<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain backs Obama opposition to funding more F-22 jets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/</link>
	<description>All politics, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Some progress... - Page 17 - Hostboard</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2843084</link>
		<dc:creator>Some progress... - Page 17 - Hostboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2843084</guid>
		<description>[...] Some progress...    CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - McCain backs Obama opposition to fun...   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some progress...    CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive &#8211; McCain backs Obama opposition to fun...   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerena</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842621</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842621</guid>
		<description>Who cares what or who McBush supports....HE IS ABSOLUTELY IRRELEVANT....like his party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares what or who McBush supports....HE IS ABSOLUTELY IRRELEVANT....like his party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnie</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842620</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842620</guid>
		<description>john mccain needs to get on a jet out old of the country,and take palin with you,and david gergen, and the gop with you,as well ... mccain is a joke...... who cares what he thinks or says (cnn) it means (nothing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john mccain needs to get on a jet out old of the country,and take palin with you,and david gergen, and the gop with you,as well ... mccain is a joke...... who cares what he thinks or says (cnn) it means (nothing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denna</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842598</link>
		<dc:creator>Denna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842598</guid>
		<description>@ TCM  	 July 13th, 2009 3:17 pm ET -- sure, why not….further weaken our country&#039;s defense, and cause even higher unemployment…hey McCain, why don&#039;t you jump over the fence too, like Spector?
_________________________________________________________
TCM,  You certainly seem to have a lot of time to express your opinions, all wrong-headed.  Senator McCain is just being the man he was before running for POTUS.  Just because he has sided with President Obama, and rightly I might add, does not mean he  is weak or irrelevant.  By-the-by, why don&#039;t you get a job instead of blogging all day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ TCM  	 July 13th, 2009 3:17 pm ET - sure, why not….further weaken our country's defense, and cause even higher unemployment…hey McCain, why don't you jump over the fence too, like Spector?<br />
_________________________________________________________<br />
TCM,  You certainly seem to have a lot of time to express your opinions, all wrong-headed.  Senator McCain is just being the man he was before running for POTUS.  Just because he has sided with President Obama, and rightly I might add, does not mean he  is weak or irrelevant.  By-the-by, why don't you get a job instead of blogging all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan (Michigan)</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842592</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan (Michigan)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842592</guid>
		<description>The Defense Dept. has been trying to stop these planes for years. Thank God someone in Washington is finally listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Defense Dept. has been trying to stop these planes for years. Thank God someone in Washington is finally listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842583</guid>
		<description>My husband flies the F-22.  Even he would agree with McCain, there are much more important places for our defense dollars.  I have no problems with staying ahead of the technology curve, but do we need to replace every air-to-air jet on a 1:1 basis? No.  The F-35 also has an air-to-air component to their mission, at a much cheaper basis, despite the fact that there are no air-to-air adversaries anywhere on the near horizon.  

I&#039;d much rather see us funding technology to serve troops on the ground than to double our stock of high-end toys for the fighter pilot mafia running the AF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband flies the F-22.  Even he would agree with McCain, there are much more important places for our defense dollars.  I have no problems with staying ahead of the technology curve, but do we need to replace every air-to-air jet on a 1:1 basis? No.  The F-35 also has an air-to-air component to their mission, at a much cheaper basis, despite the fact that there are no air-to-air adversaries anywhere on the near horizon.  </p>
<p>I'd much rather see us funding technology to serve troops on the ground than to double our stock of high-end toys for the fighter pilot mafia running the AF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim, Seattle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim, Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842517</guid>
		<description>Dont worry about TCM, he&#039;s headed for a stroke because his &#039;values&#039; have been rejected and his team is getting beaten badly in the court of public opinion.  Its tough to be reduced to a whining, irrelevent relic of the GOP .  Let him work himself into hateful frenzy.....thats when you know they have been beaten.

TCM.....lifelong, self-loathing loser</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont worry about TCM, he's headed for a stroke because his 'values' have been rejected and his team is getting beaten badly in the court of public opinion.  Its tough to be reduced to a whining, irrelevent relic of the GOP .  Let him work himself into hateful frenzy.....thats when you know they have been beaten.</p>
<p>TCM.....lifelong, self-loathing loser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842516</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842516</guid>
		<description>read the article  --- If Bob Gates, McCain and Obama all say stop buying F-22 and the F-35 is better

let&#039;s stop buying F-22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read the article  - If Bob Gates, McCain and Obama all say stop buying F-22 and the F-35 is better</p>
<p>let's stop buying F-22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Party of NO stood calmly by for 8 year while the shrub raped and pillaged America, so, why would we listen to you now?</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842499</link>
		<dc:creator>The Party of NO stood calmly by for 8 year while the shrub raped and pillaged America, so, why would we listen to you now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842499</guid>
		<description>A republican being supportive of President Obama?

Did anyone else feel that??

The earth just shivered on it&#039;s axis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A republican being supportive of President Obama?</p>
<p>Did anyone else feel that??</p>
<p>The earth just shivered on it's axis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842483</guid>
		<description>Mitch, try to read a little more carefully. Congress is trying to fund the F-22. Sec of Defense says they don&#039;t need it. So go ask Rush why Bill Clinton is responsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch, try to read a little more carefully. Congress is trying to fund the F-22. Sec of Defense says they don't need it. So go ask Rush why Bill Clinton is responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842463</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842463</guid>
		<description>July 13th, 2009 3:06 pm ET
Mark of St. Louis wrote:
 &#039;&#039;too bad McCain jumped on the Obama bandwagon. The Obama approach is typical of Libs: cut defense and make America more vulnerable. Good Job!&quot;

Actually, military spending cuts began in the early 90s under Bush 41 as a result of the end of the Cold War and his cuts were deeper than Clinton&#039;s. This is  the problem with Americans, we believe all the generalizations that our party wants us to believe. Lets start thinking for ourselves people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 13th, 2009 3:06 pm ET<br />
Mark of St. Louis wrote:<br />
 "too bad McCain jumped on the Obama bandwagon. The Obama approach is typical of Libs: cut defense and make America more vulnerable. Good Job!"</p>
<p>Actually, military spending cuts began in the early 90s under Bush 41 as a result of the end of the Cold War and his cuts were deeper than Clinton's. This is  the problem with Americans, we believe all the generalizations that our party wants us to believe. Lets start thinking for ourselves people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All American</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842450</link>
		<dc:creator>All American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842450</guid>
		<description>I think our government should just disband our current military and outsource it to other countries to the highest bidder.

