June 19, 2009
Posted: June 19th, 2009 09:04 AM ET
A new House resolution would decry 'ongoing violence against demonstrators' in Iran.
A new House resolution would decry 'ongoing violence against demonstrators' in Iran.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote Friday on a resolution that supports "all Iranians who embrace the values of freedom, human rights, civil liberties and the rule of law."

The resolution also "condemns the ongoing violence against demonstrators."

The supporters include Foreign Affairs Chairman Howard Berman, a California Democrat, and Republicans Mike Pence and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor.

UPDATE BELOW: Sen. John McCain has introduced a similar resolution in the Senate.

The U.S. government is in a precarious position regarding how to respond to the massive rallies in Tehran opposing the results of last week's presidential election which showed a victory for incumbent hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Supporters of Ahmadinejad's main rival, Mir Hossein Moussavi, have taken to the streets this week calling for a new election and protesting the Iranian government's crackdown on the protests, which killed at least eight people.

President Barack Obama has said he is "deeply troubled" by the violent protests but he avoided siding with Ahmadinejad's opponents, telling reporters that "It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran's leaders will be."

"It's not productive, given the history of U.S.-Iranian relations, to be seen as meddling, the U.S. president meddling in Iranian elections," Obama said.

The resolution that U.S. lawmakers are expected to vote on has been tweaked from its initial version, according to The Washington Independent which has posted copies of both versions of the bill. The blog reported that Berman changed the text of the initial version, submitted by Pence, which mentioned Iran's June 12 presidential election. The initial draft resolution did not refer to it as an election, but a "process of selecting Iran's next political leader," the blog reported.

The amended bill that is expected to be voted on states that the House of Representatives:

(1) expresses its support for all Iranian citizens who embrace the values of freedom, human rights, civil liberties, and rule of law;

(2) condemns the ongoing violence against demonstrators by the Government of Iran and pro-government militias, as well as the ongoing government suppression of independent electronic communication through interference with the Internet and cellphones; and

(3) affirms the universality of individual rights and the importance of democratic and fair elections.

On Thursday, Cantor joined critics of the White House's response to Iran's disputed presidential election, saying the United States has a "moral responsibility" to condemn attacks on protesters.

"The administration's position that what's going on in Iran is a 'vigorous debate' is absurd," he said.

"People are being brutalized and murdered by the regime in Tehran. We have no idea exactly how many have died or have been seriously injured, since the regime has restricted journalists. In no way do these actions constitute a 'vigorous debate.'"

The congressman from Virginia, the No. 2 Republican in the House, added that "America has a moral responsibility to stand up for these brave people, to defend human rights, and to condemn the violence and abuses by the regime in Tehran."

UPDATE: A similar resolution was introduced in the Senate Friday by Republican Sen. John McCain, who has been outspoken in his criticism of President Barack Obama's response to this week's massive rallies in Iran against the results of last week's presidential election.

The Arizona senator introduced a resolution on the Senate floor Friday morning that he said would be "an expression of support by the government and the people of the United States of America" for those protesting the results of the June 12 election.

"It is unfortunate in a way that this resolution is required since the administration does not want to - quote - meddle and has refused, the president has refused to speak out in support of these brave Iranian citizens, most of them young, who are risking their very lives to protest what was clearly an unfair and corrupt election," McCain told his fellow senators.

– CNN's Paul Steinhauser, Deirdre Walsh, Peter Hamby and Dan Lothian contributed to this report.

Filed under: Iran


southerncousin   June 19th, 2009 10:53 am ET

That will probably have the same effect as that tough resolution the "smart" diplomacy that the administration pushed through the UN to put sanctions on NKOREA. We can now ask one of their ships to pull over and be inspected, but if they say no, there is nothing we can do. That is some real tough sanction and an example of the Obama/Clinton "smart" diplomacy. What friggin' idiots. In the meantime, get ready Hawaii, the "smart" diplomacy will result in a nuclear weapon heading toward you about July 4th. This administration should be tried for treason and thrown in Supermax.

southerncousin   June 19th, 2009 10:51 am ET

That will probably have the same effect as that tough resolution the "smart" diplomacy that the administration pushed through the UN to put sanctions on NKOREA. We can now ask one of their ships to pull over and be inspected, but if they say no, there is nothing we can do. That is some real tough sanction and an example of the Obama/Clinton "smart" diplomacy. What friggin' idiots.

worriedmom   June 19th, 2009 10:51 am ET

Why are we wasting our time on this? The house and everyone should be concentrating on the problems of the United States.
I pray for the safety of these people but listen the U.S. needs to start worrying about the U.S and get it acts together before it tells other what to do. Heck, the U.S. cannot even get a honest election down and we are suppose to be leaders????? How abuot the House make a resolution to get rid of ACORN and show people that we are in it to make elections fair and honest.

Dixon   June 19th, 2009 10:49 am ET

It appears to me that the people in Iran are working this out. I think for us to be involved could only make things worse. Our leaders need to get busy on fixing the mess we have here at home. Both Democrates and Republicans have been to busy trying to beat the other down for the next election. The majority of Americans are sick of the non-sense from the fringe of both parties.

Fla.   June 19th, 2009 10:48 am ET

CANTor's hypocritical rhetoric sadly lacks credibility. If that were the case, what about the good people in Darfur?!

Beacon   June 19th, 2009 10:45 am ET

Again, I beg the questions: where is the PROOF that the elections were "rigged", especially now, given the Ayatollah's directive? Secondly, what is new about this "resolution"? President Obama has already stated American support of "due process" and the right for Iranians to demonstrate for their own issues. Thirdly, what "moral right" does America have to interfere in ANY other country's issues without being invited to do so? Does this mean that Iranians or Frenchmen or Britons or Canadians or whomever can start calling the RNC and asking about the rights of Minnesotans who have been deprived of their due representation in the Senate because of "due process"? What hypocracy!!!!!!

John Starnes Tampa Florida   June 19th, 2009 10:45 am ET

Let's not forget we toppled their last real democracy in 1953 and installed the hated Shah in order to control their oil. He terrorized and killed many tens of thousands of his own countrymen with U.S. backing and funding. So of course Iranians fear our meddling in their affairs once again....wouldn't we in their shoes?

Frank   June 19th, 2009 10:44 am ET

The House should keep its collective mouth shut, lest it endanger the leaders of the protest movement in Iran.

We have meddled in their affairs enough over the years that they must have an acute sense of smell for that sort of thing. We should avoid giving the hardliners even the thinnest pretext for cracking down.

send in the CIA   June 19th, 2009 10:42 am ET

"...to stand up for these brave people, to defend human rights, and to condemn the violence ..."

this came from a republican? Hard to believe, but maybe that is what getting your ass handed to you at the voters box will do.

I say, as a liberal, send in the CIA and arm the dissidents

Lynn   June 19th, 2009 10:41 am ET

Well, this is a meaningless piece of legislation.

Don't they have anything better to do – like work on the economy, jobs or healthcare? Oh, I forgot, they have money, jobs and healthcare for life.

Carry on.

LIP   June 19th, 2009 10:40 am ET

Compare this to the election between Bush and Gore. What would have happened had riots broken out in Florida after the Supreme court decision? What if people had done what they have done before like during the LA riots and started burning cars, terrorizing innocents and vandalizing stores. Do you think the government would have stood by watching the destruction without swat teams, dogs, firehoses, rubber bullets and all other necessary force required to stop the anarchy? Of course not. We can' t be absolutely sure that the election was rigged either. With that, all we can do is sit back and watch and wait and hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

Bob   June 19th, 2009 10:37 am ET

I think President Obama has the right approach. “No Comment”. Once the United States government shows any sort of solidarity with the demonstrators it changes the dynamics of the situation. The Iranian government will be able to point to the Congresses resolution and say that the demonstrators are being controlled by the U.S. and trying to destroy the legitimately elected government of Iran. As the president has pointed out, the difference between the to opposition candidates is not significantly different and the demonstrators are not trying to topple their government. They are mad because they feel the one democratic right they have – the right to vote for their president – has been undermined

George   June 19th, 2009 10:34 am ET

What a Hypocrites are we and the Press ? Why so much of focus on this elections, while rest of the world nations like Burma, Tibet, Somalia and other nations smuggling drugs and killing thousands of people at home and abroad...it is simply not critical for us...we have our own colored glasses to look at the world ? Any way who makes this decision on what news sells...don't you think it is the other way round...what does the press wants to sell to public...including Iraq WAR when they followed Bush govt. towing...till the time that love affair/ presss interest faded away.....and Americans started realizing the truth...Stop the nonsense and give the real news not opinions..and what you think is important....leave the opinion part to people...

Peoples Voice   June 19th, 2009 10:32 am ET

Will you people take care of our business and stop sticking your noses in the Iranians business. What is wrong with you people?

Don   June 19th, 2009 10:31 am ET

While a nice gesture, this will accomplish precisely what? Congress needs to focus on OUR issues and stay out of this.

pilot   June 19th, 2009 10:28 am ET

The moral authority to stand up for abuses of human rights, Rep. Candor? Where's your moral authority when people ar being tortured? Or held indefinitely without being told why, with no lawyer available or means to challenge their detainment? Where's your stand for human rights then?

frustrated   June 19th, 2009 10:27 am ET

Come on republicans. Please, would your collective act together and pick a leader so we can get down to the business of fixing America and not continue to meddle in Iran. I'm not sure we have enough in our immediate arsenal to fight N. Korea, let alone start a revolution in Iran, yet your leaderless party is willing to do both.

raagos   June 19th, 2009 10:25 am ET

we should leave iran alone... its not gonna help those ppl out there. unless we do israel work

Mississippi Mike   June 19th, 2009 10:23 am ET

Good. With the president too scared to take a stand, someone in our government needs to show support for democracy and fair elections.

Too True For You   June 19th, 2009 10:23 am ET

With their crooked as a snake performance in the 2000 and 2004 US presidential elections, it's pure irony to hear how sanctimonious these republicans are about the Iranian election.

It's also rich to hear Cantor opine that "People are being brutalized and murdered by the regime in Tehran". Hey buddy, how about all your right wing nut cases murdering people right here in America with the encouragement of conservative leaders Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Coulter, Savage and O'Reilly? You should look to clean your own house before you go criticising others.

haren   June 19th, 2009 10:20 am ET

Let us end this stupid war funding which is way more than trillions of dollars and call home our troop.
we need to pass our health care reform which cost us less than 100 billion per year, Media and Republicans are keep using word trillion to scare us.
There is no need to help all these Muslim countries, they will never end fighting among themselves.

Randolph Carter   June 19th, 2009 10:20 am ET

Real freakin' smart. Now the Iranian powers that be can say, "look, these protesters are supported by the American devils" and they have an instant excuse to crack down even harder. What a bunch of rocket surgeons. Have a nice day!

Alan   June 19th, 2009 10:19 am ET

Support for individual rights in Iran?? What about supporting them here in the US!!!

carlo   June 19th, 2009 10:19 am ET

Everyone is saying push back, but I ask, push back to what? It is a sovereign nation that had an election. That would have been like Iran meddling in the 2000 election fiasco. We as Americans wouldn't have stood for it, no matter how much we opposed the process.

We interfered with Iran's elections once before. That is how Iran ended up with Islamic rule and a Supreme Leader. Let's not forget the fact that we can't exactly start a war with anyone right now.

But I forgot, Republicans love war.

Ken in NC   June 19th, 2009 10:18 am ET

I guess it is OK for our government to give a vote of support to the people of Iran but we need to be careful to remember how we would react if we were told that our elections were unfair and that we needed to do them over again.

Republicans need to shut up least they will have us in a third war. I am tired of war. We (My Country) has been at war all of my 61 years on this earth. I am sick of it. I gave my fair share and have many friends that gave all they had to give while people like Cheney claim they had more important things to do and yet people like him are now trying to drive us into another war. Those kinds of people need to shut up. North Korea is going to do it for them and when they do we will strike back and it is possible that China will stand behind North Korea and we will have another world war then so stop all the war talk people.

citizenjane   June 19th, 2009 10:17 am ET

How curious that those in Congress least likely to support President Obama's initiatives these past 5 months while doing everything possible to diminish his presidency, are now talking resolutions in support the the Iranian protesters . . . Skewed logic?

David   June 19th, 2009 10:14 am ET

U.S. says May unemployment topped 10% in 13 states. Michigan soared to 14.1%, followed by Oregon, Rhode Island, S. Carolina, Calif.

***Obama ROCKS***

David   June 19th, 2009 10:14 am ET

U.S. says May unemployment topped 10% in 13 states. Michigan soared to 14.1%, followed by Oregon, Rhode Island, S. Carolina, Calif.

DRB   June 19th, 2009 10:14 am ET

Way to go Congress!!! Freedom for all mankind is a far better than than peace. BOO the President for not making a statement in favor of Freedom and support of the Iranians who are seeking fairness, freedom and democracy. I wonder if the President supports these basic concepts upon which we were founded?

Melissa   June 19th, 2009 10:12 am ET

Vote on what exactly? The United States needs to butt out of this conflict. Do NOT take sides in this. It isn't your country, and frankly isn't really your business. This is something the Iranians need to do for themselves.

Liberal say what?   June 19th, 2009 10:12 am ET

A resolution?

Isn't that what the UN is supposed to do?

eliot from chicago   June 19th, 2009 10:11 am ET

How do you say "The Whole World is Watching" in Farsi?

ANNY   June 19th, 2009 10:11 am ET

Cantor you and all your republicans can sit back and shut up, you lost the election it is Obama's time to decide what we should do, not the GOP, all you people want is MORE WAR......and all you democrats that sound more like the GOP and do not support your democratic President can look at being dumped the next time you come up for election......

David   June 19th, 2009 10:09 am ET

the revolts for the most part have not been armed, i still believe that action in Iran should not be taken rashly, but unarmed protesters should not be killed for what they say. we may be looking at another Tiena min square event

Party Crasher   June 19th, 2009 10:07 am ET

How about putting the same amount of effort into solving some of the problems we have here.

Brian   June 19th, 2009 10:01 am ET

Talk is cheap. Except when it takes a congress vote, then its just woefully silly.

Also, they have to ask themselves, would they be making the same statements if the situation was reversed in Iran, and the opponent won and Ahmadinejad's followers were rioting about election fraud? Would we be sending a voice of support to his followers? I doubt it. Which just shows that the people behind this are all for fighting for human freedoms, when it correlates with what they want. If Moussavi won, even with allegations of cheating, I'm sure the same folks in congress would be saying it was a rousing success of democracy.

It's clear America as a country isn't going to commit to any action in Iran, and we really shouldn't in my opinion. So why commence with the empty threat of stick-waving. Wasting time voting on this type of stuff just makes us look silly in my opinion.

Sam Sixpack   June 19th, 2009 9:58 am ET

Well, that ought to do it. We also need a resolution condemning global warming, and one condemning poverty, and hunger, and …

If Iran doesn't let journalists wander around, how are we going to convince the sheeple that the propaganda we feed them is news?

donttreadonme   June 19th, 2009 9:58 am ET

I am glad someone is willing to take the side of freedom since Obama clearly will not.

President Bush’s dream of Democracy in Middle East may one day be a reality!

Patty   June 19th, 2009 9:57 am ET

Why do we have to comment at all on this situation? Do we want other countries commenting on our problems? Weare not the only country on earth. They already say we are meddling. This only makes it worse. The protesters don't care what we think.

Michigan   June 19th, 2009 9:55 am ET

Sounds like the GOP want us to get into another war over this.

Iran's Supreme Leader has come out on the side of Iran's President, so that's pretty much the end of it. I've heard talk that some want to do the election over, but that's completely pointless, Ahmadinejad will just 'win' again.

It's a horrible mess but we need to stay out of it. We've got two wars going already that we can't afford. And if this resolution passes it'll make it easy for Ahmadinejad to make the claim that those against him are allies of the 'evil' US.

Lynn   June 19th, 2009 9:55 am ET

America should butt out of Iran's business. How does anyone know what the majority of Iranians want? Look at the state of our country...Who are Americans to talk about human rights and democratic elections when 45 million of Americans have no health care....and after seven months still no senator....

What happened to America foreign policy being one voice: that of the president? This is a Republican political ploy and generated by CNN who gives the voice to few peiople and ignores the voices of the experts even when they are speaking on their show. Even Ed Rollins this morning disagreed with Cantor and McCain.

Welcome to the Blurbateria!!! | DEEP BRAIN DIARY   June 19th, 2009 9:53 am ET

[...] I guess Congress wants to meddle now. They're gonna vote on a resolution supporting the rights of Iranians to have free elections and stuff.  Maybe that spirit will carry over to HERE and WE can have free and fair elections in places like Florida and Ohio from now on, too! [...]

goawayrepublicans   June 19th, 2009 9:52 am ET

Since when does the USA all of a sudden need to prove our beliefs and backing for democracy and freedom? Oh yeah we need an amendment from the War starved Republicans, after all they must be going through withdrawal since we havn't gone to a new war in over 5 years, seems like that is their limit. Maybe the house should be a little more concerned about the fact N. Korea is aiming missles right at us.

Does America not already do this? Who are these people that say stupid, idiotic things like......

"America has a moral responsibility to stand up for these brave people, to defend human rights, and to condemn the violence and abuses by the regime in Tehran."

Really?

How about we start by doing this in our own Country first, what a bunch of Hypocrites, why don't we start by protecting our own people from the likes of these guys and the NeoCons that really run the Republican party these days.....

Leah   June 19th, 2009 9:47 am ET

The crowd chanted:"Death to America," "Death to Britain."
and yet, America still wants to stick their busy nose to where it does not belong.
Meddling with Iran will make things worse to those who protests on the street.

Jeff Brown   June 19th, 2009 9:44 am ET

YAWN...another Republican ploy to undermine President Obama. As if the GOP cares about the Iranian people! BTW, who is this guy Pence? Sounds like he's gearing up for a presidential run...

Fla.   June 19th, 2009 9:44 am ET

What part of not getting involved in other countries' elections does Congress NOT understand? This could be used as propaganda against the Iranian people we support!

I swear we have some of the biggest idiots in Congress, especially the GOP and ANY Dem that falls for their neoconservative nonsense!

Victory Gin   June 19th, 2009 9:44 am ET

I'll tell you how we should respond...not at all. These people aren't being occupied by a foreign nation, they are voicing their discontent at the gov't that they themselves put into power.
The US needs to stop sticking it's big, overbloated, self righteous nose into everyone's business and worry about the mess in it's own back yard. Seriously people...wake up and take the power back here at home.

Fair is Fair   June 19th, 2009 9:43 am ET

Remember Tiannamen Square? They carried a mock-up of the Statue of Liberty as a way of telling America "we want your moral support".

The Iranian protesters held up signs written in English for the same reason. But our President would not even issue a statement saying that America believes in the right of free demonstration.

Kudos to those house for having the fortitude to do something.

David Anthony   June 19th, 2009 9:42 am ET

American actions in foreign countries, especially Iran, should be thoroughly debated before being implemented, there are consequences that result from foreign intervention. If pres Ahmadinejad retains his position in spite of the actions occurring within his country and the U.S. does openly support the resistance then U.S.-Iranian affairs in the future will worsen. However an unstable Iran is not conducive to a stable middle east, which would in no way be a good thing. The U.S. has a moral obligation to promote those freedoms, not to ensure them, and especially not to force them upon another people. I also note that none of the reports which i have read have stated if the protesters where armed or threatening the lives of the police. If they were then the deaths of 7 (potentially more) could be explained. An armed revolt here in the U.S. against the government would bring military intervention. What i am saying is that these events may not be so easy to explain, so our leaders should not be rash, and should decide if intervention in Iran is really the best course of action for the American people.

Nelson Colorado Springs Co.   June 19th, 2009 9:42 am ET

Thank about it there nothing the United States can do but whine. President Obama is right . "It's not productive, given the history of U.S.-Iranian relations, to be seen as meddling, the U.S. president meddling in Iranian elections," Obama said. But this goes all the way back to the Shaw and North. Nothing but Spend control from Virginia, the No. 2 Republican in the House.

flybyshoeing   June 19th, 2009 9:40 am ET

Stop wasting time on these meaningless resolutions and get busy on healthcare. Good Grief.

George From Minneapolis   June 19th, 2009 9:39 am ET

We (America) had our own disputed election a few years ago, so, I am glad that the President the sense to know America is in no moral position to speak out against what is going on in Iran at the moment.

Finally, we have a leader who respects other countries enough to realize that they are smart enough to handle their own domestic issues.

judy, Wisconsin   June 19th, 2009 9:39 am ET

Stay neutral! For once, keep your big noses to yourself!!!!

Roger in CA   June 19th, 2009 9:38 am ET

Man, politicians just can't help themselves, can they?

Obama is completely right that it would be counterproductive for the U.S. to appear to be meddling in the Iranian process. This sort of political masturbation that the Congress wants to pursue is exactly the sort of thing that will be used by the hardliners in Iran to leverage their position.

The problem with democracy, I guess, is that politicians are remarkably spineless and feel the need to pander to the least common denominator "gut reactions" out there. Sure, we are inclined to root for the guy who ISN'T the KNOWN anti-Semitic and belligerent freak, and our media just LOVES this sort of story. But let's please be careful: "the devil you know vs. the devil you don't know..."

Remember: Saddam Hussein consolidated his position in the world because he was Iran's enemy, so the simplistic drivel we were fed here is that he MUST be our friend.....

The New and Improved No Incumbents 2010   June 19th, 2009 9:36 am ET

Meddling in Iran's election will only strengthen the hardliners. Iranians are perfectly capable of dealing with this as evidenced by the size of the protests.
Would Americans have welcomed Iranian intervention supporting one side of the disputed 2000 election? Would we have wanted Russia to tell us in 1960 that Nixon won because of disputed ballots in Chicago that went for Kennedy?
Republicans are demogoguing this issue by saying that America has the responsibility and the power to intervene in Iran. The U.S. will be hated if we don't respect other countries' sovereignty.

RealityKing   June 19th, 2009 9:30 am ET

So much for Obama's Linclon, JFK and Reaganesk abilities..

Willy Brown   June 19th, 2009 9:29 am ET

Vote for what? How about working on the USA democrats!

GI Joe   June 19th, 2009 9:29 am ET

I'm complaining in writing to my representatives in congress today.

Our taxes are paying their salary to DO OUR WORK. NOT to interfere in other countries elections. Maybe we should vote some more of them out - the next batch might work for US.

justice counts   June 19th, 2009 9:27 am ET

The US always trying to put is nose in other countries business. This country has problems all over within its borders and now trying to put its nose in another countries affairs.

SHIRLEY SDL   June 19th, 2009 9:25 am ET

And to all of you war mongers, this is as far as America should go into another countries elections. America does not have the best record of running legitimate elections after 2000, and we should learn to mind our own business when it comes to the way that others live.

UNHAPPY DEM   June 19th, 2009 9:23 am ET

Make you wonder whose side our illustrious leaders are really on.

Donkey Party   June 19th, 2009 9:21 am ET

Not only are the idiot RepubliCONS trying to undermine the President's policy, they are undermining the legitimacy of the Iranian opposition with their self-serving political grandstanding. Why does the GOP ALWAYS defy political experts? What knowledge of Middle-eastern politics do these right-wingers have? I despise them for their hypocrisy. They don't want the government in your lives, but it's ok to meddle in the lives of the Iranians. It is more than apparent that the only thing on the GOP agenda is to start WWIII.

Once You Vote Black: PUMA where are you?   June 19th, 2009 9:19 am ET

What is the point of commenting or making a point. Let the Iraninans figure out what they want to do. Who ever wins we will have to work with them or fight them. We don't want them to have the excuse of saying the US picked their leader. Stay out of it Obama, let the House do what they want.

ge   June 19th, 2009 9:18 am ET

practice what you preach

dominican mama 4 Obama   June 19th, 2009 9:17 am ET

I said it before, I'll say it again: this is the time for us to mind our own business. Read in the paper yesterday that some Iranians are accusing us of promoting the current unrest. !?! The situation is very tenous. Folks kep pushing for the President to comment, that's because it is what we have always done: interfered where we are not wanted. Please, we have to get away from that brand of "foreign policy". It hasn't worked!!!

Let the people of Iran sort themselves out. Please!!

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA   June 19th, 2009 9:17 am ET

I wonder if this would have played out this way if John McCain were present. Answer: NO
There would have never been any dialogue from him to the entire Muslim world. He would probably be trying to invade Iran. Now here he is, CANTor and the rest of republican lames acting like they support the Iranians.

Sharon Northern Virginia   June 19th, 2009 9:15 am ET

Come on REplug stop trying to create another war. How many more American women and men need to die? What about our bad election process in 2000 and 2004?

Jesus   June 19th, 2009 9:14 am ET

It's about time.

Dawn In Pa   June 19th, 2009 9:12 am ET

and why are we involved? Did Iran have a resolution against the United States when Bush and Company stole the elections away from Gore in 2000, and did they have one in 2004.

If you have been watching the news lately, Iranian supreme leader condemning the US and the UK in interfering in their election, gee why can't we be concerned and be diplomatic at the same time, they are going to do what they want anyways. We meddled in the 50's and then they over threw the Shah of Iran, taking 52 hostiages, holding them for 444 days. They were released when Reagan took the oath of Office, do we need this again, we have more enemies out there then allies, and you can thank GWB...

The lonely Libertarian of Liverpool NY   June 19th, 2009 9:12 am ET

While they are at it, why not pass the same resolution for the American Citizens here at home? I have been lead to believe that we have freedom and liberty here at home, but I can not be gay, or smoke pot, or smoke cigarettes, I'm taxed above 50 % of my earnings, and I can not visit Canada ( which is only 60 miles away), I can not have a back yard camp fire, can't be sick, take a vacation, can not retire until I'm dead.

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA   June 19th, 2009 9:12 am ET

Well do what you have to do Congress. I stand by the President's decision to be mum until a resolution has been made, which should be coming out today. Let's see what Khomeini does.

gl, From Pittsburgh   June 19th, 2009 9:11 am ET

The congressman from Virginia, the No. 2 Republican in the House, added that "America has a moral responsibility to stand up for these brave people, to defend human rights, and to condemn the violence and abuses by the regime in Tehran."

Hey, Repubicans remember 2000 election in the country it was stolen – Did you fools do any thing? You Repubicans are the Taliban of this country. You want to fight for other coutries HUMAN RIGHTS, BUT don't fight for your own country HUMAN RIGHTS. YOU REPUBLICANS MAY HAVE FORGET ABOUT THE 2000 ELECTION, BUT MOST AMERICAN PEOPLE DID NOT!

Respect   June 19th, 2009 9:10 am ET

Can we get a republican led Darfur resolution? Didn't think so!

Respect   June 19th, 2009 9:07 am ET

What a bunch of idiots!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP