July 17, 2009
Posted: July 17th, 2009 03:35 PM ET

From ,
 Gov. Mark Sanford's security clearance was erroneously suspended by a DHS employee.
Gov. Mark Sanford's security clearance was erroneously suspended by a DHS employee.

WASHINGTON (CNN) – South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's federal security clearance was wrongly suspended by a Department of Homeland Security employee in the days following the governor's admission of an extramarital affair, department officials confirmed Friday.

Sanford's security privileges were suspended on Wednesday, July 1, according to DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Sean Smith. Smith would not identify the employee who suspended Sanford's security clearance, or say why the action was taken.

But the suspension came just one week after the governor emerged from a mysterious absence and revealed his relationship with an Argentine woman.

The employee sent a letter to Sanford notifying him of the suspension, but Sanford likely did not receive the letter until Monday, July 6, the end of the long holiday weekend, Smith said. On that same day, Sanford met in Charleston with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano at a pre-scheduled meeting focused on port security.

The following day - July 7 - senior DHS officials learned that Sanford's status had been suspended and immediately moved to restore it, the DHS said.

DHS spokeswoman Sara Kuban said the employee who suspended Sanford's security clearance "acted on their own volition."

"That employee did not follow the proper procedures or check with their supervisor about issuing the suspension," Kuban said. "The same day that senior DHS officials learned of the suspension, it was immediately reversed and the clearance was reinstated."

A Homeland Security official wrote to Sanford on July 7 to inform him that his security clearance had been restored.

"The suspension of your clearance was made in error," DHS Personnel Security Division chief Katherine Janosek wrote in the letter to Sanford, a copy of which was obtained by CNN.

DHS officials declined to say what if any action had been taken against the employee.

Sanford's office said Friday that none of the governor's official duties - including his tour of the security project in Charleston - were affected by the security snafu.

Filed under: DHS • Mark Sanford


Reinstate Darwinism   July 17th, 2009 8:17 pm ET

I'm sure the DHS employee thought it was his right. All DHS employees seem to think of the constitution as toilet paper. I don't like Sanford... I don't like the DHS even more. For the nutty libs out there. Next time any of you do something in your personal life that is morally questionable to anyone. I hope your boss publicly chastizes you and promptly fires you infont of all of your co-workers... oh wait.. i forgot Libs don't work.

BJC   July 17th, 2009 8:05 pm ET

If you put yourself in a compromising positions, you put the country in a compromising position.

I guess this is suppose to be the joke of the day? Wonder what would have happened while Clinton was busy when Monica smoked his cigar?

demwit   July 17th, 2009 7:51 pm ET

Nope..., no politics there.

m smith   July 17th, 2009 7:48 pm ET

Hey another of the C street gang bites the dust. The party of immoral conduct. No wonder they lost the last election . They where all to busy screwing around to pay any attention. So much for God and family. Looks like the south is haveing way to much fun. Hum? Wonder whos money is financing all this stuff??

Alex in Wisconsin   July 17th, 2009 7:10 pm ET

Well back in the old days, high profile officials leaving the country for days for a rendezvous with a foreigner was automatically investigated for the possibility of espionage. If Homeland security no longer temporarily suspends security clearances on purpose for such instances, the country is in danger and the Republicans who believe in strong national security need to speak out.

amy p   July 17th, 2009 6:42 pm ET

This guy has gone AWOL from his state on multiple occasions, even out of the country, at tax payers' expense. He has no future political career, and as long as he is IN office, he is hurting the GOP in a big, big way.

Why isn't his leaving the country while he was AWOL not being investigated further? What security issues could he potentially put his state or our country at risk with?

Brian   July 17th, 2009 6:32 pm ET

I am a retired naval officer still working for the government with a security clearance. A clearance is a privilege with certain REQUIRED responsibilities, including notifying your security officer of any travel plans to foreign countries and personal relationships with non- U.S. citizens. Gov Sanford failed to do this. His clearance SHOULD BE revoked.

Ain't life strange?   July 17th, 2009 6:31 pm ET

It appears a part of our nation feels an elected official fooling around on his wife is an offense against the nation. Let's strip him of his security clearance, put him on trial, throw him in prison, put him againts the wall and let a firing squad have their way with him! Geeze! The guy commited adultry, not sold top secret info to our enemies. The only ones who lost anything from all of this is his family... and they should be the only ones who say what punishment he deserves. People need to stop thinking all politicians should be as pure as the driven snow because no one is... not you, not me, not the christian right. If we were we wouldn't be on here spewing a bunch of hateful crap.

Len in Washington   July 17th, 2009 6:25 pm ET

Pardon Me?
He:
Lied to his wife
Lied to his children
Lied to his staff
Lied to his State Legislators
Lied to local and national media
and.....
still gets a security clearance???????

Remainders: Cartoonists need not apply   July 17th, 2009 5:53 pm ET

[...] Homeland Security suspended his security clearance “in error.” [...]

laura   July 17th, 2009 5:50 pm ET

Anyone not a governor would have had their clearance pulled right away for having an unreported close relationship with a foreign national. Why should this guy be any different? The DHS employee did the right thing.

Proud American   July 17th, 2009 5:17 pm ET

Why should the entire country be forced to trust someone who's own family don't?

yuri   July 17th, 2009 5:15 pm ET

Let's suspend his security previleges completely, so he can go gallivantin' for more gal pals.

Stacy from Leesburg, VA   July 17th, 2009 5:02 pm ET

This is SOP. You can lose your security clearance for many reasons, including the activities that Governor Sanford participated in. If Governor Spitzer had a clearance, his should have been revoked as well. If you put yourself in a compromising positions, you put the country in a compromising position.

Dieter Zerressen, Denver, CO   July 17th, 2009 4:46 pm ET

The security clearance should have been rovoked for "moral turpitude" as it would be for anyone else in a similar situation. He lied, he concealed and he cheated that makes him a security risk. Of course, he's a christian (small c), southern old white guy Republican so that makes it all OK. god (also small g) already forgave him so why not the Dept of Homeland Security?

F-Dog   July 17th, 2009 4:46 pm ET

Wrongly?

cary   July 17th, 2009 4:46 pm ET

Why is this man not on trial right now?

Why is he still in office?

Why isn't C-Street being investigated?

DUNCAN   July 17th, 2009 4:33 pm ET

HOUND DOG SANDERS

You aint nothin but a hound dog
Cryin all the time.
You aint nothin but a hound dog
Cryin all the time.
Well, you aint never caught a rabbit
And you aint no friend of mine.

When they said you was high classed,
Well, that was just a lie.
When they said you was high classed,
Well, that was just a lie.
You aint never caught a rabbit
And you aint no friend of mine.

…..that hang dog look and all the tears……..

Karl in Charleston,SC   July 17th, 2009 4:33 pm ET

That DHS employee should be terminated!

Frank   July 17th, 2009 4:30 pm ET

Talk about closing the barn door after the horse is out!

Dutch/Bad Newz, VA   July 17th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

I guess that DHS employee is taking it upon himself to remove Sanford from office. This is step one. Next they'll take away his passport.

mike in VA   July 17th, 2009 4:23 pm ET

good to see our government is running so efficient!

Ren from Baltimore   July 17th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

Reasons for having one's national security clearance suspended include, but are not limited to:

– Being in a compromising predicatment which would make one subject to possible blackmail, thus jeopardizing the "secure" information which the clearance warrants.

This is not a frivolous matter, but touches on gambling problems, other money problems, family or relationship problems, criminal problems (even by association).

– Being of an unsound mind to the extent that one is not fully responsible for your actions and/or your actions otherwise jeopardize your position, those around you, and the ordinary citizen.

Again, nothing frivolous is intended. Such behaviors as unexplained, lengthy disappearances, irrational responses and actions, for example, would call into play a psychiatric assessment as to one's ability to funciton independently. A family member, co-worker, or other interested party could initiate such action with demonstrable cause.

Gov. Sanford's behaviors certainly should raise red flags in terms of the viability of his having access to critical national and state information. Nothing frivolous about that DHS employee's actions at all.

puzzled   July 17th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

Considering how Gov. Sanford makes secret trips to foreign countries and puts himself into situations that could compromise him, it seems reasonable that his security clearance would be revoked.

kyle from ohio   July 17th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

It should have been suspended on purpose and the Goverment of the USA at least the DHS should have questions, this Governer going to another county crying to a Newspaper report (girl-friend) and as far as we know she could work for her goverment extracting information from crybaby SANFORD

Active Duty Democrat   July 17th, 2009 4:10 pm ET

His career should be suspended...well actually his bid for pres if he were to make one...thats good enough for me...

GI Joe   July 17th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

Maybe he and Ensign should BOTH have their clearances revoked, not just suspended.

Their actions have not been above-board and I believe other people would have lost their clearances altogether.

Different treatment for white men?

Mark,B'ham,Al.   July 17th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

It looks like this DHS worker and the Ohio Income Tax supervisor have something in common. Right "Joe the Plumber? Could they be democrats who are big Obama fans?

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@wolfblitzercnn: To everyone, I hope you are having a wonderful, healthy and rewarding Thanksgiving. And a delicious one, too.
Updated: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:57:27 -0800
@HornickCNN: Happy Thanksgiving ya'll!
Updated: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:49:12 -0800
@CNNPolitics: RT @PoliticalTicker: "White House guest chef offers politicos a turkey recipe" - http://bit.ly/90lsDs
Updated: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:54:57 -0800
@PrestonCNN: CNN Radio: Term limits supporters aim for a comeback -- http://bit.ly/5lknt8
Updated: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:53:38 -0800
@CNNPolitics: RT @PoliticalTicker: "Thanksgiving thoughts from Washington and beyond" - http://bit.ly/7d6JEq
Updated: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:50:09 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP