Romney: New gun laws won't make a difference 'in this type of tragedy'
July 23rd, 2012
08:15 PM ET
2 years ago

Romney: New gun laws won't make a difference 'in this type of tragedy'

(CNN) – Continuing the debate over gun rights after Friday's Aurora, Colorado movie theatre shooting, Mitt Romney on Monday argued there was no need for new gun laws and stood by legislation he signed as Massachusetts governor banning assault weapons.

"I still believe that the Second Amendment is the right course to preserve and defend and don't believe that new laws are going to make a difference in this type of tragedy," Romney said on CNBC.

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

He continued: "There are–were, of course, very stringent laws which existed in Aurora, Colorado. Our challenge is not the laws, our challenge is people who, obviously, are distracted from reality and do unthinkable, unimaginable, inexplicable things."

The shooting on Friday, which left 12 people dead and 58 wounded, ignited fierce debate over the weekend and placed the presidential candidates in the spotlight over their positions on gun rights.

Romney's remarks against new laws don't stray too far from similar comments from the White House this weekend. Speaking aboard Air Force One as the president flew Sunday to meet with families of those killed, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Obama did not have plans to push for new legislation in light of the Colorado massacre.

"The president's view is that we can take steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them under existing law. And that's his focus right now," Carney said, adding it was too early to determine how the issue would play in the election. Meanwhile, some have pointed to the president's 2008 campaign promise to reinstate a federal ban on assault weapons.

As governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed a 2004 extension of a ban on assault weapons, at the time saying "These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."

Also as governor, Romney enacted a statewide "Right to Bear Arms Day," which is held on May 7 to "honor law-abiding citizens and their right to 'use firearms in defense of their families, persons, and property for all lawful purposes, including common defense'," according to his campaign website.

In 2006, ahead of his bid for the 2008 Republican nomination, he became a lifelong member of the NRA.

Asked Monday about the assault weapons ban, Romney said the legislation came as a bipartisan effort from both those who "were for additional gun rights and those that opposed gun rights."

"The idea of one party jamming through something over the objection of the other tends to divide the nation, not make us a more safe and prosperous place," he said. "So if there's common ground, why I'm always willing to have that kind of a conversation."

The two campaigns took a pause this weekend, pulling their attack ads from the air and breaking from the campaign trail to reflect on the shooting.

Monday morning, however, the campaigns largely resumed their activities, as both teams went on the attack through press releases and as the candidates had campaign appearances on their schedules.

Romney said Monday the campaigns were back "under way" but with a different tone.

"Yes. I think we are, but we're starting also with a level of thoughtfulness and seriousness that I think is appropriate in the aftermath of a tragedy of this nature. Obviously, the campaigns are under way," he said. "We're talking about our respective views and at the same time, our hearts are heavy as we think about the funerals that'll be held this week and the families that have been so tragically altered by virtue of the loss of life."

– CNN's Kevin Liptak contributed to this report.


Filed under: 2012 • Mitt Romney • President Obama
soundoff (188 Responses)
  1. grrace

    New gun laws won't make a difference? Well. I didn't realize Mitt Romney owned a crystal ball.

    July 23, 2012 08:26 pm at 8:26 pm |
  2. george of the jungle

    flip flop flip flop. Romney hunting give us a break. He looked like an idiot holding that shot gun. Forward 2012

    July 23, 2012 08:32 pm at 8:32 pm |
  3. Four and The Door

    Our challenge is not the laws, our challenge is people who, obviously, are distracted from reality and do unthinkable, unimaginable, inexplicable things.
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________
    Mitt Romney is correct. Isn't the problem here the senseless hate and disregard for life shown by the lowlife coward clown-boy rather than the means with which he selected?

    July 23, 2012 08:37 pm at 8:37 pm |
  4. John the Historian

    What does a city boy like Willard know about guns. Maybe Willard learned about guns from that murderer Brigham Young who massacred non-mornons in Utah. I wonder if their planet kolob has guns.

    July 23, 2012 08:46 pm at 8:46 pm |
  5. America1st

    That isn't what he said while Governor of Massachussets. He was gun control central then. Of course a Mitt Flippity Flop and a flitp and a flop is hardly surprising. He's all over the place.

