November 5, 2009
Posted: November 5th, 2009 10:20 AM ET

From

Washington (CNN) – The push for health care reform could receive a major boost Thursday as the nation's largest retiree organization may endorse legislation drafted by top House Democrats.

The American Association of Retired Persons' (AARP) possible imprimatur comes as Speaker Nancy Pelosi oversees final changes to the $1.055 trillion health care bill, which is likely set to come to a final vote Saturday.

The AARP is a non-profit, non-partisan group that advocates for people over the age of 50.

A 42-page manager's amendment on the health care legislation posted Tuesday night made mostly technical changes in the nearly 2,000-page bill compiled from three Democratic proposals passed by three House committees.

By making the changes public on Tuesday, House Democratic leaders could open floor debate on the bill Friday, while fulfilling their pledge to allow 72 hours of review before bringing the measure to the full chamber.

Meanwhile, the powerful American Medical Association is also set to weigh in on the debate, announcing its position on the House health care bill at a noon news conference.

House Republicans, one day after unveiling their own $60 billion bill, will hold an opposition rally on Capitol Hill. GOP leaders will join with Tea Party movement protesters and other activists to warn that the House legislation translates to a full-blown government takeover of the health care system.

Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota, told CNN's "American Morning" Thursday that Democrats had "forgotten" the lessons of August's town hall meetings, when health care reform legislation was severely criticized by angry conservatives.

"I think what we're going to see is the town hall coming to Washington, D.C., just to remind members of Congress (that) we're the ones we would like you to pay attention to, not lobbyists. And we don't want the government to own our health care."

House Democrats have rejected Republican reform plans as inadequate for meeting the goals of expanding health coverage to most of the nation's 46 million uninsured while bringing down costs and ending controversial industry practices such as denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Pelosi's bill would extend insurance coverage to 36 million uncovered Americans and guarantee that 96 percent of Americans have coverage, according to the Democratic leadership.

The claim is based on an analysis by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

Among other things, the bill would subsidize insurance for poorer Americans and create health insurance exchanges to make it easier for small groups and individuals to purchase coverage. It would also cap annual out-of-pocket expenses and prevent insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Pelosi's office has said the bill would cut the federal deficit by roughly $30 billion over the next decade. The measure is financed through a combination of a tax surcharge on wealthy Americans and spending constraints in Medicare and Medicaid.

Specifically, individuals with annual incomes over $500,000 - as well as families earning more than $1 million - would face a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge. Growth in Medicare expenditures would be cut by 1.3 percent annually.

The House bill also includes a government-run public option. Under the House plan, health care providers would be allowed to negotiate reimbursement rates with the federal government. Pelosi and other liberal Democrats had argued for a more "robust" public option that would tie reimbursement rates for providers and hospitals to Medicare rates plus a 5 percent increase.

Several Democrats representing rural areas, however, killed the proposal after complaining that doctors and hospitals in their districts would be shortchanged under such a formula.

The House bill differs from legislation now being considered by the Senate in a number of critical ways. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, also favors a public option, but would allow individual states to opt out of the plan.

A bill recently passed by the Senate Finance Committee does not include a tax surcharge on the wealthy, but would instead impose a new tax on high-end health care policies, dubbed "Cadillac" plans by critics. A large number of House Democrats are adamantly opposed to taxing such policies, arguing that such a move would hurt union members who traded higher salaries for more generous benefits.

Reid refused Tuesday to predict when the chamber would pass a health care bill, possibly signaling difficulty in generating support from his entire Democratic caucus.

President Barack Obama has said he wants to sign a health care bill this year. However, Reid declined to offer a timetable when asked at a news conference if he believed the Senate would pass the bill by the end of December.

Filed under: Health care


jay   November 5th, 2009 11:48 am ET

Another group involved in American politics is yet again selling its soul to the devil, selling out its constituency, and ensuring that its numbers will drop. Sounds like more of the status quo that Obama promised to do away. All this to reduce coverage to seniors, drive up the deficit despite what Nancy "The Shrill" Pelosi and the Bamster say.

a health economist   November 5th, 2009 11:46 am ET

People, will you please think for a minute.

If you are so against the government "controlling healthcare" why are you not against the government contolling the millitary?

If you are worried about the government spending too much why don't you also want the defense budget to be decreased?

If you seriously think the government is going to make "death panels" because the elderly "cost to much to keep alive" why do you not also think the private market would not do the same? (and more eviciently)

If you are against "socialsim" do you feel we should privatize our roads, police stations, fire stations, and military? They function under socialsim principals.

If you don't like "spreading the wealth" does that mean you have no insurance of any kind? Because insurance, all insurance, functions by the spreading of wealth from those that have no or little claims to those that do have claims. If my premiums are $10,000 a year and I have no claims I don't get that money back. It's been spread to those that have made claims.

Susan in NC   November 5th, 2009 11:32 am ET

Michele Bachmann, the Wicked Witch of the Mid-West, is at it again - more idiocy and more whining, but no answers.

Mike in Dallas   November 5th, 2009 11:32 am ET

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,, LOL,
SOOOO the well financed neocon LOST. Daaaaaayum. Palin, Pawlenty, and numerous other big name cons couldn't pull Hoffman thru. That must mean Obama is successful.
YES WE CAN. OBAMA-BIDEN 2012

Susan in NC   November 5th, 2009 11:31 am ET

Thank you, AARP! Finally, change we can all live with and hope for many! Now, hopefully, the AMA will announce the same at noon today! Say YES to adequate health care for all Americans!

Robert1234   November 5th, 2009 11:29 am ET

Naturally the AARP loves it. Their main income is from selling bad health insurance to their members. Either Medicare for All or nothing!

Macho Macho   November 5th, 2009 11:27 am ET

The American Association of Retired Persons' (AARP) possible imprimatur comes as Speaker Nancy Pelosi oversees final changes to the $1.055 trillion health care bill, which is likely set to come to a final vote Saturday.
_____________________________________________________

Tax and spend, tax and spend, spend and tax, spend and tax....
We as a Nation are broke, if this passes it will be the death nail in Free America's coffin. Reverse Logic? 45,000 people die each year in America because they have Medicaid and Medicare health insurance provided for by an inept Government Bureaucracy. Insurance company profits are approximately 2 billion/yr, Medicaid and Medicare fraud losses are approximately 30 billion/yr, Figure it out Obamabots!

Pepou   November 5th, 2009 11:24 am ET

I am a Senior and I FULLY support the health care bill put forth by the democrats.

Tex   November 5th, 2009 11:10 am ET

As long as they get some form of a public option I'm happy, along with what about 61% of the country? You know, the ones who vote with their own best interests in mind.

Sam   November 5th, 2009 10:55 am ET

You have already misstated facts in the first few lines of your article. The AARP is not a non-partisan advocacy group. While they do not officially endorse the Democrat Party, they consistently endorse the positions of the Democrat Party. Also claiming to be non-profit is also not entirely true since the AARP was created by an insurance company in order to steer the elderly into buying their insurance products. In reality, the AARP is little more than a liberal political monstrosity, which snookers the elderly into supporting liberal political positions, while at the same time, using their membership as a marketplace for the products they choose to market to them.

Mark,B'ham,Al.   November 5th, 2009 10:54 am ET

What was AARP's pay off for their support since they have lost lots of members over this issue already? Getting rid of Medicare Advantage makes their more expensive and less coverage insurance more sellable.

Mark,B'ham,Al.   November 5th, 2009 10:50 am ET

If this monstrosity passes both houses of Congress and it ends up costing more than the recent estimate of 1.3 trillion dollars everyone of you who pushed for this should be the first ones to get their taxes raised to pay for it. History proves that everyone of these big government entitlements cost more than the estimates form Congress so our deficit gets even bigger. Look closely at the bill and get your insurance before 2013 or you will be on the government option. Also Congress cannot be made to go on the public option so that tells you it is not a good thing because if it was they would be on it. My Congressman has already said the taxpayers cannot afford the current bill and will vote no and I am glad. If my son who made $18,000 last year cna pay $250 a month for insurance on he and his son, then everyone else in his situation can make the sacrafice and get health insurance.

tom   November 5th, 2009 10:49 am ET

This is precisely why I am not an AARP member. I learned long ago that this group does not truely represent their members. In this case they are focused on what this bill will do to increase their insurance sales. This health care bill will be about as effective as the stimulus bill only far more damaging. Why are the dems so hell bent on passing something so ridiculous? This disaster will kill jobs, add to the deficit, not cover many uninsured, and destroy the quality of health care as we know it. Dems can kiss my vote goodbye.

Debbie Limuti   November 5th, 2009 10:42 am ET

WHY would AARP back this health reform bill for seniors??????
How does it benefit the seniors on Medicare. It will limit treatment
for this senior population.

RobLA   November 5th, 2009 10:41 am ET

AARP's membership is going to plummet.

This is not the way to healthcare reform.

Goodbye AARP.

Jimbo   November 5th, 2009 10:37 am ET

They better otherwise the Obama regime will spank them just like the Chamber of Comerce.

Bow down or else!!!

I love collaboration. Don't you?

Also, if we wait long enough to vote then no one will be opposed to it. Americans traditionally have a short attention span and don't have the energy for a long political fight.

Fan of Common Sense   November 5th, 2009 10:34 am ET

If I was a member of the AARP (AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RED-TAPE PROPONENTS) I would be ending my membership today. Under the demorats' proposal, seniors will suffer more than anyone else. When medicare is scaled up to include everyone (which is basically what this proposal mandates) there are going to be alot less resources for our seniors......those who probably need and deserve them the most. Too bad most of them are not mentally sharp enough to realize this simple and predictable fact. I'm not sure whose interest the AARP is really looking out for, but it's not our seniors. WAKE UP GRANDMA! WAKE UP GRANDPA!

Enough   November 5th, 2009 10:33 am ET

Look for the AARP membership to drop significantly over this. Nancy Botoxi is already admitting it will go over 1 trillion dollars...............so look for it to be even higher than that. We all know government estimates aren't worth the paper they are printed on...........kind of like our money.

bill callahan   November 5th, 2009 10:31 am ET

Another reason to not join or cancel my AARP membership. They are supposed to be looking out for seniors.

Jon   November 5th, 2009 10:28 am ET

Smart. I really think health reform will pass and will eventually be a huge success in this country. Those who supported it during this difficult time will be proven right in the long run.

Lauree   November 5th, 2009 10:27 am ET

Why doesn't any article regarding AARP and the Health Care Bill include the information that AARP is the largest provider of GAP insurance for seniors. With the "gap" between what Medicare covers and what it doesnt getting bigger due to the cutbacks, AARP stands to make billions of dollars with increased demand for GAP insurance. There is a money motive here .. don't let the "non profit" smoke and mirrors deceive you. Its always about the money or the power and often about both ... follow the money and you find AARP.

Johnny DC   November 5th, 2009 10:26 am ET

KEYWORD: Advocacy group

The AARP is nothing but another lobby. It doesn't represent the best interests of the elderly everywhere, only the best interests of its members and its bureaucrats.

Sure, this is the plan. Take families that make $1M, which gets you an average place in Manhattan or San Francisco, and steal another $50,000 from them annually. Good idea.

Linda Sage   November 5th, 2009 10:25 am ET

If you endorse the government healthcare bill, you will loose me and several other members. The government ruins everything they touch, and we already have enough problems with the healthcare system, we don't need any more.

Kevin in Ohio   November 5th, 2009 10:25 am ET

Precisely the reason I dropped my membership of this ultra-liberal group. I encourage others to do the same. This group has never been a true friend of us retirees. $500 billion in medicare cuts will...and MUST....lead to the so-called "death panels". There is simply no other logical result.

VB Lincoln Park NJ   November 5th, 2009 10:24 am ET

I am an AARP member, and am glad to see the organization supporting REAL health care reform, and not the joke that the party of NO (GOP = Greed Over Principle) is claiming is health reform, when all it is (is) welfare for the health insurance companies (21st century robber barons).

Dan   November 5th, 2009 10:24 am ET

The AARP sold everyon e out with the Bush Administration when they endorsed the pharmaceutical plans for seniors. There is no reason to believe they are doing ANYTHING for the good of the people now. This health care bill–if that is what one wants to call it– is a sham and will bankrupt all of us! The democrats in Congress who so eagerly seek socialization should be removed from office–they have nothing to offer and cannot even identify the real problem of health care.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About The Ticker

The latest political news from CNN's Best Political Team, with campaign coverage, 24-7. Sign up for our twice daily Ticker emails. Got a news tip or feedback? For complete political coverage, bookmark CNNPolitics.com.

CNN=Politics Screensaver

CNN=Politics ScreensaverTap into the power of The Situation Room. Download this powerful new tool that keeps you posted on the latest political news from the campaign trail.
Download (4.1 MB, PC only)

twitter
@psteinhauserCNN: New CNN Poll: 8 in 10 say economy's in poor shape, but that's actually an improvement. Also: Racial divide on jobs - http://bit.ly/7vZKHS
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:50:56 -0800
@KuhnCNN: Rick’s List: A New, Twitter-Happy CNN Show Anchored By Rick Sanchez? http://www.mediaite.com/ozjwx
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:18:37 -0800
@psteinhauserCNN: Freshman House Democrat from Alabama to switch to Republican Party, sources telll CNN - http://bit.ly/4pXIzB
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:43:21 -0800
@KuhnCNN: RT @RickSanchezCNN: Hey guys, new CNN show beginning Jan 18th, weekdays 3-5pm ET. "Rick’s List"- Who will make the list?
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:10:12 -0800
@wolfblitzercnn: New SitRoom start time. Beg. mid-Jan, we're on 5-7p ET. Our excellent team can focus on 2 solid hrs. Less becomes more.
Updated: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:45:58 -0800
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP