Charleston, South Carolina (CNN) - With Newt Gingrich creeping up in the polls and potentially on the cusp of a South Carolina victory, one of Mitt Romney's senior advisers sought to change expectations ahead of Saturdays' pivotal presidential primary.
Though his campaign has competed aggressively in the state and is hungry for a win here, Romney strategist Stuart Stevens said the idea of a loss to Gingrich on Saturday is not far-fetched.
Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @politicalticker
"Do I think we could lose South Carolina? Sure. Of course," Stevens told CNN after Thursday's presidential debate in Charleston.
"The very idea that we are sitting where we are two days before South Carolina, having won New Hampshire, having done very well in Iowa, and the question is 'Could Romney lose South Carolina,' is such an absurd question."
"The idea should be does he have a chance in South Carolina," Stevens claimed.
When it was noted that Romney had a 10-point lead over Gingrich as recently as Tuesday, Stevens shook his head.
"These things were always going to be close," he said. "I think it's very competitive. I think it's a four-way race. The whole race is very fluid."
The late effort to adjust Romney's prospects comes as public and private campaign polling shows a tightening race in South Carolina, following strong debate performances this week from Gingrich, several flubs by Romney on the campaign trail and Rick Perry's decision to abandon his White House bid.
Romney and Gingrich are now essentially battling one-on-one down the stretch, with Rick Santorum in third place.
"It's tight, it's real tight," said one Romney adviser who did not want to be quoted discussing internal poll numbers.
One trend has emerged in Romney's internal polling: a sharp gender gap between the two frontrunners.
Romney is holding onto a robust lead over Gingrich among female voters, but the flip side is also true - Gingrich is beating Romney among men.
A second place finish by the former Massachusetts governor in South Carolina would unquestionably be a disappointment for a campaign that was confident and riding high just last week after a decisive Romney victory in New Hampshire.
Romney has traveled around South Carolina with Gov. Nikki Haley at his side for two weeks, and the campaign has spent heavily on television, radio, mail and phone calls to targeted voters.
Haley radiated optimism on Thursday, telling CNN: "We are going to win South Carolina."
Another leading Romney surrogate, state treasurer Curtis Loftis, did not seem so confident at a campaign event on Friday.
"It has been a hard week," Loftis said at a rally in Gilbert. "Nobody is gonna deny that."
There are other signs that the Romney team is anxious.
The campaign added an extra campaign event in Greenville on Friday night - a late effort to hold down Gingrich's and Santorum's margins in the socially conservative and evangelical-heavy upstate.
Romney, meanwhile, is hoping to bank most of his votes along the more moderate coast, where the fiscal and military issues that Romney prefers to talk about on the stump predominate.
Behind the scenes, Romney advisers in Boston have been scrambling this week to halt Gingrich's renewed momentum.
After Gingrich shot up in the polls after Monday's debate in Myrtle Beach, the Romney campaign swiftly sharpened their attacks on Gingrich and arranged a series of conference calls with reporters to challenge the former House speaker's judgment and discipline.
Meanwhile, Missi Sousa, a staffer in Romney's political shop in Boston, blasted out a message Wednesday to campaign backers nationwide urging them to call into South Carolina and "turn out Mitt's supporters."
"Please get the word out to your personal networks," Sousa wrote in the email, provided to CNN by a Romney supporter in Columbia. "This is all hands on deck."
Romney campaign officials and surrogates also tried unsuccessfully this week to bring on several South Carolina business leaders and Republican fundraisers who were backing former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman.
But the Romney entreaties were rebuffed, multiple sources told CNN, and many of those Huntsman backers publicly endorsed Gingrich instead on Thursday.
Some of that movement can be attributed to veteran GOP strategist Richard Quinn, who worked for Huntsman but signed on with the Gingrich campaign on Thursday to assist with the final South Carolina push.
Perry drops out, endorses Gingrich
Judge-drawn Texas redistricting map tossed out by Supreme Court
Gingrich releases 2010 federal tax records
Santorum tries to shoulder past Romney, Gingrich in debate
I love how these debate hosts set Gingrich up for these rants, they might as well put gun powder in his mouth. He should make his campaign slogan "Family values for everyone but me".
Ron Paul not mentioned I see. He should just ditch his party and run as a third party candidate. Sure, he'll split the vote and ensure Obama's victory, but he will get to stand by his principles and values and represent them on the national stage. As opposed to being passed over in favor of these lesser candidates. Good luck Dr. Paul
"Have you noticed how he tries to put down people by saying they are envy and he has earned it by hard work. So, his hard work his legitimate and the gets a tax break. Average Joe like me that earns 50K is not hard work and so it does not get tax break. These repubs are hypocrits and hold on to their rich folks base by getting votes in the name of religion. OBAMA/BIDEN 2012"
I dislike Romney as much as the next, but stop with the bullsh1t like that. The average Joe like you who earns $50k barely pays any federal taxes at all. In fact, 47% of the country pays 0 or receives money back in federal income taxes.
Sounds like they are starting to lay the groundwork for the 'why we lost' speech.
@LARRY, this is CNN.
Thanks for playing!
Romney's tax plan would raise taxes on the poor to fund a $300,000 tax cut for people that make over $1 million a year.
Why doesn't he just eat the poor while he's at it?
Slapping my head that people would actually vote for a serial adulterer. Character mean anything? It's everything to me. We're talking about the president here, not a manager at McDonalds. Just because he "laid it down" to King yesterday doesn't mean his flawed past isn't just disgusting and gross on so many levels.
Romney's advisor said it's a 4 man race, so why was Ron Paul AGAIN the only candidate not mentioned??
I think he loses to Ron Paul.
Wow. Time for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America to pony up some more "buy an election" money!
Well, he can always go to the Cayman islands and play with the cash he hid from paying taxes on when he loses...or maybe send thank you cards to all the people he fired so that he could make money from them losing their jobs.
Honestly I don't care who wins so long as its not Newt. That guy is a scary guy in the point where he would start world wr three. Romney is a good solid choice and he's use to running a state and he's not apart of the Washington group that's screwed this country for the last ten years. Don't get we wrong I want Obama to win. But if he doesn't I'd feel much better that he loses to Romny. At the end I honestly would choice Ron Paul as my vice plenty of experience between the two and the support the two carry is big.
This is the smiling doofus you want giving you his corporate version of reality, America? Come on.
Did a quick Ctrl+F search of Ron Paul, what a surprise, not one mention of him in the entire article. Mainstream media continues to fear him and won't give him coverage. WAKE UP PEOPLE, THE NATION IS IN TROUBLE. Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that has the balls to do what is needed for the people.
Ron Paul will sweep all these other phonies away.