February 14th, 2009
11:20 AM ET
5 years ago

Stimulus bill plans limits on executive pay

WASHINGTON (CNN) - Included in the massive $787 billion economic stimulus package passed by Congress Friday and now awaiting President Barack Obama's signature is an amendment that would severely restrict bonuses and other forms of compensation for top executives at companies receiving federal bailout money.

The amendment by Sen. Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, would impose wide-ranging restrictions on how - and by how much - top executives at companies receiving federal bailout money can be compensated.

The measure would cap bonuses - often far more lucrative than base salaries for top executives - and could require executives at companies that have already received bailout money to pay back some of their compensation if it exceeded certain limits.

Dodd, a Democrat from Connecticut, said in a statement that his amendment was aimed at imposing "tough new limits on huge bonuses" for executives at firms receiving money from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

"The decisions of certain Wall Street executives to enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers have seriously undermined public confidence in efforts to stabilize the economy. American taxpayers deserve better," Dodd said.

But some financial industry advisers and analysts said Saturday - as the entire stimulus package headed for Obama's desk - that the Dodd amendment was
far tougher than what even Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner proposed recently, particularly in the number of high-paid executives and employees it would affect.

It will be up to the Treasury Department to implement the restrictions in Dodd's amendment if the stimulus package becomes law with Obama's signature.

Among the many provisions of Dodd's measure:

– Firms taking more than $500 million from TARP would be required to restrict compensation paid to the 20 top-earning employees as well as to key executives. For companies getting $250 million to $500 million from TARP, it would be senior executives and the top 10 earning employees, and the number of affected employees would go down from there for companies taking less than $250 million from TARP.

– "Golden parachutes" for senior executive officers or the next five most highly-compensated employees would be banned at companies receiving TARP funds, ending those often-sizeable severance payments for departing executives.

–Top executives at TARP-funded firms would be barred from receiving bonuses exceeding one-third of their annual salary. For many top executives that would mean a dramatic reduction. The Wall Street Journal cited as an example the 2007 compensation of Bank of America Corp. CEO Kenneth D. Lewis, who was paid a salary of $1.5 million that year but who actually earned a total of $16.4 million including a bonus, stock-option awards and restricted stock. At the same salary level, Lewis' 2009 compensation would be restricted to about $2.25 million under the Dodd provisions, the Journal said.

–The Secretary of the Treasury must review past compensation paid to the top 25 employees of TARP recipients and seek reimbursements "if those payments
were contrary to the public interest or inconsistent with the purposes of the (stimulus package) or the TARP," according to Dodd's statement.

But the restrictions could have unintended consequences, some financial industry insiders said Saturday.

"Basically this is encouraging the sales force - the lifeblood of any company - to look for work elsewhere, to leave (TARP-backed companies) for healthier companies where they can make more money," said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs for the Washington-based Financial Services Roundtable, a trade association representing 100 of the largest financial firms in the country.

"So if the goal of TARP is to make companies stronger, to get them back on their feet so they can stand on their own, and this drives away key executives, this is a problem," he told CNN in a telephone interview.

Talbott also posed the question of what would happen on the Dodd amendment's sliding scale of restricted compensation at large firms when "the top 20 earning employees are restricted and they move down in income. They are no longer that company's top 20 earners, others in the company now become the
top 20. Are those 20 (then) under the compensation restrictions?"

Jim Reda, a New York-based compensation and corporate governance consultant, told CNN that TARP-funded firms could face a dilemma if the Dodd restrictions are imposed: either lose key executives to other companies, or pay back the TARP money immediately and possibly jeopardize the company's capital position.

"It's not good for taxpayers to have (TARP) money in organizations where the executives are leaving or the company is weakened," Reda told CNN.

"My suspicion is that there are a lot of loopholes in this, " Reda said, adding, "What it accomplishes is that it really confuses everybody."

There are questions about how the restrictions would apply retroactively to companies that already have received TARP money, Reda said, and questions
about how Dodd's restrictions fit with the looser restrictions on executive compensation proposed by Obama and Geithner.

Presumably, Dodd's amendment "overrides" Obama and Geithner," Reda said, adding, "That's extremely confusing."


Filed under: Stimulus • Wall Street
soundoff (One Response)
  1. mln

    I can't believe people who are making 1.5 million are complaining about this–there are poeple out here who are not working–some who are but can't pay for food and fuel...people are losing their homes and companies are worried that if they take 'government money–that's taxes from those of us who work for far less then 1.5 mill–they'll lose top people–stop whining wall street..spend some time serving breakfast at a homeless shelter, or a county ED and see how people without jobs, homes or health insurance are making it on nothing....

    February 15, 2009 02:20 pm at 2:20 pm |

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.