June 13, 2009
Posted: June 13th, 2009 05:59 PM ET

From
Iranians protest against the reelection of Ahmadinejad outside the interior ministry in Tehran.
Iranians protest against the reelection of Ahmadinejad outside the interior ministry in Tehran.

(CNN) - The White House is watching closely the results of the Iranian election, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Saturday.

“Like the rest of the world, we were impressed by the vigorous debate and enthusiasm that this election generated, particularly among young Iranians. We continue to monitor the entire situation closely, including reports of irregularities,” Gibbs said in a statement.

The Iranian government announced Saturday that incumbent president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won the nation’s closely watched election with 62.63 percent of the vote. The results were met with skepticism from supporters of the main challenger, former Prime Minster Mir Hossein Moussavi.

Related: Ahmadinejad hails election as protests grow

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton echoed Gibbs on Saturday, saying, “We watched closely the enthusiasm and the very vigorous debate and dialogue that occurred in the lead up to the Iranian elections.

“We are monitoring the situation as it unfolds in Iran, but we, like the rest of the world, are waiting and watching to see what the Iranian people decide. The United States has refrained from commenting on the election in Iran, we obviously hope that the outcome reflects the genuine will and desire of the Iranian people,” she said.

Angry crowds on Saturday gathered in Iran’s capital and broke into shops, tore down signs and started fires as they protested Ahmadinejad’s re-election, according to a CNN team on the ground.

Before the vote count ended, Moussavi issued a sharply worded letter urging the counting to stop because of "blatant violations" and lashed out at what he indicated was an unfair process.

Moussavi said the results from "untrustworthy monitors" reflected "the weakening of the pillars that constitute the sacred system" of Iran and "the rule of authoritarianism and tyranny." Independent vote monitors were banned from polling places.

What officials have called an unprecedented voter turnout at the polls Friday had been expected to boost Moussavi's chances of winning the presidency.

Filed under: Iran • Mahmoud Ahmadinejad


Spencer   June 13th, 2009 4:59 pm ET

"Irregularities"? Half the country is poised on the edge of revolt amidst widespread claims of improper election procedures, and the only title given to that is "irregularities"?

Ernie in LA   June 13th, 2009 4:57 pm ET

The WH needs to be monitored for "irregularities".

The Iranian people HAVE decided.....   June 13th, 2009 4:49 pm ET

Obama's speech in Egypt had no effect on Iranians as they stuck with Ahmadinejad--chalk up another loss for Obama.

GOPer   June 13th, 2009 4:49 pm ET

A sad day for Iran and democracy.

ib   June 13th, 2009 4:47 pm ET

Obama should love Iran; the goverment controlls everything there. Obama loves it when it when the gov. has controll. The world is laughing at us because Obama thinks he can talk and reason with them while they are thumbing their noses at us. Obama is a weak president when it comes to world affairs.

Andrew   June 13th, 2009 4:46 pm ET

While I hope that violence doesn't erupt, I do hope the people of Iran protest and investigate the strange results of this election!

GI Joe   June 13th, 2009 4:46 pm ET

It seem to be the year 2000 in Iran (remember Florida????)

rob   June 13th, 2009 4:44 pm ET

Lol you know they rigged that election

Chris   June 13th, 2009 4:42 pm ET

This is bad. It has to be voter fraud or something that controlled the voting thing. Cutting cell phone services and others to stop Mousavi from winning was purely demonic and unjustified. I have a bad feeling Ahmadinejad will put Iran on grounds for a totalitarian dictatorship. For me, I wanted Mousavi to win so he can end the nightmare, but the Supreme Leader....what supreme leader? Iran needs to stop this corruption!

How Nice   June 13th, 2009 4:37 pm ET

If everything was Bush's fault, why do you think you have a mandate to make the same spending mistakes to the 10th power, effectively bankrupting our country, devaluing our currency and setting the stage for Argentina style inflation and higher interst rates.

Wait till Obama's policies hit everyone with massive tax increases everywhere you turn.

I feel like I am living through Jimmy Carter Two.

What a bunch of bull, save jobs, just show us how losing 2 million jobs since you took office created or saved 150,000.

OBARFA, GETTING SICK OF YOUR LIES.

OBARFA THINKS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE STUPID. LET'S SEE HOW STUPID THEY ARE IN 2010 and 2012.

chris   June 13th, 2009 4:37 pm ET

this may be the test joe was talking about. i'm a rep. and didn't vote for our pres. while i'm guilty of picking on the vice president in small talk...a part of me thinks he sometimes says what many people are thinking. as this continues to unfold, i hope president obama weighs the influence that western leaning iranians support.

Cali J   June 13th, 2009 4:35 pm ET

Uh-Huh!
Yesterday CNN was reporting on how close this election should be.
Funny how societies who are unarmed and have no local district representation, often find that after the votes are tallied, the most powerful one wins by a huge margin. Kind of like Chavez or even better, Kim Jung Ill.
Even if this was rigged, The Supreme Council has already approved. That's all she wrote folks.
Notice, the internet was shut down right before and after the election as reported on other news sites.

Georges   June 13th, 2009 4:35 pm ET

What's all the fuss with the Iraninan election ? Did someone find a dangling CHAD ?

How Nice   June 13th, 2009 4:33 pm ET

Iran no longer has the threat of the US. Why we have a spinless leader in the White House.

North no longer has the threat of the US. Why?, we have a spineless leader in the White House.

I truly feel that our security as a nation is in peril. We better wakeup in 2010 and 2012 or this country will be more akin to a Socialist third world country, then the great country it was before OBAMA destroyed it.

Doug, Atlanta   June 13th, 2009 4:31 pm ET

The election was clearly a sham and a clear warning to Obama that Iran will never change in it's intentions. That is to dominant the middle east and aquire nuclear weapons..

This is the perfect storm for the US and it's allies to help the Iranian people stage a coup but our current goverment does not have the backbone!

Sam I Am   June 13th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

This is a very interesting situation. A presidential candidate has won the election. The side that lost is threatening to "take the country back." I wonder if Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck have broadcast franchises in Iran?

John   June 13th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

WASTE OF TIME
Does the White House not have better things to Monitor:
1. Our Economy
2. Wars
3. Health Care
4. Etc.
How the Heck is it going to matter if it is Ahmadinejad or any other Scoundrel.

Dan, TX   June 13th, 2009 4:27 pm ET

This vote shows that the Iranian people want war with the West. It is a slap in the face to those who want peace.

Morley   June 13th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

Gee it looks like Obama needed to send his old group ACORN to Iran if he wanted a different outcome. ACORN could have taught Ahmadinejad oppsition how to fix the election.

Alexander   June 13th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

I really feel for the people of Iran. Did they really think that their will would supersede that of the ayatollah? Still, there is but a glimmer of hope that a silent revolution could overthrow their tyrannic regime. I pray for the young people of Iraq to achieve that.

bsmith171   June 13th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

'they' could monitor for 100 years.

Iran doesn't care.
they know the USA is weak under baby boomer prezzies.

Post always rejected by CNN   June 13th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Too bad they weren't around in 2000 in the USA> Then they might have really really found irregularities. Especially in the supreme court.

CTR   June 13th, 2009 4:08 pm ET

Perhaps the Peanut Farmer should have set up shop in Iran to ensure the elections were fair.

Mary the Democrat   June 13th, 2009 4:03 pm ET

We need to be careful and ensure we don't appear to be interfering with their elections.

Obamasupporter   June 13th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

A recount should be done. I don't understand how you could have reported a hugh turnout and say there were long lines with most of the supporters being Moussavi supporters and Ahmadinejad got announced as the winner by a hugh margin. It is either the election was corrupt or what was reported to us was false information biased and one sided toward Moussavi . I would like to konw the real story.

craig donahue   June 13th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

i.m for health care reform even though i have excellent coverage. the only thing that would anger me is if this reform includes illegal immigriants.

virginia nielsen   June 13th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

If here, that's a real democracy, we had terrible "irregularities" in 2000 presidential elections, can you imagine in a semi-dictatorship government ?

John   June 13th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

The results don't make sense – there were four candidates in the race and the "bottom two" had over 20% support in the last poll before the election. The results as announced had the two top vote-getters (Ahmadinejad and Mousavi) splitting 98% of the vote – what happened to the other two challengers? Also, the results show Mousavi losing his own home town / province by roughly the same margin as he "lost" the rest of the country – impossible.

It appears that the current Iran government is not even *trying* to make the results look plausible – just holding the appearance of an election and publishing "results" that suit them.

decent american   June 13th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

the liberal ideology is that human beings will eventually repsond to reason and education.

honestly, this concept of human nature does not hold. sometimes you have to accept that evil has to be confronted and DESTROYED. it is called REALITY. itis what it is, i dont like it any more than you do.

if you all took some time to study the roots of conservative thought and liberal thought you would understand this. it is a way to see the world, liberalism one of "constructing heaven on earth through political means" and conservatism one of realizing the fallen nature of human beings and seeing the limits of gov't and the fact that we can not produce "perfection on earth' we can only work within the imperfection of mankind in the here and now.

Jeff in Houston   June 13th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

It's a pity some third world country did step up to question the validity of George II's elections. Or, maybe the current man in charge in Iran read a page out of George's playbook. Same thing, different players, and differing degrees of outrage. I wish the Iranian people success in accomplishing something we American's lacked the courage to protest.

Carlos   June 13th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

With this joke of a administration we have now the whole world is laughing at us. These other countries are daring mobamy to show them anything besides his toothy grin.

John Macomber   June 13th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Surprise! Surprise! Who expected anything different.

Dixon   June 13th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

The pictures remind me of the days they took our embassy. Maybe they will take Ahmadinejad hostage for a couple years. Does the phrase reap what you sew mean anything to you, Ahmadinejad.

Martin S.   June 13th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Irregularities, what are irregularities. I love sheep, yah know. Really love sheep. In fact my first girlfriend was a sheep. Dick Cheney loves sheep so much, he lives in wyoming. So there is no irregularities in Iran that supercede irregularities in wyoming.

Scott   June 13th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

should we be said surprised! I see it getting to point where there will be a bloody revolution it's really sad. Had America just left the government in the '50s alone instead of sending in the CIA and installing the Sha. We would not be in this mess. sometimes you reap what you sow.

Earl   June 13th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

Irregularities? That is nothing new to Americans. Just to review, lets see, rolling black outs in California, hummmm, Eron collapse and Ken Lay dies, hummm, Iraq connection with 911, hummmmm, Dick Cheney and torture, hummmm, Dick Cheney and KBR, hummmm, outing of a CIA agent, hummm....i'm still gay and love sheep, what is new in the world, hummmm??

Peter Vogel   June 13th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

It's about time! So far, I've been disgusted by the blind acceptance of the election results by the media. Text messaging and opposition websites are knocked out the day of the election, Moussavi loses in his own home town, the "landslide" numbers are evenly distributed, basically the same percentage all over the country – how much smoke does the press need to see before they yell fire? Instead, nearly all the stories I've seen bury some comment about "allegations of fraud" in the second page of the article. This has been abysmal, embarrassing to the journalistic profession thusfar. Do your jobs – get to the truth.

HEIDI   June 13th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I was hoping that Ahmadinejad’s would lose. He is a person without vision or the abilty to change. He is like the GOP, but for some reason he can't seem to go the way of the dodo.

Mattison Brooks   June 13th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

The elections are a farce. Any country that has a supreme ruler, aka the Ayatollah, is just a dictatorship with a nice public face.

So in reality, it doesnt really matter who wins these elections. Its a theocracy, and not a real democracy.

Charlotte   June 13th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Looks like Ahmadinejad took a page out of the GW Bush election strategy. Nice to know we aren't the only country whose right wing will rig elections.

Joe the carpenter   June 13th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

What is it with "conservative" right wing politicians manipulating elections? Looks like Ahmadinejad learned something from bush/rove and co..

Champly   June 13th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

How can the Obama administration talk about "irregularities" in Iran when the Obamas have done things like sacking the IG of Americorp ? And why has CNN not done a story about the sacking of the IG of Americorp ? It is a big deal. It is not like a political act, it is more like obstruction of justice.

KathyC in MInnesota   June 13th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

It would not surprise me if the Ruling Mullahs in Iran prevented a more Moderate opponent to actually win. For they are the ones pulling the strings.

If anything, this election in Iran signals another revelution of the people to rally and defy the tolitarian rule they have lived under since 1979. The younger generation of Iranians will not be supressed. Cange is coming to Iran.

Joanna   June 13th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I am sure there is a bunch of funny business here. But it is good to see the people of Iran wanting change.

Sidney Jacobs   June 13th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

White House monitoring Iranian elections.
Looking for irregularities.
WHAT A BIG FAT JOKE.
How they hell do you think Obama got elected?

Rick   June 13th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Monitor what?

Barry Obama has no say in what goes on over there, rigged or not its thier business and there isnt anything we can do about it.

9corona   June 13th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

The Obama administration is only monitoring what trick's it can apply to their next election

Zero.   June 13th, 2009 3:13 pm ET

You think I got the time wrong. Soon will be Sunday in Tehran. Just another 45mns.

@T   June 13th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

Gee, all that biiig speech and skullduggery by Oblabla for nothing. Hahaha.

He and Gibbs, of all people, ought to know that sometimes, "change" DOESN'T happen.

Dave   June 13th, 2009 3:10 pm ET

Obama should send his ACORN cronies over immediately. Blago-lib isn't doing anything, he could supervise the deal.

BTW, imagine Rush Limbaugh said what Letterman did about Sasha or Malia. There ya go, no decent person can support the Democrats.

Easley Blackwood   June 13th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

Events in Iran certainly tend to contradict the romantic notion that democracies are inherently stable and peaceful. In fact, they are peculiarly prone to stolen elections and civil wars. Both have occurred in the United States.

LibertyQueen   June 13th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

Rigged election, no doubt...just like the ones in the US in 2000 and 2004. Republican and Iranian government...both out of the same cloth.

Zero.   June 13th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

Sunday the Thirteeth unlucky for some. But more-so for iran. Time to–

"Drop those Bombs Irael"

Limbaugh is a Liberal   June 13th, 2009 3:07 pm ET

Yes, Iran's elections are flawed, the candidates have to be approved by a small group of traditional leaders... How is that different from the US? We have such an olligarchy that only two parties are really allowed in the White House, no other party is invited to debates, and the primaries are decided by superdelegates. Only candidates who make backroom deals and kiss up to party elders are nominated. And don't think Obama was an exception either! He was kissing up to Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi from the moment entered the senate, and now he's compromising all his campaign promises away to the same people who run circles around him!
We are no better than Iran!

Margaret   June 13th, 2009 3:06 pm ET

You think violence is vigorous? You think Marxism is vigorous? You think the destruction of a nation is vigorous?

Hillary, I am surprised, and yet nothing surprises me about this administration anymore.

Chuck   June 13th, 2009 3:05 pm ET

Hmmmmand these are the people that Barack Obama wanted to meet with unconditionally. You're a real judge of character, Mr. President.

Gary in CA   June 13th, 2009 3:01 pm ET

Are they being diplomatic with their statements or do they really mean them? Anyone who thought anyone but Ahmidenjad would "win" this "election" must not be paying attention.

Peter E   June 13th, 2009 3:00 pm ET

I do support independent monitoring of elections around the world, except as some of our own recent elections have demonstrated the US is still not in a position to lecture others about voter fraud and election irregularities. We really need to fix our own system to set the right example before we go around telling other countries how to vote.

Siara   June 13th, 2009 3:00 pm ET

Is there any next step for the Iranian people? Anyway that the results can be verified or not?

Zero.   June 13th, 2009 2:55 pm ET

Disidents? Or Disintry?

Diane Dagenais Turbide   June 13th, 2009 2:54 pm ET

Wow...such an election turn out...yet so few are celebrating in the street and writing to family and friends!

John   June 13th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

What else is new when we see or talk about this country. They even cheat their own people out of their vote. What a farce Iran is. Democracy my arse. Dictatorship lives with the people of Iran. Only until the people themselves rise up and fight these crooks and thieves, nothing will get done. To the people of Iran, my prayers are with you. You have been robbed again by the very people who say they there for your rights and and freedoms. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is an idiot

susan   June 13th, 2009 2:48 pm ET

We can only wish the Iranians well. They deserve better than what they are getting and should not have to riot for their rights and a fair election.
We are used to election fraud and ballots running out, but we have never had our telecommunications cut off and information from the outside world.
There has to be something wrong with a government when they demand all foreign media leave.

TCM   June 13th, 2009 2:47 pm ET

yeah....the white house is monitoring...because they know this country is highly dissatisfied with their incompetence...and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if we start having riots in Washington, showing the discontent created by the Obama administration.

Reggie   June 13th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

Obama, watch no more! It's clear that the election was rigged. Now what?

Donkey Party   June 13th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

It's more than apparent that Iran's ultra right-winged ruling theocracy has meddled in the vote results. I can only hope that the people of Iran will find it in their hearts to throw the firebrand religious zealots out of power and return the country to it's people. This is a clear example of why religious fanatics (Huckabee, Romney, Palin) have no business in government.

Legna   June 13th, 2009 2:40 pm ET

Big deal ...we can't even monitor our own spending....How are we going to monitor somebody else's election????

kenny cole   June 13th, 2009 2:36 pm ET

no comment

bimmer   June 13th, 2009 2:32 pm ET

Perhaps should send some laxatives.

Denna   June 13th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

Wow. A fixed election and it's NOT in the U.S. I guess we do have some influence in Iran after all. The Iranians are stuck with a president they don't want. We all know what that's like, right? I hope the people of Iran prevail in getting the president they want before the one in office ruins things like our unwanted president did.

Steve in PA   June 13th, 2009 2:30 pm ET

And what exactly will the US Government do if there were Irregularities? Nothing. There is absolutely nothing we can do if Iran had a corrupt election. I expected this outcome from the start and I watched as I was proven right. The Iranian News Agency was reporting Ahmad's win with only a few % reporting in. A Government controlled News Agency reporting that their great leader won. Big surprise.

It's up to the people of Iran to stand up to their corrupt leaders and remove them from office if he did indeed steal the election. I won't be surprised if there is violence and protests that arise from this outcome.

GI Joe   June 13th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

Sounds like the year 2000 all over again, doesn't it? Different country, different warmonger.

Just saying .....................................................

democrat no mas(Independant now)   June 13th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

So, ACORN has offices in Iran too?

Alfred E. Neumann   June 13th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

Perhaps the White should refer them to Bush v Gore or Franken v Coleman (aka Dumb v Dumber).

Lauren   June 13th, 2009 2:22 pm ET

Did ACORN send over people to sign up voters more than once so they could try to vote multiple times like they did here in the USA?

Funny, we have an organization here in the USA who has conducted and even promoted voter fraud ( ACORN ) and the White House sure will not comment on that,,, will they?????????????

ACORN should under investigation, but the White House will not even THINK about doing that. But they are keeping a close eye on Iran??????????

Yea,,,,, the double standard prevails again, the black man in the White House is watching everything except the people who got him to where he is today.

David form WI   June 13th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

This situation in Iran a surprise to anyone?

I just hope and pray Iran does not have a Tienanmen Square (on a national level) situation.

Don't forget the popular candidate who didn't win wasn't exactly a saint himself.

S Callahan   June 13th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

his is the nation that has not obeyed the Lord its God, or resonded to correction. Jeremiah 7:28
I will pray for the citizens that put good faith into voting. It's the will of the people that will rise.

DaBird   June 13th, 2009 2:19 pm ET

Ahmadinejad would do anything to win an election. I wonder if ACORN is in Iran signing up fake voters? It's now four states where ACORN has been convicted, but Clyburn and Nadler are corrupt and won't investigate.

Kevin -- Evansville, Indiana   June 13th, 2009 2:18 pm ET

It's probably a good think the Iranian version of George Bush was "elected" to a second term. Like Bush, it gives him more rope to hang himself with. By the time four years rolls around, people there are really be sick of him and his ilk.

Nestor, Austin, TX   June 13th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

Wait,

Didn't President Obama say his speech in Cairo would cause Iran to be reasonable? Is he a more naive version of Neville Chamberlain?

tcaudilllg   June 13th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

Now would be a good time to get a nice U.N. resolution which sends paratroopers into Iran and secures the democratic Moussavi victory. And if not, you can look forward to sending them in anyway some time in the next four years, probably under grimmer circumstances.

WDM   June 13th, 2009 2:15 pm ET

This reminds me of Florida 2000.

WDM   June 13th, 2009 2:13 pm ET

The party of no.

katiec   June 13th, 2009 2:11 pm ET

Who counted the votes??

Dawn in Pa   June 13th, 2009 2:08 pm ET

I think it was rigged, just like 2000 US elections of the United States...

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
hambypCNN: Steele and Kaine square off on health care, jobs, and Steele talks (a little bit) about his new book ... http://bit.ly/6kbvKz
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:37:59 -0800
@HornickCNN: White House to government: Continue to open up: http://bit.ly/6SC11i
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:07:15 -0800
hambypCNN: Michael Steele has a book coming out in Jan. Asked about it on CNN, Steele demurs: "Ya, that's what I'm hearing somewhere down the line."
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:52:08 -0800
hambypCNN: @DanDoranBlum nice. hopefully you get two big wins over Pitt in one week.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:42:32 -0800
hambypCNN: @AP_Ken_Thomas excellent duane spencer reference. let's try to work in lee scruggs, too, before the season ends.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:14:50 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP