May 29, 2009
Posted: May 29th, 2009 12:50 PM ET

From

WASHINGTON (CNN) - The Obama administration is turning to the Supreme Court as it seeks to block public release of photos apparently depicting abuse of suspected terrorists and foreign soldiers in U.S. custody.

Justice Department lawyers late Thursday told a federal appeals court in New York - the same one on which high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor sits - to hold off a ruling ordering release of the material, saying they plan to ask the justices to hear their case.

The government said it would proceed "absent intervening legislation" from Congress.

The "motion to recall" comes after President Barack Obama ordered government lawyers earlier this month to object to the court-ordered release of photos depicting the mistreatment of prisoners held in Iraq and Afghanistan, reversing an earlier White House decision. The Pentagon had been set to release hundreds of photos in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The ACLU - which had filed the initial lawsuit for disclosure - has criticized the administration's about-face, saying it "makes a mockery" of Obama's campaign promise of greater transparency and accountability, and damages efforts to hold accountable those responsible for abusing prisoners.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last September the photos must be released. The president now says doing so "would pose an unacceptable risk of danger to U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq." Sotomayor has served on that court since 1998, but was not involved in that particular appeal.

The Senate last week voted for the Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act, which would limit the reach of the Freedom of Information Act in this instance. The House could adopt a similar provision next month, as part of an omnibus spending bill.

The government has until June 9 to file its initial appeal with the Supreme Court.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan - herself a finalist for the upcoming high court vacancy - told the New York-based appeals court that if Congress passes the disclosure amendment, Defense Secretary Robert Gates could "preclude release under (the Freedom of Information Act ) of the photographs at issue in this case."

In court documents filed earlier this week Gen. David Petraeus - the top U.S. commander in the region - argued public access would have a "destabilizing effect" on Pakistan and other U.S. partners in the battle against the al Qaeda terrorist network.

"Newly released photos depicting abuse of detainees in U.S. military custody in Afghanistan and Iraq would negatively affect the ongoing efforts by Pakistan to counter its internal extremist threat," wrote Petraeus, the chief of U.S. Central Command.

U.S. allies in the region already "struggle with their populations' perceptions that they are merely instruments of the U.S. government and do not have their citizens' best interests at heart," and releasing the images "would likely deal a particularly hard blow" to American efforts in those countries, he stated.

He predicted a likely result of the photos' release would be "civil unrest via spontaneous demonstrations in Pakistan's largest cities."

Forty-four photos are covered in the ACLU request for release, but others could be released under the earlier appeals court ruling.

The justices would be under time pressure to decide whether to accept the government's appeal for review, before the court recesses for the summer in late June. They would not return until late September, when Sotomayor would join them if confirmed.

The case is ACLU v. Department of Defense (06-3140).

Filed under: Obama administration • Supreme Court


Wanda in FL   May 30th, 2009 9:48 pm ET

if the President feels releasing these photos might hurt our troops i trust his judgement.

MBFLA   May 29th, 2009 5:55 pm ET

Dick and Dubya have created vastly more enemies with their horrible belief in torture. People all over the world know what has been done in our name and our status is so much less because of the sadists of the previous administration who thought they would learn something by torturing people to the point of making them insane. If they did not hate us before, they surely do now! How could you blame them? Rape... slamming heads against walls... preventing sleep for weeks... unrelenting stress positions....subjecting them to their greatest phobias, who makes up this stuff and to learn what? Sounds like nothing. Sick, sick sick. Kill me quickly but don't let Cheney torture me, please!

The Broker.   May 29th, 2009 5:50 pm ET

Nataka Picture. Moto-Picture. Show Bwana Bush was right... Obama was wrong..

DawnL,CA   May 29th, 2009 5:40 pm ET

This is not the time to release photos. We have 2 wars & Pakistan & N.Korea to concern ourselves .It shows that Obama can listen to his generals which is more than I can say for all the Bushies.

flybyshoeing   May 29th, 2009 5:19 pm ET

I understand the decision to try and keep them sealed, but what I do not understand is lying about the content. The Pentagon and Robert Gibbs both lied yesterday.

flybyshoeing   May 29th, 2009 5:17 pm ET

Some of the most disgusting photos are already out. Huffington Post has multiple stories with links. Also many of the comments have additional links. Don't look unless your stomach is empty. You may vomit. There are women and children in some of the pictures. They are very bad. I doubt this comment will make it through.

Unhappy   May 29th, 2009 4:26 pm ET

The terrorists already have their recruiting posters from Abu Graib. Not to mention 10,000s killed and terrorised by our troops.

This is an opportunity to purge the shame from America.

J.P.   May 29th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

With the proposed closing of Club Gitmo, the result has already surfaced in the battlefield:
Fewer "detainees" are being detained for questioning.
They're just being shot in the field.

Nice move, Dems (or should I say "the party of unintended consequences"). You people just keep opening the door into your own noses.

Neilz   May 29th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

He's all but made his case on the national security preclusion. He'll let the ACLU muck through the legal quagmire, and if he doesn't get the ruling he wants he could simply issue an Executive Order banning release as detrimental to national security, further miring the ACLU in legal limbo until after 2012. We'll never see the photos. We'll never get a full hearing or objective examination of the evidence. We are being played.

Grrr-awful-o   May 29th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

I hope the pictures are released. Someone in the Obama administration must have realized that they'll own the fallout now. And we got some 'change we can believe in' on their position on this topic.

dan   May 29th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Bo might be able to change laws "now" but he's not got so he cannot judge those who came before him. Also he should be held entirely responsible for anu deaths that result from his unwillingness to take tough action on those who intend us harm. Bo might find it difficult to keep an army staffed with his liberal "I won't protect you" attitude.

JA/TN   May 29th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

do we really need to see the photos, we get point, we need to focus on jailing the top dogs, not the low ranks, they only followed orders

Tk1   May 29th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

yes please show the world so they can get angry and bomb the hell out of us!!!!!! ignorance all of this is, WAR is HELL, what would you prefer?? to serve TEA and CRUMPETS?

yuri   May 29th, 2009 3:01 pm ET

We agree that it could pose a potentially dangerous threat to our troops abroad and put them in harm's way.

MD   May 29th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

President Obama promised transparency in his government. He did not promise transparency that may jeopardize the safety of our men and women in uniform.

For all those people who are attacking Obama for reversing himself, think how you would feel if your son or daughter was serving abroard, and these pictures came out. Be grateful that you do not have another obstinate president like Bush, who never wavered, no matter how wrong on an issue.

Obama listened to his generals on the ground and did the right thing by reversing his decision. I am sure Obama is aware of the political damage for being viewed as a flip-flopper. I admire him for putting the safety of our military personnel above himself.

ACLU should pause and consider the harm the release of these pictures may cause our sons and daughters serving abroad, at this time, and withdraw the suit.

Willy Brown   May 29th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

More distractions from camp Obama that means he's getting ready to sneak in a huge tax hike while his lap dog media salivates on TV for him over some old pictures.

Cynthia - Arkansas   May 29th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

After reading about what is shown in the photos (rape) I don't think we want those released. I wish people would stop second quessing everything that President Obama does. I believe that he knows a whole lot more about a situation than the rest of us do and he will do what is right. He is a decent and fair man.

God bless you President Obama!

Teleprompter of the U.S.A.   May 29th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

President Flip Flop to the rescue!!

The only reason he isn't releasing these photos is because the U.S. public is firmly against release of the photos. It isn't because of any beliefs of his won.

MaryJo Bruce Surprise, Ariz   May 29th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

Move on people!

matt   May 29th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

If the ACLU is involved, I know exactly what position I take.....the opposite one.

Good job Obama (and that is the only time I will say that)

Pee Wee   May 29th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

He needs to stand by his decision to not release them. This is just punting and kicking the can down the road. Or, voting "present", if you will.

JonDie   May 29th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

The commission of crimes by US soldiers needs to be exposed...even if those individuals, acting on the illegal orders of the US president and his henchmen, are not going to be prosecuted.

Tim   May 29th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

This can all be easily settled if Obama would actually take a stand for once. He has the power to block the release. If he doesn't want them blocked, then he should say so.

He is a coward.

Lisa in Shelton CT   May 29th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

The ACLU may cry "mockery" but if the Freedom of Information act has any teeth and I believe it does – the ACLU will be able to have all those photos to chew on before long. Brilliant legal professor Obama may not want the unseemly appearance of being an attack dog against the former potentially criminal administration, and by holding back he can maintain an, "I tried to stop it" stance and yet allow the High Court and justice to prevail with the ACLU taking the hit for being a single minded foe of the Republican agenda.

Rob   May 29th, 2009 2:11 pm ET

Guess the libs and Code Pink freaks ain't gonna be too happy about this

Dawn in Pa   May 29th, 2009 2:10 pm ET

I know that a lot of the bloggers will be saying transparency... THINK, understandably, our soldiers could be in danger, is our soldiers would be captured, they could torture them or maybe killed. I think that after the war, yeah, but not now.
Remember what everyone has been saying that Obama is making our country less safe, if they are released what could happen, our country would really be vulnerable to another attack.

Obama has a lot on his plate, Hurricanes, 2 wars, economy, jobs, threats by North Korea and Iran. Israel and the Palestinians, the Middle East and Israel. How would you like to be President at this time.

Mike in Fairfax   May 29th, 2009 2:09 pm ET

"Wait!! I know!! Let's get these other guys to tell us we HAVE to release them..!! Yeah.. that's the ticket!!!"

Bo   May 29th, 2009 2:04 pm ET

ACLU. They don't care about the men and women defending their rights. All they care about is lining their own pockets. They rather see an American service memeber killed by terriorist, then keep the already explosive photo a secret.

What purpose will get out of seeing photos that have been seen on Iraq? and we all know what happen, when those photos were released.

ALCU only cares about themseleves. Eff the country....is what their saying

A CZAR FOR THIS AND THAT....   May 29th, 2009 2:02 pm ET

Mirrors, mirrors on the wall who is the greatest "CZAR" of them all ?
and the answer is: Obama of course the savior of all....puting down
country first prioity...perhaps he will invite the Terrorists to the WH tea party...Next in Egypt he will pay tribute saying: :viva to them and down with the USA" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Manoy777   May 29th, 2009 2:00 pm ET

ACLU needs to MOVE ON!!!

Everyone already knows what happened in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq... NO NEED TO INCITE...
I do believe that these pictures will only give Al Qaeda more substance to use for recruiting and inspiring Muslims to join their maligned and wicked cause.

Fair is Fair   May 29th, 2009 1:58 pm ET

I simply cannot understand why the ACLU is hell bent on putting soldiers lives in jeopardy. So okay, libs... looks like the choice comes down to what the ACLU wants and what Obama and his advisors want. What do you choose?

RNC = DNC = politics as usual   May 29th, 2009 1:54 pm ET

Even the ACLU says: "it "makes a mockery" of Obama's campaign promise of greater transparency"

Add this to the list of broken promises. A number of web sites are now tracking his kept and broken promises, since Umbama and his misty eyed supporters have an astoundingly short memory.

I know there will some comments here like "what broken promises, where?" Spend about 3 more brain cells and 5 more seconds and look for yourself.

Bob of Lompoc   May 29th, 2009 1:52 pm ET

It's getting warmer by the day. Who do you think will roll first – Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzalez. ? The sweat puddles are getting larger.

carlo   May 29th, 2009 1:43 pm ET

I've read that some fo the pictures shows sexual abuse of children. If that's so, they definitely shouldn't show them. That would be a disaster for our troops right now.

Chi Town   May 29th, 2009 1:40 pm ET

No matter how this goes down... it's bad for the country.

You release them it's bad... you don't it's bad...

Double edged sword for sure

Jeff Spangler, Arlington, VA   May 29th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

Why is Obama kicking this can down the road, when many lawyers think he will be ordered to release the photos no matter what the military or some ragtag jihadists think of them. This case is a profile in weakness and weaselling by The One.

donttreadonme   May 29th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

I knew it wouldn't be long until the very liberals who helped elect Obama would turn on them.

New Yorker   May 29th, 2009 1:33 pm ET

It's quite clear that the ACLU's main objective is to destroy this country in whatever way they can.

katiec   May 29th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

I really do not see what the release of these photos will accomplish. It will further support the worlds view of do as I say, not as I do
mentallity of the previous administration.
The majority of American people do not support torture and these
pictures will be disturbing for everyone. What our leaders allowed to happen is against the Geneva Convention and honor, and we do
not need to expose further proof of our wrong doings.
We are striving to bring our United States of America back to the status we once had and do not need more of the past to drag us
down.

Obama Victim   May 29th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

Hey – let's ask Sotomayer what SHE would recommend!!

Should Obama release the photos or not, Ms Sotomayer??

Brian G, Sugar Land, TX   May 29th, 2009 1:27 pm ET

Would these photos be any better or worse than a Freddie Kruger movie? Released or unreleased, these photos will not vary the opinions of those against whom we fight eiterh physically or politically

Don't ya think that our enemies are already doing the maximum to harm us anyway?

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA   May 29th, 2009 1:24 pm ET

I'm a democrat, but I support the President's decision not wanting these photos released. Releasing those photos will incite anti-American sentiment in the Arab world and put our troops in danger. I'm all for transparancy too, but not at the risk of our men and women in harm's way. DO NOT RELEASE ANY PHOTOS. As if the photos that we've already seen aren't bad enough. It's a despicable thing to see and I can see how that can be used to the enemies advantage to kill our troops and disrupt the peace process in the entire region.

didi   May 29th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

great.

Mari( maybe one of my comments will be posted)   May 29th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

We believe that the photos and ALL documents relating to Bush & DICK sanctioned torture should be released. So that we, the People, can see for ourselves what horrors have been done in our name!

And for those who will say "torture saved us from another attack!"

I say....... statistics show that the chances of an American dying in a terrorist attack is....... (drumroll)...... ONE...... in 9.3 million!

However, every day...... every day........ 2,500 Americans die of heart disease!

Kevin in Ohio   May 29th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

Obama, on this issue, is 100% correct. When will the ACLU and NYT start putting our country first instead of their own liberal agenda?

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@KuhnCNN: Rick’s List: A New, Twitter-Happy CNN Show Anchored By Rick Sanchez? http://www.mediaite.com/ozjwx
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:18:37 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: Freshman House Democrat from Alabama to switch to Republican Party, sources telll CNN - http://bit.ly/4pXIzB
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:43:21 -0800
@KuhnCNN: RT @RickSanchezCNN: Hey guys, new CNN show beginning Jan 18th, weekdays 3-5pm ET. "Rick’s List"- Who will make the list?
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:10:12 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: New SitRoom start time. Beg. mid-Jan, we're on 5-7p ET. Our excellent team can focus on 2 solid hrs. Less becomes more.
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:45:58 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: Tiger Woods' standing with Americans takes a big hit but there appears to be a big racial divide - http://bit.ly/6dW44s
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:28:45 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP