July 14, 2009
Posted: July 14th, 2009 11:03 AM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Judge Sonia Sotomayor said Tuesday that the question of whether affirmative action is needed is "always first a legislative determination."

The Constitution, she noted, promotes and requires the equal protection of all citizens.

"It is firmly my hope," she said, that in 25 years race won't need to be considered as factor. The country, she said, has made great strides in racial matters in recent years. She also cited, however, situations with "compelling state interests" - such as university admissions - where the state often applies a solution "that is very narrowly tailored."

CNN Radio: Candy Crowley goes behind the headlines on Sotomayor

Sotomayor specifically noted a case involving the University of Michigan law school, where the high court ruled that it was appropriate for race to be considered as one of several factors. She also noted, however, a companion case in which the high court rejected a system of racial quotas in the undergraduate admissions program in the University of Michigan.

Filed under: Sonia Sotomayor • Supreme Court


FLP   July 14th, 2009 12:45 pm ET

I would rather have the white fire fighter that passed the test, than the black fire fighter that failed it! I don't want the least qualified person when I need them, I want the most qualified, regardless of race.

tedious898   July 14th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

southerncousin July 14th, 2009 11:42 am ET

The libs certainly don't want the best and brightest leading this country. They would lose the elections and stall the dumbing down of America they have been striving for since the 1930's.

============================

HA HA...You've missed the reality mark by a few solar systems....Space Cadet.

McCain/Palin = academically illiterate

Obama/Biden (the Winners) = academic geniuses (constitutional experts/professors)

How is this dumbing down America? Please explained oh enlightened one!

Tired in SC   July 14th, 2009 12:41 pm ET

Sonia Sotomayor; race would not be a factor now if the blacks did not keep it going. they raise cain if someone not of their color looked at them wrong. they are the ones causing racial strife. They love the publicity. If the media did not publicise all this stuff it would soon go away.

tedious898   July 14th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

barbara, (poorly informed person)

go ahead and write your congressman to your hearts content. In the meantime look back at the history of the country (i.e. civil rights, slavery, brown v. school board) and consider the reasons why affirmative action was instituted.

If people were judged and given opportunities based upon skills, and education and not ethnicity (i.e. race, gender), it wouldn't be necessary. Because you didn't know this, you might want to take a course in "recent american history" to help you.

Tim from Roseburg   July 14th, 2009 12:29 pm ET

Why hasn't the New Haven test been posted? I would like to see how it is racially exclusive.

ariel   July 14th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

Amazing the GOP, in their thinly veiled bigotry, asking these loaded questions.

citizenjane   July 14th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

since the caucasians are becoming the minority July 14th, 2009 11:37 am ET

how about afirmative action for the white folk, make latins the majority
----------------–

White folk have had affirmative action for 200+ years in this country. Pay back looking you in the face?

RH   July 14th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Affirmative Action is racism – no two ways about it. One form of discrimination will never alleviate another. Whites have just as much right to be outraged by racism against them as anybody else.

barbara   July 14th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

I am going to write my Senators and REMIND them that I , as an American citizen, have the right to equal protection and that I feel that this right is being violated in the name of affirmative action. We need a law overturning this policy because it is clearly unconstitutional. Otherwise every white person CAN claim that their right to equal protection is being violated,...I see a class action suit in the near future.

Sniffit   July 14th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

Soooo, which is scarier for you GOPers?

A. Sotomayor "legislating from the bench" regarding affirmative action;

B. Congress "taking a lead on affirmative action" (i.e., the way it's supposed to work and what you are impliedly arguing for when you criticize her in this manner)...while the Dems have a supemajority in both houses;

C. Everyone being treated equally;

D. All the above.

My guess is you all vote D.

A Free Thinking American   July 14th, 2009 12:09 pm ET

How about this for a novel idea? Track race for demographic purposes only. This way educators can see where the country is lacking, i.e. if the majority of qualified applicants are white, then more emphasis should be placed on traditional minority education areas. In other words, still hire/admit the best qualified based on merit, however, use the data collected to fix the issue and give everyone a stable, sound foundation vs. just giving a handout. In today's society, there is definitely no room for prejudicial treatment and that should go both ways. Now that we've identified the problem (over 40 yrs ago) let's work to fix it instead of applying a "handicap" to those who aren't qualified.

Michigan Jim   July 14th, 2009 11:57 am ET

Affirmative action is the precise opposite of equal protection.

PFFT   July 14th, 2009 11:55 am ET

"The Constitution, she noted, promotes and requires the equal protection of all citizens." It's just that some require more equal protection than others, no matter how qualified or unqualified that person might be.

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA   July 14th, 2009 11:53 am ET

I agree that AA should be addressed by Congress. Cases evolving around equality is not for a judge to decide. That is something morally wrong in the fabric of this nation and needs to be addressed by Congress.

New Age Democrat   July 14th, 2009 11:52 am ET

In 25 years? Are you serious?!?!?! Using race as a factor in any way, is discrimination. I say this as a father of a minority family, and I mean every word. Don't give me a leg up just because of skin color. It was wrong back then, and it's wrong now. It is time for this nonsense to end!

Mike in NYC   July 14th, 2009 11:51 am ET

Actually, the question of whether affirmative action is needed has been a determination of the MSM and other controllers of public policy debate, who always default to the "blame Whitey" setting.

It’s interesting that Sotomayor used the same "25 years" figure that O'Connor referenced in the majority rulings in the Michigan cases. That time frame roughly coincides with the passing of the White majority in this country. Anyone who thinks that non-Whites will favor dropping AA policies upon gaining demographic dominance is delusional.

elliott   July 14th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Affirmative action is RACIST and bad for America......

John   July 14th, 2009 11:47 am ET

Great logic. In order to eliminate race as a considering factor we make it a considering factor by law.

UNHAPPY DEM   July 14th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Affirmative action needs to go away. It provides unfair advantages to minorities. It also puts people in positions for which they are not qualified, which in turn leads to an inefficient economy, which leads to inflation, which leads to a weaker USA. If minorities want to be equal ,then treat them equal. Hand up, not hand out.

Scott, Tucson   July 14th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Here in Arizona we're putting Affirmative Action on the ballot for 2010. Expect the voters to remove affirmative action as a means of hiring and promotions.

southerncousin   July 14th, 2009 11:42 am ET

The libs certainly don't want the best and brightest leading this country. They would lose the elections and stall the dumbing down of America they have been striving for since the 1930's.

FLP   July 14th, 2009 11:41 am ET

Too bad her own rulings show she can't make fair decisions and she discriminated against the white fire fighters. Race has proven to be an issue with her. Where was the equal protection for them?

since the caucasians are becoming the minority   July 14th, 2009 11:37 am ET

how about afirmative action for the white folk, make latins the majority

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
hambypCNN: Steele and Kaine square off on health care, jobs, and Steele talks (a little bit) about his new book ... http://bit.ly/6kbvKz
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:37:59 -0800
@HornickCNN: White House to government: Continue to open up: http://bit.ly/6SC11i
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:07:15 -0800
hambypCNN: Michael Steele has a book coming out in Jan. Asked about it on CNN, Steele demurs: "Ya, that's what I'm hearing somewhere down the line."
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:52:08 -0800
hambypCNN: @DanDoranBlum nice. hopefully you get two big wins over Pitt in one week.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:42:32 -0800
hambypCNN: @AP_Ken_Thomas excellent duane spencer reference. let's try to work in lee scruggs, too, before the season ends.
Updated: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:14:50 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP