Republicans furious over Obama recess appointments
January 4th, 2012
06:24 PM ET
2 years ago

Republicans furious over Obama recess appointments

Washington (CNN) - Congressional Republicans were furious Wednesday after President Obama's recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, arguing the move was unconstitutional because the Senate has met every three or four days over the holiday period and therefore was not on a recess.

"This is an extraordinary and entirely unprecedented power grab by President Obama," complained House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, in a statement, saying it "would have a devastating effect on the checks and balances that are enshrined in our constitution."

- Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

"This recess appointment represents a sharp departure from a long-standing precedent that has limited the President to recess appointments only when the Senate is in a recess of 10 days or longer," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky.

The intense GOP reaction to Cordray came before Obama also recess-appointed three members to the National Labor Relations Board, an agency under fire from Republicans who believe it is tilted in favor of labor unions.

However, Senate Democrats defended the aggressive efforts by the White House, arguing the president's constitutional authority to fill top government posts outweighed whether Congress was technically in session or not.

"In both of these cases he is using that power judiciously to counter Republican attempts to cripple two agencies that look out for the middle class," said a top Senate Democratic leadership aide. "The CFPB can't function effectively without a head and the NLRB can't function effectively without these slots being filled."

One of Obama's picks for the NLRB is a Republican, the Democratic aide noted.

At issue, is a disagreement over the meaning by the term "recess?" The constitution states the president can make recess appointments but fails to dictate how long a recess is. Legal experts have debated the point for years.

Either way, the White House called the pro forma sessions "gimmicks."

Republicans accused Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, of hypocrisy because he had successfully utilized pro forma sessions to block recess appointments by President George W. Bush.

In his statement Wednesday, Reid did not specifically address his shift in thinking. However, the Democratic aide explained that Senate Democrats supported the moves because they believe a presidential challenge was inevitable-either by Obama or a future president. They also felt the appointment of Cordray to the consumer-friendly board was worth tossing out a precedent they've used before and might have otherwise tried to use again.

"Someone was going to challenge this at some point anyway," the Democratic aide said.

A top Republican aide predicted a small business or business association would file suit to block Cordray from carrying out his duties. That could make it harder for Corday to set up the nascent agency and its work would be "tainted," the aide argued.

Also see:

Paul: Gingrich a 'chickenhawk'

Iowa outcome: What it means for the president

McCain backs former foe Romney over Senate colleague Santorum

Army soldier rallying for Paul violated military ban on political activity

Romney NH ad alleges Obama broke promises


Filed under: Congress • President Obama
soundoff (78 Responses)
  1. Harry Wreckdom

    Aw, gee Mr. Boner – did the scary man in the dark skin hurt your widdle feewings again????

    Go ahead, cry us some more of your crocodile tears...........

    See what obstructionism gets you????

    January 4, 2012 09:19 pm at 9:19 pm |
  2. Anonymous

    Recess Appointments – Reagan: 243... Bush: 171… Clinton: 139……... Obama: 29.

    January 4, 2012 09:28 pm at 9:28 pm |
  3. LibsLieAlways

    technically congress was not in recess...........hence the anger...........but another loop hole for use next year.........someone mentioned that Obama only has 29 recess appointments which is low.......well when you have all three branches of government his first two years 29 in the third is pretty much on par with all the rest.....for three years worth of appointments given the fact he had no need for recess appointments his first two years in office.

    January 4, 2012 09:30 pm at 9:30 pm |
1 2 3 4