April 13th, 2010
03:00 PM ET
5 years ago

Gingrich: 'You can't govern by saying no'

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Tuesday that having a positive agenda in 2010 could help Republicans win the White House back in 2012.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Tuesday that having a positive agenda in 2010 could help Republicans win the White House back in 2012.

Washington (CNN) – As Republicans begin to prepare in earnest for this year's midterm elections, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is again challenging his party to do more than oppose Democratic initiatives.

Instead, Gingrich told a gathering of conservative bloggers at The Heritage Foundation Tuesday that the GOP should develop a positive agenda for 2010 that can carry Republicans through to the next presidential election in 2012.

Rather than running from 'the party of no' label developed by Democrats as a talking point against congressional Republicans, some Republicans have embraced the idea of resisting the priorities of the White House and the Democratically-controlled Congress as the midterms inch closer.

"There is no shame in being the party of no if [Democrats are] proposing an idea that violates our values, violates our conscience, violates our Constitution," former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said last week at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference. But, speaking at the same event, Gingrich offered a very different vision. "There are many things that we can say yes to," he told his fellow Republicans.

Asked about the split between himself and Palin, Gingrich said Tuesday that running only on opposition to the Democrats may result in success later this year, but doing so would leave the GOP without a clear road map for how to wield the levers of government should they regain control of Congress.

"You can't govern by saying no," the former House Speaker said.

"Imagine we won a huge victory [in November]. Imagine that John Boehner's the new [House] Speaker. Imagine that Mitch McConnell is the new [Senate] Majority Leader. What's their agenda? It can't just be yelling no."

Citing unemployment, energy policy, and the size and scope of the government, Gingrich added that "there are a hundred questions that are real," when it comes to what the Republican agenda would be if they recaptured control of Capitol Hill.

Gingrich also opined that having a positive agenda now would help Republicans in the next White House race.

"If you run in '12, you want to win a re-affirming election, in which people actually vote for something," he said.

Citing Ronald Reagan's victory in 1980 and Republicans' success in the 1994 midterms, Gingrich said it was important to offer "solutions not just ideology."

And, referring to the GOP's victory in 1994, Gingrich said, "We did not have a contract against Bill Clinton. We had a 'Contract with America.' We stood for welfare reform, we stood for tax cuts, we stood for a balanced budget."

Asked to name what he sees as the top issues for a positive Republican agenda, Gingrich mentioned creating jobs, balancing the federal budget, developing an energy policy that reduces dependence on foreign suppliers, and reforming the educational system.


Filed under: 2010 • 2012 • GOP • Newt Gingrich
soundoff (81 Responses)
  1. Peter E

    Let's see... Republican plans fro the economy so far: 16 pages, (double spaced of course) half of which were stolen from Obama's plan. Republican plans for health care reform: 3 pages of bullet points, including the title page, most of which were, once again, stolen from the Obama plan. Yeah, I think republicans have a clear plan for America: producing empty bullet points with ideas stolen from your opponents.

    April 13, 2010 04:36 pm at 4:36 pm |
  2. Sean

    It's about time someone from the right showed enough courage to point out the obvious and demand something more. I'm offended by the current Republican strategy of "just say no", because the only ones who really get hurt by it are the American people. We need the government to be solving our problems, not grinding to a halt simply because one party thinks it will afford them political leverage.

    April 13, 2010 04:36 pm at 4:36 pm |
  3. Chessnutz of Liverpool NY

    I know how to say "No" as well and I say no more Neo Conservatives in the people's government!
    I'll never vote for any GOP person who is not a conservative Libertarian.
    I'll vote for blue dog democrat before I will ever vote Neo Con!

    April 13, 2010 04:38 pm at 4:38 pm |
  4. djdjdjs

    The party of NO is Staying the Course Newt.

    Just two weeks ago repubs vowed to NOT work with this President and the rest of Congress on future bills.

    Stay the course, or they'll be calling you a RINO.

    No flip flopping now.

    April 13, 2010 04:38 pm at 4:38 pm |
  5. Jilli

    "Imagine we won a huge victory [in November]. Imagine that John Boehner's the new [House] Speaker. Imagine that Mitch McConnell is the new [Senate] Majority Leader"

    Oh Lord, that's even scarier the the financial meltdown we just endured. I can't think of anything worse for this country right now than Boehner and McConnell running the show.

    April 13, 2010 04:38 pm at 4:38 pm |
  6. Limbaugh is a liberal

    Yes, we sure prefer republican plans over just a straight-out saying of no... Just like in 2006 when democrats swept the House and overtook the Senate because the republican plans were sooo much better than the democrats' NO. Um... What was that NO again? Sounds awesome. I just have very recent memories of where republican 'plans' lead...

    April 13, 2010 04:39 pm at 4:39 pm |
1 2 3 4