Nuclear energy lobbyists scramble on Capitol Hill
March 14th, 2011
07:19 PM ET
4 years ago

Nuclear energy lobbyists scramble on Capitol Hill

Washington (CNN) - Lobbyists for the nuclear energy industry rushed to Capitol Hill Monday to try to reassure members of Congress and their aides who are deeply concerned about the nuclear crisis in Japan, and what it could mean for nuclear energy in the U.S.

As he walked the halls of Congress going from meeting to meeting, Alex Flint, a top lobbyist for the Nuclear Energy Institute, told CNN that the industry's immediate goal was to give worried lawmakers as much information as possible.

"We're trying to make sure people understand exactly what's occurring - understand the context under which they're going to be making decisions in the future about the way in which the Congress wants to treat nuclear energy," Flint told CNN.

Flint was careful not to sound like he was trying to pressure Congress at such a sensitive time, but there is no question he and other industry representatives are working to prevent support for nuclear power from unraveling on Capitol Hill.

Flint's first afternoon stop was a meeting he helped arrange with Senate Energy and Commerce Chairman Jeff Bingaman, D-New Mexico, a supporter of nuclear energy, for aides to all senators and Senate committees.

In a sign of the intense interest, some 150 Senate aides showed up for the briefing to hear from representatives of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's lobbying arm, and Exelon, the Chicago-based owner of the largest group of U.S. nuclear power plants.

Later, they repeated the same briefing for aides to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the House Appropriations Committee.

Bipartisan support for nuclear power has been growing in recent years, as lawmakers look for alternative energy sources.

The crisis in Japan threatens to reverse strides the nuclear industry was making in getting financial and policy support from Congress for new nuclear power plants.

During the closed-door question-and-answer session, industry representatives handed out an 11-page information packet, obtained by CNN, which was clearly designed to quell concerns.

"Given the safety record in this country...we believe that public support for nuclear power should not decline dramatically," reads the industry prepared packet.

Despite the push, already senators who have long championed nuclear energy in the United States were voicing concern.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Connecticut, told CNN he believes it’s best to "slow things down" with regard to the permitting process for new nuclear power plants in the United States, until more information is known about the situation in Japan.

Sen. Lisa Murkowksi, R-Alaska, said she hopes nuclear energy in the U.S. is not in jeopardy, but isn’t so sure.

"We're all watching the situation in Japan with a great deal of concern about what Mother Nature has wrought not only to the country of Japan but perhaps just how nuclear is viewed in the world," said Murkowksi, as she raced to her own meeting about the crisis.

Flint is pushing hard to keep congressional supporters from turning their backs on nuclear power.

"We have a lot of support from politicians in both parties right now. They all have questions - they've been watching the news," Flint told CNN, "whether they’re changing their mind, whether there are issues we need to address, this is a two way conversation."

As Flint moved from congressional meeting to meeting, word came that top Democrats called for an investigation of the safety of U.S. nuclear power plants.

Without missing a beat, Flint said that was to be expected, and insisted the industry would welcome a probe of safety.

To be sure, Flint is getting help from powerful lawmakers who are not wavering.

"I would hope leaders here would not try to take advantage on an opportunity to demagogue an issue and appeal to the worst, appeal to the fears in people," Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Arizona, told CNN.

By the end of the day, Flint and other leading representatives of the nuclear industry had met with hundreds of people on Capitol Hill - mostly congressional aides.

It helps that Flint used to be the staff director for the Senate Energy and Commerce Committee.

He says that gives him a better understanding of how Congress works. It also gets his phone calls returned and gets him in the door, as he begins what he says will be a long process of convincing lawmakers not to give up on nuclear energy in the United States, as they and their constituents watch the horrific images coming from Japan.


Filed under: Congress
soundoff (28 Responses)
  1. jow

    "Senate Energy and Commerce Committee?" that;s a new one

    March 15, 2011 01:21 am at 1:21 am |
  2. gardiananj

    We need to reconsider our fears of nuclear reactors! First,compare the number of people killed from all nuclear accidents including Chernoble, to the number killed from all Petroleum Energy production. My estimate is less than 1%. Compare the pollution from nuclear energy to the pollution from petroleum energy, again my estimate is less than 1% (remember Exxon Valdez and the latest BP Gulf oil fiasco?) And remember that nuclear radiation is the same as radiation from the sun, the same as "Visible Light". It is very short term, it isn't stored in fat & bone tissue, like the heavy molecular weight hydrocarbon "Carcenagens" from petroleum. I am not a conspiracy theorist, and I don't believe the Oil & Gas industry is subverting Nuclear energy, rather they are just letting our own fears dictate the market, and our fears are overblown and out of proportion because of the awesome power of Nuclear Bombs we associate with Nuclear Reactors. thanks gardiananj

    March 15, 2011 07:12 am at 7:12 am |
  3. Anonymous

    Fewer nukes and more green energy. It's time to move into the future and stop desperately clinging to the failures of the past.

    March 15, 2011 07:28 am at 7:28 am |
1 2