September 29, 2009
Posted: September 29th, 2009 12:18 PM ET

From
Controversy is surrounding Obama's campaign to secure the Olympics in Chicago.
Controversy is surrounding Obama's campaign to secure the Olympics in Chicago.

WASHINGTON (CNN) - President Obama's decision to head to Copenhagen, Denmark, later this week to make a push to bring the 2016 Olympic Games to Chicago is not without political controversy.

Critics say Obama is making a risky move, since key issues - ranging from Iran's nuclear ambitions and health care reform in Congress to deteriorating conditions in Afghanistan - are pressing on the administration.

"I think it's baffling that the president has time to travel to Copenhagen," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri. "[Obama's] got a lot of responsibilities. His number one responsibility is to keep our country safe."

Chicago is vying for the Summer Games against Madrid, Spain; Tokyo, Japan; and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Leaders from Brazil, Spain and Japan are expected to also make in-person pitches. The International Olympic Committee will vote on the host city Friday in Copenhagen.

It will be the first time an American president attends an IOC vote.

Obama will leave Thursday night, attend meetings on Friday morning, and return Friday afternoon, the White House said. First lady Michelle Obama will leave ahead of her husband, on Tuesday night.

Bond said that the issue of Afghanistan and whether to send more troops there should take precedence over the Olympic bid.

Dave Zirin, a contributor to The Nation magazine, said that while the Obamas should be standing with their city, it was unlikely the first couple would be making the trip if Chicago wasn't being considered.

"Amid a roiling national debate on health care, President Obama will be there to join [the first lady]. Would he be risking presidential prestige if Chicago wasn't going to get its place at the Olympic trough? Not very likely," Zirin recently wrote on the liberal blog, The Huffington Post.

But senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, who also heads to Copenhagen this week, rejected the notion that the president is risking political capital.

"Absolutely not. The president is a competitive spirit. He's very interested in promoting Chicago. ... He's not thinking about the political calculus," she said. "He's thinking what's best for the American people."

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said winning the games for Chicago would help the U.S. economy.

"Obviously any Olympics showcases the country that those Olympics are in and there's a tangible economic benefit to those games being here. And the president wants to help out America's bid."

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, a Democrat, believes the benefits to Chicago's economy from hosting the 2016 Olympic games "will be great and the risk to taxpayers low."

When asked if her husband was risking political capital if their bid should fail, the first lady said that it's the country's bid - not her husband's.

While Bond and other Obama foes criticized the president's trip to Copenhagen, the president got support from an unlikely ally.

On Monday, former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney told the Washington Times that Obama's personal appearance is "likely to ensure the city lands the games."

"I think his presence makes it almost certain that Chicago will win the bid," he added.

Romney is no stranger to Olympic negotiations. In 2002, Romney was in charge of the Salt Lake City, Utah, Winter Olympics.

Romney said he believes that while the president may risk some political capital, the trip is in the country's best interest.

The lobbying effort to bring the games to Chicago, meanwhile, isn't coming just from the president.

Michelle Obama vowed Monday to "take no prisoners" as she and her husband work to promote Chicago's 2016 Olympic bid, comparing the intense lobbying effort to the 2008 presidential campaign.

"It's a battle - we're going to win - take no prisoners," she said, noting that in the campaign a lot of voters made their decision in the final days, and members of the IOC may do the same.

"And our view is, we're not taking a chance," she said. "We're just not going to assume that the bids - that the decisions are made, and so that no matter what the outcome is, we'll feel as a country, as a team, that we've done everything that we can to bring it home."

Jarrett said the Obamas will be a powerful one-two punch.

"What a dynamic duo they will be. I think it will be high impact," she said. "I think their presentation will be both very personal, given that they know and love Chicago so well, and I also think it will talk about the Olympic spirit and the Olympic movement and why we think that Chicago really is the prefect place to host the Olympic and Paralympic games."

– CNN's Ed Henry and Dan Lothian contributed to this report.

Filed under: President Obama


Melissa   September 29th, 2009 10:55 am ET

Not really. It would be very good for this country's economy to get the olympics because the country that holds the olympics every four years ends up with billions of dollars in its pocket. This is actually a good idea. Very few people think this is a risk, except those that are trying to cause trouble.

Change_Has_Begun   September 29th, 2009 10:53 am ET

I am happy for you and I m let you finish...but Afghanistan, Iran, and Health Care should be priorities....

Accountability   September 29th, 2009 10:53 am ET

Where were these critics when Bush spent weeks at the ranch in the middle of two wars? Hypocrites.....

rainbowgirl   September 29th, 2009 10:51 am ET

All this political risk talk is so stupid. Why can't the President (ANY president) go to Copenhagen to support the United States' bid for the Olympics, a wonderful event for our country, and still keep his eye on the many isuses facing us today?? One does NOT preclude the other! The President, again, ANY president, works 24/7; it's not like he won't be working the whole time on the airplane ride over there and on the way back. It will merely take a few hours at the most out of his day to promote the United States for the Olympics, which is a worthy goal, so this "issue" is a NON-issue! No one is reasonable these days–always looking for trouble where there isn't any!

Jimmy   September 29th, 2009 10:50 am ET

What? He's just doing what he always done, kind of like voting "present". This man does NOT understand the job of the president and he is so under qualified it isn't funny. The people he has chosen to surround himself with are proof of that. What a fool to leave town when there is so much going on that needs to be addressed. Have a nice vacation Obama, we'll still be unemployed when you get back.

T'SAH from Virginia   September 29th, 2009 10:50 am ET

OMG – President Obama can CHEW GUM and WALK at the same time!!! Taking ONE DAY off to go bid for the Olympics is not going to start a WAR!

If America is ATTACKED while he is away, I am sure he will not SIT THERE AND CONTINUE TO READ A BOOK to school children for 5 minutes before reacting!!!! Jeez!

Fool me once shame on u, fool me twice... err...   September 29th, 2009 10:50 am ET

It is just amazing what a cool operator our President is. Just when you think the pressure must be getting to him; from birthers, to the economy, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the Nuke threat from Iran, and all the political doom and gloom cable chatter; he goes out and tackles yet another issue which you thought was way out there off his radar screen. To me, that's a very calming effect. It shows that no situation is ever going to get to him. Not to mention he can walk and chew, not just one, but multiple gum sticks at the same time.

Neutralizer   September 29th, 2009 10:49 am ET

Olympic in Chicago? Attendees MUST wear bullet proof vest and have bodyguards with them, Gang war in Chicago, killings 24/7 is enough to scare anyone to attend the Olympic game. I hope the IOC will reject Chicago right away; Japan is much better or Spain.

AJ   September 29th, 2009 10:48 am ET

I am a lifelong Democrat but think this is another example of bad judgment. How many times does Obama need to excersize questionable judgment before we've all had enough? This is not an issue that the President of the United Stated States should be involved with.

JB - NYC   September 29th, 2009 10:47 am ET

What do you expect.. this clown has never even run a candy store.. What would make anyone with a brain think he could run a country?
Experience counts.. Shame you idiots watch too many movies and live in fantasy land. You should have paid attention to your History classes or at least understood the Constitution and would realize we live in a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy.

diridi   September 29th, 2009 10:46 am ET

it certainly helps the nation....

docallen   September 29th, 2009 10:46 am ET

I suppose if he walks the dog, he will be criticized for taking unnecessary time away from his Presidential responsibilities. He has shown he can multitask. Where were all of the concerns when Bush was down in Texas all of the time clearing brush? In these times of video conferencing, etc., Obama does not have to be in the White House to effectively manage the Executive Branch.

Jean   September 29th, 2009 10:45 am ET

The US has a perfectly capable Olympic Committee which, in fact, has been very successful in getting the Olympics for many US cities over the years without any help from Obama or any other President. I resent the fact that once again we are paying for a trip that the President does not need to make and many Americans do not think is appropriate. The added expense to have the President attend is enormous when you add in the cost of Air Force One and all the security and other things necessary when a President travels – especially overseas – this is wasteful.

Bluebonnet   September 29th, 2009 10:45 am ET

Once Israel nukes Iran, we won't have to worry about which country get the olympics! The mob-run town of Chigao surely doesn't need it! All the crooks and ethnics groups are rubbing their hands together thinking up ways to scam people who attend.

LacrosseMom   September 29th, 2009 10:45 am ET

Political risks? Why? President & Mrs. Obama are from Chicago, they lived there, their daughters were born there. Since he is president why not use his popularity to gain the Chicago area the Olympics?

The Olympics will bring jobs, visitors and plenty of money to Chicago, and the United States since many foreign visitors will stay and tour other parts of our beautiful nation.

I say, go for it President Obama! Bring the Olympics to Chicago!

Rio 2016   September 29th, 2009 10:45 am ET

Given the inordinate number of days his predecessor spent on vacation, I don't think there's much room for criticism by the GOP. That being said, he shouldn't be promoting the games for Chicago for several other reasons. I live in Chicago and I can assure you that taxpayers and citizens are already paying for the games through slashed budgets, reduced and eliminated services, staffing cuts and layoffs, fewer police, and the tax money that is being used to build the Olympic Village. Not to mention the Mayor is selling off just about every source of city revenue to pay for it. We have a massive budget deficit. This is a city living far beyond its means and not for the benefit of the people who live here. Obama should be going to Copenhagen to support Rio's bid!

Lynne   September 29th, 2009 10:43 am ET

What political risks? The president, like the other three leaders of the countries who are in the running for the '16 Olympics, is going to help present Chicago's bid. Only one country will be chosen and it won't necessarily be America.

Kudos for the President for going to the Committee and presenting his case and not taking the most politically safe route of perhaps not being one of the THREE countries not selecred.

kimberly   September 29th, 2009 10:43 am ET

No it doesnt. We are proud that he is doing this. Its good for America, its good for Chicago, and its good for every business owner in Ill that needs help. EVERY OTHER COUNTRY that is bidding for this will be there, so he should be there. Its ONE MORNING! TWO HOURS!!! All these repukes in the senate running around on news shows running thier hateful mouths are the ones dragging this out and wasting time. They are ANTI AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Blutarski   September 29th, 2009 10:42 am ET

Yeah, come to Chicago, have a few laughs, watch an honor student get beaten to death by a violent mob in the street. He is wasting his time, there is no way the Olympic Committee will pick the most corrupt and violent city in the U.S. (next to New Orleans). Hold the Olympics in Kabul, let them foot the bill for Nation Building instead of the U.S.

I guess the Obamas have a lot of people in the Chicago area to pay back. Maybe Rezko is calling in some favors, or perhaps his buddy Nahdim Auchi. Any money generated by this event were it to be held in Chicago(bang bang) will be syphoned off by union bosses, and corrupt politicians and businessmen. Imagine the Big Dig, but on a larger scale.

ysidero   September 29th, 2009 10:42 am ET

i think it's great that the president can look at the big picture, and lend his support and a little bit of his time to something positive for a major american city and the whole nation. this olympic bid, if successful, will contribute to job growth, infrastructure improvements, and civic pride – whats not to like about all that? and, the games wont occur until 2016, so this is a good example of giving up a little in the present for huge benefits in the future – a lesson others should learn.

Ray   September 29th, 2009 10:41 am ET

It's not like the man is vacationing there. He is stopping by (a quick day trip) to get the games in Chicago. Big Deal!!!

I would think having the games here would be a pretty good economic boost....

Gerald   September 29th, 2009 10:41 am ET

The push is payback only , dinner with Oprah and the likes.

Thomas   September 29th, 2009 10:40 am ET

I do not think it is appropriate for the President to become involved in this matter. If it is truly about improving the economy (which I don't believe it will) then why does not the Secretary of Commerce go?

There are many high level government officials that can go in the President's place.

LA has been the only American city that was able to successfully host the olympics from a financial standpoint. I do not believe that Chicago is the best city for the olympics. It will end up costing the state and the nation a lot of money.

Why not let some other country host it instead?

Erik in Real Pennsylvania   September 29th, 2009 10:39 am ET

This is a mistake. The President can't be perceived (or characterized) as weighing in on relatively trivial things, despite the economic boost to the metropolitan area under consideration.

SLM   September 29th, 2009 10:39 am ET

When the going gets tough, Obama jets out of town. Not a good move, but he already knows he is a one term president anyway. Obama is in way over his head and doesn't make any of the tough decisions, always leaving someone else to blame. That's what you get when you elect a community organizer/Junior senator who votes "present" instead of having an opinion. Well Mr. Obama, no more voting present.

Rick   September 29th, 2009 10:36 am ET

I find it very inappropriate that the first lady would make that comment. Not that I would want to tangle with her even if she had gloves on but I find it very crasp of her to make that comment. I gues it is what we should expect from the wife of the Fuhrer. She obviously has the same mindset as him and that is that they can do no wrong. Well, wake up MS obmaa, nobody elected you or gave you the go ahead to be the spokeswoman for the US in obtaining the olympics. Maybe you better spend more time in your garden and less time taking extravagent trips at our expense.

Lila   September 29th, 2009 10:36 am ET

First he's doing too much. Then he's not doing enough. Then he's doing too much again..

Enough   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

Shows where this mans priorities are........NOT here. He has some tough decisions to make on the war, the economy is in the toilet, ACORN has wasted millions of our dollars, Health care needs to be dealt with and off he goes campaigning for the Olympics.

Debra R   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

Obama...get back to work....we did not hire you to get us the olympics, we hired you to run the country (well I didn't...thank GOD). is your ego so big that this cannot be delegated to someone else while you tend to Iran, Korea, the economy.....you know the stuff you said you were going to handle....

Mike   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

With all the real problems this country faces, mostly caused by nobama, here he is trying to get the olympics in that "septic tank of a city" called chicago. Must be some money for the under the table crowd who support nobama who want more payback.

Terry from West Texas   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri: "I think it's baffling that the president has time to travel to Copenhagen," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri. "[Obama's] got a lot of responsibilities. His number one responsibility is to keep our country safe."

He's got a point. I hear that there are no phones or computers on Air Force One so the president will be totally out of touch with the rest of the world. Also, when he gets to Copenhagen, I hear that there are no phones or computers there either. You know Europe is kind of backward.

Lyndon Johnson said, "If I walked across the Potomac, the headlines the next day would be 'President Can't Swim.'"

Henry Miller, Libertarian, Cary, North Carolina   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

And who's paying the costs of Obama's little sales trip? I expect the cost of a round trip by Air Force One to Denmark, plus, I'm assuming, the costs of various auxiliary aircraft, plus the costs of all the advance work, and on and on, is upwards of a few million bucks.

So, is the US taxpayer expected to pick up the tab for all that?

Brian   September 29th, 2009 10:35 am ET

As I understand it, the trip to Copenhagen will be a day trip: leave in the morning, return that night. Strictly a business trip, w/ the potential economic benefits to the Chicago area stagering. Well worth a few hours of his valuable time.

Anonymous   September 29th, 2009 10:33 am ET

please give this smart, active president credit for being able to multi-task here. i am very proud of president obama being able to juggle so many issues and still be on top of his game. the republicans just can not stand the fact that we have a very young,strong, decision making leader here. to have the olimpics come to the US will bring much needed revenue and many jobs to chicago so please republicans just take off your nasty hats just this once and let our president do his job..........BEING OUR PRESIDENT!

ran   September 29th, 2009 10:33 am ET

Fear/hate and obstructionism must be a Republican speaking again.

Short of President Obama leaving office permanently the GOP will never be happy with what he does.

That is why we should just go directly to Single payer non-profit universal health care now. Then on to energy and immigration reform. Leave the GOP in the past because they seem happy there.

Duck Fallas   September 29th, 2009 10:32 am ET

"His number one responsibility is to keep our country safe."

Says who? George Bush?

Republicans have to stop making things up.

Sean   September 29th, 2009 10:32 am ET

"His number one responsibility is to keep our country safe." Seriously? Who is this guy, Superman? What, he leaves Metropolis for any length of time and Lex Luthor will swoop in and destroy everything? Gimme a break. This is the President of the United States. He is connected 24/7 to his advisers, to the military, to the so-called nuclear "football". He can lead the country every bit as efficiently from Copenhagen as he can from Air Force One or Dick Cheney's "undisclosed location". Let's not play the screaming patriot-wannabe here. Grow up.

GI Joe   September 29th, 2009 10:31 am ET

Change has already happened. The American people have seen the true colors of the Republicans and Blue Dogs. Not pretty at all.

This is OUR country, and should be run by and for us, not the Insurance Companies.

spenser M   September 29th, 2009 10:31 am ET

you know the olympics bring profits as well...

ajks   September 29th, 2009 10:30 am ET

The Olympics will make a huge economic increase for the United States. I am glad that the President and Mrs. Obama are making a bid for the Olympics, and for the prestige that they would lend the Olympics here in the U.S.

Illinois 2   September 29th, 2009 10:29 am ET

Keep the politians out of the Olympic Games... Chicago can't take care of their own problems, let alone the vast problems created by these games.

Jim   September 29th, 2009 10:29 am ET

With the communication available to President Obama, what is the problem ? Oh yes, I remember now, he is a democrat.

Bedtime for Obonzo   September 29th, 2009 10:26 am ET

Just imagine the opportunities for corruption by Chicago government, unions, contractors, maybe even "community organizers." A new stimulous plan - Chicago style.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@KuhnCNN: Great meeting @JackGrayCNN today and seeing @sinderbrandrcnn in NYC! AC Rock Stars! :-)
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:07:10 -0800
@KuhnCNN: Posted today: Clinton foreign trip first on Twitter. http://bit.ly/9Axuh9 /via @PoliticalTicker
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:36:14 -0800
@KuhnCNN: RT @octavianasrCNN: MUST-READ// Coaching tomorrow's world leaders, through social networking -- http://bit.ly/9tmW6x
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:32:51 -0800
@AWMooneyCNN: Metro finally comes and then stops at station for 20 minutes #snoverkill
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:46:27 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: I just shoveled two feet of snow off the roof. That was fun!
Updated: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:14:34 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP