Des Moines, Iowa (CNN) - Top Iowa Republicans, facing the very real possibility that Ron Paul could win the state caucuses on January 3, are defending their state's first-in-the-nation status against charges of irrelevancy.
Many GOP leaders consider Paul unelectable and his nomination an impossibility. So they're getting ready to dismiss the Iowa results–and that makes Gov. Terry Branstad predictably mad.
In an interview with CNN, the Iowa Republican governor tried to finesse the significance of any Paul victory.
“It's who comes in second and who comes in third as well as who comes in first. And if somebody else does surprisingly well, it could well launch their campaign. It's happened before. So you don't necessarily have to win in Iowa, but you do need to be in the top three to be in contention going forward," Branstad said.
Republicans in the state do say Paul has the best organization of any of the contenders. In fact, one senior Iowa Republican said the congressman has taken a page out of President Barack Obama's playbook by energizing new people to participate - with a special focus on young voters.
Paul, who returns to the state on Wednesday for several days of campaigning, has an appealing message that may sound oddly familiar: Washington needs dramatic change, especially on the economic front. He pledges to cut $1 trillion out of the federal budget during his first year in office.
"I think what it says is that the voters in Iowa are looking for a dramatic change and recognize that the country is clearly going in the wrong direction. Ron Paul has the biggest plan, best plan, or at least the most, uh, comprehensive plan to reduce the federal debt. And that's the number one issue in Iowa. And he has a plan that would reduce federal spending by a trillion dollars in the first year. That's a dramatic, radical, change," Branstad said.
Several Republicans acknowledged that Paul's foreign policy stances–including pushing minimum engagement for the U.S. overseas–has dampened some support for him.
Also see:
Bachmann: I'm not a politician, don't even know how to be one
Romney, on Letterman show, jokes about hair, Newt Gingrich
Perry: Romney and Gingrich backed the 'biggest act of theft in American history'
From CNN Politics
© 2011 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
| Advertising practices | Advertise with us | About us | Contact us | Work for us | Help
I hope he wins and it shows how stupid the American primary voter is when we have separate primaries or caucuses.
Primary elections should be just as the General elections, they should be held on one day for both parties at the same time and with no restriction who anyone could vote for other than for one candidate in one party.
That way the All the American people have a say in who will be the nominee for their party of choice and of course the person of their choice instead of a few voters who have little choice as the campaigns go on and we have people like the Koch brothers and others buying elections of their puppets.
"Several Republicans acknowledged that Paul's foreign policy stances–including pushing minimum engagement for the U.S. overseas–has dampened some support for him." I wish someone could show me how all of these endless wars has improved our countries defense? I see a country that is tired of war and BANKRUPT because of them!
Ron Paul 2012!!!
Ron Paul is such a phony – claims to be a liberatarian while advocating that the government force women to continue unwanted pregnancies against their will. This is government tyranny.
It's the only time those hick farmers get any attention. Do they represent the REAL people in the rest of the country? NO
Iowa and Ron Paul have been left behind by a dynamic, interconnected, and rapidly transitioning world. The politics and ideology of the 1950s are no longer relevant – just like the state and this candidate.
The Iowa Straw Polls have almost always proved to be meaningless - as they did again this year. The caucuses are equally easily influenced by individual politicians "buying" the votes. They are generally also meaningless.
As someone who plans on participating in the Iowa Caucuses, I will do so in support of Ron Paul.
As a political Independent, who voted for Barack Obama in 2008, Ron Paul has the best plan to restore the Federal Government's Constitution; cut welfare and warfare, restore civil liberties and end the Fed Reserve Bank's influence on our currency!
Question: What other modern "democracy" has two-party rule anywhere else in the world?
The sad thing is that Paul is the only Republican who really makes sense. Of the rest of the pack. some are religious nuts, some are authoritarian statists, some are jingoistic war-mongers, most are some combination of the above, and some are all of the above. The only good thing that can be said about most Republicans is that they at least make the right noises about keeping the Democrats from reducing the country to an abject welfare state and spending it i(further) nto bankruptcy.
Some Iowans seem to think that what happens in Iowa will determine he general election. I'd say, don't discount the other 49 states just yet.
To Ron Paul supporters, I did not vote in the last two presidential elections. But, I am now voting for Dr. Ron Paul. Before, I felt that picking between the two parties was like having to pick between the devil, and the son of the devil – the Democrats, and the Republicans. Honestly, I see both sides as being absolute traitors, to the American taxpayers. Anyway, 50% of Americans do not vote. I say, we need to reach out to these people, who are undecided, or disillusioned with Big Gov. Getting their vote is even more important than trying to change the minds of people, who are already deeply entrenched in their views. Talk to those who have lost all faith in politics. Explain how Dr. Paul is fearlessly taking on Big Gov. with all it's corruption, overspending, and backroom deals. Explain how he is fighting for the average American, and working to expose Big Gov's deeply embedded corruption, when no one else will. If we can each change just one undecided person's mind, and make sure that they get to the polls, we can win! Imagine if we each doubled, or tripled, our votes, by reaching out to the other 50%!!!
How hilarious. If the winner in Iowa has no relevance ergo Iowa has no relevance.
Oh look – a man with a brain might actually get elected to something, for the first time in living memory. Are we headed towards a meritocracy? Let's hope so: it's about time...
America Needs Ron Paul.
Ron Paul has had consistent policy positions from the start. The other candidates simply say what the voters want to hear. Ron Paul warned us about the housing bubble, the debt crisis, the collapse of the US dollar, the high employment and recessions; basically, the entire collapse of our economy. He is the only candidate who can get us out of our mess.
Ron Paul is a man who defends the constitution, civil liberties, peace and prosperity. Paul has the wisdom, foresight, honesty and integrity to be president.
Mitt Romney does not where he stands on any issue; Michelle Bachmann is just very angry; Rick Perry does not know very much; John Huntsman has worked for Democrats for many years; Rick Santorum is an extremist; and Newt Gingrich is philosophically unanchored, an unstable element, whom as Peggy Noonan, former Reagan speechwriter writes is a “human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, Watch this!”.
America Needs Ron Paul.
The problem I have with Ron Paul is that he is an idealist that hasn't realized that this isn't an ideal world. He also seems to be an isolationist. It makes me wonder if he would have faced the communists during the cold war or the Nazis in WWII. I wonder if he really understands that the constitution has a section for Congress that is allowed to make new laws as the times demand. That includes things like unemployment insurance and food stamps.
Wow – If he gets the votes in Iowa, it's the VOTERS that are deciding!!! So now the establishment is going against what the voters want. What a shame! What a MESS these TeaPublicans are in!!!
Whew, President Obama can just sit back and relax for a moment and enjoy the circus!!!
So would this GOP Establishment call the Iowa caucuses irrelevant if Gingrich was going to win? or Romney? They are bascially saying the will of the people of Iowa is irrelevant! People should literally be up in arms about this!!! The Republican party is hijacking Democracy!!
So, if the status quo is interrupted at all, there are charges of irrelevancy? Wouldn't that indicate the exact opposite? For those of you in Iowa or anywhere else, who are undecided, let me ask you to look past the name-calling and take a look at the candidate. Look at what he says, what he has said for years, his voting record, and the way he conducts himself. Draw your own logical conclusions. If you determine that Ron Paul is not for you, then at least you have done so in a rational way. I did this 4 years ago, and have been a supporter of Ron Paul ever since.
If the GOP is so mindless to not embrace the most conservative candidate then the GOP is lost
People will write his name in as a message to the establishment that has for too long hand picked their candidates. The establishment has created too many things that voters of both parties do not Want.
I'm not concerned when it comes to Ron Paul's foreign policy views. I am very concerned when it comes to NEOCONSERVATIVES foreign policy. Newt wants John Bolton (neocon) to be part of his administration and Romney has neocons advising him on foreign policy.
HAHAHaaa....Ron Paul has the GOP running scared! GO RON! He is the change we desperately need in this country
Ron Paul is going to win Iowa! I just met him in Exeter, NH tonight at a town hall meeting. The place was packed! Go Ron Paul!
I want Ron to win Iowa just so I can see all the 24hr media hacks from Fox to CNN try to brush it off like its meaningless.
The media has favorites .. Stop watching and go read.
LOL – The only thing irrelevant is the MAINSTREAM MEDIA! The self proclaimed elite in Madison Avenue board rooms actually think us REAL AMERICANS care what they think! What a pack of schmucks – how dare they attempt to bully the grassroots of Iowa “If Ron Paul wins – you are irrelevant”. The good people in this Republic need to completely destroy these mainstream media thugs where it hurts – in their profits and losses! Turn your sets OFF and leave this bunch of losers left talking to themselves!!
WE WON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN!!
RON PAUL 2012!!
This comes as no surprise to me.
The people currently in power do NOT want a Ron Paul sitting in the white house.
They are scared of his ability to say no to wasteful spending. They don't like that because they have all become shopaholics. Spend, spend, spend. Putting our grandchildren in debt. I'm sick of it, my inlaws are sick of it, my neighbors are sick of it, 90% of the folks at the coffee shop are sick of it.
We have lost control of congress. It is long past time to rein it in.
Ron Paul 2012 or the Chinese will start taking possession of US land to cover our debt.
Caucuses are a huge joke!
Why not let all the folks that want to vote, vote? By secret ballot the way elections should be held. You shouldn't have to explain to your judgmental neighbor why you support one candidate over another. In America it is actually none of their business!
Get real Iowa!
Why do we care what Iowa says. There are 49 more states. We're not tied to Iowa and from what I've heard from that state, I'm very glad.
Isn't this caucus Iowa's main claim to fame? Iowa loves being first in the nation with their caucus. And now, heaven forbid, someone they don't approve of may win. What to do? You should love Paul. He's planning to do away with lots of government stuff. The department of Education, even the government itself, farm subsidies, social security, medicare, on and on. He's full of good ideas.
typical AIPAC response; if they can't buy their candidate in by way of minipulating the media, which they control, they just use patsys like trump to spu unelectaility statements, and if that doesn't work, they just say we are taking our ball, and going home, after spending millions in Iowa, and in contrived debates to persuade the American people Romney is their guy, but the American people have spoken and honesty, integrity, the Constitution, wasteful spending have won in the form of Ron Paul..
too bad you folks aren't in china, you'd make perfect filters..isn't that the same as hackers..
Ron Paul will win despite the efforts of the liberal media, that means the American people win, not AIPAC, and their cry-babies
I think many Americans including Republicans are beginning to see the sense of Ron Paul's foreign policy as well as his economic policy. We can see in the news that our current policy of propping up dictators in other countries has led to problems like you now see in Egypt. We've been aiding Pakistan and now they are turning against us. Iraq was a failure and Afghanistan is going pretty bad too. The American people now realize they were lied to about WMD as a reason to go into Iraq, so many of them are questioning these threats about Iran. And Ron Paul is right about diplomacy ...it worked with JFK in the cuban missle crisis, so if we can earn the trust and respect this nation once held, we've got a good chance of living peacefully in this chaotic world.
Ron Paul might be energizing the young people with his economic policies, but we old tired people are really tired of war after war after war...especially when they are not declared by congress, they take so many lives unnecessarily and we can't afford them anymore. We are sacrificing the defense of our own country and our borders for the sake of ...well...WHAT? Somebody's mixed up philosophy in my opinion.
Ron Paul is doing well in the republican primaries, but he will do even better in the general election because all of those people who believed Obama's lies are now looking for somebody honest to give their vote too. Do you know anybody besides Ron Paul that fills the bill?
No Caucus should mean anything more than a straw poll. You have a process that allows very few people to spend their time moving form one candidate to another. This is neither fair or indicative of real choice.
In spite of media bias that can cut a candidates vote in half, Paul was still doing so well that in desperation the GOP elites are trying to scare Iowans into not voting for Paul by threatening irrelevance. They are rather sad. Let the voters choose!
See VoteYourHeart.US to learn more of how media Bias cost America $10 Trillion in debt.
Ron Paul WINS 2012 election in a landslide..... pundits headlines read "what does this mean?" "do we redo the elections now?" and "what is this Constitution people keep talking about?"
Is there anything he can do to get the news behind him.
The only reason they keep asking if he will run independent and not ask the others is because he is the only one that would have a chance if he did!
The warmonger establishment is getting nervous. Ron Paul will give Americans their money back and he will give Americans their country back! They can't handle the truth! RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!!!!
I have to say, for a guy who does good no many polls, it just seems like he has everything working against him BUT the voters. Isn't that odd? I won't vote for him. He switched his beliefs on abortion, lost my vote. I'd rather he stick to his libertarian guns.
Just another indicator that when the teapubs can't win by the rules, they just change them !
Doesn't matter what the 78 year old crazy wins in Iowa. He is NOT making it to the WH except on a tour!
Ok, so let me get this straight. Ron Paul energizes young people, independents, and is the most likely GOP candidate that a democrate would vote for, and somehow this is bad for the GOP?
I switched to the GOP just to vote for Ron Paul, if he is not the nominee, then I will not be able to support the GOP any longer. I like most Democrats for Ron Paul will most likely vote for a write in for Paul or vote for Obama.
The "GOP Leadership" should really consider how big the GOP could be with Ron Paul as the Candidate. I guess they are not serious about growing the party.
Republicans hate Paul because he is an ACTUAL conservative. Republicans claim they are conservative, but consistently increase the size of the government and constantly channel taxpayer money into bailouts and subsidies for their corporate buddies. Paul would make actual cuts to the government, even the pet programs republicans wanted to keep. Paul also recognizes the waste of money Americas constant medling in every country in the world brings us, all the while putting us further in debt and in the pockets of China. Republicans don't want to cut our military budget. (largely, because they are in the pockets of the private contractors to the military, who actually end up with a lot of that money)
No wonder republicans want to see Paul fail. They are afraid of actual conservatism.