Actually, lets just go to an all volunteer military or militias. Might as well with all the cuts to the DOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think our government should just disband our current military and outsource it to other countries to the highest bidder.</p>
<p>Actually, lets just go to an all volunteer military or militias. Might as well with all the cuts to the DOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardiff kid</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842437</link>
		<dc:creator>cardiff kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842437</guid>
		<description>The F-22 Raptor is a money pit. Short and simple.  One plane, not including deveopment costs, runs $138 million.  It costs $44,000 per flight hour to maintain.  Much of it to repair the constantly damaged radar absorbsion coating. (An ageing F-15 costs $14,000 less per hour to run).  The F-22 does not, and will not, have a helmet mounted cueing system, the &quot;look at it and shoot&quot; system currently used on a number of currently operational aircraft  and on the F-35.  In contrast, the F-35 is significantly cheaper to acquire.  Anticipated costs are $65 to $120 million per aircraft depending on configuration.  (One version of the F-35 is capable of vertical take off and landing).  The F-35 can carry more ordinance and is more flexable in application.  McCain and Obama got it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The F-22 Raptor is a money pit. Short and simple.  One plane, not including deveopment costs, runs $138 million.  It costs $44,000 per flight hour to maintain.  Much of it to repair the constantly damaged radar absorbsion coating. (An ageing F-15 costs $14,000 less per hour to run).  The F-22 does not, and will not, have a helmet mounted cueing system, the "look at it and shoot" system currently used on a number of currently operational aircraft  and on the F-35.  In contrast, the F-35 is significantly cheaper to acquire.  Anticipated costs are $65 to $120 million per aircraft depending on configuration.  (One version of the F-35 is capable of vertical take off and landing).  The F-35 can carry more ordinance and is more flexable in application.  McCain and Obama got it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awaitingliberalizationbyCNN</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842432</link>
		<dc:creator>awaitingliberalizationbyCNN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842432</guid>
		<description>Are we not allowed to advance our self defense unitl all the dope smokin&#039;n, non working liberal have once again helped themselves to all the tax payer money they can steal?  That is the Obama idea and he will never finish stealing our money.  AND FOLKS IT IS OUR MONEY NOT THEIRS, LIBERALS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we not allowed to advance our self defense unitl all the dope smokin'n, non working liberal have once again helped themselves to all the tax payer money they can steal?  That is the Obama idea and he will never finish stealing our money.  AND FOLKS IT IS OUR MONEY NOT THEIRS, LIBERALS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842422</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842422</guid>
		<description>Well we offically have 141 in service with another 36 currently under construstion at 137 million a piece.  If the conservatives want to cut back on some spending this is a small piece/price at 3 billion but it is better than nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we offically have 141 in service with another 36 currently under construstion at 137 million a piece.  If the conservatives want to cut back on some spending this is a small piece/price at 3 billion but it is better than nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Templer</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842402</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Templer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842402</guid>
		<description>we spend more money on the Military than the rest of the world combine.  We need mwrap vehicles, better body armor, better training more soldiers with language skills.  Yes these are great systems and it feels great to be 10 or 15 years ahead of everyone else but we need what we need to fight today&#039;s battles.  Finish the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq first then we can look at adding these systems.  The missile defense system that we keep pissing Russia off with doesn&#039;t work and it never did.  SDI never worked it was designed to bankrupt the Soviet Union mission accomplished not the US.  You can&#039;t have everything while people who are out of work or can&#039;t get healthcare.  the Defense budget is Half of the discretionary budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we spend more money on the Military than the rest of the world combine.  We need mwrap vehicles, better body armor, better training more soldiers with language skills.  Yes these are great systems and it feels great to be 10 or 15 years ahead of everyone else but we need what we need to fight today's battles.  Finish the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq first then we can look at adding these systems.  The missile defense system that we keep pissing Russia off with doesn't work and it never did.  SDI never worked it was designed to bankrupt the Soviet Union mission accomplished not the US.  You can't have everything while people who are out of work or can't get healthcare.  the Defense budget is Half of the discretionary budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sniffit</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842385</link>
		<dc:creator>Sniffit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842385</guid>
		<description>@ TCM, who said &quot;further weaken our country&#039;s defense&quot;

Typical misrepresentation.  It&#039;s almost artithmetic.  It does not weaken us to stop making something of which we have enough.  Nobody suggested destroying the ones we&#039;ve already got.  Ergo, this maintains status quo...it does not degrade our defense....particularly in light of th eintent to focus on a more technological advanced alternative.  Leave the decisions to the rational people and go back to playing in the sandbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ TCM, who said "further weaken our country's defense"</p>
<p>Typical misrepresentation.  It's almost artithmetic.  It does not weaken us to stop making something of which we have enough.  Nobody suggested destroying the ones we've already got.  Ergo, this maintains status quo...it does not degrade our defense....particularly in light of th eintent to focus on a more technological advanced alternative.  Leave the decisions to the rational people and go back to playing in the sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Freedom for Security, Lose Both</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842380</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Freedom for Security, Lose Both</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842380</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need F-22&#039;s any more.  The Pentagon and CIA are now distributing the lyrics to Kumbaya to all our enemies as part of our new way forward.  Now, everyone sing along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don't need F-22's any more.  The Pentagon and CIA are now distributing the lyrics to Kumbaya to all our enemies as part of our new way forward.  Now, everyone sing along...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mmmm, tastes like hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842357</link>
		<dc:creator>Mmmm, tastes like hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842357</guid>
		<description>Hmm, &quot;critical military construction projects.&quot;  Funny how republicans get to complain about Socialism when it comes to the Stimulus/Recovery Act and the use of government money to create jobs, yet turn around and whine about job losses when the administration shuts down an unnecessary defense program.  It must be fun to be a hypocrite, I should give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, "critical military construction projects."  Funny how republicans get to complain about Socialism when it comes to the Stimulus/Recovery Act and the use of government money to create jobs, yet turn around and whine about job losses when the administration shuts down an unnecessary defense program.  It must be fun to be a hypocrite, I should give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traj</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842344</link>
		<dc:creator>Traj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842344</guid>
		<description>Mccain really isn&#039;t so bad. He is actually more moderate than he is consevative, and I for one appreciate his stance on this one. Of course, my president is always right.... Love you Mr. President and First Lady..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mccain really isn't so bad. He is actually more moderate than he is consevative, and I for one appreciate his stance on this one. Of course, my president is always right.... Love you Mr. President and First Lady..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch/Bad Newz, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842342</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch/Bad Newz, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842342</guid>
		<description>Stop building them.  We have enough of them here at Langley to spread around the country.  Not to mention they bust out windows whenthey fly overhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop building them.  We have enough of them here at Langley to spread around the country.  Not to mention they bust out windows whenthey fly overhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: come on CNN!</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842333</link>
		<dc:creator>come on CNN!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842333</guid>
		<description>Steph   July 13th, 2009 3:05 pm ET

What do all the other senators think? Why on earth do I care if McCain agrees or disagrees with our current president?!?!
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because he is a senior senator you idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph   July 13th, 2009 3:05 pm ET</p>
<p>What do all the other senators think? Why on earth do I care if McCain agrees or disagrees with our current president?!?!</p>
<p>-------------------------&#8211;<br />
Because he is a senior senator you idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank from florida</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842305</link>
		<dc:creator>frank from florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842305</guid>
		<description>For once, even the defense dept.(they know best, Ha Ha) say they don&#039;t need any more of these aircraft. What wrong with the politicians? Oh, that&#039;s rite, they&#039;re politicians! I&#039;m glad to see John McCain is back to being the good guy he&#039;s been for almost his entire life. (After getting seduced by Sarah Palin&#039;s politics of pandering)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once, even the defense dept.(they know best, Ha Ha) say they don't need any more of these aircraft. What wrong with the politicians? Oh, that's rite, they're politicians! I'm glad to see John McCain is back to being the good guy he's been for almost his entire life. (After getting seduced by Sarah Palin's politics of pandering)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans are the American Taliban</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842244</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicans are the American Taliban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842244</guid>
		<description>Mission Accomplished John....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mission Accomplished John....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy from Leesburg, VA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842231</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy from Leesburg, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842231</guid>
		<description>Bravo to the President and Senator McCain for removing spending on the F-22. Sure, it is impressive but really not needed. There is no great air war coming unless Al-Queda develops an Air Force. Even if China happened to start an air war, the existing crop of F-18, F-16, and JSF are far more technically advanced than any thing China has in its aresenal. Sure, blame President Obama for everything under the sun folks if it makes you feel better, but this is a smarter use of money by the President and the Pentagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo to the President and Senator McCain for removing spending on the F-22. Sure, it is impressive but really not needed. There is no great air war coming unless Al-Queda develops an Air Force. Even if China happened to start an air war, the existing crop of F-18, F-16, and JSF are far more technically advanced than any thing China has in its aresenal. Sure, blame President Obama for everything under the sun folks if it makes you feel better, but this is a smarter use of money by the President and the Pentagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842230</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842230</guid>
		<description>TCM - The Pentagon, the DOD, the Armed Services comittee and any reasonable militar analist disagree with your whinning fear mongering rethoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TCM &#8211; The Pentagon, the DOD, the Armed Services comittee and any reasonable militar analist disagree with your whinning fear mongering rethoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCB</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842224</link>
		<dc:creator>GCB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842224</guid>
		<description>WOW... the only reason John McCain supports the President on this issue is because he came off looking very stupid when he stood up and brought this issue up during a Press Conference and Obama slammed him down!!!   So here he is trying to save face yet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW... the only reason John McCain supports the President on this issue is because he came off looking very stupid when he stood up and brought this issue up during a Press Conference and Obama slammed him down!!!   So here he is trying to save face yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is one step for World Peace</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842216</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama is one step for World Peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842216</guid>
		<description>These two Georgian republicans no doubt support increased military spending. I wonder if they are evangelicals or fundamentalists ? Strange how SOME of those people love their weapons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two Georgian republicans no doubt support increased military spending. I wonder if they are evangelicals or fundamentalists ? Strange how SOME of those people love their weapons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill   NY</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842214</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill   NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842214</guid>
		<description>Mr McCain figures &quot;if I can&#039;t crash em, nobody can&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr McCain figures "if I can't crash em, nobody can"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842212</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842212</guid>
		<description>Oh, be careful McCain you will be kicked out of the Repub party for agreeing with President Obama.  LOL

Actually  it is rather nice to hear a Repub acting like an adult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, be careful McCain you will be kicked out of the Repub party for agreeing with President Obama.  LOL</p>
<p>Actually  it is rather nice to hear a Repub acting like an adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mich</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842206</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need it. In our histroy we have heard those words alot.

F-4 , F-15 , F-14, Corsair, Hellcat, Thundercheif.
 
These are examples of some airplanes in point or another that congress said we didn&#039;t need.  Once you hide your wepons will be the point that you find you needed most.  The F-22 is the future of air combat.  BILL CLINTON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don't need it. In our histroy we have heard those words alot.</p>
<p>F-4 , F-15 , F-14, Corsair, Hellcat, Thundercheif.</p>
<p>These are examples of some airplanes in point or another that congress said we didn't need.  Once you hide your wepons will be the point that you find you needed most.  The F-22 is the future of air combat.  BILL CLINTON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In John we trust</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842185</link>
		<dc:creator>In John we trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842185</guid>
		<description>Once again, John&#039;s the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, John's the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John, a proud veteran</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842130</link>
		<dc:creator>John, a proud veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842130</guid>
		<description>Senator McCain is right on the money.  We already have plenty of these planes.  China and Russia now have more sophisticated ways other than a shooting war to make our lives difficult if they want to. We already could bomb them back into the stone age if we wanted to.  This is the age of robots and drones.  Put the newly unemployed to work on these.  What we need now is better computer security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator McCain is right on the money.  We already have plenty of these planes.  China and Russia now have more sophisticated ways other than a shooting war to make our lives difficult if they want to. We already could bomb them back into the stone age if we wanted to.  This is the age of robots and drones.  Put the newly unemployed to work on these.  What we need now is better computer security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842119</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842119</guid>
		<description>Nice job John McCain.

If you look inside that defense budget you&#039;ll find billions more of wasteful spending. I know, I used to work for a defense contractor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job John McCain.</p>
<p>If you look inside that defense budget you'll find billions more of wasteful spending. I know, I used to work for a defense contractor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill from GA</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill from GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842115</guid>
		<description>Maybe Lockheed could re-tool to build high-speed rail cars at the Marietta plant. Have major components made in surrounding states; interiors made by laid-off workers at Blue Bird bus company in Middle Georgia. just an idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Lockheed could re-tool to build high-speed rail cars at the Marietta plant. Have major components made in surrounding states; interiors made by laid-off workers at Blue Bird bus company in Middle Georgia. just an idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCM</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842111</link>
		<dc:creator>TCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842111</guid>
		<description>sure, why not....further weaken our country&#039;s defense, and cause even higher unemployment...hey McCain, why don&#039;t you jump over the fence too, like Spector?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, why not....further weaken our country's defense, and cause even higher unemployment...hey McCain, why don't you jump over the fence too, like Spector?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominican mama 4 Obama</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842104</link>
		<dc:creator>dominican mama 4 Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842104</guid>
		<description>Do the words &quot;lucrative defense contracts&quot; ring a bell? These boys think that it is business as usual in D.C. You know: $600 hammers, $8000 toilets etc.

Way to keep your eyes on the ball Obama and Mc Cain. 

People like Isakson will tryo to get this unnecessary expenditure approved by tugging at the ole patriotic heartstrings. It is not going to work this time bubba. Even if the contractor of said jets promised you a nice little kickback in return, it is NOT going to fly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the words "lucrative defense contracts" ring a bell? These boys think that it is business as usual in D.C. You know: $600 hammers, $8000 toilets etc.</p>
<p>Way to keep your eyes on the ball Obama and Mc Cain. </p>
<p>People like Isakson will tryo to get this unnecessary expenditure approved by tugging at the ole patriotic heartstrings. It is not going to work this time bubba. Even if the contractor of said jets promised you a nice little kickback in return, it is NOT going to fly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RI Moderate</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842095</link>
		<dc:creator>RI Moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842095</guid>
		<description>The F-22 is incredibly impressive, but this is the right decision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The F-22 is incredibly impressive, but this is the right decision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sniffit</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sniffit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842083</guid>
		<description>Aaaaaaand, where is the F-22 manufacturing plant?  Georgia perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaaaaand, where is the F-22 manufacturing plant?  Georgia perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS007</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842082</link>
		<dc:creator>JS007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842082</guid>
		<description>So for the people pushing this the main concern is not national defence, but jobs in their districs.  Good for Obama and McCain standing up to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for the people pushing this the main concern is not national defence, but jobs in their districs.  Good for Obama and McCain standing up to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Army Vet</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842068</link>
		<dc:creator>Army Vet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842068</guid>
		<description>So, we&#039;re going to spend millions building jets which we already have, and even the Joint Chiefs say we don&#039;t need.  Sounds like normal government spending to me, what&#039;s the problem?  Why spend it on actually taking care of soldiers and their families, or getting effective fighting equipment for the current missions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we're going to spend millions building jets which we already have, and even the Joint Chiefs say we don't need.  Sounds like normal government spending to me, what's the problem?  Why spend it on actually taking care of soldiers and their families, or getting effective fighting equipment for the current missions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark of Saint Louis</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark of Saint Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842067</guid>
		<description>too bad McCain jumped on the Obama bandwagon. The Obama approach is typical of Libs: cut defense and make America more vulnerable.
Good Job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad McCain jumped on the Obama bandwagon. The Obama approach is typical of Libs: cut defense and make America more vulnerable.<br />
Good Job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin B</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842065</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842065</guid>
		<description>Mr McCain has always understood that military-industrial complex is a self feeding machine, if the DOD or the president did not request this aircraft, why in the world world do we need it. 

Only the southern republican zealots in the congress would insist on this expenditure in a time when americans of all backgrounds are suffering economically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr McCain has always understood that military-industrial complex is a self feeding machine, if the DOD or the president did not request this aircraft, why in the world world do we need it. </p>
<p>Only the southern republican zealots in the congress would insist on this expenditure in a time when americans of all backgrounds are suffering economically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corbett</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842064</link>
		<dc:creator>Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842064</guid>
		<description>This is just more of the same old bullsh--- Wait,  this actually sounds very reasonable.  Both McCain and Obama agree on not buying things that nobody wants or needs?  It must be some sort of Socialist plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just more of the same old bullsh- Wait,  this actually sounds very reasonable.  Both McCain and Obama agree on not buying things that nobody wants or needs?  It must be some sort of Socialist plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842062</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842062</guid>
		<description>What do all the other senators think? Why on earth do I care if McCain agrees or disagrees with our current president?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do all the other senators think? Why on earth do I care if McCain agrees or disagrees with our current president?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842058</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842058</guid>
		<description>McBush finally did something right. I&#039;m shocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McBush finally did something right. I'm shocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842048</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842048</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, on one side the Pentagon, the White House and the Armed services Committee of the Senate. On the other side Saxby &#039;no problem to call veterans traitors&#039; Chambly.
Is there really a doubt on which side is right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's see, on one side the Pentagon, the White House and the Armed services Committee of the Senate. On the other side Saxby 'no problem to call veterans traitors' Chambly.<br />
Is there really a doubt on which side is right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842045</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842045</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, on one side the Pentagon, the White House and the Armed services Committee of the Senate. On the other side Saxby &#039;no problem to call veterans traitors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's see, on one side the Pentagon, the White House and the Armed services Committee of the Senate. On the other side Saxby 'no problem to call veterans traitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Joe</title>
		<link>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/13/mccain-backs-obama-opposition-to-funding-more-f-22-jets/#comment-2842037</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?p=60218#comment-2842037</guid>
		<description>I think he decided it&#039;s easier to do this than to fight the Defense Department&#039;s decision.  Don&#039;t let this fool you as a YES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he decided it's easier to do this than to fight the Defense Department's decision.  Don't let this fool you as a YES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
