huge compliment of Ministers/Secretaries with overlapping responsibilities whose performance does nothing but create other Third World ministries.

    Change We Can Believe In.

    January 7, 2009 09:12 am at 9:12 am |
  3. Dawn

    Someone has to keep a watch on the fiscal spending. The United States need to have to get back our dignity,

    January 7, 2009 09:19 am at 9:19 am |
  4. watcher

    Chief Performance Officer? Is that more like the Administration Administrator, Oversight Overseer or Committee Commissioner?
    Looks like we'll be getting our $1 trillion's worth...NOT!!
    What a transparent phony.

    January 7, 2009 09:19 am at 9:19 am |
  5. Steve

    I wonder how much that job pays. And what exactly does "bringing back fiscal order" mean? We voted for Obama so he would give us money. Is that "fiscal order"? No. But we need money.

    January 7, 2009 09:24 am at 9:24 am |
  6. Joe in NJ

    "The CPO will 'help put us on a path to fiscal discipline,' a Democratic official said. "

    Shouldn't each government agency be responsible for their own fiscal discipline? And surprise! Killefer was part of the Clinton adminstration.

    January 7, 2009 09:26 am at 9:26 am |
  7. Super D

    This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of new big government.

    The DEMS don't have a clue.

    January 7, 2009 09:26 am at 9:26 am |
  8. Diana, MI

    @MD
    If Bush had done his job appropriately, we wouldn't need such oversight.

    Barack is right, we are inheriting the problems of a corrupt and inept administration. He has to do whatever it takes to "right" all the wrongs of Karl Rove, Cheney and the other Bush henchmen.

    Bravo Obama, we are with you.

    January 7, 2009 09:29 am at 9:29 am |
  9. KJL

    Er....... Could we have a look at the job description?

    January 7, 2009 09:30 am at 9:30 am |
  10. sky

    yeah, I even thought it was a bit tacky....and I can't stand this woman.

    January 7, 2009 09:30 am at 9:30 am |
  11. Ken

    OK with the CPO. May be a good idea we can get behind to support our President Elect.

    Sanjay is a great guy and certainly a very fine physician. I sincerely admire his stepping into the neuro OR during one of his Iraq visits but adviser to Hillary during her health care reform debacle is no reference for him to be SG.

    What's next "Legal Zoom" for Attorney General?

    January 7, 2009 09:33 am at 9:33 am |
  12. Virginia

    Another Chicago cronie, perhaps???

    January 7, 2009 09:36 am at 9:36 am |
  13. Newport News, VA

    If republicnas are so big on fiscal discipline, why didn't their republican president appoint this position in his administration?

    January 7, 2009 09:36 am at 9:36 am |
  14. Kurt C.

    Let's just make up a slew of new positions to give out to political friends and cronies.

    January 7, 2009 09:37 am at 9:37 am |
  15. Matt in CT

    Wonderful – let's bring back fiscal order by creating another government job with paid benefits, etc. Atta boy.

    January 7, 2009 09:38 am at 9:38 am |
  16. Baze

    I don't care about this junk anymore. Let's get to 1.20 already.

    January 7, 2009 09:38 am at 9:38 am |
  17. Tony

    Just how big is this government going to get? I guess the government doesn't have to cut back on expenses while the rest of us do. Way to go Obama. Already starting to spend more than you should. Why don't you look at the existing government agencies and revamp them or does making people do their jobs make too much sense?

    January 7, 2009 09:38 am at 9:38 am |
  18. Matthew

    MD, are you kidding? Having someone ensure that there is fiscal continuity and responsibility is hardly a ministry... I'm sure that she is only going to be giving the president advice on how to bring back some fical responsibility into the governing process. Something that has been sorely lacking ...since the Clinton administration!

    January 7, 2009 09:43 am at 9:43 am |
  19. B.O by any other name is still b.o.

    And the building of government bureaucracy begins. Sign of a good leader, throw money and people at the problem. How much thought did that one take??

    No wonder they are called "Dimocrats"

    January 7, 2009 09:47 am at 9:47 am |
  20. Tim

    Hey, my comment disappeared. Maybe it was secretly renditioned to a third country.

    Anyway, this is a good idea. I'm qualified, appoint me.

    January 7, 2009 09:47 am at 9:47 am |
  21. hmike

    with the appoinment of Nancy Kellifer as "performance czarina" will that mean the redundant position of " Inspector General " be eliminated?

    January 7, 2009 09:48 am at 9:48 am |
  22. John in Ohio

    I think it's great that, unlike so many previous presidents, Obama is actually going to be keeping an eye on your money and how its spent, instead of through contracts left and right to political contributors.

    January 7, 2009 09:49 am at 9:49 am |
  23. 1/20/13

    Let the big government begin so he can talk about job creation........What a waste

    January 7, 2009 09:49 am at 9:49 am |
  24. Kevin in Ohio

    Mor and more bureaucracy and bigger government. this should be a suprprise to no one.

    January 7, 2009 09:51 am at 9:51 am |
  25. hmike

    not to get off the subject but, Has the Pentagon given any thought to removing American Naval ships away from the med? Any one with a 1967 history book might remember how the USS Liberty was treated by our Allies when witnessing that conflict in the same area.

    January 7, 2009 09:54 am at 9:54 am |
  26. Scott

    And just how much of our tax paying dollars is going to go towards this twit's salary?

    January 7, 2009 09:54 am at 9:54 am |
  27. Pat F

    He needs a Chief Gimmick Officer, from what I've seen so far. Panetta at Intelligence with NO intelligence experience? Sanjay Gupta as Surgeon General – at 39 years old? What's next – Ty Penningon at Housing and Urban Development? Paris Hilton as Commerce Secretary?

    January 7, 2009 09:56 am at 9:56 am |
  28. Independent In NY

    Suck it up neo-thugs !!!

    January 7, 2009 10:03 am at 10:03 am |
  29. S Callahan

    Ok...I now know her name, and where she works. Now tell me...
    who is she? What is her background? Tell us a little about her and how she can be vital? What's her vision?

    January 7, 2009 10:03 am at 10:03 am |
  30. liz

    The government already spends 25% of its budget to track where the other 75% goes. That move was made to keep tabs on fraudulent operators that were bilking about 2% from the gov't with underhanded dealings on contracts. More gov't efficiency for ya.

    January 7, 2009 10:08 am at 10:08 am |
  31. That Other Jerry

    Maybe this will turn out to be a smart move, but at the moment it seems redundant. "Chief Performance Officer"–didn't we used to call that person the President?

    January 7, 2009 10:08 am at 10:08 am |
  32. RealityKing

    Clearly Obama doesn't believe in fiscal order..., I mean just yesterday he promised us trillion dollar ear marked deficit spending for years to come. No, theres no liberal change here.

    January 7, 2009 10:09 am at 10:09 am |
  33. Laverne

    This may be a revelation to some, but we are in the biggest financial deficit this country has ever faced and this mostly happened while on the republicans watch who say they are fiscally responsible. Obama has to do BOLD and BIG things in order to try and get this country moving in the right direction. Some say, well how is spending more money going to help, well it may not make sense, but it is just like when you get vacinated with the same disease you are trying to prevent. Not sure why it works, but it does! At least Obama is attempting to do something besides playing the blame game. He has a VISION for this country and it is his vision. He is choosing excellent people to help him carry his vision out and I applaud him for being courageous in a time such as this. May God Bless him and Keep him!

    January 7, 2009 10:11 am at 10:11 am |
  34. RealityKing

    Meanwhile...,

    U.S. budget deficit in 2009 will rise to record $1.2 trillion, or 8.3% of GDP, NOT COUNTING any Obama stimulus, government estimates.

    January 7, 2009 10:12 am at 10:12 am |
  35. Steve

    This is about the Palin story this morning. I saw so many liberal posts slamming Palin for crying foul and how Levi needed to play by the rules. Well, that's fine, I agree that he should get his education and scrape by the best he can. However, I think Palin has a valid point.... the ONLY reason this was reported in the news was to make her look bad. That is the ONLY reason. Why else would anyone care? I mean, seriously, why?

    January 7, 2009 10:13 am at 10:13 am |
  36. Jack

    Isn't the President the "CPO" in our government?

    January 7, 2009 10:13 am at 10:13 am |
  37. Mike, Syracuse NY

    I guess Obama is tackling unemployment one person at a time by creating all these informal czars and officers. Every position created already has a corresponding cabinet official who is supposed to do that job. How is this suppoesed to work without a lot of confusion? Maybe they will all just be one big committee. Of course we all know the camel is a horse designed by a committee.

    January 7, 2009 10:13 am at 10:13 am |
  38. 13 Days To Go

    The usual crew of naysayers just can't stand the fact that PE Obama is doing exactly what he said he would do and exactly what is right to provide oversight and transparency.

    January 7, 2009 10:13 am at 10:13 am |
  39. Charles

    Let the spending begin...

    January 7, 2009 10:18 am at 10:18 am |
  40. NEL E BELL

    IS THIS REALLY NECESSARY? OBAMA, IS SO FAR NOT DONE ANYTHING BUT PROMISE DEEPER NATIONAL DEBT AND TAX CUTS FOR TRUELY WHAT. IS THIS RESSION ANY WORSE THAN ANYOTHER RECESSTION? I ASK THE READERS THIS COULDN'T WE WORK OUR WAY OUT SLOWLY RATHER THAN A METEORIC RUSH. FROM WHAT I'VE LEARN IN LIFE SLOW AND STEADY WORKS LONGER THAN SPEEDY AND WASTEFUL.

    January 7, 2009 10:19 am at 10:19 am |
  41. Larry in Houston

    Diana in MI , you're right on this one !!
    Thanks,

    January 7, 2009 10:27 am at 10:27 am |
  42. james4833

    What possible good could this position do? Performance and good government is an oxymoron. Obama is dreaming if he thinks he will crack this nut or hold anyone within the federal Government accountable for anything. Our congressmen being held accountable really works, doesn't it?

    January 7, 2009 10:27 am at 10:27 am |
  43. Allen

    Besides I always thought the CPO was the president? What's Obama gonna do?

    January 7, 2009 10:28 am at 10:28 am |
  44. jj

    All of the board to which Bush made last minute appointments to long term vacancies should be abolished right away. Obama's efficiency expert should focus first on those boards and commissions and abolish them now and think in the future about any replacement for the boards and commissions.

    Bush makes last-minute appointments
    President Bush made another round of last-minute appointments Tuesday, giving 45 aides, supporters and others a parting gift as he leaves office: presidential appointments to boards and councils, with terms lasting three to six years after he leaves office.

    January 7, 2009 10:32 am at 10:32 am |
  45. Sweetie

    What an absolute Joke!

    I'd laugh if I didn't really feel like crying!

    Clearly this green horn is so caught up in his own press that he doesn't realize he is duplicating positions and creating confusion when it isn't necessary.

    Doesn’t anyone around him tell him the score?

    January 7, 2009 10:33 am at 10:33 am |
  46. mcl

    Did anyone see the report about Al Queida is blaming obama for the war over there in Iseral? They could'nt be far from the truth. The guy stinks with loathing for this Country....................................

    January 7, 2009 10:35 am at 10:35 am |
  47. WILEY COYOTE super GENIOUS

    FOR ALL THE OBAMABOTS LET ME REMIND YOU HE ONLY GIVES GREAT SPEECHES WHEN HE LECTURES YOU ON RACE AND AMBIGUITIES. ON FACTS, WELL CUT GOV'T SPENDING, NOT. ON ANY ISSUE THAT REQUIRES A STAND ON FACTS HEM, AND HAW, NOT SHOCK AND AWE. ONCE THE RACE FACTOR IS ACCEPTED NOW WHAT BIGGER DEBTS AS FAR AS GENERATIONS CAN SEE. WILL HE REALLY BE A SUCCESS NOT ONCE REALITY HITS ON 1/21/09. ITS TIME FOR INEXPERIENCE TO BEDAZZLE US. NOT!

    January 7, 2009 10:36 am at 10:36 am |
  48. Disillusioned

    Will she help me balance my checkbook after I'm done paying for Obama's stimulus plan?

    January 7, 2009 10:37 am at 10:37 am |
  49. R Wolf

    No one ruined this Country more than Bush did, but all you can do is be critical of Obama. Let him do his job. Where is Bush? Well, he's been on vacation, even while the Country is in the worst mess it's ever seen. If you're going to blame someone, blame the man responsible for all this. Obama, even before he's taken office, has given the Country more hope than we've had in eight years. So, unless you have something positive and helpful to contribute, just shut up and let Obama/Biden make this Country whole, prosperous, respected and fully functioning once again.

    January 7, 2009 10:39 am at 10:39 am |
  50. Polar Bears Against Palen

    Do you right-wingers really prefer Bush over what Obama is about to give you? How pathetic. You are lucky Bush and Cheney aren't in prison for crimes against humanity. That is where they belong.

    January 7, 2009 10:40 am at 10:40 am |
  51. Mike, Port St Lucie

    When Ed Koch was mayor of NYC he would walk around the town asking the average person, "How am I doing?".

    WE THE PEOPLE are the chief performance officers, and right now there is no one in Washington that is doing to well.

    You got that for free... and my carbon foot print was small... I just saved the country a few million dollars, now I'm going to DisneyWorld.

    January 7, 2009 10:40 am at 10:40 am |
  52. arc, Lugano CH

    Scott January 7th, 2009 9:54 am ET
    And just how much of our tax paying dollars is going to go towards this twit's salary?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I'd imagine a few clams less than the approximate $7.1B monthly payment that went to Iraq for January 2009.

    January 7, 2009 10:47 am at 10:47 am |
  53. Anonymous

    Just amazed by the comments attacking Barack. Well... which administration did this deficit come from? He's trying to fix something that is broken and yet many of you are so against it already. Yes, he's appointing people who may lack the knowledge in the area–however, those individuals are coming in with a fresh perspectives. Unlike, Bush who appointed people with experience, but lacked the intelligence! His administration knew more about being a crook rather than leaders. Stealing from the hard-working Americans... rescuing crooks by providing billions of dollars in Bail-Out! Get Real!

    As far as thi article goes... Sarah Palin is dumb enough to allow her daughter to be with someone who does not have a goal in life...dropping out of high school is the wrong thing to do for a new father. How far will you go nowadays with a high school diploma? Well, I am sure she will hire him under her administration... and have another dumb Republican without education and can't even work a fax machine! Ah... tragedy in the making!

    January 7, 2009 10:47 am at 10:47 am |
  54. The Artful Dodger

    To MD who said The Obama administration is quickly resembling a Third World government:

    Bush took us to Third World status, so what did you expect? Sorry, the neocons had their chance, and the last 30 years of your policies have brought us to the brink of ruin. Now, we are happy to clean up your mess, but shut up while we're doing it.

    January 7, 2009 10:50 am at 10:50 am |
  55. mcl

    THIS IS IN REFERANCE TO R WOLF>>>>>>STUPID PERSON........ If I remember correctly, I know that it is MAJORITY DEMS in the senate while BUSH/CHANEY is in office and votes need to go through them first. All statics point to the dems for low employment, high crime, high welfare, ect. obama will bring it down even more...............

    January 7, 2009 10:51 am at 10:51 am |
  56. 1/20/13

    To Polar Bears Against Palen

    Lets see he his going to give me a weaker military and higher taxes to support the lazy. NO, I AM NOT EXCITED

    January 7, 2009 10:51 am at 10:51 am |
  57. change I can't agree with

    She must be part of the new jobs program that Obama is talking about. Only problem is her position is really part of his job and thats not much help to the average american .

    January 7, 2009 10:52 am at 10:52 am |
  58. Pat J

    I wouldn't be surprised if Obama brought back the draft as part of his "job creation" program. He always likes to leave out major "details" on his new "proposals."

    January 7, 2009 10:53 am at 10:53 am |
  59. An American

    Sooo tired of Obama aleady – and he is not even in the Whitehouse. The younger generation that helped put him in will regret it when all the bailouts come due – too bad everyone's children have to pay the price for other peoples mistakes. Its the taxpayer that is going to get it good not the crooks – they are making off with tons of money and living LARGE.

    January 7, 2009 10:55 am at 10:55 am |
  60. libs be dopes

    Coming next.....................

    The Ministry to Watch Over the Chief Performance Officer

    Tape at 11:00

    January 7, 2009 10:58 am at 10:58 am |
  61. Bob

    Shouldn't it be the whole cabinets job to do this ? Rein in spending, make each of their own areas more efficient, then go to congress and say nock off ALL the pork. This position is a joke and a waste of more taxpayer money. This is not change, it's more of the same. By the way, what happened to the term Czar, it was not used this time.

    January 7, 2009 10:59 am at 10:59 am |
  62. EDDIE

    Another big paying job added, how sad to the unemployed persons. Democrats, spend and spend??? Too many big jobs and not enough workers or just a pay off??? Change??? Add big paying jobs???? Breaking promises and not in office yet... WOW

    January 7, 2009 11:04 am at 11:04 am |
  63. Change - Yeah Left

    What a joke! Why is the Obama machine adding more and more and more and more and more people to the cabinet? Who does he owe for what?

    January 7, 2009 11:04 am at 11:04 am |
  64. Can You Do Better?

    Let the PE make his appointments. Would you rather he simply added people to the roles and then tell you about them? He is being transparent; he is not asking anyone "what do you think of . . . ?" He is making appointments who MUST be confirmed BEFORE they are actually in the job.

    Obama is setting up shop the way HE believes it will best serve the people of this Country. Give the man a chance to literally begin to be the President.

    Accountability is necessary in all aspects of leadership. Right now FISCAL accountability is top priority for the United States of America.

    Stop complaining and begin to hope for the best for our Country.

    January 7, 2009 11:08 am at 11:08 am |
  65. Zev Green

    Oh the sharks are already circling. This proves that nothing Obama does is good enough for CONservatives. This new position is essential. Our debt is 70% of GDP... thanks Republicans! And now these are the very people complaining about Dem's spending money on a (gasp, woman- or fill in dirogatory insult here) who is in charge of keeping fiscal responsibility?

    Looks like the GOP is the GOHP H for hypocracy.

    January 7, 2009 11:08 am at 11:08 am |
  66. chris

    Why the appointment, lets just say.....

    - no bid contracts
    - incompetence
    - pay to play
    - $600,000 toilet s
    - $230,000 for bathroom upgrade for Interior Scy
    - lost 9 Billion in Iraq

    - fingers too tired to keep typing....

    January 7, 2009 11:10 am at 11:10 am |
  67. richard rohde

    Not a big PEBO fan, but, I have been very impressed with his moves during the transition. This is a good idea and I for one would like to see how it works out before it is blasted. He is showing a surprising (to me anyway) sense of business acumen in bringing good management to the world's largest enterprise. Hopefully, he will succeed in this.

    January 7, 2009 11:10 am at 11:10 am |
  68. Mari

    President-elect Obama has been left with the BUSH DISASTER:

    MOUNTING NATIONAL DEBT OF OVER........$10 TRILLION

    A BUDGET DEFICIT OF OVER.......... $1.2 TRILLION

    AN UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF 6%

    ETC., ETC. HE WILL NEED ALL THE HELP HE CAN GET FROM AS MANY BRILLIANT PEOPLE AS HE CAN HIRE!

    YOU FAR-RIGHT-NUTS CAN COMPLAIN ALL YOU WANT...........BUT THIS.......MESS....... IS THE ...........BUSH.......LEGACY!

    January 7, 2009 11:16 am at 11:16 am |
  69. norman

    What Obama has done is hire a mother for the country. The new performance officer will scold Barney Frank when he gets a giveaway tingle. The Washington establishment is now "Animal House" on LSD. It seems that intervention therapy in indicated and really that`s what the new position is.

    January 7, 2009 11:19 am at 11:19 am |
  70. carlo

    You people are such embiciles. Bush has run us into a hole, your lives are garbage, yet you STILL bash Obama, actually hoping that he fails. I don't care how partisan you are, you should want Obama to succeed, because it benefits all of us. By the way, Bush has grown government more than any other president in history.

    January 7, 2009 11:20 am at 11:20 am |
  71. FreeNLovIt

    We need someone with judgement to analyze the situations, vision to see the future and patience to see things through. Obama has the wings of Clinton and the wings of Gates/Jones. We THE People, need to UNITE and give it a chance. So shut up!!

    January 7, 2009 11:26 am at 11:26 am |
  72. Changing from Bad to a Disaster

    You can't blame this all on Bush – guess who ran Congress for 6 our of his 8 years in office?

    Yep – THE DEMS!!! They were truly the ones in charge, Bush just got blamed for Congress' mistakes and missteps. After all, that's what Republicans are good for, being blamed for the LIBERAL'S MISTAKES!!

    January 7, 2009 11:29 am at 11:29 am |
  73. Stan

    After reading all the negative comments here, I am appalled at the lack

    of hope smeared on our country's future. Wake up people and see what

    you as individuals can do in spreading a little good will – if not in your

    actions, at least in what you choose to share on these pages.

    Sincerely.

    January 7, 2009 11:29 am at 11:29 am |
  74. Rachel

    She'll need all the luck she can get. Hope proves to be a better than what some predict and I hope we can afford her!

    January 7, 2009 11:32 am at 11:32 am |
  75. dave

    Chief Performance Officer? Man, why didn't he get Dave Ramsey for this. He's Gupta-like.

    LOL

    January 7, 2009 11:36 am at 11:36 am |
  76. Stan

    Rachael, We can't afford to sit – and watch things crumble.

    January 7, 2009 11:38 am at 11:38 am |
  77. Pat F

    @The Artful Dodger – If you think this is a third world country, you are simply an ignorant fool. We have no starvation, no cholera epidemics, a fully functioning democracy, no martial law, a free press, low infant mortality, nearly universal literacy...

    It is grotesque and an insult to people who actually live in third world conditions to compare the US standard of living to theirs. Just because you've had to cut out one of your daily lattes from Starbucks does not make this a third world country. Grow up, for God's sake.

    January 7, 2009 11:41 am at 11:41 am |
  78. Tom in Delaware

    Well, Obama did say he was gonna bring change to Washington, and now he's proven that he can create new jobs.....OK, just one, but it's a start.

    Can't wait to see all the CNN News stories on Joe Biden's kids, should be really juicy stuff!

    January 7, 2009 11:46 am at 11:46 am |
  79. Tom in Delaware

    Next will be the Ministry of Silly-Walks.

    January 7, 2009 11:50 am at 11:50 am |
  80. Barb

    I was expecting a new "Secretary Of Change"!

    January 7, 2009 12:07 pm at 12:07 pm |
  81. Heather in SoCal

    Remember the scene in the movie "Dave" where the fake president actually led the cabinet through striking outdated items, line-by-line, from the budget? What a great idea that was - and now PEBO is getting ready to do it! And he needs someone that's basically an outsider (not part of the current congress) to help do it. If the savings are great it will help pay her salary, many times over. I say give it a chance.

    January 7, 2009 12:09 pm at 12:09 pm |
  82. Murray Storrings

    Great pick and its about time someone made that postion in govt , (Canada needs it also} ( great job obama)you cannot make everyone happy but not so popular changes shows a great leader .....

    January 7, 2009 12:31 pm at 12:31 pm |
  83. rodlang

    Just yesterday Obama said we will have trillion dollar deficits for the next couple of years. I don't know how this woman can change that. She's not president and not a member of Congress. Oh well, good luck to her. She needs it.

    January 7, 2009 12:36 pm at 12:36 pm |
  84. Kurt C.

    The naivete of Obama supporters and their non-knowledge of fiscal matters is truly astounding.

    January 7, 2009 12:38 pm at 12:38 pm |
  85. bsmith171

    mckinsey is a NAZI operation.
    she will fit right in to the DC culture.

    January 7, 2009 01:05 pm at 1:05 pm |
  86. thersa

    To Changing from Bad...
    Why don't you get your facts from someone who doesn't lie? The Dems were not in charge the last 6 out of 8 years. You can't stand that the country was run the way you conservatives all said it should be and it was a huge, unmitigated disaster!

    January 7, 2009 01:32 pm at 1:32 pm |
  87. geecee827

    Some of you are so laughable. Obama can't do anything you approve of, can he? You will criticize and ridicule anything and everything he does because you just hate him and cannot accept the fact that he is our President. You want him to fail so badly. And you call yourselves Americans?? Regardless of whether he appoints totally capable people to a position or whether he appoints someone who has the intelligence, but not the experience, but who can learn and listen, doesn't matter to you. You just want to ridicule and lambast him every chance you get. If the guy sneezes you will accuse him of spreading germs. You're just a bunch of sore losers.

    January 7, 2009 01:47 pm at 1:47 pm |
  88. vincent - phoenix

    No matter what he does.... MD, Mike in Syracuse, Sweetie, Disillusioned, and ALL the other usual suspects will be RIGHT THERE to poo-poo it without so much as a glance to actually LEARN its goal or intent.

    Obama could cure cancer and they would all say... well what about aids...? Obama could then cure cancer 'and' aids... and they would scream.... HE DID IT FOR POLITICAL GAIN...

    GEEZ guys..... pace yourselves... its gonna be a looong 8 years for you.

    January 7, 2009 01:57 pm at 1:57 pm |
  89. Millie Gee

    I don't think we need to defend any of President-Elect Obama's choices. He won the election. The majority voted for him. Allow the losers to whine among themselves. Nothing the PE does will ever be satisfactory to them. Whine on....

    January 7, 2009 02:19 pm at 2:19 pm |

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.