March 10, 2009
Posted: March 10th, 2009 09:30 AM ET

From
Bernanke called for new policies to help absorb future financial shocks.
Bernanke called for new policies to help absorb future financial shocks.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) – Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that economic recovery hinges on stabilizing the financial system, and proposed new policies aimed at absorbing financial shocks in the future.

Watch: Bank reform 'key to recovery,' says Bernanke

"Until we stabilize the financial system, a sustainable economic recovery will remain out of reach," Bernanke said in prepared remarks.

Bernanke said governments around the world must work together to address problems associated with financial institutions deemed too big to fail. These large, interconnected financial institutions that pose a "systemic risk" to economic stability, he said.

Full story

Filed under: Ben Bernanke • Economy


DOC   March 10th, 2009 11:51 am ET

...and bank reform depends on transparent use of taxpayer's funds. Considering that the banks have already shown their irresponsible behavior with the "recovery" money that was handed to them, we can pretty much surmise we're in trouble.

april   March 10th, 2009 11:50 am ET

Mari–check your facts about who was in control of Congress and when.I think you will be surprised to find that Democrats were responsible for the votes to go to war in Iraq, and the votes for the spending during Bush's administration.

RinFL   March 10th, 2009 11:50 am ET

Good thing that we have smarter people trying to fix things than those who post on blogs (self included). some things I find interesting and baseless:
1. Abolish the Federal reserve rants........Well now the Fed under geenspan did some damage with it's policies and I think there was some political motivation on that point. But, to rail on Ben Bernake? Who better for the job than a student of the last great deleveraging event in the US? Deny all you want but the Fed has actually served it's purpose well lately, the lengths they have gone in this "event" are incredible and history will bear that out.

2. Rants on Tim Geitner... Who better? I think that most people have a problem with him because they do not understand what he is talking about. Look kids this is no simple matter and there is probably no way to actually explain in real person terms what is going on in the banks.

3. This beleif that the free market will fix it's self is delusional at best. The market was supposed to, by consideration of it's best interest, regulated it's self to prevent such a thing. Did not happen, never will happen the history of 1880's & 1920's and current are but 3 examples of the falicy of the financial industries ability to self regulate.

Concerned in MA   March 10th, 2009 11:41 am ET

For all of you who say "this isn't Obama's Problem"...

YES, IT IS.

If, as a private citizen, you take a job that the person who had it before you failed miserably on... guess what? It's your problem now.

If Obama didn't want the job, he shouldn't have run. If he doesn't want it now, he should resign.

Quit whining.

Mari   March 10th, 2009 11:36 am ET

I read an interesting article in the NYTimes this morning, by conservative, David Brooks, I quote:

" ..... but let's face it the current Republican response is totally misguided. The House Minority leader, John Boehner, has called for a federal spending freeze for the rest of this year. In other words after a decade of profligacy, the Republicans have decided to demand fiscal straightjacket at the one moment in the past 70 years when IT IS COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE."

Mr. Brooks is right! Its insane of the GOP! First they controlled BOTH House & Senate from 1994-2007 and spent and DE-regulated all they could! And then, through EIGHT YEARS of Bush they allowed Bush to DOUBLE the National debt and .......... HIDE the TRUE cost of the war!

One question:

WHERE WERE ALL THESE SO-CALLED-FISCAL-CONSERVATIVES WHEN BUSH WAS SPENDING OUR NATION IN TO .......... OBLIVION?????????????????????????????????

april   March 10th, 2009 11:25 am ET

Benanke is wrong–it's the economy that makes the banks strong, we need to do what the Chinese are doing–declare war on unemployment. Until people feel secure in their jobs they are not going to spend, they won't take out loans, buy houses or cars.Without that– the only capital these banks will recieve is the money pumped into it by the government, taken from those still employed. Those 12.5 million and growing unemployment number, means less people putting money in the governments pocket. What ignorance is a foot.

New Day   March 10th, 2009 11:21 am ET

I think both democrats and republicans (and their pundit lackeys) are overstating this crisis to advance their agendas and, in the process, causing the market and consumers to panic.

The facts are that:

A) not everyone deserves a loan
B) your house isn't worth the inflated price you paid
C) no one that handles large sums of money should go unregulated
D) the vast majority of us have spent beyond our means and, now that we have stopped, the economy needs to adjust to reality.
E) we don't need 1000 credit card companies, 500 banks, and a starbucks and mcdonalds in every corner.

Once the economy adjusts to a new more common-sensical lifestyle, we will all be fine, just fine.

connect the dots   March 10th, 2009 11:20 am ET

The Federal Reserve is the biggest risk and filled with crooks.Not many people even know it is a private bank run by unknown money mongers.

Bayousara   March 10th, 2009 11:20 am ET

Capitalism........free market system.............

These are not religions.

If they don't work, and there have been plenty of examples throughout our country's history with devastating results, then why do we keep on keepin' on?

There are other examples of financial systems around the world....let's investigate them to see if they will work better.

Thomas   March 10th, 2009 11:19 am ET

Shocker that the guy who runs a bank cartel wants the banks to be given money. This is not surprising.

Is there someone independent of conflict of interest that has a recommendation on this?

Sophie   March 10th, 2009 11:16 am ET

What sense does it make if someone who makes a payment ONE DAY late has the interest on their entire credit balance raised permanently to outrageous rates into the 30% range?

This would discourage me from even making one more payment on that card. The debtor will never get that card paid off at that rate.

The banks haven't figured this out yet. They will when zillions of people stop making credit card payments.

Why bother? Use your money for the bare necessities. Yes, your credit will go down the tube, but you can resurrect it down the line.

Lilarose, Bandon, Oregon   March 10th, 2009 11:14 am ET

Regarding credit card "plastic" debt, if the financial institutions keep raising interest rates/fees like they have been recently, they are really going to lose big in this part of their industry.

What sense does it make if someone who makes a payment ONE DAY late has the interest on their entire credit balance raised permanently to outrageous rates into the 30% range?

This would discourage me from even making one more payment on that card. The debtor will never get that card paid off at that rate.

The banks haven't figured this out yet. They will when zillions of people stop making credit card payments.

Why bother? Use your money for the bare necessities. Yes, your credit will go down the tube, but you can resurrect it down the line.

mamosa   March 10th, 2009 11:14 am ET

Does the Federal Reserve need to be re formed? Taken over by the government?

Scott, Tucson   March 10th, 2009 11:11 am ET

And these are the same banks that charge us outrageous card interest rates while paying out mere pennies on interest to savings accounts. That also hit us with excessive ATM fees, overdraft charges, transaction fees, fees to talk to a live teller ect... And we are suppose to bail them out? Let them fail!

Ray Fisher   March 10th, 2009 11:11 am ET

Bernanke is correct, the banks must be reregulated before recovery can begin in earnest. Geithner has been lagging thus far on laying out the details of his plans. America must have a stable banking system to provide confidence in the economy.

ran   March 10th, 2009 11:10 am ET

Then reform the banks and get on with it.

Raul   March 10th, 2009 11:09 am ET

How about stablelizing the public. Does it make sense for the person that makes 9-10 dollars an hour to be subsidizing the people that make thousands per day? If we live in a capitalist country whatever industry that can not make it. Well let if fail. If it is a good bussiness there wil be someone willing to take the risk and pick it up. The only ones that can't make their money back are the tax payers that are on a salary and always end up picking up the tab for the one that have squandered someone else's money. Every one that makes an investment knows there is a risk, just like every one that has a bussiness knows there is a risk. Let's grow up.

Jim   March 10th, 2009 11:06 am ET

Heard some of the Fed Chairman's presentation and a few Q&As afterward. It struck me that if we do not incentivize the banking system to do the right thing, then bankers will spend most of their time figuring out how to get around the government's regulatory system; in other words, the banking system will do the wrong thing because they make more money that way. Questions are: (1) how do you create incentives so that correct behavior is rewarded? and (2) what is "correct behavior" in a free market?

Anyway, although not in the banking realm, as a parallel concept I thought about how to incentivize doctors and hospitals to treat patients without insurance: why not allow them some sort of tax breaks for treating patients without health insurance? Of course, it causes tax payers to pay the bill, but it provides the medical industry a clear message about what we as a society regard as "correct behavior" and it preserves the idea of a market rather than creating another government program. So what about banks – is there a regulatory system we can construct that promotes "correct behavior" with rewards?

joe smith   March 10th, 2009 11:06 am ET

not just reform, but OVERSITE, these people, especially the ones that received bailout monies,need a few FBI and IRS officials inhouse to monitor their comings and goings,then maybe the American people who are paying for this scandle will feel somewhat protected..

Axl in Iowa   March 10th, 2009 11:06 am ET

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

S.S.D.D.

If we had just let them fail at the onset, we would likely be on the re-bound right now. If I recall correctly. About 85% of Americans demanded that. Instead, about .0000001% (Congress) decided to "Bail" them out. Well, they're still failing, and we're still paying.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Houff   March 10th, 2009 11:02 am ET

Micheal, I don't think any rational thinking person expects this president to fix our economy. First, I don't think government is ever positioned to do much for the economy, except maybe make it worse. Sadly, I think that is what is happening. Government never does ANYTHING efficiently or cheaply. We understand government has to do some things, but they are never done without all kinds of bureaucracy, red tape, cost overruns and waste. I support our military, but they are just as bad as all other government entities. If you have any doubts, look at VA Hospitals and the US Postal Service. Then compare them to privately run counterparts. There is no comparison.

This economy cannot be fixed by government, and certainly not by government spending. Government is too slow, cumbersome and lacking in incentive to ever do a good job of much of anything. Failing businesses, including banks, should fail. The market will not allow a vacuum. The "space" will be filled.

katiec   March 10th, 2009 11:02 am ET

Isn't it sad that we cannot depend on the financial institutions, Wall St, to do the right thing? Their greed is criminal. They are even using our taxpayer dollars to lobby for their benefit.
Rules, regulations must be established as we they will not become credible on their own.
I am not against nationalization of the banks as they cannot be
trusted,

Mark   March 10th, 2009 11:02 am ET

We need to stabilize Obama and Pelosi's spending plans!

Pee Wee   March 10th, 2009 11:01 am ET

The Dow is now at 6805, right about where it was in April of 1997.

Alas, Obama has returned us to the revered days of Clinton prosperity.

Why all the complaining? Those were great days, right?

obama-mama   March 10th, 2009 10:59 am ET

The greedy rich destroyed this country.

Freddy   March 10th, 2009 10:58 am ET

Gotta love the libspeak. I remember when President Bush first came to office and libs were blaming him for the economy back then, nevermind the fact that the economy had started to turn South during the Clinton administration, Libs placed the blame squarely on Bush's shoulders. Now that Obama is in office, the Libs are screaming about how it's not Obama's economy and not his fault. Nice 180, libs, you are truly the masters of hypocrisy.

Just another American   March 10th, 2009 10:52 am ET

BTW, the market is UP 253 at the moment and this is the day AFTER the president changed stem cell research restrictions. Maybe republicans can say something negative to make it drop?

Get Well Soon GOP   March 10th, 2009 10:51 am ET

If the Recovery depends on bank reform, then what was the stimulus package for? I love Obama, but he is spending a lot of money. Am I right about that or is the GOP constant complaining just getting to me?

Abel Walinski   March 10th, 2009 10:49 am ET

Think, people. The banks know that Obama's socialistic plans will bankrupt the taxpayers, so why would the banks now start lending to people who won't be able to pay them back in the future?

Kevin in Ohio   March 10th, 2009 10:48 am ET

"Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that economic recovery hinges on stabilizing the financial system, and proposed new policies aimed at absorbing financial shocks in the future"..... he is dead on target. Obama should take heed. And, yes, this is Obama's economy.

Dave From Philly   March 10th, 2009 10:46 am ET

I think it is way too late, the markets have already failed. We just refuse to believe it. Banks and large corporations have played an accounting figures game for so long that the numbers no longer add up.

An accountant/auditing professor once told me that figures can figure, but number never lie.

Lexie   March 10th, 2009 10:43 am ET

This is still very much a Republican problem. President Obama can't undo eight years of corruption overnight. The Republicans have cost the taxpayers years and years of $$$$.

Micheal   March 10th, 2009 10:35 am ET

This is not obama economy yet. Anybody who expected a turn around after his second day in office is a fool!

Sue   March 10th, 2009 10:34 am ET

This means that the rich people who are taking all the bail-out money are going to have to stop placing their cuts into tax havens in the Cayman islands, and actually start paying US taxes. If all of them paid US taxes like they were supposed to, then we would NOT be in the mess.

al in memphis   March 10th, 2009 10:26 am ET

Didn't we learn from the fall of the Roman Empire that nothing is too big to fail. Greed and corruptions will erode anything. If they are too big to fail, then that means they were too big to run with any efficiency.
Competion breeds effiency– looks like the don't interfer with business attitude forgot that is the true core of capitalism.

Average Joe   March 10th, 2009 10:23 am ET

I would love to see the whole rotten Federal Reserve system reformed/abolished. But we all know that isn't going to happen.

JS007   March 10th, 2009 10:18 am ET

Keith Olbermann last night did a great summary of why banks were not regulated. Over the last 10 years or so they spent BILLIONS on lobbying and political contributions. Basically, they own the government. That is why the CEOs can destroy companies and the economy by taking insane risks and then walk away with millions, plus bailouts. I bet no CEO will go to jail over this. Cramer also pointed out last night that we regulate gambling way more than Wall Street. Wall Street did what mafia could never do – rewrote the laws to legalize their criminal behavior. These guys ARE geniuses!

Typical White Person   March 10th, 2009 10:16 am ET

Darn! He had to talk today, just when the market was rebounding...

RealityKing   March 10th, 2009 10:14 am ET

That's that problem.. Nothing should be too big to fail!!

joseph   March 10th, 2009 10:14 am ET

I believe in the free market system but it seems that the government is having to do all of the heavy lifting while the private sector remains selfishly quiet about what they can do to roll up their sleeves and pitch in to help. The private sector has turned JFK's phrase on its head and has continually asked what the government can do for them, instead of asking what they can do to help their country.

susan rattray   March 10th, 2009 10:11 am ET

Watched the speech, thought it a good one. If the markets cannot find any solace or good feeling in his speech then the markets deserve to tank, and tank badly. Wall Street has been acting like a 2 year old stamping its foot when things don't go their way.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: Trifecta -- NOT. My Redskins, Bills and Packers all lose this weekend. Very sad.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:40:09 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @andersoncooper: Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players http://bit.ly/6C3OlX
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:47:50 -0800
@HornickCNN: RT @cnn_oppmann: CNN.com: Mexico City approves same-sex marriage. http://bit.ly/5RyMnk #mexico
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:46:26 -0800
@HornickCNN: Rudy's reportedly not running for NY SEN or Gov ...
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:43:48 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Redskins-Giants always exciting. Both teams have a lot to prove. And Giants can still salvage playoffs. Skins just need a win.
Updated: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:19:36 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP