(CNN) - While some opponents of Mitt Romney seized on his now-famous "misstatement" about the poor this week, Ron Paul defended his Republican presidential rival on Friday.
"I don't believe for a minute that if Mitt Romney was sitting here, that if he released everything in his heart, he (would say): 'You know what, the truth is, I really don't care about poor people.' That isn't–I just don't believe that," Paul said in an interview on CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight."
Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker
Romney made the original comment in an interview with CNN on Wednesday morning, in which he said he was not "concerned about the very poor" because they have a government-backed safety net in place. He added, however, that "if there are holes in it, I will work to repair that."
His remark quickly sparked an outcry that forced the former Massachusetts to spend much of the day clarifying his comment and providing fuller context.
Ultimately Romney conceded Thursday, saying he "misspoke."
“When you do I don’t know how many thousands of interviews, now and then you may get it wrong, and I misspoke,” Romney said in an interview on KSNV, a CNN affiliate in Las Vegas.
Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, as well as top Democratic groups, took swipes at Romney over the remark, hitting the candidate as insensitive.
But Paul, who will compete with Romney in the Nevada caucuses on Saturday, said the comment was overblown.
"I think it was a big issue because of politics, because of the opposition, the demagoguing, the media jumping on this," Paul said. "Actually, I think I ended up probably defending him more than he defended himself."
The libertarian Texas congressman, instead, faulted Romney's economic plans for his slip-up.
"I think the problem is he's a victim of his own economic theories, rather than him being cold and heartless," Paul said.
Romney on 'poor' comment: I misspoke
McDonnell open to spot as GOP running mate
Romney hits U.S. Taliban proposal
A Trump endorsement: Where imagination and reality meets
Gingrich to challenge Florida delegates
Watch Piers Morgan Live weeknights 9 p.m. ET. For the latest from Piers Morgan click here.
Ron Paul would destroy the country by making it vulnerable to attack ("no preemptive strikes"), Mitt Romney is a typical "used car salesman" politician who would do anything to get elected (he will show his true colors when he passes another Assault Weapons Ban; he is pro-gun control), and Rick Santorum is far too conservative to appeal to mainstream America.
Yes, that leaves Newt Gingrich as the best option. He is flawed, disorganized, and has had plenty of past PERSONAL troubles, but he will not destroy the country outright, threaten the Second Amendment, or allow President Obama to win in a landslide. Gingrich is intelligent and experienced and, even if he loses the general election, he is the best symbolic candidate for the Republican Party. It will show that the Republican electorate still has some enduring sense of character and credibility.
If you look at what he was trying to say, not just at the inarticulate and lunkheaded way he *said* it, he wasn't inaccurate. OTOH, whining about his own lumbering statements being held up to scrutiny isn't exactly honest. You said it, you own it.
Like beating a dead horse......the media really overplayed their hand on this one. The talk show hosts as well, except Bill Maher, who at least has the common sense to explain to the numnuts the point Mitt was making, like everyone didn't know already. Unfortunately for Mitt, Obama is taking care of the middle and poor classes, so he actually beat him too it.