February 6, 2009
Posted: February 6th, 2009 05:41 PM ET

From
President Obama's decision to nominate Sen. Judgg Gregg as Commerce Secretary has sparked concerns about who will control the 2010 census.
President Obama's decision to nominate Sen. Judgg Gregg as Commerce Secretary has sparked concerns about who will control the 2010 census.

WASHINGTON (CNN)– President Barack Obama’s decision to cross party lines and nominate New Hampshire Republican Sen. Judd Gregg to run the Commerce Department has set off a partisan battle over the 2010 census.

African-American and Latino leaders are concerned that the Census Bureau, which is part of the Commerce Department, might lack sufficient resources under Gregg’s leadership to accurately count ethnic minorities.

And in response to statements from the White House that it will work closely with the bureau’s next director, some House Republicans are suggesting that the Obama administration could manipulate the 2010 tally to achieve a longer-term political advantage for Democrats because congressional redistricting depends on census results.

The Census has been the topic of political debate in the past. Many experts believed that the door-to-door approach used in the 1990 Census count missed 1 to 2 percent of the total U.S. population, with many of those uncounted Americans thought to be minorities who lived in urban areas. To address that concern, Census officials proposed using some basic statistical techniques to fill in the gaps. Democrats tended to favor this approach, which were expected to increase the population count in areas of Democratic strength; Republicans tended to oppose the new techniques for similar reasons. The controversy even reached the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1990s.

Gregg, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee and of the subcommittee that oversees the Commerce Department, cast a vote in 1995 to abolish the entire department, and in 1999 opposed emergency funding for the 2000 census.

Almost immediately after Gregg’s formal nomination earlier this week, Hispanic and African-American advocacy groups began to express concern about Gregg’s leadership of Commerce during the 2010 census.

Gregg’s record raises “troubling concerns regarding his commitment to the department’s core missions,” California Democrat Rep. Barbara Lee, chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus said in a statement Tuesday.

The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials was likewise concerned. “Census data are the fundamental building blocks for reapportionment and redistricting, which determine the contours of our representative democracy,” the Latino group said in a statement earlier this week.

The group also said it “will be closely monitoring the confirmation process to learn more about Secretary-Designate Gregg’s view of the Department’s responsibility to conduct an accurate census.”

Efforts by the White House to reassure minority advocacy groups have generated claims of partisanship from Republicans. After the Obama administration said Thursday that the director of the Census Bureau would “work closely with White House senior management,” California Rep. Darrell Issa and North Carolina Rep. Patrick McHenry, two Republican members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, wrote the President a letter.

“Requiring the Census Director to report directly to the White House and circumventing the Secretary of Commerce is both outrageous and unprecedented,” the two Republicans wrote. Issa and McHenry also described Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel as a “hyper-partisan” who might “politicize the Census Bureau and manipulate the 2010 Census” on the administration’s behalf.

In a statement that also appeared to be targeted at Emanuel, House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio said Friday that the decennial census “should not be directed by political operatives working out of the White House.”

Asked about the controversy during his daily briefing Friday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs seemed to be trying to find a middle ground.

Echoing the White House’s earlier statement, Gibbs said there’s “historical precedent,” for the director of the Census Bureau to work for the Commerce Secretary and to “work closely” with the White House as well.

"Everybody can be assured that any person that is picked by the President . . . . [will] implement the views of [the] president," said Gibbs. “And President Obama obviously is, believes that we have to for a lot of reasons have a fair and accurate count during the next census. That’s, as president of the United States, exactly what he intends to do.”

Gregg has yet to have his Senate confirmation hearing for the Cabinet post. Boehner also said Friday that the issue of control of the Census Bureau could be raised during Gregg’s confirmation process.

–CNN Polling Director Keating Holland contributed to this report.

Filed under: Census • Judd Gregg • President Obama


Tina   February 7th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

Change dems can believe in. Who needs ACORN?

Annie, Atlanta   February 6th, 2009 10:15 pm ET

I'm not understanding why Obama nominated this guy – this is a head scratcher.

Texas Teacher   February 6th, 2009 9:56 pm ET

How about a little VETTING... PaLease!

Texas Teacher   February 6th, 2009 9:55 pm ET

How long before 2010? Not so long.... but not soon enough! Seriously...

Penumbrist   February 6th, 2009 9:53 pm ET

Use of basic statistical techniques = not counting, but guessing. It's an unconstitutional way to conduct a census - not really a census at all.

John G   February 6th, 2009 9:29 pm ET

Why not have Census report directly to the White House to circumvent the Republican head of Commerce as well as the law regarding the census?

This administration has made rules just to break them the same day (lobbyists) so why should this rule be any different?

Holly - Missouri   February 6th, 2009 9:14 pm ET

This is disgusting. The census should be about getting an accurate count and picture of what is going on in our nation. Period. Whatever method will produce the most ACCURATE results is the way to go. It SHOULD be just that simple...

M   February 6th, 2009 9:05 pm ET

How hard can it be?

Get Frankins people to count them. How many do you need to win?

Kathy in Florida   February 6th, 2009 8:53 pm ET

OBAMA needs to remember who elected him....What is he trying to prove with all these repubs in key positions, especially repub white males. What happened to women and minorities?

Mark   February 6th, 2009 8:50 pm ET

"Hyper-partisan"? Pot, kettle, etc.

The Gregg nomination amounts to appointing a fox to be Commissioner of Henhouses. The White House had bloody well better be prepared to keep a close eye on him.

Zack   February 6th, 2009 8:48 pm ET

So now we're even letting our politicians bicker over what should be a simple matter of statistical analysis left to professionals. Honestly, are we so partisan as a people that we're willing to permit this behavior?

Mike, Syracuse NY   February 6th, 2009 8:43 pm ET

Many minorities in urban areas don't want to be counted because they are here illegally. Counting illegals just skews representaion in Congress.

S Callahan   February 6th, 2009 8:39 pm ET

I can't see how his appointment can affect the census....they are already testing/hiring persons to do the job.....

Texas Teacher   February 6th, 2009 8:22 pm ET

Mr. President Obama... are you losing YOUR mind? Stop appointing these stupid republicans who got us into this mess to high government offices! For Gods sake.... give it a break! We did NOT vote for this bipartisan BS! We do NOT want Republicans having any power in our new government... they do NOT deserve to be in ANY position of power! SERIOUSLY... :( I am sick to death of this bull crap! And I am NOT alone!

Paul   February 6th, 2009 8:18 pm ET

How ironic, that some House Republicans fear that members of the Obama administration may attempt to manipulate the 2010 census to achieve political congressional redistricting..................those that fear would more likely to make the attempt...............and since they (GOP) are not in power, we don't need to worry.

These Republican congressional leaders continue to VOICE fault of the Obama administration.......and , yet, what DID THEY DO for US....nothing but a financial meltdown under the Bush administration.

MARIO L.A   February 6th, 2009 8:07 pm ET

LOL, I have heard some silly things in my life, but this takes the cake...
People we have been flushed for so long, that we cant climb out the bowl for pulling down the handle.

Greg is a great pick, for those that worry about trade, he is open to free trade as long as it is fair, and level, and for the census, well I guess if your playing by all the rules, you have nothing to worry about. TIS THE AMERICAN WAY

Jetty   February 6th, 2009 8:01 pm ET

Republicans are defining the end of their party. Rush Limberg is gone and so are the hardcore conservatives like Sean Hannidy. Others like Karl Roove are waiting their trial. I hope they keep silent to lessen the price they have to pay for missleadinmg the Bussh administration.

Time to bread a new Neo Conservative agenda under Michael steel if we have to avoid GOP becoming another Liberaterian patry (dead and irrelevant).

For Obama, you are on the right tract because the current stimulus debate is healthy and would yield positive results in the years ahead.

Franky   February 6th, 2009 7:45 pm ET

This is one of the most idiotic and most bull crap things I ever heard. One minute one side is upset...and then the other side, they ain't upset, they're upset!!

You all elected officials are all a bunch of freaks...

kayla   February 6th, 2009 7:42 pm ET

AMERICA, YOU NEED PHYCIATIC TREATMENT. ENOUGH ALREADY.
GO GET A LIFE. AND STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT EVERY DARN THING.

joe plummer   February 6th, 2009 7:41 pm ET

The President is smart in this case,its wise to keep your enemies closer and make sure he cant damage more things than he already has.

Interested in MO   February 6th, 2009 7:34 pm ET

Wasn't it a bunch of Republicans who gerrymandered the redistricting in Texas a few years ago? But now, oh no!! The Democrats might get an advantage! Good grief.

Ken in NC   February 6th, 2009 7:30 pm ET

This is beginning to reek of childish tic for tac. It appears that every person named for an office by this President is coming under fire for one thing or another. I am not knocking those with tax issues but along with them it seems that everything is being done to throw up road blocks to prevent this President from getting his people in place so they can get on with the work they should be doing. This so sad because these people realize that if they succeed in causing our government to collapse, they got down the tube too but I sense that they don't care.

I hate Rush but.......   February 6th, 2009 7:30 pm ET

Actually "Debbie" it is NOT ridiculous, the census is where it is FOR A REASON so it can't be manipulated politically FOR ANYONES advantage and the framers of our country realized that when they came up with the idea.

Sorry if facts and reasoning make it appear to be "ridiculous" in your ahem, mind, but then again your a "typical" Obama supporter.

But Barry is so great and he makes the sun warm and bunnies fuzzy and, and, and HOPE and CHANGE........................

One and done Barry.

01/22/2013

Ms. Johnson, Pearland,Texas   February 6th, 2009 7:28 pm ET

Bad choice why elect a democratic president to take care republicans who have stood against everthing the democratic party stands for.

No Incumbents 2010   February 6th, 2009 7:23 pm ET

Did he pay his taxes?

Jeanne   February 6th, 2009 7:19 pm ET

Oh, you mean like you Republicans tried to gerrymander in several states to change or cut districts in Republican favor. Give me a break!!!!

Justin   February 6th, 2009 7:18 pm ET

Totally ridiculous story. It's time for me to give up my Republican Party affiliation. The Republicans in Washington are making us all look like clowns.

an american first   February 6th, 2009 7:17 pm ET

Are you serious? Pres. Obama gives a Commerce Secretary job to a major Republican in the country, and the Republicans are complaining why the census was not soley controlled by the Secretory-appoint Gregg. Let me say this again – are you serioius?

Do you realize that he DID NOT HAVE TO appoint Republican to this position at all? If he didn't, would this be an issue? – of course NOT...

snuggs   February 6th, 2009 7:15 pm ET

All these people care about is winning elections. They certainly don't care about us (except Obama).

Anonymous   February 6th, 2009 7:14 pm ET

All these people care about is winning elections. They certainly don't care about us (except Obama).

FreeNLovIt   February 6th, 2009 7:14 pm ET

Oh, dear, here we go again!!

NoMcSame   February 6th, 2009 7:11 pm ET

No ReThuglicans. They care about Iraq Only. Vote them out.

Charles from Atlanta   February 6th, 2009 7:09 pm ET

I'm not sure why he is chosen. But I think there must be a reason.

I say if you don't have a mailing address don't count them   February 6th, 2009 7:07 pm ET

as a democrat, no mailing address, you aren't counted

at what point are you a functioning citizen?

I think it should matter, not that you are phyically in the U.S., but that you are contributing in a way that is reflected by a place that mail is delivered to

Looking for you under bridges or where ever is allowing a continuing problem to exist... why are we taking care of people that aren't trying to take care of themselves?

Living in San Francisco, this translates into dramatic health issues, etc, and it really smells (the people in the transient population choose even elevators to go to the bath room in)

I am not advocating forgetting these people, make them a part of a different count, their phychological problems etc absolutely need addressing, but define the census in a countable way

Rae   February 6th, 2009 7:01 pm ET

These children will fight over anything.

Rick Sutter   February 6th, 2009 6:57 pm ET

One more move toward socialism. Control the census, control the airwaves ("fairness" doctrine). Step by step and you dems are like the frog in the pot of water. You won't even notice your country is gone until it is too late.

LONGV   February 6th, 2009 6:52 pm ET

A bipartisan president, get real? Obama has a lot to learn.

Debbie   February 6th, 2009 6:49 pm ET

OH GROW UP PEOPLE! This is ridiculous.

Citizen Abu, CA   February 6th, 2009 6:43 pm ET

Republicans, please chill. We have your back

Doug   February 6th, 2009 6:42 pm ET

I am a democrat O supporter, this appointment continues to show that washington is a joke. He voted against having a federal department but now he can lead it, WHERE? This is ridiculous and it should be ended by the Senate. He should be defeated and quickly. O is not doing anybody a favor with these management decisions.

By The Numbers   February 6th, 2009 6:29 pm ET

Simple solution, staff the operation to it's highest level ever ..... on a per million people of population basis ...

DEMS ARE IDIOTS   February 6th, 2009 6:29 pm ET

Leave it up to partisian democrats to be complaining about this. Just admit it, you hacks would find a problem with any republican that was choosen by your messiah. I just think its hilarious that Obama has had more ethical issues/ tax issues arise in his first two weeks then Bush had in his first 4 yrs, But BUSH is the UNETHICAL one? For Godsake the guy Obama picked to run the IRS didnt pay his taxes???? Are you people serious, you have lost all resemblence of respectability. God help us all these next 4 yrs.

Sniffit   February 6th, 2009 6:08 pm ET

Oh brother...so special interests are whining and the GOP is making baseless accusations...so Obama's going to have to lay the smack down on both sides. I think we'll be seeing a lot of that over the next 4 years.

BB   February 6th, 2009 6:01 pm ET

***** chirp ***************************** chirp *****

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@KuhnCNN: Great meeting @JackGrayCNN today and seeing @sinderbrandrcnn in NYC! AC Rock Stars! :-)
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:07:10 -0800
@KuhnCNN: Posted today: Clinton foreign trip first on Twitter. http://bit.ly/9Axuh9 /via @PoliticalTicker
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:36:14 -0800
@KuhnCNN: RT @octavianasrCNN: MUST-READ// Coaching tomorrow's world leaders, through social networking -- http://bit.ly/9tmW6x
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:32:51 -0800
@AWMooneyCNN: Metro finally comes and then stops at station for 20 minutes #snoverkill
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:46:27 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: I just shoveled two feet of snow off the roof. That was fun!
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:14:34 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP