(CNN) – Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN Sunday he disagrees with conservative commentators who have labeled Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist, but said he has better things to do than be "the speech police."
"Look. I've got a big job to do dealing with 40 Senate Republicans and trying to advance the nation's agenda, and better things to do than be the speech police over people who have their views about a very important appointment," McConnell told CNN's John King on State of The Union. "So I'm not going to get into policing everybody's speech."
The comments come two days after Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, publicly repudiated recent statements from conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich calling Obama's choice for the high court a "racist."
"I think it's terrible," Cornyn told NPR Thursday. "This is not the kind of tone any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advise and consent.”
McConnell told King Sunday the idea that Sotomayor is a racist - a notion largely based on her 2001 speech at Berkeley - is "certainly not my view."
"My view is we ought to take a look at this nominee's qualifications,” McConnell said. “I think her life story is absolutely impressive."
But the Senate Minority Leader added he would not rule out pushing for a filibuster against Sotomayor after a thorough investigation into her past rulings and statements.
"To predict [a filibuster] in the same week that the nominee is put forward is putting the cart before the horse," McConnell said. "We have no earthly idea whether that would be appropriate at some point in the process. We've got a lot of cases to read and a lot of background to check."
Mitch has a big job "trying to advance the nation's agenda" back to the 19th CEntury...he's very busy...
Instead of getting all worked up about one stray comment she made eight years ago to a group of hispanic students, why don't all of you who are convinced she is a racist go back an look at the decisions she's written in 17–yes 17–years on the federal bench. You will find she's actually quite moderate, even conservative, in the way she follows the "rule of law" that Republicans have now adopted as their mantra. At least Sessions, McConnel, etc. have now recognized that following Rush and Newt will indeed lead the party out of the ditch but also over a cliff.
I would hope Rush and Newt are not the spokesmen for the Republican Party. If so, this country is headed for a one party system. We need two parties in this country and the Republican party needs to stop the overt racial divide that they are trying to hold on to. We have moved into the 21st century and there are better issues to be addressed. Racial division is going the be the downfall of this great country. Let's pull together and make this country one nation under God!!
What is this I read? A Rep. standing up for what is right? Just looked outside and it is raining cats and dogs!
Well CNN I see your still playing with the headlines. I see now where in this article that mentions Limbaughs name..
Wwell, what do you know, a Repugnican that thinks. No if he only talks to the rest of his group and get them off of "guns, abortion and tax cuts" they might will a few.
Rev, Huckabee says Michael Steele is the RNC's token negro ....is that racist?
@Paul from Kissimmee May 31st, 2009 11:22 am ET
Good response - couldn't agree with you more. Folks need to dump their "victim" mentality and EARN their rights by ACTING responsibly.
No one race is at fault for all problems. Financially, racially, mentally, and physically handicapped can help themselves in varying degrees, but cannot blame their woes on the bogeyman. I grew up mixed race and poor; prisoners claimed and received more benefits than we received. There is not any race that can claim that it did not enslave and was not enslaved. (Yes, there were even black slave owners and white slaves in America.) Review your histories – the good and the bad. I am proud to be an American.
Do you relize that you agreed to bipartisanship when you elected out President? Your pary has been anything but bipartisan vy trying to rename the Democratic Party the "Democrtaic Socialist Party". It os OK that Bush an dCheney madea boatload of money off of oil and Haliberton but about 120 days into the new President we are slamming him for a stimulus package formulated under the Busgh administration. Rus limbaugh and Newt Gingrich need to go away. Your best chance for 2012 is Colin Powell and Tom Ridge. But the prviously mentioned zero's would fight them. All tthe splintering in the Republican Party is pushing people to the Libertarian Party as in Ron Paul.
H levine Las vegas
Just like writing on truck stop rest room stall.. Amounts to about the same thing. Stinky, vulgar and ignorant...
Please! a Person of color cannot be racist. Plain and Simply put.
The party of No will NO themselves to extinction.
Mitch and his buddies would LOVE to be the speech police. Its in thier nature. They just never consolidated power long enough. They already wiretapped why not control speech as well?
Sen. McConnell should leave that job to the Obama administration.
This is a hilarious argument, and those people (Champly, et al) on here repeating that she is a 'racist' are in fact, of course, racists themselves. But more importantly, they are morons. Judge Alito, a VERY conservative judge, said exactly the same thing in his confirmation hearing a couple years back. Reagan said the same thing about having a woman judge on the court back in the 80s. Are they racist? Give me a break. And La Raza? You mean the organization praised by both President Bush and John McCain? Uh-huh.
Keep digging a hole, conservatives. You've just lost another million votes.
All Sotomayor did was very bluntly state something we all know as true: Don't judge another until you've walked a mile in their shoes. Read her whole speech and not just the soundbites coming out of the GOP, who so desperately want to block anything President Obama wants to do.
The fact that Sotomayor was referring to something involving race does not mean she's a racist. She has judged plenty of cases fairly and impartially.
Let's hope that the Senate can all be adults, take a look at Sotomayor's complete record and qualifications, keep an open mind throughout the confirmation process, and then vote accordingly.
Some of the same people whose party nominated HARRIET MIERS, of all people, are now using a statement out of context in a futile effort to sabotage a FAR MORE qualified candidate.
gl, Pittsburgh–you need to get a grip. You're going to pop a vein. As far as Limbaugh is concerned; he has a right to his views. Politicians paying so much attention to him is great for his ratings, but I would think politicians have more important work to do. Well, maybe not.
If all the all the statement politician have made in there life time were calogne it would not be one in office. If one were alive in the forties thourgh the eighties it would sound like Hiltler any where USA. Said enough.
"Ridiculous May 31st, 2009 1:08 pm ET
Would all this speculation and scrutiny be taking place if this nominee was a white male with the same qualifications? Would they have even looked back for any little satement in one of his speeches?"
What short, little, uh–memories libs have. Remember Robert Bork?
Rush and the Republicans will take whatever they can find to get rid of her because she's a woman and a Latina. They are the racists. I have gotten plenty of emails from my Rush-listening, fox news watching friends about Mexicans and Obama that were plenty racist and now they want to talk about her. What a bunch of hypocrites!
What is racist is to pull a persons words out of context to imply racism so you can stoke the passions of your base...
THAT'S what's racist, Chapmply
Regarding Sotomayor's decision in the case of the New Haven firefighters case, the city rejected the firefighter exam because the test violated Title VII, the federal civil rights law that prevents discrimination in employment. (All test scores were tossed and another test was given.)
Sotomayor was following the law – which is what a judge is sworn to do – when she (and the entire 2nd Circuit court) made her decision regarding this case.
Please, folks, do a little research and stop blindly believing everything that Rush and the GOP spout. The Internet is a very quick tool for finding out a lot of information – be a good citizen and stay informed.
Champly May 31st, 2009 1:21 pm ET
wishing – you wish she wasn't racist but she was. She referred to her self as a "latino women" compared to "white men". That is a clearly racist statement which disqualifies this candidate.
WHAT? So if I call myself a white female, which is the truth, I'm being racist? So I can't be on the Supreme Court? Oh, wait, I never went to the top law school in the country, graduating first in my class, never been appointed by GHWBush as a judge, run a courtroom, made decisions, run another court at a higher level...THAT'S why I can't be nominated. She is more than qualified.
When a man makes the same kind of statements about his immigrant background, that's fine. Now, THAT is racism at its finest. A white male can say the exact same things, (and did, check Alito's confirmation hearings!) and it is absolutely no problem for other white males. This is almost laughable if it weren't so sad that the evolution of this country seems to be part of the de-evolution of white males.