Gingrich: Super PAC hypocrisy
December 21st, 2011
02:19 AM ET
2 years ago

Gingrich: Super PAC hypocrisy

Oskaloosa, Iowa (CNN) – Newt Gingrich pressed on White House rival Mitt Romney Tuesday to condemn super PACs from engaging in negative campaign tactics on a candidate’s behalf.

The independent expenditure committee in question, Restore Our Future, is spending millions on television, radio and mailer pamphlets supporting Romney and attacking the former House speaker.

Under the Supreme Court's  2010 Citizens United ruling, Super PACs can receive unlimited contributions as long as they do not coordinate with official campaigns. Gingrich assailed Romney who abdicated responsibility for Restore Our Future’s negative advertisements, saying he’s “not allowed to communicate with the super PAC in any way shape or form” in accordance with the law.

The former speaker dismisses that argument, telling reporters in Ottumwa, “I have a simple challenge for Gov. Romney. This PAC was created by his former staff and funded by his personal buddies. If he wants to stop it, he can say it publicly.”

A spokesman for the Romney campaign declined to comment.

Gingrich has his own super PAC, Winning Our Future run by former staffers, including spokesman Rick Tyler who defected from Gingrich’s campaign when a number of other staffers left in June. The former speaker insists if he wants to influence the pro-Gingrich super PAC he can do so legally through public statements.

“[Romney’s] super PAC is run by former staff with money given by his friends,” Gingrich said to Iowans gathered at Smokey Row Coffee House in Oskaloosa. “And I would simply suggest to all of you, if he can't influence his former staff and his friends how is he going to influence the Congress? How is he going to influence the Russians, the Chinese?”

Romney’s super PAC is planning on spending $1.4 million next week leading up to the first nominating contest on Jan. 3, according to Gingrich, which he claims is “more than we’ll spend in the whole campaign in terms of Iowa.”

“I don't object to being outspent. I object to lies. I object to negative smear campaigns, and I object to things that the candidate himself refuses to support,” Gingrich said, in Ottumwa, criticizing the former governor for disassociating himself from the independent super PAC that is producing negative ads on his behalf.

"(T)hese are his people doing his ads, doing his dirty work while he pretends to be a above it,” said Gingrich.

CNN’s Rachel Streitfeld contributed to this story.

You can follow Shawna Shepherd and Rachel Streitfeld on Twitter: @ShepherdCNN and @Streitfeld CNN.


Filed under: Uncategorized
soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. Donkey Party

    Newt is just tired of all his dirty laundry being aired. Pass the popcorn please...

    December 21, 2011 04:14 am at 4:14 am |
  2. Thomas

    Winning Our Future or Restore Our Future ?

    Who comes up with these catchy slogans , how many great thinkers dose it take , how much do they get paid ?

    Abbott and Costello perform the classic "Who's on first?

    December 21, 2011 06:01 am at 6:01 am |
  3. NATHAN WIMBERLY

    Citizens United looks pretty bad to Lizard now that he doesn't have the money to fight back, but he won't tell the truth like he did about the Ryan plan. Wingnuts can't stomach the truth,thus Fox and NewsMax lies.

    December 21, 2011 06:28 am at 6:28 am |
  4. S.B. Stein E.B. NJ

    I thought that these super PACs were to support a candidate with no input from the actual candidate. Isn't that the case? If it isn't, then how is a candidate suppose to ask for the super PAC to stop working and raising unlimited undisclosed funds for its respective candidate? I would like any and all organizations raising money for an issue or candidate (or against one) to have full disclosure of what was raised, spent on what and for whom (or issue). The FEC should have that on its website for all to research.

    December 21, 2011 07:21 am at 7:21 am |
  5. Indy

    I would never want to see Newt win the election, but you have to admit he is right sometimes and he nails Romney here. Romney is full of it when it comes to his influence with his super PAC and Mitt is famous for hiding behind facts and everything seems to be OK for him to do but no one else.

    December 21, 2011 07:30 am at 7:30 am |
  6. Wire Palladin, S. F.

    Truth hirts Ging. You are not going to win the nomination. If you do, Obama is going for another 4 years for sure.

    December 21, 2011 07:40 am at 7:40 am |
  7. Keyser Soze

    Mitt Gingrich, Newt Romney. Same side of the coin.

    December 21, 2011 07:58 am at 7:58 am |
  8. ATL Guy

    Very awesome tactic by Gingrich. Romney is a lying hypocrite and he and all of the Republicans were planning to use PACs and Karl Rove to go after Obama. Romney's puppy dog approach to appeasing everyone on every issues made him say he was against PACs while at the same time he was benefitting from them. He's a clown. And a joke. Gingrich needs to keep beating him over the head with this issue now that he's said he doesn't like PACs.

    December 21, 2011 08:01 am at 8:01 am |