January 31, 2009
Posted: January 31st, 2009 02:04 PM ET

From
 Gregg confirmed Friday he was under consideration to be the next Commerce Secretary.
Gregg confirmed Friday he was under consideration to be the next Commerce Secretary.

WASHINGTON (CNN) –Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire is the leading candidate to become commerce secretary and a decision could come as soon as Monday, an Obama administration official told CNN Saturday.

Gregg said in a statement Friday that he was among those being considered for the post, but White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday that "a final decision had not been made."

"I know that's something that he [President Obama] hopes to make a decision on and announce shortly. But until the President tells me to make a personnel announcement from this podium, I'll refrain from getting into individual names on that," Gibbs said at Friday's press briefing.

The administration official Saturday spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss administration deliberations.

The nomination of Gregg to be commerce secretary could result in a victory for Democrats in the Senate. If New Hampshire's governor, a Democrat, were to appoint a Democrat to replace Gregg in the Senate, that could give Senate Democrats the 60-seat majority needed to overcome Republican attempts to use filibusters to block legislation.

However, two New Hampshire Republican Party sources have suggested to CNN that Gov. John Lynch is careful to appeal to Republicans and might be open to appointing a Republican to "follow the will of the people," according to one of the sources.

President Barack Obama first nominated New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to be commerce secretary. But earlier this month Richardson withdrew, citing the distraction of a federal investigation into ties to a company that has done business with his state.

Richardson told reporters he underestimated how long the investigation would take, calling it an "untenable delay" likely to hinder the confirmation process.

Gregg, a third-term senator known for being fiscally conservative, is up for re-election in 2010.

(Updated Saturday afternoon with additional information)

Filed under: Judd Gregg • Obama administration • Popular Posts


Dan in NY   February 1st, 2009 9:38 am ET

Ed, why not a Repulican? With the economy in shambles, a fiscal conservative (Democrat or Republican) is a smart choice for Commerce Secretary.

Ed, Santa Fe, NM   January 31st, 2009 6:48 pm ET

why a republican?

Dieter   January 31st, 2009 6:26 pm ET

I think Gregg knows his days in elected office are numbered – the R's are loosing big time in New England. The Gov better appoint a Democrat though – I don't want to miss Limbaugh popping a vein in his neck.

bsmith171   January 31st, 2009 5:31 pm ET

what are his qualifications?

if he's a tax cheat, he's OK.

zack   January 31st, 2009 5:29 pm ET

How about appointing an independent? But then they usually caucus with one party or the other so I guess that doesn't really matter huh?

PL   January 31st, 2009 5:12 pm ET

"The administration official Saturday spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss administration deliberations."
So doing it anonymously is ok?

Chuck   January 31st, 2009 4:02 pm ET

Obvious attempt to put another Democrat in the Senate is obvious.

Desmond Sequeira   January 31st, 2009 4:02 pm ET

So what is it with so called officials saying "official" things unofficially?
Are these the guys/gals who are not getting attention by doing useful things?

Barack wins and America collectively loses.   January 31st, 2009 3:55 pm ET

DON'T TAKE THE SEAT. IF FRANKEN WINS HIS SEAT, WE WILL NOT, I REPEAT NOT HAVE A FILIBUSTER PROOF MINORITY IN THE SENATE, as his replacement will be chosen by a Democratic Governor.

Gordon Shumway   January 31st, 2009 3:53 pm ET

This is strictly a political move by Obama's boys to try and cinch up the filibuster stopper so they can finish the demise of the Republic and turn on the Socialistic spigot of revenue sharing. If Gregg takes the non-job, he'll have been a big part of the whole national disaster.

Fred C Dobbs   January 31st, 2009 3:53 pm ET

Caroline Kennedy is already packing her bags and moving to New Hampshire.

IMPEACH NOW   January 31st, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Meanwhile, over 100,000 have lost their jobs on the Messiah's watch, and the Dow had another down week. If Obama continues at this rate, he is destined to become a one-term failure.

The Intelligent Citizen   January 31st, 2009 3:37 pm ET

I like Mr. Gibb's response. There are many times when the President's response to the press should be ....

"That's none of your business".

... and this is one of those times.

Mr. Obama, handle our country's affairs with some air of confidentiallilty. When the time is right, you'll share the salient points with the public.

Jacque Bauer   January 31st, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Total disaster. If Gregg had any principles, he would tell Obama thanks but you are on your own.

Dan, TX   January 31st, 2009 3:30 pm ET

Judd would bring a republican strong view of trade and global free market into the administration.

I hope that a centrist democrat is picked to replace him if Judd decides to take the job.

Harvey L   January 31st, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I wonder if President Obama would chose a Republican Senator, from a state with a Democrat for governor, in order that the NH governor could fill Sen Judd's vacant seat with a Democrat? Wonder, wonder, wonder?

Kevin   January 31st, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Yes, please appoint Judd Gregg.

And to the Governor of New Hampshire, appoint a Dem.

KN   January 31st, 2009 3:11 pm ET

A Republican as Commerce Secretary? Wasn't the Republicans who got us into this mess?

Mike in NYC   January 31st, 2009 3:11 pm ET

Wait, wasn't he obligated to find another non-white when Richardson dropped out? This is definitely a "step backward."

The struggle against institutional racism is never over, I guess.

Barack wins and America collectively loses.   January 31st, 2009 2:58 pm ET

Please don't abandon the Conservative movement. You will be a complete idiot if you decide to take this post, Senator Judd. It is a win for Socialism and loss for Conservativism and Capitalism.

You will likely lose your seat, next election.

rich   January 31st, 2009 2:56 pm ET

Wise man. I guess he has seen the handwriting on the wall. The GOP is in the dog house. Good for him for wanting more than a bone.

Whatever...   January 31st, 2009 2:55 pm ET

Where is Chuck Hagel? What happened to him?

james   January 31st, 2009 2:54 pm ET

I guarantee you he's nothing but a pawn in the socailist agenda of the democrats. He will have no power. Obama is playing the bean game.

dorothy smith   January 31st, 2009 2:27 pm ET

I think he sounds just like what we need. With the kind of money we are talking about, we need someone with a conservative hand on the till. It would also be very nice, not to have to listen to any more of the Republican filibusters. If he doesn't pan out, he can be replaced in 2010.

Dot

David   January 31st, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Obama is a smart politician. The Democrats couldn't get to 60 in the senate in November but now they can with the commerce secretary pick and if the Minnesota recount stay where it's at. mission accomplish.

mike88   January 31st, 2009 2:24 pm ET

Well, look at it this way, Obama will be able to roll his agenda forward like the red carpet. But, if that agenda fails, there is only one party to blame=Democrats!

Stu-Florida   January 31st, 2009 2:23 pm ET

AND THE BEAT GOES ON!!!

elsie   January 31st, 2009 2:21 pm ET

"The administration official Saturday spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to discuss administration deliberations."

Who ever this "official" is should be fired and so should CNN person for reporting it. I am so sick of hearing this type of stuff.

Mike Dallas   January 31st, 2009 2:17 pm ET

Not only is Obama smart but he is also shrewd.

If Gregg refuses, OB can say hey we tried to include repubs in the Cabinet. If he accepts, Dems stand a chance of a Democrat appointed as the 60th senator in the U.S.Senate.

It is a win/win for Obama.

I like having a smart man for President once again!

Fred   January 31st, 2009 2:15 pm ET

Oh Yes!

Carl Justus   January 31st, 2009 2:14 pm ET

I think it is a great idea to have Gregg as the new commerce secretary.
Obama has already bent over backwards for the stubborn republicans and all he gets backs is nonsense and stupidity.

alfred huessein neuman   January 31st, 2009 2:13 pm ET

Obama wants change alright, change to the extreme left view. This just n...

"Although the SEIU's campaign efforts focused on Democrats, the union's performance reviews will be strictly nonpartisan, Stern said.

Stern believes that his members are owed something in return for their efforts... He wants to make it easier for unions to form.

President Obama echoed some of those sentiments on Friday, issuing pro-labor executive orders..."

Obama is delivering on his "back room promises". But there's no change from the Chicago style politics BHO grew up in.

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   January 31st, 2009 2:09 pm ET

That's one way to "get to 60". How about another Repellican in a blue state for HHS?

Dawn   January 31st, 2009 2:08 pm ET

Now what will Congress fine on him? Every vetting sometimes don't over turn every rock. Every President has had Cabinet members that do not make it. it is the rules of the jungle.

Herk McGraw   January 31st, 2009 2:07 pm ET

I understand the idea of opening a Senate seat for the Democrats but I just saw Sen. Gregg on CNN where he said he is opposed to the current Stimulus Package because it had too much "pork." He refused to acknowlege that whatever he considered "pork" also created jobs and he did not suggest any ideas for creating jobs. He just blew smoke as all aginners do.
A person to be Commerce Secretary should, at least, have some positive comment as to what he supports.

Greg Hodges   January 31st, 2009 2:07 pm ET

During the election debates last year, all I heard was Barack Obama never reached out to Republicans. He has already done more in 2 weeks to be bipartisan than George Bush did in 8 years. I simply hope that everyone can stop screaming at each other long enough to actually listen and get some real work done in Washington. The new President is trying to lead by example; maybe the G.O.P. can put aside it`s mindless rhetoric for once and do the same.

Peter   January 31st, 2009 2:02 pm ET

I still think Richardson should've been Secretary of State...

Greg Hodges   January 31st, 2009 1:59 pm ET

During the election debates last year, all I heard was Barack Obama never reached out to Republicans. He has already done more in 2 weeks to be bipartisan than George B

BRUTIS   January 31st, 2009 1:59 pm ET

Why a Republican from the GOOFY OLD OARTY????

aware   January 31st, 2009 1:56 pm ET

With the number 60 as the motivation! :(

hungry   January 31st, 2009 1:53 pm ET

can't trust any republicans.

Sanity has returned   January 31st, 2009 1:52 pm ET

The NH Gov should put a Dem in the Senate seat should it be vacated. The Governor has that discretion.

Rob   January 31st, 2009 1:49 pm ET

Wow, Obama really DID read 'Team of Rivals' , Sen. Gregg is Obama's Salmon P. Chase.

joe   January 31st, 2009 1:46 pm ET

Hope he's up-to-date with his taxes

Bruce   January 31st, 2009 1:45 pm ET

This is the same thing Bush did in 2000. He tried to sure Democratic senators from Republican-leaning areas into his cabinet in order to change the balance in the Senate. The press, of course, was on it immediately, and the Democratic senators turned it down with apologies.

Now Mr. Obama is seeing areas where there is a Republican and where his appointed or elected replacement would most likely be a Democrat. I understand his reasoning, and find nothing evil or clandestine in it. However, I hope that the Republican senators will be as aware of this as Democratic ones were eight years ago.

The Democrats want a filibuster-proof senate. Some Republicans reaching for the gold ring may give it to them.

tiff of Lithia Springs   January 31st, 2009 1:38 pm ET

good for bipartianship.

Guy in the Midwest   January 31st, 2009 1:35 pm ET

I think that Judd Gregg is a good pick for Commerce.
though, its 50 50 as to who the Gov of NH picks to be his replacement, a Republican or a Democrat.

SAGG   January 31st, 2009 1:33 pm ET

"However, two New Hampshire Republican Party sources have suggested to CNN that Gov. John Lynch is careful to appeal to Republicans and might be open to appointing a Republican to "follow the will of the people," according to one of the sources."
---

Since when should a Dem governor try to appeal to Repubs to get their approval about who he or she should pick to replace a Senator? If Sen. Gregg believes that his accepting President Obama's offer to take the job could upset the Senate GOP's chances of fillerbustering, then he should NOT take the job. President Obama tried to get approval from the GOP House for what he wanted to do with the stimulus, and look where that got him. Gov. Lynch, if you're given the opportunity, then PLEASE pick a Dem!

WIlly Brown   January 31st, 2009 1:31 pm ET

Gregg stay away from the nitiwts

cnnnewser   January 31st, 2009 1:30 pm ET

Very wise choice. He'll do a great job!

Bill P   January 31st, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Don't believe the bi-partisan crap. He'll be replaced by a democrat senator in order to create a filibuster proof Senate.

Neicey in Ohio   January 31st, 2009 1:28 pm ET

Welcome Mr Gregg!!!

Dylan   January 31st, 2009 1:22 pm ET

This is genius.

New Hampshire has a democratic governor which means the Dems will add another senator.

Joyce Becker   January 31st, 2009 1:20 pm ET

I don't have any opinion on Judd Gregg as Commerce Secretary, one thing is that his replacement would be a Democrat.

david   January 31st, 2009 1:16 pm ET

wonder if this man has paid his taxes? obama doesn't seem to be able to select candidates very well. obama may be a good lawyer but as a manager, a leader, he seems to be lacking so far, to date.

Ryan   January 31st, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Brilliant! Obama is sticking it to the GOP like it's his job...! They're freaking out now..it's awesome.

yuri   January 31st, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Whether or not it is an act of finesse by the Gems, remains to be seen. Nonetheless, a filibuster-proof majority aimed, possibly, by the Dems seems quite mouth-watering. Obviously, the GOP is not salivating. Onecan palpate and feel the dudgeon among the GOP.
Let the games begin.

mark bryant iii   January 31st, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Not a bad move. The new prez is going as bipartisan and even more than past administrations. 3rd Republican in cabinet

SueB   January 31st, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Great. Gov Lynch will appoint a Dem to replace him in the Senate and Obama will get his filibuster proof Senate. Then Obama will fire Gregg and replace him with a freespending socialist leaning Commerce Secretary. He'll kill 2 birds with one stone.

imobro   January 31st, 2009 12:56 pm ET

Again Pres. Obama is interested in getting the BEST MAN for a specific position. This shows if the person is the best suited for the position he'll ask him to serve our country. He puts politics aside because he wants the BEST in order to get OUR COUNTRY turned around. Our PRES. is a great man, not about himself. He is sincere when it comes to getting this country back on TRACK, here and in the world. May GOD keep Pres. Obama and his family safe.

Proud American   January 31st, 2009 12:49 pm ET

60 seats for the democrats in the senate, great choice Mr. Obama

Lisbon   January 31st, 2009 12:46 pm ET

I will support him if he promises to shut down all of the people and radio stations that are spreading Republican lies. They should not be allowed to defy Obama.

Sam   January 31st, 2009 12:46 pm ET

Obama's brilliance never ceases to amaze me! Picking a Republican senator from a state which is run by a Democratic governor will almost surely result in another Democratic senator. Don't forget that the governor chooses who he/she wants to become the senator from his/her state, and since John Lynch (gov. of NH) is a democrat, he'll pick a dem to represent NH in the senate!

60 Democratic senators here we come!!

GM from MN   January 31st, 2009 12:44 pm ET

With him out a Democrat will likely replace him giving the Dems the 60 seat majority once MN's race is finalized and Franken declared the winner.

Emma from Texas   January 31st, 2009 12:42 pm ET

This is why I love Obama. He got 3 republican secretaries in his democratic administration that no other president did. God bless President Obama and his family.

JERRY TANNER   January 31st, 2009 12:41 pm ET

THE ONLY REASON THAT THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO DOLE OUT THE MONEY FOR FIXES OTHER THAN RELIEF ON TAXES IS SO THEY CAN GET THEIR HANDS ON ABOUT 50% OF IT AND THAT PART WILL NEVER GET TO THE PEOPLE. THATS ALWAYS BEEN THE WAY SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME. LOTS OF MONEY THAT CAN'T BE TRACED BACK .

THANKS

JERRY

Meka   January 31st, 2009 12:39 pm ET

Good Pick!

Donna   January 31st, 2009 12:37 pm ET

I'M CONFUSED

I'm confused ...perhaps you have the answer. How can two million blacks get into Washington DC in sub zero temps in one day when 200,000 couldn't get out of New Orleans in 85 degrees with four day's notice.. !!!???

Xavier   January 31st, 2009 12:35 pm ET

Bush would never even have thought to appoint a democrat to this position. Its a new day GOP, and you old relics will have a hard time living in it. The appointment of STeel is so blantantly fake that its pathetic. The GOP is always a day late and a dollar short. You cant fake being inclusive, you either are or it comes across as a con.

Franky   January 31st, 2009 12:32 pm ET

"Should Congress cap compensation for employees of any company that accepts federal bailout money?"

Whoa...did you see the numbers? Thank God I ain't over there, LOL!!

Knox   January 31st, 2009 12:24 pm ET

Talk about being bi-partisan!

independent   January 31st, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Full disclosure called for. Where do Rush and Hannity make their real money?

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: Trifecta -- NOT. My Redskins, Bills and Packers all lose this weekend. Very sad.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:40:09 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @andersoncooper: Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players http://bit.ly/6C3OlX
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:47:50 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @cnn_oppmann: CNN.com: Mexico City approves same-sex marriage. http://bit.ly/5RyMnk #mexico
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:46:26 -0800
@HornickCNN: Rudy's reportedly not running for NY SEN or Gov ...
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:43:48 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Redskins-Giants always exciting. Both teams have a lot to prove. And Giants can still salvage playoffs. Skins just need a win.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:19:36 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP