February 3, 2009
Posted: February 3rd, 2009 03:16 PM ET

From
Ty, the maker of Beanie Babies, has retired two new Ty Girlz dolls named Marvelous Malia and Sweet Sasha.
Ty, the maker of Beanie Babies, has retired two new Ty Girlz dolls named Marvelous Malia and Sweet Sasha.

(CNN) - Controversy forced the withdrawal of two more figures from the public scene Tuesday, but these were not named Daschle or Killefer.

Ty Inc. - the company that brought the world Beanie Babies - bowed to pressure from the White House and "retired" dolls named Sweet Sasha and Marvelous Malia Tuesday.

The 12-inch-tall dolls, which bear a resemblance to the first family's Sasha, 7, and Malia, 10, were introduced last month as part of the Ty Girlz collection.

Watch: First daughter dolls?

First Lady Michelle Obama's press secretary said it was "inappropriate to use young private citizens for marketing purposes."

While the dolls still appeared on the Ty Web site Tuesday, a red banner above them read "Retired."

The retirement of the dolls came as the Obama administration announced the withdrawal of two nominees because of controversy over tax issues. Former Sen. Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination as health and human services secretary and Nancy Killefer withdrew as the nominee to become the Obama administration's chief performance officer.

While a forced withdrawal may hurt a politician's standing, it apparently bolsters a doll's value.

Just after the Ty announcement - a set of the Sweet Sasha and Marvelous Malia dolls had reached $152 in one eBay auction Tuesday afternoon.

Ty sold the dolls for $9.99 each during the three weeks the dolls were on the market.

A Ty executive insisted last month that the dolls had nothing to do with President Barack Obama's young daughters.

Ty Senior Vice President of Sales Tania Lundeen said "Sasha and Malia are beautiful names" that "worked very well with the dolls we were making."

Filed under: Obama family


No Incumbents 2010   February 3rd, 2009 7:28 pm ET

@ shoegazer
Because idiotic Americans buy the products, and then gripe about the capitalist being parasites.

curtis   February 3rd, 2009 7:23 pm ET

More like crumbled under a deluge of bad press and threatened lawsuits.

How could they ever think it was appropriate in the first place? You can't make and sell dolls of people without their permission.

Cindy   February 3rd, 2009 7:11 pm ET

@Lilarose in Bandon, Oregon February 3rd, 2009 4:15 pm ET
And good riddance!From a mom of two girls. I would be furious to have my girls publicly portrayed like this.
Wonder Y –Ty didn't try to sell Dolls of the Bush Twins???

beetle   February 3rd, 2009 7:07 pm ET

ty must be repub. greed was written all over it. that is something they would do for a dollar.

Simmy   February 3rd, 2009 7:03 pm ET

Their website was also flooded with negative comments. They had no choice. Next time think before exploiting.

Don't Mess Around With Jim ...   February 3rd, 2009 6:38 pm ET

There are some Americans with principles ... thank the lord.

I am sure it was the voices of many thousands of those Americans, telling Ty that the exploitation of Sasha and Malia was a financial danger to the corporation, that made them see the light.

Oh, it's also not wise to get on the bad side of the President or the 1st lady in a public relations dispute.

My2Cents   February 3rd, 2009 6:33 pm ET

My question is why were dolls named after 10 and 7 year old girls made with "breast-bumps"? Ridiculous.

"Ty Senior Vice President of Sales Tania Lundeen said "Sasha and Malia are beautiful names" that "worked very well with the dolls we were making." Yeah, just add "sweet" to Sasha and "marvelous" to Malia and you got "redlight" district sounding names. What creeps

Lynn in NM   February 3rd, 2009 6:27 pm ET

Private citizens? If you had wanted your daughters to stay private citizens, your husband shouldn't have run for public office. They are now celebrities, as are you. Sorry Michelle. You can't take just the perks without paying your dues.

Debby   February 3rd, 2009 6:25 pm ET

Oh brother it was okay though when the pre-inauguration stuff of the Obama's ad-nauseum was sold everywhere, but now its wrong to have the dolls out.

Jackie in Dallas   February 3rd, 2009 6:19 pm ET

It doesn't require a lot of lawyers to see that this was inappropriate. It was no secret that Ty was trying to make money off of dolls based on the First Family. By any stretch of the imagination, what the Obamas did was to protect their children from being capitalized on, something most parents would understand, and that I, as a childless woman, can certainly understand.

It is not socialism to protect your family from exploitation. Nor did it probably take any type of strongarm techniques. Ty has been known to jump first then find out that their decisions were not too smart before; this is just another example. Children's images and names, whether they are in the White House or the poorhouse, are protected from exploitation.

Dan   February 3rd, 2009 6:19 pm ET

What does Obama-Mama has got to say here. She is keeping quiet.
It would have been better if TY had to pay some royalty to Barack/Michelle. They usually take that kind of money.

Perusing-Through   February 3rd, 2009 6:08 pm ET

IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO!

There are $Billions being made out there and in all types of ways just by stamping Obama or "YES WE CAN" on the product. But TY took it too far when it stole the names of President Obama's daughters and to use it to market it’s first ever "Beanie Babies" of color. That was no coincident. Shame on you TY! Shame on you!

Chuck   February 3rd, 2009 6:00 pm ET

Sidmore,
really?
You voted for Obama and now, because they dont want their little girls exploited for comercial reasons, now you think he's elitist?
Really? This is what made you think, after all this time being a supporter of his, NOW you think he's elitist?
Ok,
I guess your right, it is elitist in that their not trying to exploit unknowns for comercial purposes.

Mike   February 3rd, 2009 5:59 pm ET

Sidmore,

Are you so blind as to think that the names of the dolls are what this is all about?

It makes me wonder if you have any young daughters yourself. I'll admit that I don't either, but I at least know that I would not like the ideas of others profiting off of my children. Since when is protecting your children elitist? Parental permission is required by law to do things such distribute likenesses of a minor.

Angela   February 3rd, 2009 5:47 pm ET

Ty should also donate the profit made from the dolls to a charity of Malia and Sasha Obama's choice.
Who did Ty company think they were fooling? It was no coincidence that a few days after the inauguration these names were selected. Why didn't they use Tasha and Shana? Katrina and Daphne? Capitalism at it's best/worst...

Reality Check   February 3rd, 2009 5:42 pm ET

That's too bad. What happened to our contry based on CAPITALISM?

I can hear the SOCIALISM knocking at our door....

Watch out America!

shoegazer   February 3rd, 2009 5:41 pm ET

It never ceases to amaze me how these parasitic companies will sink to the lowest common denominator to try and make a buck.

No Hillary = No Obama   February 3rd, 2009 5:41 pm ET

I wonder how many lawyers were involved in this strong arm?

I witnessed history!   February 3rd, 2009 5:28 pm ET

Of course they 'retired' them b/c they knew they were wrong to use the names without the first lady's consent from the get go no matter how they tried to cover it.

Sidmore   February 3rd, 2009 5:24 pm ET

What was so wrong with Sasha and Malia dolls? First, the Obamas do not own a copyright on those names. Second, they should be happy that little African American girls will have dolls that look like them. It is such a selfish act and really turns me off and it smacks of elitism. And this comes from someone who voted for you, President Obama.

Meka   February 3rd, 2009 4:46 pm ET

The "Boycott" worked!

Glennis   February 3rd, 2009 4:18 pm ET

They bear no resemblence to the Obama girls. But having said that, it's pretty obvious that the people who put these thiings out is trying to take advantage of the first family. I wouldn't buy them whether I liked Obama or not. If it were my family they were using, I'd sue 'em.

Lillie   February 3rd, 2009 4:17 pm ET

GOOD!! Malia and Sasha are beautiful names and should never be exploited for profit!!!!

Sylvia   February 3rd, 2009 4:16 pm ET

The 12-inch-tall dolls, which bear a resemblance to the first family's Sasha, 7, and Malia, 10, were introduced last month as part of the Ty Girlz collection.

what resemblance????????????????????????????????????????

Lilarose in Bandon, Oregon   February 3rd, 2009 4:15 pm ET

And good riddance!

From a mom of two girls. I would be furious to have my girls publicly portrayed like this.

Bill   February 3rd, 2009 4:14 pm ET

The First Lady was right–Too much pressure on her girls I think. I mean ....Dolls?

legal in nc   February 3rd, 2009 4:14 pm ET

In whats left of our free market society it's a shame that a company can't market something because the White House says so. They should have given the Obamas (Chicago Thugs) a cut from the sales and they would have been able to keep on allowing these dolls to be sold to benefit both their company and the Obamas.

Jim   February 3rd, 2009 4:10 pm ET

Ha! People are already trying to sell them on Ebay for as much as $50.

Mari   February 3rd, 2009 4:09 pm ET

Good, to have done this WITHOUT the approval of President & Mrs. Obama showed a total lack of respect!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@edhenrycnn: Christmas at the White House -- click on fun video package put together by CNN WH producer Shawna Shepherd http://tinyurl.com/yz7ftee
Updated: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:58:23 -0800
@edhenrycnn: http://twitpic.com/s991o - OK it's not a foot of snow in Grand Rapids, but we're getting there ..
Updated: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:39:15 -0800
@edhenrycnn: RT @PoliticalTicker: "Poll: Obama's approval rating drops" - http://bit.ly/4xOREF
Updated: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:37:57 -0800
@edhenrycnn: RT @DonnaBrazile Another male pol admits to affair with staff (Baucus). Lust & greed bipartisan.Ethics must look into this // strong words
Updated: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:26:44 -0800
@edhenrycnn: @TonyFratto true, DC cab drivers from elsewhere not used to snow, but what's federal government's excuse? been snowing here for decades
Updated: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:11:06 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP