June 2nd, 2009
12:12 PM ET
6 years ago

Nancy Reagan to appear at WH, lunch with Michelle Obama

Former first lady Nancy Reagan will be attending an event at the White House on Tuesday afternoon.
Former first lady Nancy Reagan will be attending an event at the White House on Tuesday afternoon.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former first lady Nancy Reagan will personally attend a White House ceremony Tuesday afternoon when President Obama signs legislation authorizing the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission, CNN has learned.

Mrs. Reagan will also attend the unveiling of a new statute of President Reagan Wednesday morning at 10 a.m. in the Capitol Rotunda. After the unveiling, the former first lady will share a private White House lunch with Michelle Obama.


Filed under: Michelle Obama • Nancy Reagan • President Obama
soundoff (223 Responses)
  1. honnus

    Who cares?? He's DEAD, and the wifey has no significance, (never did, never will) to our country. He did great things, while all the time senile....that's why we voted for the Bushies....logic dictated that senility was a good characteristic for our presidents to have. I sure hope Obama doesn't waste one second of his time entertaining the old hag!

    June 2, 2009 01:07 pm at 1:07 pm |
  2. Fitz in Texas

    Teleprompter of the U.S.A. June 2nd, 2009 12:38 pm ET

    Poor Nancy, that's a scary looking woman you're going to be having lunch with.
    ________________________________________________________
    Actually, it shouldn't be all that bad for Mrs. Reagan. This administration hired a make-up artist to tone down that mean (mean....not my word, the word of the liberal media) look that Mrs. Obama has at the cost of $100,000.00 per year which the taxpayers pay for. This is the First Lady that has ever done this, so this is one thing that Mrs. Reagan and Mrs. Obama won't have in common. Yep, all this "change" is costing the taxpayer a lot of money.

    June 2, 2009 01:08 pm at 1:08 pm |
  3. Peggy

    To: republican scum scum

    A quote by the late Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931-2005

    "You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody, anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any Nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."

    In other words, GET A JOB and quit living off the working Republicans. Republicans have money because we are CONSERVATIVE. Democrats like to spend other peoples money. LIBERAL = spend, spend, spend and live off government programs which are funded by the working Republicans.

    June 2, 2009 01:09 pm at 1:09 pm |
  4. Independent

    Well now, that is really special....Nice to hear that 2 first ladies can get together...

    June 2, 2009 01:09 pm at 1:09 pm |
  5. Mari( maybe one of my comments will be posted)

    @ Indiana voter.......... Yes, Reagan did win RE-election with 49 of the 50 states. I voted for him.

    However......... let's not forget the 19% interests, the "Twin Recessions of 1981 & 1982" and......the Crash of 1987.

    Oh........ and Iran/Contra scandal. Reagan sold arms to Iran, of all places!

    Not all was rosy during St. Reagan's two terms in Office!

    June 2, 2009 01:09 pm at 1:09 pm |
  6. kevin - Philly, Pa

    Geez, its kinda sad to read people leaving comments degrading the former first lady, or the current one. Its even more pathetic to attribute party lines to a simple lunch between two nice ladies. Its also mind boggling that we have people on here who are quick to criticize Pres. Obama when he's only been in office for less than 5 months. I say this, if we lived through the 8 years of Bush/cheney regime, I am sure we can grant Pres. Obama (which the majority of the country voted for) some time to judge him fairly. Until then lets try to show some Unity Rep and Dem alike.

    June 2, 2009 01:13 pm at 1:13 pm |
  7. Kewpie

    I think it's gracious for the two of them to lunch together. Nancy still looks pretty good for an old dame!

    June 2, 2009 01:15 pm at 1:15 pm |
  8. Arrington E. Thomas

    I'm glad to hear and see that the former first lady is looking well! Former first lady enjoy your lunch with OUR first lady Mrs. Obama.

    June 2, 2009 01:15 pm at 1:15 pm |
  9. Darth Vadik, CA

    This is posted here because the comments were closed in American Opinion about muslim world

    Chris,

    Do you remeber which country last year was the only one to welcome even President Bush with people waiving American and Albanian flags, and even hugging Bush? In which and only country Bush could walk down a street without the whole city being put down in a lockdown?

    ALBANIA & KOSOVA

    before you do the right wing every majority muslim country is "bad" routing do something you right wing idiots never do

    GET THE FACTS STRAIGHT

    June 2, 2009 01:15 pm at 1:15 pm |
  10. wishing

    I use to have a singlarly negative view of the Reagan years, for good reason. Since then, I have learned from Democratic political analysts that President Reagan did more for nuclear arms control than any other president. Given that alone (and I am not in a position to question the analysis) I now accept his administration as having be positive for America. Debt, business policies, Iran-Contra, etc. I now chaulk up to the price we paid for moving our world a bit further away from nuclear destruction.

    June 2, 2009 01:16 pm at 1:16 pm |
  11. harold

    WOULD RONNIE ...have saved Capitalism?..... As its being saved today...With all the governments money and efforts?...."Government is the problem..... NOT the SOLUTION."... man of the...1980's...once..said".....

    June 2, 2009 01:19 pm at 1:19 pm |
  12. Carrie

    Check your facts people. Reagan screwed up the economy. That trickle down economics and cutting taxes philosophy never worked. Even George H.W. Bush called it voodoo economics. Bush Sr. had to raise taxes (Reagan did too BTW) to fix things and so did Clinton. Then we had shrub come in and try to do the same stupid stuff with the economy that Reagan did. And we all know how that turned out.....

    June 2, 2009 01:20 pm at 1:20 pm |
  13. jm

    There are some truely vile people on this board today. I feel sorry for you people with all the hate that consumes you. Maybe you should think before you speak or you will be the one's to burn. CNN you better print this. I cannot believe you allow such garbage on your website, calling for the death and burning of people while moderating calm, rational points of view.

    June 2, 2009 01:23 pm at 1:23 pm |
  14. Chris D.

    CNN, please don't let left/right wing nuts drop hateful rhetoric on your blogs....
    We need to all study history, not listen to commentators.....
    Fact: Ronald Reagan walked into high inflation when he got into office.....Cutting taxes helped this......However he also raised taxes 6 times....

    Fact: Obama walked into a Depression which is deflation/implosion.....He had to deficit spend in the short term to replace the ususal consumer spending.....

    Fact: FDR couldn't have been the worst President ever, as Americans voted for him for 4 terms straight...he died in office, and was repalced by H. Truman......FDR almost did 16 years in the WH.....So either he was the worst or we're saying Americans were stupid to vote for him....The 22nd Amendment was added to the constitution so that Presidents could only serve 2 terms....to make the executive branch fair & balanced......

    People do your homework!!!! Learn about your nation!!!

    June 2, 2009 01:23 pm at 1:23 pm |
  15. Darth Vadik, CA

    wagon,

    BTW it was when Reagan came to power that we traded weapons for hostages (with according to right wingers now terrorists, aka Ahmendinajad of Iran, yes he was one of the main culprets of the hostage taking back in 1979)

    BTW it was when Reagan took office that all the coorporate scandals began (aka Keating 5) due to regullation

    BTW it was Reagan lowering that upper income people tax bracket that trippled the national debt of the US.

    BTW should I keep going?

    BTW it was when Reagan was in office that the unions started to break up making it impossible to raise a family on a single income, thus having both parents works, thus having the parents not spend more time with their kids, thus having a whole generation of Americans having lower grade and the academic standards keepgetting lowered to match "expectations." Of course the right wing bigots blamed public schools and teachers, but people are starting to realize where all this started.

    BTW ....

    June 2, 2009 01:24 pm at 1:24 pm |
  16. worriedmom

    Are all the Libs having a bad day today???? Please go drink some more Kool-Aid and take a Valium, everything will be fine in the Land of Obama.........

    June 2, 2009 01:24 pm at 1:24 pm |
  17. Hopeful Optimist

    You know, the passage of time really does tend to heal. Lotta negative comments here; and I was certainly not a supporter of Reagan. However, he was not nearly as bad as I thought back then, and he was not nearly as great as some think today. He did like his naptime and his movies. And 'Mommy'.

    June 2, 2009 01:25 pm at 1:25 pm |
  18. Darth Vadik, CA

    I ment to say de-regulation

    June 2, 2009 01:25 pm at 1:25 pm |
  19. Dick, Las Vegas

    Such hate in this country. A former first lady cannot even visit the White House without the hate-mongers taking a shot at her. And we wonder why the rest of the world has lost their respect for us. We've become a country of second graders throwing juvenile taunts at each other. What a great democracy we have.

    June 2, 2009 01:25 pm at 1:25 pm |
  20. Darth Vadik, CA

    and finally.....

    BTW, wagon, you're an idiot

    June 2, 2009 01:26 pm at 1:26 pm |
  21. SENSIBLE MIKE

    EO June 2nd, 2009 11:29 am ET

    How much will this statute cost me,?? i remembered very well what happened to us in the 80s when Reagan was President.

    We did not have jobs and was unemployed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Nice to see that my tax is been used for a cause, while children are homeless and hungry.

    What happened to our priority???

    EO,

    maybe you were unemployed because of your horrible grammar. If i was your prospective boss i wouldn't hire you either.

    Its "nice to see that my taxES"

    How much will this "statue" cost me not statute

    June 2, 2009 01:30 pm at 1:30 pm |
  22. Joseph, Los Angeles

    OK people, please stop ragging on Mrs. Reagan. Sometimes I cannot believe the hatred that grips this country.

    Have a nice lunch ladies!

    June 2, 2009 01:30 pm at 1:30 pm |
  23. Darth Vadik, CA

    Congradulations GOP,
    you're "act like a tough guy" act has sparked a Democratic fire under the bellies among fed up Americans, in other words, "you have awoken a sleeping giant."

    June 2, 2009 01:31 pm at 1:31 pm |
  24. Randolph Carter

    J.P. wrote: Gee, I guess the wealthy REALLY DO create the jobs in this country.

    You've got it all backwards: The people who work at jobs create the wealthy. Have a nice day!

    June 2, 2009 01:32 pm at 1:32 pm |
  25. Sniffit

    @ Rob, who said "Because he or she too will be taking over an America that will have been decimated, this time by the false prophet known as Obama."

    So I take it you're one of those GOPers who waits 5 days of positive DOW growth for a day that it drops back a portion of that and then cites it? Pick up something other than the latest GOP talking points memo and read about the world around you. Things aren't as bad as they were and they're getting better. I know the GOP like to badmouth it all in the hopes that they can continue to ruin consumer confidence and perpetuate the recession so they can blame Obama, but seriously, you sound like a retard.

    June 2, 2009 01:36 pm at 1:36 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9