
WASHINGTON (CNN) - On the eve of his fourth prime-time news conference, President Barack Obama was working the phones, calling lawmakers involved in the health care talks to push them to embrace reform, White House Communications Director Anita Dunn said Wednesday.
It follows the president's Tuesday meeting with Democrats at the White House, dubbed a "serious working session" where "major progress" was made, Dunn said.
Senior administration officials said the president will not meet with lawmakers Wednesday but was temporarily shifting focus to the discussions with visiting Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki, the joint news conference with him, and then the prime-time news conference Wednesday. Obama was talking with his advisors and staff throughout the day regarding any updates from Capitol Hill on the state of play in the health care debate.
Aides said the president's opening statement at the news conference will be approximately seven minutes long. It will focus primarily on health care, but also will be a "report card" on the administration's accomplishments during the first six months, and where the administration needs to go, aides said. The president was still tinkering with the speech at mid-afternoon, but aides said there were no "holes" in it as such, to put in news of any anticipated legislative "breakthroughs" from Congress.
Officials said Obama will be taking a more hands on approach with members of Congress in the days and weeks to come regarding the health care debate.
Tuesday, House Energy and Commerce Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman of California and six other committee members met at the White House for more than two hours - and during one hour the president was with them, aides said.
During that meeting the six so-called Blue Dog Democrats gave their list of ten demands on how they want the bill changed, including ways to cut costs, according to aides.
Some argued that the Medicare advisory council, which advises Congress in setting rates for reimbursement to medical providers under the Medicare program, should be empowered to make changes in cost-related issues. White House aides said they want the panel to be empowered to make cuts in benefits and increases in premiums, and to force those changes, unless Congress rejects.
While lawmakers say a tentative deal was reached on this point, White House officials would only say the president "agreed with the lawmakers he met (on) with the need to cut costs."
They refused to confirm that there was a verbal agreement because there was "not an actual ink agreement" regarding the council. "The process is still going on," one official said.
White House Communications Director Dunn said the White House, through OMB Director Peter Orszag, has been lobbying for, and supportive of, the idea of an independent board of medical professionals working to set and cut costs of health care. The president took his "direct concerns" to members of Congress and they did the same, Dunn said. "The president feels as if the Blue Dog Democrats and the Senate Finance Committee are 'working together in a bipartisan way,'" Dunn said.
White House aides say the administration is concerned about three centers of serious opposition from House Democrats: the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats who are worried about the cost and a public health care plan; the freshmen and other Democrats from high-income districts who are concerned about taxes for high-income Democrats, and the anti-abortion Democrats who are concerned about federal funding going for abortion services, and whether health care providers can opt out of certain procedures.
One official said the administration is aware that "if any of these three groups abandon the effort the bill would be impossible to get out of committee, much less pass."
Aides say the president and lawmakers also discussed the public option versus a co-op option.


You know, if the Dems just cut out all their vote buying spending (um, I mean pork spending, um- ear marks), then we could probably afford something. Especially if those other bloated, wasteful, inefficient social programs, Medicare and Medicaid, were fixed.
Ethan July 22nd, 2009 4:21 pm ET
TO YOU, 'ETHAN', FROM A REPUBLICAN –
Posted this twice before, let's see if I get a response from a Republican this time.
Very simple yes or no question.
Are you okay with Americans — your aunt, your son, your sister, etc — being denied health care coverage from THE GORVERNMENT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT SPONSORED HEALTH REVIEW BOARD DETERMINED THAT YOUR LOVED ONE DID NOT MEET THEIR REQUIRED STANDARDS TO CONTINUE LIVING?
GUESS WHAT? THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GONNA GET IF THIS DISGRACE OF A BILL OBAMA AND PELOSI RAM THROUGH BECOMES LAW!
Oh, and by the way, little fact for you. 99.99% of hospitals would not turn away someone in a life threatening situation just because they didn't have insurance! Just ask anyone who's in this country illegally. Nice try Ethan, but your sorry argument falls flat. Better go back to MSNBC and look for a new one.
Desiree – Margaret Thatcher did a lot of good for the economy of England, but she also TRIPLED the number of people unemployed and had such a devastating effect of the society that in 1997 (seven years after the end of her tenure) the CHILDHOOD-poverty rate in England was the biggest in all EUROPE (Eastern Former Communist Countries considered too)!
And besides remember that if we follow your line and consider this Health Care Reform 'socialism', then we should get rid of all POLICE AND MILITARY FORCES, after all they also fell in such poor and biased version of 'socialism'...
He's been inolved from the beiginning. There are three arms of government and the President cannot do the legislative portion of the government. That's why he designated them to their job. For years the house and senate has not made any major legislation or tough decision as this one and now are scared to make a tough decision.
It was easy to go to war without saying how to pay for it. And now that Americans are asking for the same amount of money that went to war in Iraq the Republicans are blocking it. Go figure where their priorities lie.
WE need healthcare passed now.... if we don't do it now our economy will go bust and worse than this now.
Why in the next 10 years the beginning of 80 milion baby boomers will begin to retire at the price of $15,000 in social Security per year.
When all of the "boomers" are retired it will ad 1.2 Trillion per year to our debt not including medicare. Why at just $10.00 per "boomer" for medicare will bring the total up to 2 TRILLION PER YEAR!!!! and that is why we need healthcare reform now, turn healthcare into a utility cost plus 10 percent.
Like Obama knows what he is talking about. He is better to go overseas again.