Week One nears completion in Minnesota Senate trial
ST. PAUL, Minnesota (CNN) - The courtroom battle over Minnesota’s Senate race wraps up its first week Friday, beginning the day with the testimony of Ramsey County elections manager and former state elections director Joseph Mansky.
The first week has primarily been centered around presenting background information and details of the election process to the three-judge panel, and Mansky's testimony is no different.
Earlier in the week, Deputy Secretary of State Jim Gelbmann - a central figure in the both the election and the recount process - testified for about a day and a half on procedures and details, from the training of local election judges to the level of back-and-forth on a myriad of issues between each campaign during the recount.
The judges will ultimately decide the electoral fate of former Republican Sen. Norm Coleman - who's been in the courtroom all week - and Democrat Al Franken. Coleman is contesting recount results that gave the lead to Franken.
Coleman's attorneys say there are thousands of absentee ballots that were rejected erroneously that should be counted. They've brought a handful of voters to the witness stand this week in an effort to prove those votes were wrongfully excluded from the total.
Absentee ballots have been rejected for a number of reasons. The Coleman campaign has pointed to some that were rejected for technicalities like signatures on the ballot that don't match the signature on the ballot application, stickers that were accidentally placed askew on the ballot covering a signature, and instances where voters have occasionally signed below a signature line as opposed to on it.
The Franken campaign contends that some human error on the part of election workers is normal in any election, and does not constitute a valid reason to re-examine as many as 11,000 ballots, as the Coleman campaign has said they may request.
Franken lawyers are also looking to prove that in the past the Coleman campaign had argued against counting absentee ballots, long before they were for it. They say Coleman is now merely "casting a wider net" in the hopes that the more votes are included, the better the chance Coleman has.
The trial is expected to last weeks.
From CNN Politics
- FBI declines to provide requested materials to House Oversight, Chaffetz issues new June 8 deadline May 25, 2017 07:43 pm
- Trump at NATO summit
- Gianforte assault charge puts GOP in lose-lose situation May 25, 2017 07:43 pm
- Montana's special election: Know the facts May 25, 2017 07:19 pm
- 6 things to watch in the Montana special election May 25, 2017 01:26 pm
- Obama photographer keeps trolling Trump May 25, 2017 07:09 pm
Minnesota loses either way in this process – a liberal elite or a right wing zealot, what a choice.
This whole thing reminds me of Florida in 2000, but at least there aren't any chads to discuss.
Why not read the ballot rules and abide by them.
Having another person fill out your voting ballot and signed with this same persons forged signature and expect it to be counted .
Having persons signature on one file and Initials on their ballot and expect this ballot to be counted .
This Coleman is a nut job / throw him under the bus stop wasting tax payers money in court with this flake.
This is another reason where this country is with this type waste.
Coleman is hoping to steal this election like the GOP did in 2000.
All these witnesses aren't even necessary. You've got counties that have more votes than voters. Didn't anybody see Black Sheep? Franken clearly cooked the books during the recount. The recount should be invalidated and Coleman should take his rightful place as the senator from Minnesota.
Remember back in November when you said that if you were the one behind in the votes, you'd step down so that the people of Minnesota wouldn't have to go through some lengthy battle and not be represented?
Yeah I remember that too.
Go away Coleman. We didn't want you the first time.... we don't want you now.
Hypocrite
They've already counted the votes, Coleman's and Franken's camps both approved/disapproved votes together for the final tally. It's just that the final tally didn't go Coleman's way, and how he's in a strop for being ousted by a comedian.
One of the witnesses Coleman brought to the stand was a guy who's girlfriend illegally signed his ballot. That witness and his ballot were rejected by the judge. And that's the best Coleman can come up with?
"Hey Coleman,what's for lunch,lobster or cracked crab".........
This is another political joke that is making our government look foolish.
Isn't it time we got back to respect for our government?
The republicans are ruining our country.
More votes than voters – again! Sounds like the Alaska elections all over again, except that there, of course there are so few Democrats no-one even bothered to complain.
The hypocracy is striking, however. When 'in the lead' Coleman was very vocal about letting the result stand, but as soon as it changed he was up in arms for every R vote to be counted and every D vote to be discounted. Either accept the result or keep counting, but don't switch positions every time the count goes for or against you.
To Fred C. Dobbs:
Ditto!
Some one should tell Coleman that he lost the race by a razor thin margin. It is time to move on without wasting precious resources (time and money).
Coleman's dentures are too big for his mouth...
I am so tired of the false information. There were NO instances where there were more votes than voters in a county check your facts. Oh I forgot, republicans don't deal in facts, what should I expect.
coleman just go away.
Not entirely comfortable with either of them. Both extremes. Although Coleman has the RNC fiasco in the twin cities on him.
FRANKEN cooked the books? How? It's not as if they have Franken and his aides doing the ballot counts.
america is and always has been an overall liberal country, our founders where some of the most liberal people in the world of their time, so many of you forget that.... and as to elite, boy I just don't get that one, why wouldn't we want to be represented by our best and brightest ie our elite, words like liberal and elite have turned into code words with meaning other than what they actually are, how some right wing types just revel in their mediocrity is beyond me.
and "cooked the books" HOW?? get real, you radical right conspiracy people types are no different than and just as scary and left wing "bush ordered 9/11" crazies.
if ALL you read is the radical right blogs you are NOT educated and most of that stuff is just soooo amazingly stoopid that it takes a real idiot running on nothing but their own fears and prejudice to buy it.
coleman is a typical corrupt professional politicians out for himself, he's a scumbag and thats a fact, al's OK, he's definitely to the left but his hearts in the right place, give him a chance and see for yourself
Now that Coleman's lawyers are arguing that the rules for absentee ballots should not apply (i.e. you can have someone forge your signature on the application), can we please count the absentee ballot from the (ficticious) illegal alien who also voted in person? Oh wait, he probably voted for Franken.
Heads or tails boys