June 11th, 2009
02:05 PM ET
9 years ago

Obama takes health care push to town hall meeting

 President Obama is discussing health care reform in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

President Obama is discussing health care reform in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

(CNN) - President Barack Obama took his health care reform push on the road Thursday, saying in Green Bay, Wisconsin, that those concerned with high costs and rising deficits should be proponents of change to an ailing system.

"If you're worried about spending and you're worried about deficits, you need to be worried about the cost of health care," he said at a town hall meeting, later adding that doing nothing would cost far more in the coming years.

He aimed his comments at Republican opponents of Democratic-backed proposals for a government-funded national health care option intended to ensure that 47 million Americans lacking health insurance can sign up for - and afford - coverage.

Republican leaders specifically oppose the government-funded plan, fearing it would lead to eventual elimination of private health insurance.

Obama acknowledged he supports what is called the national option, saying it would increase competition for private plans. At the same time, the president insisted a national plan would be one of many choices as part of reforms intended to strengthen the U.S. system.

"If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor," he said to applause. "If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan."

Savings in spending on federal Medicare and Medicaid programs, as well as decreasing tax deductions for high-income Americans, would help cover increased costs of health care reform, Obama said.

He noted that some facilities and places, including Green Bay, offer better medical care at a lower price than others.

Full prepared remarks after the jump:

Thank you. It is wonderful to be back here in Green Bay. I want to thank Southwest High School for hosting us today, and I want to thank Laura for sharing her story. It takes courage to do that, and it takes even more to battle a disease like cancer with such grace and determination.Laura’s story is incredibly moving. Sadly, it is not unique. Every day in this country, more and more Americans are forced to worry not simply about getting well, but whether they can afford to get well. Millions more wonder if they can afford the routine care necessary to stay well. Even for those who have health insurance, rising premiums are straining their budgets to the breaking point – premiums that have doubled over the last nine years, and have grown at a rate three times faster than wages. Desperately-needed procedures and treatments are put off because the price is too high. And all it takes is a single illness to wipe out a lifetime of savings.

Employers aren’t faring any better. The cost of health care has helped leave big corporations like GM and Chrysler at a competitive disadvantage with their foreign counterparts. For small businesses, it’s even worse. One month, they’re forced to cut back on health care benefits. The next month, they have to drop coverage. The month after that, they have no choice but to start laying off workers.

For the government, the growing cost of Medicare and Medicaid is one of the biggest threats to our federal deficit. Bigger than Social Security. Bigger than all the investments we’ve made so far. So if you’re worried about spending and you’re worried about deficits, you need to be worried about the cost of health care.

We have the most expensive health care system in the world. We spend almost 50% more per person on health care than the next most costly nation. But here’s the thing, Green Bay: we’re not any healthier for it. We don’t necessarily have better outcomes. Even within our own country, a lot of the places where we spend less on health care actually have higher quality than places where we spend more. Right here in Green Bay, you get more quality out of fewer health care dollars than many other communities across the country. And yet, across the country, spending on health care goes up and up and up – day after day, year after year.

I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage – they like their plan and they value their relationship with their doctor. And no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan.

But in order to preserve what’s best about our health care system, we have to fix what doesn’t work. For we have reached a point where doing nothing about the cost of health care is no longer an option. The status quo is unsustainable. If we do not act and act soon to bring down costs, it will jeopardize everyone’s health care. If we do not act, every American will feel the consequences. In higher premiums and lower take-home pay. In lost jobs and shuttered businesses. In a rising number of uninsured and a rising debt that our children and their children will be paying off for decades. If we do nothing, within a decade we will spending one out of every five dollars we earn on health care. In thirty years, it will be one out of every three. That is untenable, that is unacceptable, and I will not allow it as President of the United States.

Health care reform is not part of some wish list I drew up when I took office. It is central to our economic future – central to the long-term prosperity of this nation. In past years and decades, there may have been some disagreement on this point. But not anymore. Today, we have already built an unprecedented coalition of folks who are ready to reform our health care system: physicians and health insurers; businesses and workers; Democrats and Republicans. A few weeks ago, some of these groups committed to doing something that would’ve been unthinkable just a few years ago: they promised to work together to cut national health care spending by two trillion dollars over the next decade. That will bring down costs, that will bring down premiums, and that’s exactly the kind of cooperation we need.

The question now is, how do we finish the job? How do we permanently bring down costs and make quality, affordable health care available to every American?

My view is that reform should be guided by a simple principle: we fix what’s broken and build on what works.

In some cases, there’s broad agreement on the steps we should take. In the Recovery Act, we’ve already made investments in health IT and electronic medical records that will reduce medical errors, save lives, save money, and still ensure privacy. We also need to invest in prevention and wellness programs that help Americans live longer, healthier lives.

But the real cost savings will come from changing the incentives of a system that automatically equates expensive care with better care – from addressing flaws that increase profits without actually increasing the quality of care.

We have to ask why places like the Geisinger Health system in rural Pennsylvania, Intermountain Health in Salt Lake City, or communities like Green Bay can offer high-quality care at costs well below average, but other places in America can’t. We need to identify the best practices across the country, learn from the success, and replicate that success elsewhere. And we should change the warped incentives that reward doctors and hospitals based on how many tests or procedures they prescribe, even if those tests or procedures aren’t necessary or result from medical mistakes. Doctors across this country did not get into the medical profession to be bean counters or paper pushers; to be lawyers or business executives. They became doctors to heal people. And that’s what we must free them to do.

We must also provide Americans who can’t afford health insurance with more affordable options. This is both a moral imperative and an economic imperative, because we know that when someone without health insurance is forced to get treatment at the ER, all of us end up paying for it.

So what we’re working on is the creation of something called a Health Insurance Exchange – which would allow you to one-stop shop for a health care plan, compare benefits and prices, and choose the plan that’s best for you. None of these plans would be able to deny coverage on the basis of a pre-existing condition, and all should include an affordable, basic benefit package. And if you can’t afford one of the plans, we should provide assistance to make sure you can. I also strongly believe that one of the options in the Exchange should be a public insurance option – because if the private insurance companies have to compete with a public option, it will keep them honest and help keep prices down.

Now, covering more Americans will obviously cost a good deal of money at a time where we don’t have extra to spend. That’s why I have already promised that reform will not add to our deficit over the next ten years. To make that happen, we have already identified hundreds of billions worth of savings in our budget – savings that will come from steps like reducing Medicare overpayments to insurance companies and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse in both Medicare and Medicaid. I will be outlining hundreds of billions more in savings in the days to come. And I’ll be honest – even with these savings, reform will require additional sources of revenue. That’s why I’ve proposed that we scale back how much the highest-income Americans can deduct on their taxes back to the rate from the Reagan years – and use that money to help finance health care.

In all these reforms, our goal is simple: the highest-quality health care at the lowest-possible cost. We want to fix what’s broken and build on what works. As Congress moves forward on health care legislation in the coming weeks, I understand there will be different ideas and disagreements on how to achieve this goal. I welcome those ideas, and I welcome that debate. But what I will not welcome is endless delay or a denial that reform needs to happen. When it comes to health care, this country cannot continue on its current path. I know there are some who believe that reform is too expensive, but I can assure you that doing nothing will cost us far more in the coming years. Our deficits will be higher. Our premiums will go up. Our wages will be lower, our jobs will be fewer, and our businesses will suffer.

So to those who criticize our efforts, I ask, “What is the alternative?” What else do we say to all those families who now spend more on health care than housing or food? What do we tell those businesses that are choosing between closing their doors and letting their workers go? What do we say to all those Americans like Laura, a woman who has worked all her life; whose family has done everything right; a brave and proud woman whose child’s school recently took up a penny drive to help pay her medical bills? What do we tell them?

I believe we tell them that after decades of inaction, we have finally decided to fix what is broken about health care in America. We have decided that it’s time to give every American quality health care at an affordable cost. We have decided that if we invest in reforms that will bring down costs now, we will eventually see our deficits come down in the long-run. And we have decided to change the system so that our doctors and health care providers are free to do what they trained and studied and worked so hard to do: make people well again. That’s what we can do in this country; that’s what we can do at this moment, and now I’d like to hear your thoughts and answer your questions about how we get it done. Thank you.

Filed under: President Obama
soundoff (134 Responses)
  1. fedup

    If the people who want a government funded healthcare program were the ones who were capable of funding the program we wouldn't have a problem.
    Start a non-profit to fund insurance for those who "need" it through donations. Assuming all democrats want to provide healthcare coverage for the uninsured there should not be a problem finding funding. You know, there are lots of RICH DEMOCRATS too.

    June 11, 2009 03:42 pm at 3:42 pm |
  2. Mike Dallas

    I cannot believe all the selfish neo-cons complaining about helping to pay for those less fortunate. And yes this liberal has a job, and it pays north of 65K so I would be one of the ones footing the bill. Too tight to spare 5 bucks so others can have health insurance?. As President Obama pointed out if you had been listening and not typing the name calling rants, you would know that we are paying now for all the uninsured but as he stated, it is the costliest care provided, ER. So, I might be good pay small amounts over time to keep folks from having to go to the ER as the last resort.

    After all, one layoff and you would need that safety net, and I know repubs think the word "empathy" is a four letter word, but in this case you might want to Google the definition.

    June 11, 2009 03:42 pm at 3:42 pm |
  3. Michigan Jim

    If you think health care is expensive now, wait until Obama makes it "free."

    June 11, 2009 03:42 pm at 3:42 pm |
  4. Minnesotan

    Please nationalize health care. It will save money, help people and truly annoy the Republicans when it gets going and proves all of their petty and deceitful rants to be false.

    June 11, 2009 03:43 pm at 3:43 pm |







    June 11, 2009 03:43 pm at 3:43 pm |
  6. Sniffit

    @ It Cant Be Stopped, who asked "What does Obama mean with this statement?"

    He means a reduction in the allowable deduction...and it sounds like he means either scaling the deduction according to income or cutting it off at a certain income level...much like I don't get to deduct student loan interest (the way people do with their mortgage interest) because my salary is above a certain limit. It has nothign to do wih raising taxes...it has everything to do with starting to limit the deductions that are historically taken only by those who make alot of money. You GOPers can complain about the base tax rates all you want, but the fact remains that the richer you are, the more deductions you are able to take advantage of in order to avoid paying your taxes and the result is an EFFECTIVE TAX RATE on people of high income much less than the base rate, and in many cases a lower EFFECTIVE RATE than those in lower income brackets.

    June 11, 2009 03:43 pm at 3:43 pm |
  7. denverdoc

    To Dabird,

    You know what, I'm tired of paying for other people as well. In fact, I think that you should pave the road that goes to your house on your own. I also think that you should be responsible fo your own sewerline as well. While we are at it go ahead and build your own electricity generator and irrigation system.. I dont want to pay for the maintaince of those as i'm not using them. Dont you dare have your children go to public school as i dont have children and why should i be forced to pay for yours to be educated. Also you can become your own fire brigade and police department I dont want to pay for those either. Socialism stinks!

    June 11, 2009 03:43 pm at 3:43 pm |
  8. Helene

    As someone who was raised in Europe I cannot believe that this country does not have a sensible heath care for its citizens. Get real !

    June 11, 2009 03:45 pm at 3:45 pm |
  9. Obama - NOPE

    Socialized medical coverage for all, good medical care for none.

    June 11, 2009 03:46 pm at 3:46 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6