Washington (CNN) - In a mostly party line vote, Republicans voted 228 to 192, to strip National Public Radio of all federal funding.
The standalone measure, introduced Tuesday by Colorado Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn, bars any of NPR's affiliate radio stations across the country from using any federal funds to purchase any programming from NPR. The vote is a victory for Lamborn, who tried unsuccessfully to strip federal funding for NPR last year.
According to NPR's website, it provides content to 900 independent stations, reaching 27.2 million listeners every week.
An analysis done by the House Democratic minority reported some 414 stations which provide 7,800 jobs in 280 congressional districts would be affected should the cuts go through.
Seven Republicans did vote against the measure, and one member voted present.
Democrats tried unsuccessfully to get a majority of House members to oppose the measure, and at least one member used parliamentary inquiries to try to stall a vote. Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner, New York, jumped on Republicans for allegedly breaking their own rules during debate on the measure.
First, he objected to consideration of the bill saying it violated a Republican-imposed House rule, "which requires 72 hour layover of the bill and it to be electronically noticed in order for it to be considered by the House." He then held up a sign with a quote from House Speaker John Boehner and read aloud, "I will not bring a bill to the floor that hasn't been posted online for at least 72 hours."
Republican Rep. Ted Poe, Texas, who was sitting in the chair, responded that the rule is not predicated on a number of hours, "but rather on a number of calendar days." He said that since the measure had been electronically available online since Tuesday that would constitute three calendar days, thus not breaking any rules.
When that didn't work, Weiner returned to the floor Thursday afternoon and tried to shame his Republican colleagues into voting against the bill. He mockingly thanked Republicans for calling an, "emergency session," to eliminate funding for popular programs like "Car Talk."
"Crisis averted, ladies and gentlemen," he said. "I'm glad we got the economy back going. I'm so glad we secured our nuclear power plants. So glad Americans are back to work. We discovered a target we can all agree upon. It's these guys. This is the problem. - it's Click and Clack." Weiner had a poster of the show's hosts Tom and Ray Maggliozzi (who refer to themselves as Click and Clack) over his shoulder while speaking.
Cartalk is a weekend entertainment program that offers advice to listeners on things like car repairs, and sometimes personal dilemmas.
Weiner joked, "Now, let's look at the record here. For one, they talk in that Boston accent. "Car Talk." It's car, congressmen. Second, they talk about master cylinders. It's kinky. I am glad my Republican friends are finally getting to the bottom of this."
Weiner then took a final jab at his Republican colleagues saying, he was sure that getting rid of "Car Talk" was in their 2010 campaign promises.
"All of these guys that finally are going to be taken off the public payroll. The Republican party, no one can say they are not in touch. They get it. They understand where the American people are. The American people are not concerned about the economy around the world. They're staring at their radio station saying, 'Get rid of Click and Clack,'" Weiner said.
From CNN Politics
© 2011 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| Advertising practices | Advertise with us | About us | Contact us | Work for us | Help
That's funny!
The RIDICULOUS GOP will continue to pander to the MEGA RICH, OIL COMPANIES and Corporations with billions in profits while PUTTING THE BOOTS to the MIDDLE CLASS. BTW CROOKS, WHERE ARE THE JOBS?
If they pull funding for NPR they'll be fundraising for twelve months a year rather than the eleven they already do...
"It is time for us to remove the federal support system ... and see what NPR can do on (its) own."
Translation: The conservatives want it dead if it's not going to be beholden to the corporate advertising revenue that is now the arbiter of truth, relevance and legitimacy at every single other "news" media outlet.
Gee, I wonder why conservatives don't like the absence of that influence?
And this is based on another Fox exclusive of two hours of tape edited to a few minutes. First the republicans declared war on the unemployed and we said nothing. Then it was Hispanics and we said nothing. Then women's rights, seniors, veterans, teachers, policemen, government workers, firemen, unions, and then they began to chip away at public broadcasting. Even a right wingnut who champions smaller government has to see the hypocrisy. The GOP battle plan appears to be modeled after Hitler and Stalin.
Let's see. If congress voted to reduce their pay by 8% like they are asking poor and middle class workers to do. If they voted to pay for their own insurance and not take it with them when they leave. I will never support another republican as long as I live....well maybe my county sheriff, his deputy's love him on both sides of the isle.
We all going to listen to popular doctorines of mr. rush l, that what they want. Bravo republicans. I wish you could stop funding formedicare, afaghnstan war, bush tax cuts, oil company subsidies...... . Love u
GOP stop playing politics. I can't wait for 2012 when you find out how much Ameiricans disagree with your petty nonsense.
Won't pass in the Senate so whatev. GOP = American Taliban
The lying dispicable GOP fear the Truth that NPR reports – that's what the entire issue is – keeping the truth from the public. Shameful shameful shameful – but that's Republicans in America for you. They don't care about truth, or helping ordinary people – only about helping the already wealthy and making sure corporations have their interests met. This is what is passing for America these days.
Thats right the Democrats would rather cut Medicare or Social Security than funding for NPR (aka Liberal mouthpiece.)
Republicans hate NPR because reality has a liberal bias.
Looks like the house is simply advertising who they are afraid of. And it turns out to be a spineless punk activist kid with a video camera and an agenda. Ironic that he's calling NPR biased...
All i have to say to these GOP (spineless frightened rabbits) in congress is, You are now 100% OWNED by the tea party. Time to bow to your new masters.
Bravo. Why not call this the " Juan Williams-cry me a river because I violated my job description with the people who plucked me from obscurity-Bill"? This is a piece of meaningless political theater from the people who promised us a " laser-like focus" on Jobs: where the hell are they?
The GOP knows this will go nowhere, so why waste our time and money on this meaningless crap?
"...a longtime target of conservatives irritated by what they consider the outlet's liberal bias...."
Actually, NPR is quite balanced. The problem is one of perspective. The leadership of our country has tilted so far to the batsh!t crazy right over the last 30 years, that anyone left of Ted Nugent is considered a socialist by the right-wingers and their ignorant followers. What used to be called the center is now called the left. Ask a citizen of just about any other country on earth and they'll point out that there is no left-wing in America any more. Keep voting for corporatist schmucks and enjoy your stagnant wages and rising healthcare costs, suckers.
Sweet!!!! Why should the American taxpayer pay for a one sided liberal radio station anyway? If their programming is so good, then they should be able to stand on their own and maybe start making a profit (gasp!). Yes I said it libs. Maybe along with donations, the National People's Radio can start making money from advertising and compete in the markets like all other radio stations.
This is a free country with free speech and freedom to assemble, share information and ideas of all types. At least that is what it once was until the Republicans ruled. Now it is only Republican ideals or nothing. A radio station should not be penalized for the comments or opinions of its employees and neither should an organization such as Planned Parenthood, particularly when obtained in a covert – disguised operation like the Nazi SS might conduct. This is nothing more than trying to get rid of liberal institutions. The Republican agenda is simply get rid of everything – attack everything. They are creating a nation on attack against itself, its institutions and its own people. We once prided ourselves in our diversity. The nation was built on diversity. They attack liberals, moderates or anyone even remotely liberal, whether it be in media, our schools and universities, unions and labor, the middle class. Be white and Christian and by all means we must all have guns of whatever nature or kind. Around the world people are fighting and dying for democracy and civil rights and our country is taking away those rights. If this is how it will be then similarly, all funding to conservative organizations should also be withdrawn.
a NPR fundraising executive ...saying public radio would be better off without federal money.
_____________________________________________________________________________
And every Democrat in the House voted to keep funding these Bozo's?!?!? The Democrats just thumbed their noses up at every American taxpayer. This is Washington Federal Government at its worst.
Go ahead and pull the funding. It cannot have any effect on the truth, and thatis what the Conservatives can't deal with that becasue they are on the wrong side of it most of the time.
Why do they waste time on bills like this? I wonder how much tax payer money Republican house members spend in their attempt to look like they are saving tax dollars. I would really like to see a news organization research how much money is required for staffing, overhead and other expenses involved in getting a bill through the house. Something tells me those tea partiers might find out the more they spend the less they save.
The world needs to wake up to change and recognize the abundance of news outlets qualified to provide every angle and opinion both right, left and in the middle to satisfy every persons values. When there were limited outlets for news, NPR made sense. Not anymore. Not with Public funds. Go Private NPR and join the NEW media way and survive on merit not hand outs.
I have a real problem with the concept of a "government funded news orginzation". Reminds me of Pravda and Tass from the old Soviet Union.
If NPR is as wonderful as many people contend, then it will have no problem competing in the marketplace.
@ Four and the Door....
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF, BUB! I am an American taxpayer and I LIKE NPR and have no problem having my tax dollars help fund it. So when you want to talk about EVERY AMERICAN TAX PAYER....you should say all the right wing tax payers that don't support things like NPR or PBS. There are people in the nation that still can think for themselves, unlike many of you on the far right.
Since the GOBP wants to go after NPR, why not go after Rush Limbaugh and his hate speech. You can't play both sides of the fence just because popular opinion doen not swing in your favor.
So the Repubs believe NPR is an outlet for Dems and Liberal Indies... NPR produces so much more than political agendas and opinions. As a listener to NPR, which produces the MacNeill/Lehrer Report, I find it that show (Radio as well as TV) to be neutral. Striking down NPR for bias promotion is unfair.
If you look at the so called "regular news", these stations are ran, funded and managed by huge corporations that have shareholders ties, $$$ gained from bias news... (Disney, GE, Viacomm, Murdoch Mogul Enterprises).
Shameful times we live in.
confused,
yes, you are.
Surely GOPers have more important issues to address than NPR funding? It's not as if GOPers aren't being represent by a whole host of public officials . . . including those within their own taxpayer paid political caucuses within Congress itself? Should we also defund members of Congress whom we don't agree with politically?
Let's call a spade a spade. The GOBP have now been in Congress for 3 months and have not issued one bill that is directed towards creating jobs. And if giving tax breaks to the wealthy is their idea of creating jobs, then we've already proven that's a failed agenda. I di dnot hear one single ConservaFascists campaign on defundin NPR. All I recall is JOBS. The GOBP agenda since be elected back into power is strictly POLITICAL. They do not care about JOBS.
Face it, NPR is just like Air America, it can’t compete on the open market without a government subsidy.
@ Captain Awesome: How do you like the fact the number 2 investor at FOX is a member of the Saudi Royal Family? Are you happy knowing the Washington Times is owned by the head of a cult? You think that has no impact on who they cover? The advertisers for them certainly impact content. NPR plucked a lot of people like Juan Williams and Charles Krauthammer from obscurity and gave them a national audience. They have always tried to maintain a balance, and by and large they have succeeded. Its too bad the truth is not always biased in the Right's favor, but thats just the way things go. As for O'Keefe's sting, do you really think he has that much credibility after trying the stunt with the CNN reporter this year, and illegally entering a federal building to try and wiretap a Senate office? He's a arrogant punk kid on a power trip, who delights in destroying people, a right-wing Julian Assange.
Think a little.
Time's ticking. In Nov 2012, they will be sent packing in droves. America has had it with the Taliban known as the GOP. Freedom of speech is only OK if one is GOP in their eyes. Can't wait to see them become the extinct party starting in 2012.
Once again where are the job creating bills and plans Rethugs?
I'm all for it, just as soon as we end government support for oil companies, corporate farmers (and subsidies like those supporting Michelle Bachman!), and tax breaks for the wealthy. Come on, people. Fair is fair. No Republican talking about saving money and balancing the budget should be taken seriously until they start TAXING THE RICH! Taxing rich people is what made America great, and will make us great once again. If only our representatives could stop sucking on the corporate campaign money-tits long enough to use their brains and do what's right for all of us! We should outlaw all political contributions from corporations and limit the amount of personal contributions to get the money-grubbers under control.
Captain Awesome
"Sweet!!!! Why should the American taxpayer pay for a one sided liberal radio station anyway? If their programming is so good, then they should be able to stand on their own and maybe start making a profit (gasp!). Yes I said it libs. Maybe along with donations, the National People's Radio can start making money from advertising and compete in the markets like all other radio stations."
I'll make a deal with you, Captain, We'll pull funding for NPR when you agree to end subsidies for the oil and agricultural industries and let them stand on their own in the free market.
Should've been done along time ago. I would rather MY tax dollars go toward gov't operations, than opinion based anti-american rhetoric. That money will be re-approriated towards something of worth.
If they used the Okeefe video as a reason for it then the Republicans have once again passed a Bill of Attainder and have broken law. They did it when they defunded Acorn, now with NPR. Why don't the Dems stop being such huge pussies and make them involve the DOJ. Then they can get their asses handed to them when Okeefes video, ONCE AGAIN, is shown to be a complete farce.
NPR is fills a niche in radio broadcasting. Where else can you hear:
A seventeen part series on the mating habits of a duckbilled platypus.
Male radio commentators who all speak with a lisp.
A liberal viewpoint thinly disguised as objective reporting.
All right! This also means that NO ONE is allowed to watch FOX news because of it's ultra right-wing conservative bias that the nutjobs listen to!
Four and the door opens it's mouth and stupidity comes out.
oh, by the way, the good job numbers today are in spite of the Republicans.... name me one piece of legislation the Rep.s have introduced about JOBS. They haven't done diddly about what they ran on. Bait and switch Republican.
The Republicans will de-fund NPR stating we the taxpayer can no longer afford to help public radio due to our budget constraints and issues [To Quote Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado from this article, "With the national debt over $13 trillion, the government simply can't afford to fund non-essential services,…NPR can survive on its own." “We need to remove the taxpayer from the equation."]; however, the Republicans cannot come to grips with the billions and billions of dollars that the US Taxpayer subsidizes the Oil and Gas industries. Where are their respective cuts, thus saving the US taxpayers billions in savings?? This smacks of cronyism and hypocrisy!
" opinion based anti-american rhetoric"
Spoke like someone, like most of the imbeciles saying this crap, who truly hasn't listened to one godd-mn second of NPR.
The only reason CNN and the rest aren't defending NPR on this is because they're already beholden to corporate advertising dollars and it woul dbe anathema for them to support an information institution that isn't. I'd love the see the memos from the ad execs at CNN about how this should all be spun.
You're all fools! We are out of money! The golden goose is dead. Thank GOD (oh my did he just say God? I hope i offended at least half of you oh yeah MERRY CHRISTMAS Too) Why should people pay money to the government for services they don't use, want or even qualify for? The reason the oil companies keep getting rich is because we keep making the USD weaker and oil goes up. Thank those jackasses in the whitehouse for that. No one wants to loan us money any more. I bet most of you don't even pay taxes (48% Don't). Time for Americans to take responsability for their own actions and pay your own way. If you are unable to work we will help you out, but if you are between 18-55 and healthy enough to work and you are on welfare or food stamps the free ride is over. We don't care if you don't like the jobs that are out there (there are jobs out there.. your president says so... isn't that what the bailouts were for so unemployment didn't go over 8%? another lie from your Pres.) Personally i don't like my job, I haven't drawn a paycheck in months but i still pay my employees on time every week.
You do realize this is just political grandstanding by republicans. They would not have voted for this bill if they thought it would actually pass through the senate. They need to keep federal funds going to NPR because that's the only way they can censore the program. Once federal money stops, NPR can do whatever it wants. Republicans don't actually want that to happen.
And it says a lot about the so-called 'fiscal conservatives' that they waste days grand-standing on a laughable $40 million instead of using those same days to come up with ACTUAL, SUBSTANTIAL budget cuts. Oh right, the last time they tried that they realized they cannot even come up with $100 billion to cut because most of the rest of discretionary funding goes to their base: corporate subsidies, oil subsidies, tax cuts for the rich, farm subsidies. And of course they wouldn't dare anger seniors by cutting Social Security or Medicare.
They know they are stuck, and that's why they waste time grand-standing on such small cuts. It's just a delaying tactic because they have no idea how to actually tacle the budget.
@Nunya: operations like, say, funding James O'Keefe? You forget that many conservatives first gained a anational audence thatks to NPR and PBS. Remember that when you look up William F. Buckley and "Firing Line".
I really don't like republicans and all that they stand for
I wonder if many of you that want NPR defunded have even ever listened to it. I bet most of you have NOT and are just going by what you're being told by your right wing brethen. But never fear..if there is any justice in the world this bill will die in the Senate as it well should. Then perhaps O'Keefe can go undercover and spy on a right wing organization and report on it for a change. He claimed in an interview that he WOULD, but I seriously doubt it.
Moreover, it's noteworthy that despite all the claims of bias from the right wing loony-bin, the evidence of any existing bias was so absent from the public record throughout NPR's history that instead of citing myriad examples of it from particular shows...including fact-based arguments as to why there was actual bias...they had to send in a hatchet man to scam the place in hopes of getting enough film to chop up that he could piece together something that misrepresented NPR wholesale. 11 minute video out of 2 HOURS of tape that, when taken in totality, shows there's nothing biased whatsoever about what was going on....yep, that's a solid foundation...all that is needed in the Congressional record to condemn NPR and undo several decades of beneficial policy.
And now O'Keefe is trying to ham up that Soros donates to NPR...yeah, for projects like an informative special on issues in central asia or criminal justice....soooooo nefarious. I'm just suprised we haven't seen any of the astroturf alliance blabbering that obviously vapid talking point yet.
Wow! So if my tax dollars go to something I disagree with I can demand government stop funding it? So, when we cut NPR's funding, each person in the US gets what? A little more than a dime back? How about we stop funding our continued presence in Iraq? The majority of the public wants that money back! We would get over a hundred dollars back each, every year!
But I guess it's more important to cut funding for NPR, a radio that has less than 5% politically-related programs, and actually balances issues. But of course, conservatives were not outraged when NPR also hosted far-right wing Christian pastors who were speaking out against gays or muslims! THAT was okay to air on NPR?
The GOP must think I'm dumb as they look. Where are the jobs?
**cricket sounds, tumbleweed, and wind**
I thought it was all aboput jobs, jobs, jobs. Since this will never become law, it is irrelevant, but seems to me that if it did, this would result in many people losing their jobs. GOP hipocracy, at best.