May 22, 2009
Posted: May 22nd, 2009 06:14 PM ET

From
The President may name his pick to replace Justice Souter as soon as Tuesday.
The President may name his pick to replace Justice Souter as soon as Tuesday.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – A top aide to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy told fellow Democrats on Friday to get ready for President Obama's Supreme Court pick to come as early as next week, according to an e-mail obtained by CNN.

"It is possible the President will designate his nominee to the Supreme Court as early as next Tuesday or some time next week," Jeremy Paris, Leahy's chief counsel for nominations, wrote in the e-mail to fellow Democratic aides.

The Judiciary panel will handle the nomination process for whomever Obama picks to replace retiring Justice David Souter, and three senior Obama administration officials confirmed to CNN that the latest thinking at the White House is the president could make the pick as early as next week.

The White House's new point person for managing the process for the eventual nominee, Stephanie Cutter, was also spotted in the West Wing on Friday afternoon meeting with other aides, a sign the administration could be edging closer to announcing the pick.

But the three senior administration officials said flatly the president has not yet settled on his pick, and they noted this weekend would be pivotal in the decision-making process. "He's mulling it over," one top aide said of the final stages of the process.

Top officials say it is unlikely the president will announce the pick at a prime-time event, as then-President Bush did when he nominated John Roberts to be Chief Justice.

The President is spending Memorial Day weekend at Camp David, a remote location conducive to contemplation. Camp David could also be a location for last-minute one-on-one meetings with potential court nominees that can be kept secret because the media has no access to the grounds.

The senior administration officials cautioned it is still possible the Supreme Court announcement could slip into early or mid-June if the President does not make up his mind over the course of the next few days.

Obama is under some pressure, however, to announce the pick before he leaves Washington on June 3 for a foreign trip that will take him to Egypt, France, and Germany because he needs to get the confirmation process started because the Senate takes the month of August off for recess. While Obama aides are hoping to get confirmation hearings started in July, there are many possible delays that could push the hearings into September, which could put confirmation before the first Monday in October in some peril.

Senate Judiciary spokeswoman Erica Chabot acknowledged to CNN "the rumors are flying fast and furious" that next week is possible for an announcement, but stressed that Paris' e-mail is not a sign that the panel knows the timing for sure. "We just don't have an indication of when this is going to happen," said Chabot.

Chabot noted the committee is just getting Senate Democrats ready with talking points and other background material for the inevitable announcement. "The committee will begin the process once that happens," she said of Obama's eventual public announcement.

Sources close to the selection process tell CNN most of the major vetting has been done and the process is pretty far along, farther than the White House may be letting on. All of the dozen or so major candidates under consideration have had at least initial vetting and most of the top-tier candidates - a half dozen or so - have been fully vetted.

The sources close to the process say Obama has been carefully reading the research material provided by the small group of staffers coordinating the search, and has asked a lot of questions and asked for more material in some cases. The sources added Obama has had at least one formal meeting, sitting down this week with federal appeals court judge Diane Wood of Chicago. He also spoke briefly in private with Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, but sources say the meeting was not substantive.

–CNN Supreme Court Producer William Mears and Senior Political Analyst Gloria Borger contributed to this report.

Filed under: President Obama • Supreme Court


skyhawkdriver   May 23rd, 2009 6:49 am ET

Does anyone really doubt the qualifications needed to be barack obamas pick for the supreme court??..when you consider how many different groups have their hands in the presidents pockets after the election..I do't know how far he will be able to go trying to appoint a laid off chrysler worker but you can count on the fact the appointee will have socialist leanings and will in the long run be the most un-qualified person to ever serve on the bench..I can see him appointing someone like his buddy deval patrick the current governor of taxachusetts..will he seize the opportunity to appoint someone who actually has read and understands the constitution???..I doubt it

WhiteOwl   May 23rd, 2009 12:00 am ET

Past appointments have given us a Supreme Court that is currently unrepresentative in these areas :

CATHOLIC:5 out of 9
(less than 24% of adults in the US are Catholic acc. to Pew poll)

MALE : 8 of 9(despite a population 50% Female)

WHITE: 8 of 9

Republican:
No Hispanics , Asian Americans, Native Americans,
No known atheists, gays, Hispanics,...and most

Sari   May 22nd, 2009 10:31 pm ET

Ok, the guy hasn't even named anyone yet. Relax.

Republicans have NO right to complain about Obama getting a Supreme Court Appointment, or about so- called "liberal activist" Supreme Court justices. Did you know that only two of the Justices on the Supreme Court were appointed by a Democrat? The majority are Republican nominated.

Get over it. Seriously.

TRUTH   May 22nd, 2009 10:20 pm ET

Bill Clnton has my nod

Bill ~ Down on the Bayou   May 22nd, 2009 9:47 pm ET

@ Bobby:

That all sounds great Bobby, but, you seemed to have missed a very important minority.

obama needs to nominate a third generation Eskimo transvestite amputee who speaks Nigerian, and has a Mongolian law degree.

No Hillary = No Obama   May 22nd, 2009 9:34 pm ET

The Republicans are going to have a field day with whoever Obama picks.

Oh boy...   May 22nd, 2009 9:25 pm ET

I hope that quota that you are calling meritless includes the 3 whites you mention. I know how whites believe that they are the only ones qualified for anything. Laughable to someone like me who outperformed all of my white peers in graduate school.

DaBird   May 22nd, 2009 9:14 pm ET

I wonder which attorney has enough money to buy a seat in the Supreme Court. Mr. Soros will put up the cash for the Obama library to get this pick.

Charlie in Maine   May 22nd, 2009 9:13 pm ET

"The sources close to the process say Obama has been carefully reading the research material"

Again, already light-years ahead of Bush.

Barack Obama   May 22nd, 2009 9:04 pm ET

How can President Obama make an appoinment to the supreme court if he doesn`t even know what it is. During the debates he gave a comment on the supreme court that didn`t even make any sense.

Chipster   May 22nd, 2009 8:53 pm ET

Bobby,
Why can't the people in your pretend appointment group have merit? There are whites, blacks, women, hispanics, Asian Americans, gays, republicans and democrats who merit consideration and appointment. Why do you assume they wouldn't be qualified too?

Voterinohio   May 22nd, 2009 8:41 pm ET

I'm sure the person will be useless.

annie for Palin   May 22nd, 2009 8:11 pm ET

Are they from chicago and part of the criminal politician group? Are they a tax cheat? If they are not in one of those 2 catagories, they will never get approved.

Anonymous   May 22nd, 2009 8:03 pm ET

Lol

ib   May 22nd, 2009 7:51 pm ET

Wonder what far left wingnut he will suggest. Obama knows nothing except far left; no common sense.

Mike, Syracuse, NY   May 22nd, 2009 7:45 pm ET

So he finally found a gay, black, Asian-Hsipanic, disabled vet, who has voted Democratic the last 5 elections and formerly worked at the ACLU.

Lori   May 22nd, 2009 7:38 pm ET

Yeah, former Republicans have had such successes with competent Justices like Clerance Thomas. Yeah... Republicans. I can name more jacka@#es your side has named in more recent history. I have faith that an intelligent man such as President Obama will pick an excellent Justice.

James   May 22nd, 2009 7:25 pm ET

Took longer to select a family dog.

Peter E   May 22nd, 2009 7:24 pm ET

I would really like the media to stop speculating about the race/gender, etc. of the SCOTUS nominee. The selection should be made based on competence first, race last! The last Justice selected based on race was Clarence Thomas by Bush Sr. He turned out to be the laziest, most partisan, most incompetent person ever on that court, completely shaming Thurgood Marshall, the person he replaced.
Competence first!

prosanto, Phoenix   May 22nd, 2009 7:12 pm ET

The candidate should be well qualified with good experience and pragmatic. The candidate's gender and race should not matter,except politically.

Res ipsa loquitur   May 22nd, 2009 7:12 pm ET

Yep, Bobby, you're right–front-runners Diane Wood, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan have no merit whatsoever. Why would Obama ever consider one of the most intellectually rigorous, yet polite, judges of the Seventh Circuit; a self-made judge from arguably the most well-respected circuit, the Second, in the country; or an accomplished and young professional whose job is to argue cases in front of the Supreme Court?

Here's a challenge for all you ignorant hacks who decry the lack of "merit" in Obama's front-runners–pick an appeals judge and explain coherently to me why he or she has more "merit" than Diane Wood (my personal favorite). Maybe then I'll take you seriously.

Lilarose in Bandon, Oregon   May 22nd, 2009 7:10 pm ET

We need a federal law that the US Supreme Court represent ALL Americans, not just males.

That means the Court should be made up of over 50 percent women (women make up 53% of the population in America).

Look at this photo. All guys except one woman.

How can they represent females? Especially regarding abortion rights?

Notice when you see a march against abortion rights that there are usually more men than women in the march.

Wonder why?

sylhines   May 22nd, 2009 7:04 pm ET

Since W did not replace O'Connor with a female justice there will be additional pressure on Obama to name a woman. The Hispanic theme is credible in many ways and such a appointment to address those tandem concerns would be welcome. The good part of this decision is the breath of quality applicants who are women. So, I look toward a hispanic/women nominee to address those imblances. From my perspective the best choice from a unusual deep field of qualified applicants is Sullivan the former Dean of Stanford U and Kagan the solicitor general. If an hispanic is chosen then there is time to continue to make the court reflective of the country by appointing a third women then. The imbalance on the court has gone unadressed too long. Justice and common sense dictate a female nominee

Republicans are the American Taliban   May 22nd, 2009 7:02 pm ET

NEWS FLASH!!! Something might happen next week...if it does we will be there ti distort with fake headlines. Republicans throughout congress are getting the NO keys on their computers tuned up ...

Jon in CA   May 22nd, 2009 6:59 pm ET

Hola Senior Obama,

I can't imagine who ju are considering for dis job. Holy fritos will we all be shocked if ju pick a hispanic chica!

Scott   May 22nd, 2009 6:55 pm ET

Wow, what great journalism! You said two weeks ago that we would know as early as Monday of the following week. Now it's "as early as next week?" I won't be holding my breath.

Ryan in MN   May 22nd, 2009 6:51 pm ET

It will most likely be some shady character. Why? Because Obama himself is the shadiest of all characters.

Shirley In California   May 22nd, 2009 6:44 pm ET

Well, this Supreme Court decision has certainly gotten me upset with Obama. Again, I'll say it should be a qualified Hispanic woman. I just don't appreciate the fact Obama NEVER considered (at least its not being reported) interviewing a black woman. He received 92% black vote. Maybe this means nothing to him anymore but he will certainly need our vote again. I feel insulted and passed over. Please don't think I regret voting for and supporting him because he is still the best person for the job right now and McCain/palin were simply disgusting and disgraceful. I have placed Obama on the fence now and I will NOT forget this-the next time around.

Preliminary congratulations to the Hispanic community. I'm glad you got your chance.

No Incumbents 2010   May 22nd, 2009 6:35 pm ET

Count on the Repukes to turn the confirmation into a partisan food fight. As usual, the adhominems will be vicious and personal, and have nothing to do with legal qualifications, substance or even the truth.

Scott   May 22nd, 2009 6:32 pm ET

Bobby:

Quota on his comment:

Racist: 1
Sexist: 1
Homophobic: 1
Intelligent: 0

Dawn   May 22nd, 2009 6:25 pm ET

Picking a supreme court justice is one of the most important job any president can do, because they are there for their entire life. so why would he mess this up, and of course the Republicans can and will do everything in there power to get a neo-con on the bench, it should always be equal

Hammer   May 22nd, 2009 6:24 pm ET

If Obama making a choice for the Supreme Court does not scare you,just look at the choices he has made for the lesser positions,Biden for VP, Geithner for assistant Sec. of Treasury (Emmanual is running the show), Holder (represented the terroist at GITMO) are the worst of the lot, most are tax cheats and all have questionable backgrounds. Looking at his past America is in for a real character on this choice>

malclave   May 22nd, 2009 6:19 pm ET

I wonder if Democrats would think it's perfectly all right for Republicans to try to filibuster Obama's nominee, the way the Democrats did with Bush's?

Naw, that's silly. Democrats would never tolerate being held to the same standards which they apply to others.

Supreme Court Pick Likely Next Week « S E N A T U S   May 22nd, 2009 6:19 pm ET

[...] President Obama’s Supreme Court choice is likely to be announced next week.  According to Political Ticker, a top “aide to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy told fellow Democrats on Friday to get [...]

Gary   May 22nd, 2009 6:18 pm ET

moderate please – - no one too liberal or too conservative.

Mad Dog   May 22nd, 2009 6:18 pm ET

I personally hope that Obama picks the opposite of Roberts and Alito....that would be fair. Of course we all know the GOP is never concerned about fair....just right wing nutjobs.

Obama should pick who he wants and it won't matter because I guarantee that whover it is will not be good enough for the conservatives.

Who cares they had their turn now it is Obama's....and there is nothing that the right wing pundits can do about it.

Lisa   May 22nd, 2009 6:17 pm ET

i think Obama should appoint Michelle Obama. She's a woman, she's black, she's a lawyer, she is obviously wicked smart and she's down to earth. Too bad that could never happen.

obambi   May 22nd, 2009 6:12 pm ET

pointless to care–its clear it will be socialistic

Patriot   May 22nd, 2009 6:11 pm ET

I guess his pick will be a Iranian Muslim who adheres to Shiria law and hates the U.S.A.

The Broker.   May 22nd, 2009 6:10 pm ET

All this talk. All this double-talk. Who said what?

NVa Native   May 22nd, 2009 6:08 pm ET

I can't wait to see who Obama will nominate. I'm sure it will be an over qualified, extremely experienced and intelligent person that will make the radical Repubs go freakin' nuts – it will be priceless!
Boner and Beck will start crying, the Dick will snarl and gnash his fangs, Limpball will bounce and jiggle all over his mic, and the inSanity and O'Really twins will spew false indignation hour upon hour – let the circus begin!

Gary of El Centro, Ca   May 22nd, 2009 6:05 pm ET

Without even knowing who the pick will be, the Republicans have already declared it to be unacceptable. The confirmation process should be entertaining, although I don't think it will match the whole Anita Hill, coke can, pubic hair thing we went through several years back.........that would be hard to top.

Bobby   May 22nd, 2009 5:54 pm ET

Quota for Appointment of Supreme Court Justices:

White: 3
Black: 2
Women: 2
Hispanics: 1
Asian American: 1
Gay: 1
Republican: 3
Democrat: 3
Merit: 0

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
hambypCNN: Steele and Kaine square off on health care, jobs, and Steele talks (a little bit) about his new book ... http://bit.ly/6kbvKz
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:37:59 -0800
@HornickCNN: White House to government: Continue to open up: http://bit.ly/6SC11i
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:07:15 -0800
hambypCNN: Michael Steele has a book coming out in Jan. Asked about it on CNN, Steele demurs: "Ya, that's what I'm hearing somewhere down the line."
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:52:08 -0800
hambypCNN: @DanDoranBlum nice. hopefully you get two big wins over Pitt in one week.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:42:32 -0800
hambypCNN: @AP_Ken_Thomas excellent duane spencer reference. let's try to work in lee scruggs, too, before the season ends.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:14:50 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP