(CNN) - Newt Gingrich's campaign admitted Wednesday night the former House speaker was inaccurate when he claimed his team offered several witnesses to ABC News to refute statements made by Gingrich's second wife in a controversial interview aired last week.
CNN Chief National Correspondent John King reported the campaign said it only recommended Gingrich's two daughters from his first marriage, who wrote a letter discouraging ABC to release the interview.
CNN LIVE: Tune in Thursday at 8 p.m. ET for the CNN/Republican Party of Florida Debate hosted by Wolf Blitzer and follow it on Twitter at #CNNDebate. For real-time coverage of the Florida primary, go to CNNPolitics.com or to the CNN apps or CNN mobile web site.
Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @politicalticker
Marianne Gingrich claimed in the ABC interview that her husband asked for an open marriage while he was having an extramarital affair with his current wife, Callista Gingrich.
"The story was false. Every personal friend I have who knew us in that period says the story is false. We offered several of them to ABC to prove it was false. They weren't interested," Gingrich said at a CNN debate last week.
In an interview on Tuesday, King pressed Gingrich on those claims, saying ABC News insisted no such witnesses were put forward.
Gingrich said ABC's defense was "just plain baloney."
"If they're saying that, then they're not being honest," Gingrich said. "We had several people prepared to be very clear and very aggressive in their dispute about that, and (ABC News) wasn't interested."
On Wednesday, however, the campaign conceded the candidate was wrong, both in his debate answer and in his interview with CNN on Tuesday.
R.C. Hammond, the campaign's press secretary, told CNN the only people the campaign offered to ABC were the speaker's two daughters, Jackie Cushman and Kathy Gingrich Lubbers, who make regular appearances for their father on the campaign trail.
Obama shares intense encounter with Arizona governor
Gingrich shoots for the moon
Bachmann will run for reelection
IOW, Gringrich lied & then 'defended' himself by accusing honest reporting of being lies. Great leadership qualities.
Let's see... not to be outdone by Clinton in adding multiple definitions for the word "is", Gingrich is redefining three words; lobbyist does not mean lobbyist when contact says so, "friends" means daughters, and "truth"... well he hasn't told us that yet
This guy lies as easily as we breath, and you want him to be president???
Is there a surprise here? Typical Gingrich..... aggressively and offensively deny the charge by impugning the reporter or the media. If Gingrich is the Republican nominee, the Republican Party will face historic losses as he brings other candidates down with him.
If he's lying about THIS, then he'll lie about anything! Don't trust the amphibian!! Say no to the Salamander!!! Don't Vote Newt!!!!
Where do you draw the line between being wrong and lying? I am sure Newt will clarify this at the next debate and go back on ABC to apoligize to John King.
How about ABC was right
Straight lied about it. No one is surprised – the only error was getting caught in the lie.
So Newtie lies again. Ho hum...
How about that ABC was right oops
Newt Schrute LIED???? I am shocked! SHOCKED, I tell you!!!!
I believe much of what Mr. Gringrich says is "just plain baloney".
Well that isn't a mistake, it's a lie. Gingrich seems to have a penchant for re-making history in the context he prefers. Hopefully the voting public will see through this windbag who wants nothing more than to bully people into making him president.
So Gingrich basically admits he was lying. Nothing new there really.
From where I stand this is a personal issue. I am not a Newt fan but, that is his business and his ex wife. Can't we get beyond this and get to issues of the United States. When two people leave a marriage, they both lie. Besides when he entered this race we already knew he was married three times. Let it go and just move on.
It sounds like someone is a big fat liar.
Well, with ethics violations,and stress adultery, these errors will just have to be forgiven. After all, Newt"s two daughters, (who were teenagers at the time), said that he was an honorable man. Of course, teenagers always know what is going on with their parent's love life. What a great canidate, our best and brightest.
So Gingrich lied. Again
Does a Fib Newton which is the favorite cookie of the Tea Party, go well with all kinds of baloney or the "just plain" kind?
This guys is such a false liar – said twice there, I know, but it was needed as an emphasis (double liar). A typical politician. An elitist rich guy himself that pretends he's of the people and understands the people. He hasn't a clue. He's such a hot-head too, I'd imagine we'd be thrown back into multiple wars. And from his tax statements, he appears quite the stingy person for such a rich guy, lacking in generosity & compassion. I will never vote for this guy. If it comes down to him & Obama, though I've always voted for Republicans in the past ... I'd rather vote for Obama.
It isn't an error if you knew it wasn't true in the first place. It's called a "lie", and therefore, you are a "liar".
I love it. After the way he went after John King when asked delicately if he had anthing to say, he came out full force. They need to open tonight's debate with the first question being about his ex-wife's allegations, and why he lied as he was thrashing on John King for asking a completely valid question in a professional manner. What a pig.
The headline should read "Campaign Acknowledges Gingrich Lied Repeatedly"
So the lesson is....
If you're going to lie, lie big in front of a big national audience and then, only if you're absolutely forced, have some else admit the 'mistake' to a much smaller news market several days afterwards and hope it stays buried in the small arena.
(Note that the headline reads "Gingrich campaign admits error" not that Gingrich lied twice in front of a national audience.)
My question to my fellow citizens is this, when will we stop cheering because a politician says what we emotionally want to hear and instead applaud the politician who dares to speak the truth!
"the former House speaker was inaccurate" is just a polite way of saying he was lying.