May 20, 2009
Posted: May 20th, 2009 11:30 AM ET
New Hampshire may become the sixth state to legalize same-sex marriages.
New Hampshire may become the sixth state to legalize same-sex marriages.

(CNN) – New Hampshire may move closer Wednesday to joining five other states in the nation where same-sex marriages are legal.

The state's legislature, which has already passed a measure allowing gay and lesbian couples to tie the knot, is expected to revisit the issue to provide greater protections for churches and other religious institutions.

Gov. John Lynch, a three-term Democrat, said last week he would sign a same-sex marriage bill only if it provides "the strongest and clearest protections for religious institutions and associations, and for the individuals working with such institutions."

Lynch said any such measure needs to "make clear that (clergy and other religious officials) cannot be forced to act in ways that violate their deeply held religious principles."

The legislature is expected to vote on language suggested by Lynch stating that religious organizations can decline to take part in any marriage ceremony without incurring fines or risking lawsuits.

Filed under: Same-sex marriage


MatthewDetroit   May 20th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Look at the picture.

Oh they look so happy.

Charming now get over it boys.

Dan, TX   May 20th, 2009 3:12 pm ET

I still don't understand the difference between a civil union and same sex marriage. How do they differ?

joey   May 20th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

marriage is an institution, and just like all institutions, THEY ARE NOT REAL!!! So who cares? Let a man marry a banana for all i care, its just a legal contract. Nothing "natural" about marriage.

Dave   May 20th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

of course, rand, you won't bring up the hate campaigns that go with the supporters of gay marriage. it's happening there, too, you know.

Marcy   May 20th, 2009 3:03 pm ET

New Hampshire legislators do understand the constitution. A smart bunch! Congradulations! They are the true American Pioneers of our time!

Owl   May 20th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

Thank you Joe from Oklahoma. The rest of you people from away: Go make a mess in your own state. The people of New Hampshire are perfectly capable of deciding for themselves what's right. If you don't agree with our marriage equality bill, don't come here. LIVE FREE OR DIE!

oWL

Dizzy in PA   May 20th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

What's the difference if 2 men or 2 women can check off the "married" box on their tax return? I approve of what NH is doing with protecting churches, but let the churches (and judges, etc) who have no problem with it perform the ceremonies. I fail to see in all this yelling how it will hurt one straight person for one split second, honestly I don't.

LacrosseMom   May 20th, 2009 2:24 pm ET

@ Angus.......... so sorry that you are concerned for your daughter, I for one, will not take part in hate. God bless you & your family.

I am ALL for Civil Unions, and I have asked on this blog many times for someone to explain to me why the LGBT community is insisting on Same Sex Marriage?

Civil Unions give couples the legal rights, etc., they need.

I am a Christian-Independent-voter who voted for President Obama. I consider myself a fair person, and I sincerely do not hate any one (well...... maybe....... Dick Cheney).

Please someone explain why Civil Unions are not enough? Peace.

back in the day   May 20th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

Darth Vadik, CA

You didn't see no gays getting married DID YOU!

Jackie   May 20th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

I too support civil unions but not same sex marriage. I believe persons in civil unions should have the same rights and benefits as married couples. But I'm still trying to figure out why men would want to be with men and women would want to be with women- sexually that is. Am I missing something?

Jeff   May 20th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

Why would any homosexuals want to be married in some church anyway?

S.S., MD   May 20th, 2009 2:08 pm ET

Principles of Marriage; let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband. 1 Corinthians 7:2,& Ephesians 5:22-33. The word marriage in the Bible states for a male & female joining together as one, for gay couples it should be label any language instead of marriage period.

Sniffit   May 20th, 2009 2:04 pm ET

@ Alice, who said "Looks like all the Same sex Families with kids seem to be doing a hell of a better job raising the kids STRAIGHT women and men are giving up for adoption."

Poor poor Nebraska....they're never going to live that safe haven thing down, are they...

John   May 20th, 2009 2:02 pm ET

Sounds like a fair compromise to me. The churches are private institutions.

Pee Wee   May 20th, 2009 2:00 pm ET

Alice May 20th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Looks like all the Same sex Families with kids seem to be doing a hell of a better job raising the kids STRAIGHT women and men are giving up for adoption.

========================================

Assuming that your parents are hetero, you've most likely boldly proven your assertion.

Denise   May 20th, 2009 1:59 pm ET

TO THE OTHER ROBERT,

you already give southerners a bad name. sorry excuse.....

Slowgun   May 20th, 2009 1:55 pm ET

@God help us May 20th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

What about the kids????????????

-------------------------–

Which kids? The straight ones or the gay ones?

The straight ones will now grow up understanding what America really stands for. And the Gay ones will now be able to live their llives with the same liberty and freedoms as the straight ones

LISA   May 20th, 2009 1:49 pm ET

I support civil unions but not same sex marriage. Same thing I teach my kids. If there was a commerical on TV showing 2 men say kinda
being intimate. How do you explain that to your kids?

Expat American   May 20th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

Christian Conservatives are so afraid.....it's not like Black Gay Muslims are going to break into their trailers and steal their rent-to-own big screen TV or their sheets and crosses.....

Ooooooh Dear Lord, think of the children….that is, Good Decent White Christian American children!

Jon in CA   May 20th, 2009 1:48 pm ET

@ lou from CT says,

"Two PEOPLE......."

-------

Why just "Two" lou? Why not 3 or 4 people?? If they are consenting adults WHY would you stop polygamy?

Are you a bigot? Racist?? You probably long for the days when black people were hung from trees, eh?

Jimmy the Greek   May 20th, 2009 1:45 pm ET

You "equal rights" people are idiots.

Gay people ALREADY have the same rights as everyone else... they can marry someone of the opposite sex!

Straight people are also prohibited from "marrying" someone of the same sex.

WHERE is the law being unequally applied?

gt   May 20th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

flash !!! new hampshire has change its motto from " live free or die" to " 'if you cant be happy be gay "

a southern progressive moving north   May 20th, 2009 1:41 pm ET

lol.... people actually think they can control what others call their relaitonships... get a clue.. marriage is just a word.. the work and devotion to make that union last til death do you part is much more important, without, the word marriage doesnt mean anything..

and yes adulterers and divorcees , i am talking about you. you are the ones who are destroying the sanctitiy of "marriage"

Fair is Fair   May 20th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

To Dutch in Bad Newz:

May this be a lesson to you. You cannot hold on to 99% of the liberal agenda without 99% of the liberals coming out to bash you on the 1% of their agenda you do not hold on to.

Kevin in Ohio   May 20th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

Civil Unions?...Yes. Marriage? No. Keep government out of the church's business.

rob   May 20th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

Gay Marriage for ALL 50 states!!!

jumpugly   May 20th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

Dear Bristol: Go to college, get a job, be a good mother, be a useful member of society, and set an positive example.
But, Good Lord why should we care? Seriously?

gt   May 20th, 2009 1:34 pm ET

what it is , is what it is ,,,, the northeast is happpy to be the homosextual area of the country.....

Cassandra Washington   May 20th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

I believe that churches should be free to reject gay and lesbian weddings, etc. and I also believe that gay and lesbian people should be able to reject theologies that don't accept them. So, this is a good bill and should be passed.

Terry   May 20th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Marriage is an institution. Institutions are created by PEOPLE, not chromosomes or brain chemicals or even deities. If you are opposed to same sex marriage, that's fine but stop trying to foist off your superstition the marriage was created by nature or God.

Fair is Fair   May 20th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA May 20th, 2009 11:47 am ET

I support civil unions but not same sex marriage. This matter is getting out of control.
___________________

Nope. It's called a slippery slope. Get used to it.

Here in Utah   May 20th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

Dave and Mich... how about you mind your own business and not stick your nose in issues that dont pertain to you.

If your rights for getting married are being violated in any way, then I can see why you would comment here.
What do you care what I do with my partner? As far as Im concerned, you do not speak for God.

Peace

Henry Miller, Cary, NC   May 20th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

"Deeply held religious principles?" You mean fanatical superstition?

If people want to pretend there's something to the silly business of gods and devils and whatever, fine, that's their affair. But they're really in no position to insist that the rest of us accommodate their delusions.

Seattle Roberto   May 20th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

Bruce- Marriage has been redefined throught history. Do you want to go back to the marriage tradition when your wife or daughter was a man's property? Your a pig! Get an informed opinion!

brs   May 20th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

"john –
If Marriage is Legal between Same Sex, then, Why it should not be Legal between Siblings, Mother and Son, Father and Daughter?"

John, please explain how marrying someone of the sex is in anyway related to marrying a relative? And by the way both Cain and Abel married their sisters.

Jeff- Texas   May 20th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

So if they get married, how do they determine who gets to wear the wedding dress?

Jay V   May 20th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Why do people hate on other people so much? You're different people, get over it. I have brown skin, you may have white, black, purple, yellow or green. Who cares? Whatever God you believe in probably doesn't believe that you should be the one doing the judgment.

Jason   May 20th, 2009 1:16 pm ET

Ok, Why exactly do churches need protection? Because? Aren't most civil unions held at the courthouse? And if it is at a church, aren't most people going to a church that they already feel comfortable with?
As I remember. most churches have their own rules about how they do weddings anyway.
This smells like a CYA for the Gov. to me

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA   May 20th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

I'm just curious to know, out of the states that have approved S-S-M, have they made any changes to legislation?

SDW   May 20th, 2009 1:11 pm ET

Over fifty percent of all marriages end in divorce. Maybe gays will improve that stat.

Enough   May 20th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

Gays want to be equal, sorry it is impossible no matter how much you try. You can't have children naturally, can you? It isn't natural. Find a cure!!

Chris   May 20th, 2009 1:04 pm ET

If you don't like Gay Marriage, Don't have one. There case closed. Now on to the real problem with Marriage.. DIVORCE. Lets outlaw that!

Randolph Carter   May 20th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

Y'all do realize that "back in the day" is satirizing to make a point, right? Have a nice day!

Randolph Carter   May 20th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

Dutch, you are right. I stand corrected. Have a nice day!

Alice   May 20th, 2009 1:01 pm ET

you guys always say the poeple already voted no on this. Well if we left it up to "the people" things would be a LOT differant now then they are.

Alice   May 20th, 2009 12:59 pm ET

Looks like all the Same sex Families with kids seem to be doing a hell of a better job raising the kids STRAIGHT women and men are giving up for adoption.

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA   May 20th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

@ Randolph Carter

Virginia is actually a BLUE state now in case you missed the last election.

Darth Vadik, CA   May 20th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

back in the day,

you wish back for the days where you could drag black people thru the streets and lynch them too, dont you?

Michael   May 20th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Lynch is right. Churches should be able to choose who they will and will not marry. Let's get this done.

the other Robert   May 20th, 2009 12:57 pm ET

@Back in the day

Please stop talking! I pray you are not from the south because if you are you are the type that gives the rest of us southerners a bad name.

Robert   May 20th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA – Go back in the hole you came from. People like you will soon be goone and the next Generation will live much happier w/o people like you around living BITTER HATEFUL lifes.

Proud Member..Party of No   May 20th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

Looks like it's time for New Hampshire to throw out their state government. The people keep voting no and the politicians keep enacting the laws anyway.

Bruce   May 20th, 2009 12:54 pm ET

To Randolph: Robert isn't saying anything more than the truth. Regardless of whether you believe in God or evolution, it's a fact that only a sperm and egg can produce a life. That was his point of saying that the term marriage should only be used for a man and a woman. If gays want to live together they can call it anything but a marriage. I'm not saying discriminate because they are gay, just simply stating that it should be called something else since marriage has always been between a man and woman, like nature intended it to be.

Randolph Carter   May 20th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA wrote:
@ John who stated "If Marriage is Legal between Same Sex, then, Why it should not be Legal between Siblings, Mother and Son, Father and Daughter?"

That is one of the best arguments I've heard yet.

Why, Dutch? Because it is a common practice in the red states like VA? Have a nice day!

God help us   May 20th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

What about the kids????????????

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA   May 20th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

@ John who stated "If Marriage is Legal between Same Sex, then, Why it should not be Legal between Siblings, Mother and Son, Father and Daughter?"

That is one of the best arguments I've heard yet.

Lou from CT   May 20th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

People need to chill out about this issue. This is an EQUALITY issue. Two PEOPLE (emphasized for those who mentioned something idiotic about people and animals) love each others, they should be allowed to marry. Period. End of discussion.

Come on aboard, New Hampshire.

Darth Vadik, CA   May 20th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

Dallas Independent – thank goodness,

I think being gay is not bad, or a crime, or anything to be embaressed about. Nothing makes me happeir than people being truthfull to themeselves,

Now being a bigot, racist and hatefull, that is shamefull and embarassing

et   May 20th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

Another example that Doomsday is near !

Randolph Carter   May 20th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

The Black Spider wrote:
...In 99% of the cases people choose to be gay period. ...

Spidey, let me ask you something. Do you like brussel sprouts? Whether you answered yes or no makes no difference. Did you choose to like or not like brussel sprouts? Probably not. You either do or you don't. Have a nice day.

Brock   May 20th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

How can people claim they want "smaller government" but when an issue like this comes in to play, suddenly they want the government to take control. Talk about hypocrisy. Ignorance....

Dallas Independent - thank goodness   May 20th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

I cannot believe there are actually that many gays! I would be embarassed to death to 'come out of my closet' and live like they do! Pathetic!

Dieter Zerressen, Denver, CO   May 20th, 2009 12:37 pm ET

They always say this destroys traditional marriage but never say how this would destroy anything. The plain fact is, heteros don't need help destroying the institution of marriage. Newt is on his 3rd marriage and so is Rush. You don't think both were fooling around with the next wife while they still were married. Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggart are really helping out the religious end of this debate too. Republicans = Hypocrits.

Randolph Carter   May 20th, 2009 12:36 pm ET

Robert wrote:
Marriage is ONLY BETWEEN A MAN and WOMAN, because:

1. Only a Sperm can Fertilize an Egg, for Reproduction.

2. All young ones of All Animals on Earth are Nurtured by a Male and a Female. Humans can’t change the course of Mother Nature.

So, Robert, are you implying that humans are animals, that we may be related to monkeys and such? I thought that the big, invisible man in the sky created us 6,000 years ago. Have a nice day!

Enough   May 20th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

Candy – what do you have against people working hard to get ahead and making money? You too could make a good living if you wanted to. A hand up, Not a hand out. You are really Naive if you think handing people money for nothing helps them. Charity should not be a government run entity.

Angus   May 20th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

My daughter recently told my wife and I that she was gay. She just said, "Can I talk to you? I'm Gay". All my life I have protected my 17 year old. With her announcement my heart instantly broke by the thought she will face a world full of people prepared to judge her through their own ignorance and fear. I know she is strong and aware of the challenges. She will make it and live a happy and fullfiled life. But I still cry. My tears will stop only when our country fully accepts all its citizens by granting everyone full and identical rights and opportunities. Nothing less is right.

SDW   May 20th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

"Land of the free" Only in America, the most racist and sexist country in the world! Where the Republicans claim they are the saviors and champions of democracy, are against big government, fight the taliban and al-quaida, but want to use the bible to force our government to control peoples lives. The bottom line is I don't think that two people of the same sex should be together, but if they choose to so, who am I to tell them they can't! A homosexual couple should have the same rights and priveleges as a heterosexual one. So you immorally moral people who oppose same sex marriages, Please!!!

phoenix86   May 20th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

Gay marriage is an abomination.

Enlightened Voter   May 20th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

How about we do the right thing and ban discrimination in ALL forms.

Mississippi Mike   May 20th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Keep passing laws against the will of the people. Your political office is safe and you will never feel political backlash. Look how great that's worked out for California!

Candy West Virginia   May 20th, 2009 12:23 pm ET

Let's keep a true republican/conservative world where only the rich prosper, segregation is the norm, banish all gays/lesbians from the planet and only conservatives get to heaven!

Jack   May 20th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

We are all human beings and we all want the same thing, to be happy. Why deny something that all people seek and have a right to?

Joe from Oklahoma   May 20th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

New Hampshire's motto – "Live Free Or Die".
It's their state...All the best!

back in the day   May 20th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

If the gays marry then that will end all mating between men and women...and I for one don't want to be in any man pile. We need a good religous old testament lock down in the country. Two many womens rights, gays in the open, and of course look of the color running our country.

GOD WILL STRIKE DOWN AMERICA all of what I said just read a bible and you'll know I'm right

Sari   May 20th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Marriage is either a civil matter, or a religious one. This hybrid that is whichever is politically convenient at the moment has gotta go. I hope that ALL NH couples will be protected by the law when all is said and done.

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA   May 20th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

@ Lenora

I'm all for equality. I have nothing against homosexuals. My problem with the whole matter is that children being raised in this day and age are going to actually think that it's morally right for a man & man/woman & woman to be married when according to whatever faith(s) they may have been raised in may teach otherwise. I understand there's a seperation between church and state, but this matter clearly needs to be addressed. I don't have kids, but I wouldn't want to raise a child in an environment when society says same sex marriage is okay when I teach my child that it's not!

Enough   May 20th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Being anti gay marriage is nothing to do with religion, it just isn't natural and more energy should be put towards finding a "cure"

John   May 20th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

If Marriage is Legal between Same Sex, then, Why it should not be Legal between Siblings, Mother and Son, Father and Daughter?

SLM   May 20th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

This Gay marriage being crammed down our throats is enough already. I support Civil unions but not calling it marriage. Marriage vows are Husband and wife, Man and woman. They can have the same rights with a different name................it is different.

KirksNoseHair   May 20th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

Bravo New Hampshire. Another state rejects bigotry!

Sniffit   May 20th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

@ Robert, who said "2. All young ones of All Animals on Earth are Nurtured by a Male and a Female. Humans can’t change the course of Mother Nature."

Jeez man, watch some nature shows...Wild Wild Wsrld of Animals, Nova, Planet Earth, etc...or god forbid, pick up and read something other than the bible.

Slowgun   May 20th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

@Obama Victim May 20th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

as this movement gains momentum in the liberal and northern states, it may cost Democrats some of the gains they have made in the more conservative states……..Dems made some gains in the recent election, but the left wing support for this may set them back again in some parts of the country……………be careful what you wish for

---------------------------

I swear I heard this before....oh yea, 1952...Mississippi

The black spider   May 20th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

What will be next? Legalizing marriage betwen Human being and Animals?
For those who think opposing same sex marriage is a religion matter your are wrong. I am an Atheist and when I look among all the animals of the world 99% of them goes male-female. Even plants goes male-female.
I will never give my child to adoption to any gay couple. They can have their own. In 99% of the cases people choose to be gay period. Only 1% is trangender base.
Disgusting.
CNN have the got to post my message

Slowgun   May 20th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

@Robert May 20th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Marriage is ONLY BETWEEN A MAN and WOMAN, because:

1. Only a Sperm can Fertilize an Egg, for Reproduction.

2. All young ones of All Animals on Earth are Nurtured by a Male and a Female. Humans can’t change the course of Mother Nature.

------------------------------

Well put Robert..so next we should have folks who want to get married take a fertility test. And do you have any idea about what laws we should pass about single parent homes?

Lynn   May 20th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

So you people are saying "it is getting out of control" are really saying democracy when it suits you, and facism when it doesn't.

Jackson   May 20th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

I think that is a great compromise. Nice job.

back in the day   May 20th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

still can't believe they let blacks marry whites...that was the down fall of this country

Slowgun   May 20th, 2009 12:11 pm ET

Same sex marrage! Are you kidding me!

What do people think...that we live in a free country of something...I mean what's next...letting blacks vote or some kind of civil rights movement!

But I don't need to worry. I'm sure the conservatives will put a stop to this...God Bless America.

Live, Liberty and ...and...hey, does anyone remeber what follows Live, and Liberty in this?

Jack   May 20th, 2009 12:10 pm ET

Is this not the land of free? arent all people created equal, that they are endowed by thier creator with certain unalienable rights, that among thse are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Don't we all deserve the same rights? we are all human beings who desire the same thing. happiness and prosperity. thats what this nation was founded upon, liberty for all. Don't deny someone thier chance to live thier life with someone they care for.

Robert   May 20th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Marriage is ONLY BETWEEN A MAN and WOMAN, because:

1. Only a Sperm can Fertilize an Egg, for Reproduction.

2. All young ones of All Animals on Earth are Nurtured by a Male and a Female. Humans can’t change the course of Mother Nature.

Obama Victim   May 20th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

as this movement gains momentum in the liberal and northern states, it may cost Democrats some of the gains they have made in the more conservative states........Dems made some gains in the recent election, but the left wing support for this may set them back again in some parts of the country...............be careful what you wish for

Mich   May 20th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

You can stop this moral disgrace on our country N.H. Please help our country keep Honor.

Lenora   May 20th, 2009 12:03 pm ET

Yeah, Dutch. True equality is really out of control. Separate, but equal (which is inherently unequal) is much better, right?!?

Greg   May 20th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

Although I believe this is a step in the right direction, these provisions only further allow open discrimination of LGBT people. I understand that many religious institutions have strong beliefs opposing same-sex marriage, but "marriage" is BOTH a civil and religious institution. Furthermore, while churches don't pay taxes, LGBT people pay taxes and should have equal rights!

rand   May 20th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

Protecting the conservative religious institutions is rational but we need to ensure the more liberal religious institutions that will provide same sex marriages be protected too!!!! I can already see the huge hate campaigns the Catholics and Mormons will instigate.

Andrew   May 20th, 2009 12:01 pm ET

Equality is for everyone. New Hampshire will be the 6th state to get it.

Sniffit   May 20th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

And let's be clear: Lynch's little added peace of pander to the conservatives actually goes without saying and is inherent in any legislation as a result of the First Amendment.

Sniffit   May 20th, 2009 11:56 am ET

Riiiiight...so Lynch wants to "Jim Crow" the homosexual population of NH to save himself some votes with the conservatives??? Separate bu equal is dead. The Legislature isn't doing it's job if it doesn't tell Lynch to take a long walk off a short pier. They need to let him veto appropriate legislation that calls EVERY SINGLE UNION a "civil union" with equal rights and NEVER USES THE WORD "MARRIAGE," then override his veto with a re-vote. Otherwise, they'll watch their pretty little piece of legislation end up in the Supreme Court.

Dave   May 20th, 2009 11:55 am ET

Ok NH, here's your big chance to continue the destruction of this country. Have fun!

Voice Of Florida   May 20th, 2009 11:51 am ET

Is this attacking at a proximal or distal angle. I would rather protect the distal side of things.

Dutch/Bad Newz,VA   May 20th, 2009 11:47 am ET

I support civil unions but not same sex marriage. This matter is getting out of control.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: Americans back Afghan troop increase but Obama's approval now under 50 percent for the first time - http://bit.ly/8Is9xA
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:40:29 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: Americans back Afghan troop increase but Obama's approval now under 50 percent for the first time. I'm on HLN at 130pm ET
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:22:58 -0800
@cnnsotu: Two top senators, Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, & Jon Kyl, R-AZ, discuss Pres. Obama's war strategy Sunday. What would you ask them?
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:14:06 -0800
@KuhnCNN: Any celebrities tweeting about roman polanski? We want to add them to Rick's List today.
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:10:12 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: Sheryl Crow performed at National Christmas Tree lighting in DC and was wonderful. I'll play some of it Saturday in SitRoom 6 PM Eastern.
Updated: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:05:59 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP