December 2nd, 2009
07:58 PM ET
3 months ago

Advocacy group endorses Senate bill's Medicare spending cuts

Washington (CNN) - The nation's leading advocacy group for senior citizens on Wednesday endorsed the spending cuts that the Senate health care bill proposes for the government-run Medicare health program for seniors.

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, who is leading the effort to pass the Democratic bill, the AARP says the measure "does not reduce any guaranteed Medicare benefits" while it makes needed reforms to the program that is predicted to become insolvent within a decade.

The letter, signed by AARP Chief Executive Officer Addison Barry Rand, calls for the Senate to reject an amendment by Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona that would effectively kill the health care bill by sending it back to committee to remove all provisions that reduce Medicare spending.

In debate on his amendment this week, McCain has criticized the AARP for backing the health care bill, which he claimed would harm senior citizens by reducing Medicare benefits.

Republicans unanimously oppose the Senate health care bill so far, and the first three days of debate have been slowed by procedural maneuvering and drawn-out rhetoric. Several amendments have been proposed, including McCain's, but no votes have occurred due to what Democrats complain are Republican stall tactics.

"Unless the Republican leadership comes forward with a reasonable approach to these amendments, I think our patience is wearing thin," said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber. "They don't want to call theseamendments for votes and we're just not going to sit here forever and see this bill go down."

Republicans denied they are purposely delaying action on the bill, but said they won't agree to end debate on individual amendments until they've had ample time to consider them.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, objecting to a voting schedule offered Tuesday by Democrats, said there were "a number of people that want to speak" about the McCain amendment before a vote.

One senior Republican senator, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, circulated a memo to his colleagues Wednesday detailing "the tools we have under Senate rules to insist on a full, complete and fully informed debate" on health care.

Gregg's memo spelled out more than a dozen "minority party rights," including insisting on a quorum of 51 senators to conduct legislative business and requiring the text of all amendments to be read aloud in the Senate chamber.

If the two sides can't reach agreement on the length of debate for amendments and when votes will be held, Democrats could use several floor procedures to accelerate the debate. Each procedure, however, contains potential pitfalls that make Democrats reluctant to employ them.

For example, Democrats could try to cut off debate on each amendment by filing cloture motions. However, cloture motions take days to play out, making the procedure impractical for speeding up debate.

Another tactic would be trying to table amendments, which would prevent their further consideration. The risk is that if a tabling motion fails, the underlying amendment is automatically considered approved. Therefore, controversial amendments could be adopted through the simple majority vote to kill a tabling motion, rather than the 60 votes needed to pass the actual
amendment in the 100-member chamber.

At a closed meeting on the subject Wednesday, Senate Democrats vowed to work weekends and even Christmas Day, if necessary, to pass the bill by the end of the year, which is their stated goal.

In floor debate so far, Republicans have adopted the unusual position of defending the Medicare program they have traditionally opposed. Led by McCain and McConnell, Republican speakers have insisted the more than $400 billion in proposed Medicare spending cuts over 10 years would reduce benefits for senior citizens.

Democrats responded that the Republicans are spreading misinformation as a scare tactic, and insist that the reduced Medicare spending would come from eliminating waste and fraud in the popular program to ensure its long-term
financial stability.

The AARP letter Wednesday backed the Democratic position.

"With respect to Medicare, AARP supports policies to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse - and to improve quality, value and sustainability of the program for current and future beneficiaries," the letter said.

It noted the Medicare spending cuts in the Senate bill focus on "provider reimbursement reforms" - meaning reductions in how much government money gets paid to hospitals, doctors and other health care providers - rather than benefits for Medicare recipients.

On Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, one of the architects of the bill, noted the Medicare spending cuts were much less than the $2 trillion in 10 years that health care industry officials have said the Medicare
program could shed.

The 2,074-page Senate bill would provide health insurance to an additional 31 million people at a cost of almost $850 billion.

Democrats have framed the debate that began Monday as historic and said the bill would provide vital health insurance for almost all Americans, hold down spiraling costs that threaten the U.S. economy and instill needed reforms to ensure the long-term solvency of Medicare.

Republicans countered that the bill is too big, too expensive and would cause more harm than good.

The House has passed its version of a health care bill, and if the Senate eventually passes a bill, the two measures would be merged by a congressional conference committee. Both chambers then would have to approve the revised bill before it could go to President Barack Obama's desk.

Obama has made health care his top domestic priority for 2009, and is pushing for Congress to pass a final bill this year.

–CNN's Tom Cohen contributed to this story.


Filed under: Health care • Medicare • Senate
soundoff (37 Responses)
  1. Sue

    If this congress cannot govern affectively, which is what they are showing the American people everyday they try to pass any laws....then I say THROW ALL THE BUMS OUT AND START FRESH!

    December 2, 2009 09:54 pm at 9:54 pm |
  2. J.C. - Independent 4 Public Option

    The one reason for me not voting for Senator McCain was his 'choice' on health care reform. People are dying for lack of coverage or insufficient coverage. What choice do they have? Can we have some imagination beyond what we can see?

    If a strong public option is passed, it will help our small businesses to help us revive our economy and create jobs. Gov. Romney knew much better and I knew small businesses in MA can afford health care coverage now. A nation booming with vibrant start-ups and innovative ideas is a nation of hope. Please do not stare at the pie in front of you and wonder how many wedges you can cut it into for your family. Try to look at how to enlarge the pie first. Public Option will strengthen our Middle Class and our democracy. Why should we worry so much about democracy in the Middle East, while ignoring our weakened Middle Class? It doesn't make common sense.

    December 2, 2009 10:20 pm at 10:20 pm |
  3. terry,va

    AARP management is ran by Dumbocrap political contributors who stand to gain a lot of kick backs for promoting Medicare supplemental insurance policies when Medicare benefits are cut.

    December 2, 2009 10:38 pm at 10:38 pm |
  4. Michael

    The Party of NO-how sad that they still haven't rea;ized what happened November 4, 2008. They LOST!! We WON!! Why do Dems keep giving them power? They screwed up big-time. We are suffering the consequences of their bad choices.
    Come on Dems- grow a pair!!

    December 2, 2009 10:48 pm at 10:48 pm |
  5. Matt

    Only an idiot would support this joke of a bill. It isn't reform, but an unneeded overhaul. It is like tossing out a car because the tires are flat.

    Obama, Pelosi and Reid will go down in history has the trifecta of ideological, brainless, forceful politicians.

    December 2, 2009 10:51 pm at 10:51 pm |
  6. Yahbut

    I would like to know who gave Mr. Rand permission to say that AARP approves of this bill?
    Was survey taken of the members of AARP?
    If so was it sent to all members of AARP?
    By killing this amendment by Senator McCain Mr. Rand should be asked how cutting the amount of money from Medicare by the congress will benefit senior citizens?
    He should, also, be asked in what way the passage of this bill helps senior citizens?
    If he will not answer these questions then he should be asked to resign his position because something does not sound right.

    December 2, 2009 11:16 pm at 11:16 pm |
  7. Truth-Bomb Thrower

    I don't know who the AARP is working for but it's NOT senior citizens. It's the seniors that are really going to get the shaft when the government takes over the healthcare system, and remember, eventually we will ALL be seniors.

    December 2, 2009 11:25 pm at 11:25 pm |
  8. Jason

    The Republicans should be absolutely ashamed of themselves. They in no way, shape, or form are good faith partners in any debate. They hate the Democrats and the President in particular and will do everything in their power to stop any kind of positive change. What do they want us to say about them twenty years from now, they hated or they cared.

    December 2, 2009 11:36 pm at 11:36 pm |
  9. valwayne

    When when the AARP endorses gutting medicare you know it isn't being run by people looking out for the elderly. Its being run by left wing Obama Kool-Aide drinkers. This is the kind of corruption that is permeating our society today, and its a shame. The elderly, I'm getting close, really need somebody looking out for them. The leaders of AARP are throwing the elderly under the bus to curry favor and make their corrupt deals with Obama. For shame!!!! We need a new truly non-partisan organization that won't sell out their members!!!

    December 2, 2009 11:39 pm at 11:39 pm |
  10. Xavier

    Unbelievable that Mr. Rand would take this position. I assume AARP will have more leave the organization. Thank you Senator McCain for your bill. AARP is looking for the monetary gains they get from supplemental insurance policies. As always follow the money. AARP is Shameful.

    December 3, 2009 12:28 am at 12:28 am |
  11. Nea

    Hold up Democrats, wait a minute im speaking about the jobs issue when the previous administration was in the white house and we started to lose jobs why didnt anyone speak up then, Now things have gotten out of hand its all the present administration fault and also my ? to you Democrats in congress where was you when we started to lose jobs? where was you when G. Bush sent our troops off to Afghanistan in the first place now that the light is shining on you, you want to blame President Obama yes its partially President Obama fault too but im not going for putting the total blame on him its you Democrats and Republicans acting like 3 year old, instead of getting the job done.

    December 3, 2009 12:30 am at 12:30 am |
  12. Jason Travers

    Is the president's Health Care Plan due to the fact that Medicare and Social Security are essentially bankrupt now ?

    December 3, 2009 12:53 am at 12:53 am |
1 2