Senate renews fight over unemployment benefits
Washington (CNN) – Senate Democrats expect enough Republicans will vote with them on a procedural vote Monday for the Senate to take up an extension of unemployment benefits, two Democratic leadership aides told CNN. But the aides said they were less confident that they will have the 60 votes needed to pass the bill later this week.
Republicans, led by fiscal hawk Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, are not opposed to be the unemployment aid, but are philosophically against adding to the nation's soaring debt. Coburn and other likeminded lawmakers want Democrats to offset the nearly $10 billion price tag for the one month extension.
But Democrats have steadfastly refused, arguing that offsets would diminish the simulative affect of the spending on the sagging economy.
Of the 15 million people unemployed right now, about 200,000 saw their benefits expire on April 5th, and 1 million could see their benefits cut off by the end of the month if Congress doesn't act, warned Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois.
"These are not deadbeats, these are not bums. These are people who are out of work, have been out of work a long time and struggled to find a job," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, in a floor speech Monday.
The bill is the first order of business following the congressional recess. Lawmakers left town two weeks ago without approving the extension after Coburn blocked its passage. It is the second time Congress is moving a short-term extension of benefits because House and Senate Democrats can't agree on how to pay for a larger, longer-term bill.
Aides predict the debate will dominate Senate action this week, with a final vote coming Thursday or Friday.
While Democrats believe that GOP senators will appear as obstructionists, Republicans think their argument is actually tapping into voters' frustration that Washington, controlled by Democrats, is out of control on spending.
"Democrats can no longer hide behind the argument of good intentions when the results threaten our very stability as a nation. We must get a handle on the deficit and the debt," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky. "This is the issue we will focus our attention on in the weeks and months ahead."
Durbin accused Republicans of being hypocritical, since they approved deficit spending for bank bailouts, war costs, and other priorities of the Bush administration but now are insisting on paying for unemployment benefits.
"Do we have the presence of mind to do this in a way that doesn't hurt our children," Coburn said during a floor speech. "We're debating whether to take from those who come after us and give to those today."
From CNN Politics
- 'Squad' drama frustrating some House Democrats July 18, 2019 12:57 pm
- DNC chair dismisses suggestion that 'the Squad' is liability for Democrats July 18, 2019 03:12 pm
- 'Send her back!' chant shows Trump's ugly plan to get reelected July 18, 2019 01:51 pm
- Crowd chants 'send her back' as Trump escalates attacks on Ilhan Omar and 'The Squad' July 18, 2019 01:46 pm
- GOP lawmaker: Chant at Trump rally 'would send chills down the spines of our Founding Fathers' July 18, 2019 03:15 pm
- 24 Democrats are running for president. Voters and donors like only five of them. July 18, 2019 10:01 am
Coburn didnt mind borrowing a few trillion for wars though.
The way I see it here's a chance for the wealthy GOP to do something for the people they screwed: foot the bill. You guys brag every other day about how much money you're raking in from donors. Stop talking Christian and DO something Christian for a change: FOOT THE BILL!!
Same old Republicans. Willing to spend billions to help Iraq, but not a dime to help Americans.
Why won't the democrats shift $10 billion from wasteful corrupt spending to pay these UNEMPLOYMENT benefits? The nation certainly doesn't need anymore debt. Would they have to give up some of their corrupt earmarks to actually pay for the benefits instead of just borrowing or printing the money?
OMG Democrats! Come to your senses! We do NOT have the money, and that means no more spending increases. Yes, the Almighty Government has to follow the rules too, not just us peasants and serfs. If you want to spend more on unemployment, you MUST cut elsewhere. No excuses.
When It Comes To Tax Cuts For The Rich, Decrying War, Misrepresenting The Truth And Various Other Talking Points. Republicans Are All Chips In!
I am unemployed. I have worked for thirty years, my office closed. I have applied for work to about 150 different companies without being hired. I have a college education. I ran out of benefits march 27th. I do not know if I will eat, have electricity, water, or gas to go to an interview if I should get so lucky to have another one, or if I will lose my house. We need help just like the banks got, we do buy, and we do stimulate the economy, Republicans need to be channeling their energy in finding us jobs and helping to create them, instead of worrying about Confederate Day. Please help us!!!
Does the party of NO's present????
So true: Repubs condone bank bailouts and no-WMDs' war costs but oppose extending unemployment benefits for the workers. Who is the elite they so often criticize? They feel they are.
What about offsetting the cost of unnecessary wars...where are they then?
Will unemployment become the next welfare?
I know tons of people on unemployment, who truly can not find work.
And I feel for them. What are we going to do here?
Tom Coburn:
Money for a war we were lied into...check
Money for tax cuts for the rich...check
Money for the lower and middle class to put food the table because of an unemployment disaster he helped create. Nope.
Calling it courage to hold these benefits up while a single mother of two children go hungry tonight...check.
Numbers show that these are the people who win back the House. Get use to more of shafting the middle and lower class.
Unemployment Benefits is Unemployment Insurance. We pay into the funds to use in hardship and emergency. The Republicans are obstructionist. Vote no, for the party of No.
What happened to pay as you go?
Does anyone remember Coburn complaining about republican deficit spending? I didn't hear any complaints from him about Bush's spending.
SITUATIONAL conservatism anyone?
You should have gotten a handle on it when Bush kept giving the rich tax breaks. Everybody on unemployment gets less than $400 a week. Take some of congress' benefits and help the real people who got absolutely nothing during Bush's 8 years.
without benefits, crime will increase 100 percent what parent
will allow their children to be with out food and shelter. with the
amount of a benefit check it only covers the essentials. we need to pray that the senate will pass the extension and show a little empathy
they may be wearing the unemployed shoes one day.
Fight? The republicans don't care about the middle class unemployed. Heck, they constructed the policies that put the middle class into bankruptcy.