June 18th, 2009
06:29 PM ET
5 years ago

Senate approves war funds

WASHINGTON (CNN) – The U.S. Senate on Thursday passed a $106 billion spending bill that includes about $80 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, sending the bill to the White House for President Barack Obama's signature.

The money will fund the wars through October. The 91-5 vote followed a much closer procedural vote that added $1 billion in start-up funds for the "Cash For Clunkers" program, an effort to revive the stalled U.S. auto industry.

The money brings the running tab for both conflicts to about $950 billion, according to figures from the Congressional Research Service. The agency estimated that more than three-quarters of the money so far has gone to the war in Iraq, where most of the U.S. troops sent to those conflicts have been deployed.

The spending bill also authorizes the International Monetary Fund to borrow up to $100 billion, a provision Republicans criticized as a "global bailout." The international agency offers lifelines to countries in crisis, and has been heavily tapped during the current global recession.

The spending bill narrowly survived a nail-biter of a vote in the chamber earlier Thursday over the "Cash for Clunkers" provision, which will offer buyers up to $4,500 to trade in gas-guzzling vehicles for more fuel-efficient models. Democrats needed four Republican votes to reach the 60 needed to waive a budget rule and attach the $1 billion appropriation to start the program, and Washington Democrat Maria Cantwell switched an earlier "no" vote to keep it alive.


Filed under: Senate
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. Lauren

    Funny,,, I thought Obama said he was going to edn the war in Iraq?

    Another broken promise from a liar politician??????

    What do you Obama supporters have to say about your man and your Democratic White House now?

    June 18, 2009 11:06 pm at 11:06 pm |
  2. Tatianna

    As a junior senator, Obama voted against every war funding bill up until his announcement to run for president. Simply amazing, Obama knew his junior senate voting against war fund bills meant diddly squat but as a presidential candidate, if he voted against war funds (which includes funding troops) Americans would criticize him and say he is unpatriotic (we know that we now have a president who hates criticism of any kind.) Can dems tell us why Obama changed his position on voting in support of war fund bills since 2007? Its insulting to the publics intelligence if you dont think that politics might be the explanatory factor.

    June 18, 2009 11:07 pm at 11:07 pm |