July 15th, 2009
12:47 PM ET
5 years ago

Health care overhaul clears split Senate committee

WASHINGTON (CNN) - One of several proposals to overhaul the U.S. health care system passed a Senate committee Wednesday, with its ailing chairman praising the $600 billion plan as a step toward his longtime goals.

The 13-10 vote in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee split along party lines, with its top Republican arguing it costs too much and would ration care to Americans. But Sen. Edward Kennedy, its chairman, said, "We have done the hard work that the American people sent us here to do."

"We know, however, that our work is not over - far from it," Kennedy, who is battling cancer and voted by proxy, said in a written statement. "As we move from our committee room to the Senate floor, we must continue the search for solutions that unite us, so that the great promise of quality affordable health care for all can be fulfilled."

Health care has long been one of the Massachusetts Democrat's pet issues. Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, who led the committee in Kennedy's absence, said the bill is the first of several proposals "to grapple with the issue that has defied resolution through seven presidents and many Congresses since the 1940s."

It is also one of President Barack Obama's top legislative goals, and the bill that cleared Kennedy's committee closely tracks the framework Obama has outlined for a health care bill. It includes a government-run health insurance program that would compete with private insurers, requires companies with more than 25 employees to provide health coverage for their workers and sets up an "exchange" that would let people choose among a variety of insurance options.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported it would cost $615 billion over 10 years, far less than estimates for other legislation. But the estimate did not include the cost of a proposed expansion of the federally funded Medicaid system for low-income families, which could add several hundred billion to the overall tab.

Sen. Mike Enzi, the health committee's top Republican, called the measure "a prescription for failure." He said the real cost would be about $1 trillion, and the measure would drive up cost and ration health care on lines similar to Britain.

Under the British health-care system, "The older you are, the longer you have to wait to see a doctor, the longer you have to wait for tests, the longer you have to wait to get treatment," said Enzi, of Wyoming. "The people die. That's not the system we'll buy in America."

Obama and top congressional Democrats met Monday to discuss how to pay for a sweeping health care overhaul. Meanwhile, the Senate Finance Committee is working on another health care bill, and Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives released their own proposal Tuesday.

In a statement issued after the health committee vote, Obama said that measure "would offer Americans quality, affordable health care that is there when they need it."

"When this proposal is combined with other proposals that the Senate Finance Committee is working on, it's estimated that health reform will cover 97 percent of all Americans," Obama said. "The HELP committee's success should give us hope, but it should not give us pause. It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess."


Filed under: Health care • President Obama • Ted Kennedy
soundoff (54 Responses)
  1. Lauren

    I get really iratated when republicans say things like "healthcare will be rationed out". At this point the insurance companies are rationing out healthcare, they are the ones deciding who gets treatment and what treatment people get (based on what the insurance companies are willing to pay for).

    Doctors and those providing the care should make the decisions. Also, every time I hear a republican, or any elected government official, speak against health care reform for the American people I am reminded that they have healthcare and therefore don't see the urgency in helping those of us who don't.

    July 15, 2009 02:52 pm at 2:52 pm |
  2. DC Insider

    I was reading in the Express this morning (which is a free daily from Washington Post) that in order to pay for the Health Plan we'll have to tax the rich. Now as a middle class person, I am not a fan of wealth-redistribution, because it really causes more and more people to start to hide money offshore from the Government and in the end causes more issues.

    On the same token, as a person who has lived in Britain for a few years, I can tell you the NHS over there is not the best. I remember having to wait 40 days to get an appointment with my GP. I ultimately ended up going to Urgent Care Clinic and forked over $200 because I had Strep Throat. I guess for those that don't have health care, this would be a better option of waiting for ever, versus never being seen...but I am not entirely sold on it yet.

    July 15, 2009 02:56 pm at 2:56 pm |
1 2 3