April 11th, 2010
04:18 PM ET
5 years ago

Barbour: Obama, Congress 'the most liberal' ever


(CNN) – As Washington girds itself for another Supreme Court confirmation battle, a prominent Republican is predicting that President Obama will use his second high court pick to try to push the court in as liberal a direction as possible – in a reflection of Democrats’ liberal tendencies.

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens announced Friday that he intends to step down later this year, stirring speculation about who Obama will appoint during a midterm election year when Democrats already appear to be facing a challenging political environment.

“The president’s going to appoint a liberal successor to Justice Stevens who's one of the most liberal members of the Supreme Court,” Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour said in an interview that aired Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union.

Barbour added that he thought Obama is going to “appoint the most liberal person that he can and he thinks he can get confirmed. And that, that person will be a liberal. That’s just a fact.”

The former RNC chairman and current chairman of the Republican Governors Association told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley that the upcoming Supreme Court confirmation process will affect November’s midterm elections by reminding the public where Obama and the Democratically-controlled Congress sit on the political spectrum.

“Do I think it'll affect the election?,” he said. “Only to the sense that it reminds the American people of something they already know - that this is far and away the most liberal administration that we've ever had in the White House, and candidly, in the Congress.”

Barbour noted that historically both liberals and conservatives have used Supreme Court vacancies to stir up support and enthusiasm within their respective bases. But he said that Republicans may not need the extra boost that will likely come from a high court confirmation battle during a midterm election year.

“The good thing for Republicans right now is we’ve got plenty of energy,” Barbour told Crowley. “The policies of this administration and this Congress have energized our people.”

Asked whether Senate Republicans should oppose Obama’s nominee at all costs and risk taking on “the party of no” label being pushed by Democrats, Barbour was indifferent.

“I’m not worried about ‘the party of no,’ as long as we’re saying no to what the American people know are bad policies,” Barbour said. “The American people will reward you for trying to stop something they think is bad.”

But Barbour was quick to add that no one knows yet who the president will nominate to replace Justice Stevens.

soundoff (229 Responses)
  1. Jessie from Auckland, NZ

    The Republicans sound like a bunch of childish, spoilt brats to me and much worse!

    April 11, 2010 07:18 pm at 7:18 pm |
  2. Adalbert

    Who cares what this fanatic idiot say.

    April 11, 2010 07:20 pm at 7:20 pm |
  3. AK_steve

    Isn't this the guy who said that "slavery" was not a "significant" event in history. Sounds like the conservatives are ULTRA right wing, making even the traditional moderates look like liberals.

    Justice Stevens was considered a moderate conservative when he was appointed by Ford. Forty years later and the court has swung so far to the right, that the then moderate conservative (Steven's) is now the most liberal.

    It's the conservatives that have shifted and not evolved. So stop trying to blame your extreme political views on socialism and liberals.

    April 11, 2010 07:27 pm at 7:27 pm |
  4. Anonymous

    If you were right, then we'd have a single-payer, public option instead of the private insurance based health plan that passed. I'd say the 65-66 Congress was far more liberal. And the Hyde Ammendment would be gone, and we wouldn't have sent 50K more troops to Afghanistan, and... How stupid does the GOP think we are anyway?

    April 11, 2010 07:59 pm at 7:59 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10