Miami, Florida (CNN) - Perhaps it was the strong Cuban coffee.
At a campaign stop at the legendary Cafe Versailles in Miami's little Havana neighborhood, Newt Gingrich served up his toughest critique to date on Mitt Romney's claims on creating jobs.
- Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker
Gingrich seized on a new Romney campaign ad that defends the former Massachusetts Governor's record when he led the private investment firm, Bain Capital.
The ad states Romney and Bain created "thousands of jobs," not 100,000 jobs as the former Governor has previously claimed.
When asked about the ad, Gingrich laughed.
"He's now himself changing his claim," Gingrich said.
The former House Speaker called on Romney to produce records from his tenure at Bain to prove his claims.
"He's still not prepared to release any documents from Bain to prove anything," Gingrich said.
Last month, Romney told Time Magazine he and Bain created 100,000 jobs.
"And so I'll compare my experience in the private sector where, net-net, we created over 100,000 jobs. We created over 100,000 jobs," Romney told Time.
That jobs claim does not appear in the new Romney ad.
"Mitt Romney helped create and ran a company that invested in struggling businesses, grew new ones and rebuilt old ones, creating thousands of jobs," the spot states.
In an interview with CNN, Gingrich questioned Romney's claims.
"I'm saying that he misstated the facts," Gingrich said.
A new ARG poll finds Romney and Gingrich in a statistical dead heat for the upcoming South Carolina primary.
Gingrich, who has come under sharp criticism from conservative pundits for his attacks on Romney's Bain record, appeared to be pivoting away from the topic at events in South Carolina on Thursday.
But in his remarks to a packed crowd of Cuban Americans inside the Café Versailles, the former speaker defended his comments, saying the issue is fair game. The Florida primary comes just ten days after South Carolina.
"If he can't stand up today and defend his claim today, how is he going to stand up to Obama in the fall," Gingrich asked.
The former speaker pointed to a recent Washington Post fact-checking column that gave the 100,000 job claim "three Pinocchios."
Gingrich admits he has now abandoned his previous pledge to wage a positive campaign for the GOP nomination. But only, he says, because Romney attacked him first.
"You either unilaterally disarm and quit or you decide you're going to match," Gingrich told CNN.
A pro-Gingrich super PAC, Winning our Future, is now running ads featuring clips of a 30 minute documentary style video that attacks Romney and Bain.
Gingrich, who has previously said he would not tolerate any misstatements from the super PAC, gave no indication he has a problem with the "King of Bain" spots.
The same fact-checking column gave the anti-Romney flick "four Pinocchios."
A new Gingrich campaign ad compares Romney to former Massachusetts Democratic presidential candidates Michael Dukakis and John Kerry.
Gingrich brushed off the possibility the comparison could damage the GOP, in the event Romney becomes the party's nominee.
"The Obama people will figure out their own line of attack," Gingrich said.
"Let him explain his record. It's certainly not a conservative record," the former speaker added.
UPDATE: In a paper statement on Friday afternoon, Newt Gingrich called on Winning Our Future, a super PAC supporting his presidential bid, to edit or take down advertisements and a 30-minute documentary-style film critical of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital if they contained factual errors but he listed no specific problems. He then called on Romney to do the same.
"I am calling for the Winning Our Future Super-PAC supporting me to either edit its "King of Bain" advertisement and movie to remove its inaccuracies, or to pull it off the air and off the internet entirely," he said.
He said accuracy in advertising is a "two way street," and repeated his criticism of ads produced by the Romney campaign and their allies.
"Furthermore, I am once again calling on Governor Romney to issue a similar call for the Super-PAC supporting him to edit or remove its ads which have been shown to contain gross inaccuracies, something the Governor has thus far refused to do," he said in the statement.
Santorum begins S.C. push by contrasting with Obama
Gingrich hits Romney for speaking French
Colbert for president (again)
South Carolina GOP Chairman defends free market amid Romney attacks
What difference does it make how many jobs a company did or did not create when run by Romney? The United States of America is not a company, nor is the President a CEO.
How can Gingrich talk about supporting the middle class when he's a fat cat himself who has gone on spending sprees buying half a million worth of diamonds for his wife? I'm a Republican, but I don't think that even the President himself can afford that. Gingrich is the one who's afraid to answer questions since he refuses to let journalists and reporters ask questions; he interrupts them constantly. He should reveal how he made his millions before attacking others.
Talk about a circular firing squad, these stupid idiots are killing each other off faster than you can scratch their names off the list. Newt is a vicious political creep who loves to demonize, Mitmit is jtoo stupid to realize he's in his own fantasy world. Perry is a natural born moron. Santorum is an escapee from the nuthouse. Paul is the best mind the 16th century has to offer.
As a Republican, I'm greatly disappointed how Gingrich has resorted to the usual "cuthroat" and "mudslinging" when he's never been in the business sector and is a career politicians. We've all seen the damage career politicians can do regardless of their party affiliation. Capitalism is not a guarantee for success, it provides an opportunity for success. Many businesses succeed while many don't. If success was guaranteed, we'd all be entrepreneurs.
How canNEWT or any candidate tell a Super Pac what they can and cannot say. Super Pacs MUST operate independently, remember? (Yeah, right)
Webster's definition of "venture capital": money invested by owners and stockholders in a new or expanding but unproven business enterprise. Also called risk capital.
There's no guarantees, it's a risk. The owners and stockholders lose as well, if the business fails.