June 5, 2009
Posted: June 5th, 2009 04:57 PM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Philip Mudd has withdrawn from consideration as undersecretary of intelligence and analysis at the Department of Homeland Security, a decision that follows new questions over his knowledge of the CIA's controversial interrogation programs during the Bush administration.

"The President believes that Phil Mudd would have been an excellent Undersecretary for Intelligence and Analysis but understands his personal decision and the choice he has made," said White House spokesman Nick Shapiro in a Friday afternoon statement. "It is with sadness and regret that the President accepted Phil's withdrawal from consideration as Phil once again demonstrated his duty to country above all things."

Mudd was deputy director of the Office of Terrorism Analysis at the CIA during the Bush administration. Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said earlier this week that her staff was following up on news reports that suggested Mudd was aware of the agency's use of aggressive interrogation techniques during the Bush era.

"Today I am announcing that I have decided to withdraw my name from consideration to be the Department of Homeland Security Undersecretary for Intelligence and Analysis," said Mudd, in a statement released by the White House.

"I know that this position will require the full cooperation with Congress and I believe that if I continue to move forward I will become a distraction to the President and his vital agenda. I would like to thank the President for the honor of being considered and I extend my good wishes to the exceptional men and women of the Intel and Analysis office; these professionals work hard every day to analyze and share information with state, local and federal law enforcement agencies critical to the security of the United States."

White House Homeland Security Advisor John Brennan, who was originally President Obama's pick to be CIA director, withdrew from consideration for that post before confirmation hearings several months ago amid similar questions about his own knowledge of detention and interrogation policies during the Bush administration.

DHS assistant secretary of public affairs Sean Smith said Friday that the Office of Intelligence and Analysis would continue to be guided on an interim basis by Bart Johnson. No permanent replacement has been named.

–CNN's Rebecca Sinderbrand and Adam Levine contributed this report

Filed under: Philip Mudd • President Obama


Tatianna   June 5th, 2009 10:35 pm ET

If Team Obama fails to keep us safe and our citizens are attacked at home or abroad, shall we then prosecute those who dismantled our safeguards and gutted our intelligence effort? The left has nothing against torture, they just want to choose its victims. As countless leftists learned in the course of the 20th century, todays witness for the prosecution is tomorrows enemy of the people. By lefties indulging desire to criminalize policy advise, Team Obama has unleashed furier that will haunt his presidency.

Tom   June 5th, 2009 9:27 pm ET

No one anywhere should ever tolerate bringing any bush officials back into office. Not under any circumstances. Certainly not any high-ranking CIA from his administration. They are lucky they are not all in jail. The illegal torture that was conducted in disregard of international law and alll geneva conventions, the illegal wiretapping on US citizens here at home...you would think that it was pretty innocuous but in fact it was anything but, the enron economics are all hallmarks of bush failed policy. He took the best economy in Americas history, with record surpluses and broke the bank and left in financial turmoil and not mentioning record deficits. Most americans believe bush should be in jail,... so, why isn't he?

Tatianna   June 5th, 2009 9:27 pm ET

Rendition is back, you pro-torturing, posturing, hypocritical leftist fools Team Obama determined that the rendition program was one component of Team Bush on terrorism that it could not afford to discard. Obama preserves, under EXECUTIVE ORDER, that the CIA STILL HAS AUTHORITY to carry out secret abductions and transfer prisoners to countries that cooperate with America. Lefties howled when Bush did this and called it an unlawful detainee designations. And here we have Obama flying detainees to secret prisons off the map from Human Rights groups and Red Cross. Obama sure did ban torture in America but he wants other countries to do the torturing for him. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA ARE NOW OFFICIALLY PRO-TORTURE!

Simmy   June 5th, 2009 9:08 pm ET

He did the right thing......Leave Speaker Pelosi the h to the e to the double l alone.....

annie for Palin   June 5th, 2009 8:12 pm ET

How about pelosi was she aware and is lying or is the CIA lying – the white house should get their house in order.

LacrosseMom   June 5th, 2009 6:48 pm ET

@ Randy....... God willing we will see Bush & Co., brought up on war crime charges. They swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, and abide by the laws of the United States, waterboarding has been illegal in our Nation....... since the 1800's.

Mike TX   June 5th, 2009 6:29 pm ET

It's good this guy pulled his name out of the hat. He'd be a voice of reason and common sense in an administration that is WAY more concerned with saying the right things than doing the right things.

Why doesn't Pelosi step down, considering we all know she knew what was going on and chose to look the other way?

Bob of Lompoc   June 5th, 2009 6:28 pm ET

Pardon the pun, but his name is MUDD.

Stormer   June 5th, 2009 6:22 pm ET

Typical.

Republicans complain that Obama isn't "reaching across the aisle" and is excluding them. Then, when the President offers a place in his cabinet, or other high-ranking positions to Republicans, they turn them down. THEN they complain to any media outlet that will listen Obama is being partisan and excluding their viewpoint.

I can't decide; are the Republicans insane, or just plain stupid? Maybe both.

Amanda   June 5th, 2009 6:18 pm ET

Just so it is repeated again and again: Torture is un-American. It is in violation of the Geneva Convention (which the US helped draft). It is unworthy of a great country like ours. Period. Those who want to practice it should move to Burma or other countries.

Had It   June 5th, 2009 6:04 pm ET

Something smells funny - if they think they can avoid prosecution by laying low, they'd better think again.

It's coming out slowly but surely -- it will ALL come out.

Change is on the way – it may not be the change the crooks want, and that's your tuff luck.

S Callahan   June 5th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

Wouldn't it make sense to nominate someone from the ranks of the CIA...why go through training someone new...get someone who has first hand knowledge, has good judgement, is slow to anger, and very patient.

Curtis   June 5th, 2009 5:53 pm ET

I've never represented my country as a politician or in the security forces. But I know and I think most of us on here have an idea what diddicult decisions these folks have to make. Even though he may have known about the torture, in my opinion I don't think that means he won't do a good job now. (1) Hind sight is 20 / 20 vision, (2) Sometimes under difficult circumstances we may vote no at the table,and register our disapproval, but allow the majority to go ahead with the plan.

40acres   June 5th, 2009 5:53 pm ET

"June 5th, 2009 5:34 pm ET

Just wait until the next Republican administration, whether in 4 years or 40, and they try all the "Socialists" and throw them in jail. You can't go back and prosecute a difference of opinion on how to treat the three of the worst people in the world."

That depends on whether one of the "opinions" is illegal doesn't it Ted?

Independent_me   June 5th, 2009 5:45 pm ET

Serves him right!
The problem is that the Bush administration had succeeded in cowing just about every one. Nobody dared stand up to them, or question them. Even the news media feared the administration and let them get away with their fear tactics.

Phil   June 5th, 2009 5:45 pm ET

He should never have been nominated in the first place! We are supposed to get the change we VOTED for. Remember, elections are supposed to have consequences and the criminals that have perverted and pervaded our country and constitution for the last eight years should never have access to the change in government that we DEMANDED - and again, voted for!

ule   June 5th, 2009 5:45 pm ET

He did not drop out. He was fired because of his involvement in waterboarding.

tee   June 5th, 2009 5:40 pm ET

Jon Jay
He didn't want to speak about the torture the Bush administration carried out..........Get a clue..........buy a vowel.

Buckeye   June 5th, 2009 5:38 pm ET

What about Charles Freeman? When are you going tell his story and reveal how treacherous and treasonous the Israeli lobby is?

Justjean   June 5th, 2009 5:37 pm ET

Weird how some folks bring Nancy Pelosi's comments into everything. She said what she said. Has nothing to do with other news stories.

The truth of her comments will eventually come out, or... it won't. No one has confirmed either way. If everything was marked top secret, it may take awhile to find out "what's what," especially if "classified" was a cover. We shall see. I am sure folks are working on it.

Voter   June 5th, 2009 5:35 pm ET

Obama is a hopeless phony.

Here he is choosing another Bush Admin. graduate, only to be turned down by REAL Democrats. And the business of allowing families in bankruptcies to save their own home instead only being able to save their vacation home? The Big O Administration never got behind it after promising to help people who are struggling to keep their modest homes instead of helping the rich with their second homes. "Change we can believe in?" Hardly.

Is he charming? Yes. Engaging? Yes. A good speech-giver? Yes.
A man who keeps his promises? No.

Ted   June 5th, 2009 5:34 pm ET

Just wait until the next Republican administration, whether in 4 years or 40, and they try all the "Socialists" and throw them in jail. You can't go back and prosecute a difference of opinion on how to treat the three of the worst people in the world.

C Spurgeon   June 5th, 2009 5:31 pm ET

Cmon lets get on with the future instead of all this leftover stuff. Lets move on the medical plan. Lets move on the economy.Term Limits for congress are a must have for this country to move forward.

Had It   June 5th, 2009 5:26 pm ET

I think the Titanic (called we the people) are seeing the tip of the iceberg on just what has been going on in DC for years.

It will be so much better when it is ALL brought out and the rotten ones thrown away. NO MATTER WHICH PARTY OR OFFICE. Nothing can survive in this poison.

Get Serious!   June 5th, 2009 5:20 pm ET

To Butch Dillon – you should be ashamed of yourself! Unfortunately, I don't think you have the brains or conscience to know what that means. Why would you be delighted in someone else committing suicide? You really should seek mental help.

Melissa   June 5th, 2009 5:17 pm ET

Good. He needs to be held accountable for his actions.

JAY JOHN   June 5th, 2009 5:15 pm ET

HE DIDN'T LIKE OBAMA'S AGENDA -- SOCIALISM

Jon in CA   June 5th, 2009 5:15 pm ET

@ Hopeful Optimist,

Be Careful! With sensible views and intellectual honesty you display civil discourse could break out on CNN's ticker!

tim   June 5th, 2009 5:14 pm ET

Ive been reading the past few stories on here, and I can say that for the most part, it sounds like the world is full of haters.

If you do not like you life or the country, move to another country. Do us supporters a favor and leave.

Randy   June 5th, 2009 5:14 pm ET

Obama’s approach to Make Peace not War is the most sensible approach.

Criminals Bush and Cheney should be in Jail.

Prosecute them for War Crimes.

Prosecute Bush and Cheney for Deaths of 4300 US Troops and 100,000 Iraqi Civilians.

Go Obama Go.

Jail Bush.

JK Ashburn, VA   June 5th, 2009 5:09 pm ET

Too bad prior knowledge of interrogation policy is not disqualifying the idiots in Congress from their jobs. They'd rather demagogue against what they all knew was happening. Most members of Congress of hypocrits and some are outright criminal liars.

Tom   June 5th, 2009 5:08 pm ET

Nancy isn't saying they lied anymore, when it got too hot for her she refused to talk about the alleged lies.

Butch Dillon   June 5th, 2009 5:04 pm ET

Maybe Mudd's next move, to my delight, could be suicide.

Jon   June 5th, 2009 5:02 pm ET

J.Crobuzon, I am a conservative loyal to the constitution. Are you? Obama is not.

Hopeful Optimist   June 5th, 2009 5:02 pm ET

Again, I will say it. I am a Liberal Democrat, and I think that using torture as a means to an end is morally wrong. BUT, I realize that not everyone agrees with me on that , and I don't think that it should be a litmus test to determine if someone is/is not qualified for certain jobs. I will put it another way. Bill Clinton was a womanizer and cheated on his wife at the drop of a hat. But I thought he was a hell of a good president.

Its called Common Sense, folks. You need for certain people who man certain jobs to sometimes have a bit of a rough edge to them. I know I was that way when I served in the military, and I still adhere to that belief.

gae   June 5th, 2009 5:02 pm ET

Torture is a war crime. Prosecute them, don't nominate them!

Anonymous   June 5th, 2009 5:01 pm ET

Stay and fight man. I don't trust the CIA any more than I trust Bush and Cheney.

Limbaugh is a Liberal   June 5th, 2009 4:58 pm ET

So a republican senator torpedos a fellow republican's nomination just because he was Obama's pick. Congratulations for stupidity.

Laura See   June 5th, 2009 4:56 pm ET

OMG! I'm so impressed, maybe there is one person in our Administration in D.C. that actually has integrity!? Or there's even more skeletons in that closet?

Lesley Anne   June 5th, 2009 4:53 pm ET

It's interesting that on one side of the coin, the former Bush VP and also his daughter are speaking publicly about these policies claiming that they were good, solid, valuable tools while at the same time others who actually carried out the procedures lost their jobs or spent time in jail or are being drummed out of jobs in the new administration because of their knowledge about these policies during the Bush administration. This is hypocrisy. Why is Cheney being given so much positive media attention for his "enhanced interrogation" tour and being applauded in some circles while others are dropping like flies.

J.Crobuzon   June 5th, 2009 4:53 pm ET

Rob, he was a 'publican then. They had no need to lie to him, whether or not they lied to Pelosi.

J.Crobuzon   June 5th, 2009 4:52 pm ET

So Mudd is a washout? Cool. Seriously, good for him; I know Obama is trying to bring these dirty-handed crooks back into the mainstream of American politics, but I can't trust any Republican after the past eight years. They aren't loyal – just look at their comments!

Dan   June 5th, 2009 4:51 pm ET

Mudd is probably guility of something

Rob   June 5th, 2009 4:48 pm ET

He shouldn't have done it. Nancy's telling everyone that the CIA lied to her, I'm sure they lied to him as well

RNC = DNC = politics as usual   June 5th, 2009 4:44 pm ET

So even though he might have had knowlege of the torture, Obama still ""believes that Phil Mudd would have been an excellent Undersecretary"

I lose track – is Obama for or against the whole torture thing?

knew about it – OK / not OK
photos release – OK / not OK
etc.

Politics as Usual – Question Authority!

munchmom   June 5th, 2009 4:42 pm ET

Another one bites the dust....

josh   June 5th, 2009 4:39 pm ET

I think it's great that he dropped out. Wish Nancy Pelosi would follow his example.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@KuhnCNN: Great meeting @JackGrayCNN today and seeing @sinderbrandrcnn in NYC! AC Rock Stars! :-)
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:07:10 -0800
@KuhnCNN: Posted today: Clinton foreign trip first on Twitter. http://bit.ly/9Axuh9 /via @PoliticalTicker
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:36:14 -0800
@KuhnCNN: RT @octavianasrCNN: MUST-READ// Coaching tomorrow's world leaders, through social networking -- http://bit.ly/9tmW6x
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:32:51 -0800
@AWMooneyCNN: Metro finally comes and then stops at station for 20 minutes #snoverkill
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:46:27 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: I just shoveled two feet of snow off the roof. That was fun!
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:14:34 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP