January 9th, 2009
01:58 PM ET
5 years ago

After legal blow, Senate Dems weighing next move on Burris

 Roland Burris’s certificate of appointment does not require the secretary of state’s signature.
Roland Burris’s certificate of appointment does not require the secretary of state’s signature.

(CNN) – Senate Democratic leaders are weighing their options in light of the Illinois State Supreme Court decision that Roland Burris’s certificate of appointment does not require the secretary of state’s signature.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Illinois senior Sen. Dick Durbin had been very clear that their path to seating Burris began with the signature of Secretary of State Jesse White, citing a Senate rule from 1884 that seems to require it.

The court ruled Friday afternoon that no such signature was required.

Two days ago, White insisted to a Chicago radio station that he would keep his word, and not sign any certificate that also had the signature of Gov. Rod Blagojevich on it. But White was also critical of the Senate’s decision to block Burris, and said he merely considered his own signature ceremonial. His next move also remains a question mark.


Filed under: Rod Blagojevich • Roland Burris
soundoff (52 Responses)
  1. Matt

    I love it when people tell Harry Reid to go stick it. You're my new favorite Senator Burris.

    January 9, 2009 06:24 pm at 6:24 pm |
  2. Rick

    I think its discrimination against the people of illinois asking for a legal election.,

    January 9, 2009 06:28 pm at 6:28 pm |
1 2 3

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.