    July 23, 2012 08:49 pm at 8:49 pm |
  6. John

    I believe in an assault weapons ban, and I appreciate has not backed away from his decision to vote for a ban on assault weapons....I will vote for Obama, but I do acknowledge that once in a while Romney acts presidential.

    July 23, 2012 08:50 pm at 8:50 pm |
  7. James Klimaski

    Guns don't kill people. People with guns kill people. And with the right kind of gun they can kill lots of people. The idea that if everyone had a gun that night in Aurora, as the NRA suggests, Mr. Holmes would not have killed so many is absurd. It is time, it is overdue, that we examine the myths put out by the NRA and pass laws that get these killer weapons off the streets. It is too bad that neither of these two major party Presidential candidates have the guts to address this issue.

    July 23, 2012 08:51 pm at 8:51 pm |
  8. beevee

    Romney does not have to suck up to NRA. If the gun laws were strict enough this type of tragedies could have been avoided. Why is everyone afraid of NRA who are only business minded crooks who have no concern for human life. If they did, they would have voluntarily accepted gun control regulations. Why does any one need, other than for fighting a war a gun anyway?

    July 23, 2012 08:54 pm at 8:54 pm |
  9. ib1sage

    Please Mr.Romney, tell us what kind of tragedy will make you support a change in assault weapon sales?

    July 23, 2012 08:56 pm at 8:56 pm |
  10. JBJ

    A very valid point, it seems whenever something extreme happens we tend to respond with unrealistic answers. Why try to make changes that would not make any difference. I could walk down the street with cash and buy 10 guns in less than an hour. Tighter laws wouldn't even slow someone like this down.

    July 23, 2012 08:57 pm at 8:57 pm |
  11. PushingBack

    Good to know Romney thinks that when something is broken, it does not need fixing.

    July 23, 2012 08:58 pm at 8:58 pm |
  12. They ought to change from the elephant to the hippo...

    What a bunch of chixnsheet politicians on both sides. What in the world is a clip on that size useful for other than killing people? And you both KNOW that its availability "wouldn't have made a difference" ...how? Divine revelation?

    How about protecting your 2nd amendment rights by reasonable means. However, if you somehow feel that you need a hundred round clip, perhaps you might want to consider that maybe, just maybe, YOU are in the wrong?

    July 23, 2012 08:58 pm at 8:58 pm |
  13. ib1sage

    Mr.Romney you are a two faced SOB who will say anything to get elected. You lack courage, you lack ethics, you lack morality and you will surely lack the number of votes to become President of the USA.

    July 23, 2012 08:59 pm at 8:59 pm |
  14. The King

    Go see a play mittens. May I suggest "My American Cousin" at the Ford Theater.

    July 23, 2012 08:59 pm at 8:59 pm |
  15. bill

    So according to his record, Rmoney is both pro and anti-gun....which MItt is running for President?

    He can not be trusted!

    July 23, 2012 09:04 pm at 9:04 pm |
  16. natalie

    Both parties need to step up and get rid of AR's.

    July 23, 2012 09:09 pm at 9:09 pm |
  17. phil

    Its events like this that make me laugh when I hear the term "socialist" being thrown around about the POTUS when he is unbelieveably moderate. This was a great chance for a far left leader to try and stir debate on gun control and obama left it alone. I say good for him but seriously Glenn, Rush, how about some credit where credit is due? This was not the action of an ultra left wing socialist like you claim he is.

    July 23, 2012 09:11 pm at 9:11 pm |
  18. n

    Well Romney, tell us, what type of tragedy would justify a new gun law. Empty words again from Romney. He's all sound bites.

    July 23, 2012 09:13 pm at 9:13 pm |
  19. apple pie

    What a load of bs. How does he know it wouldn't make a difference. If he had had to go through multiple checks and a gun course and had access to only a certain kind of gun and only one, I would be willing to wager my right to own guns of any sort that if the tragedy wouldn't have happened, it would have at least been lessened.

    July 23, 2012 09:18 pm at 9:18 pm |
  20. Jane

    The previous post is closed to comments, so I'm using this post to let everyone know this – my grown son lives just North of Denver and he (and others) have confirmed that Romney Did Not pull his negative ads in Colorado. Unless 10 or 15 adults in Denver proper suddenly suffered a group hallucination, which lasted 12 hours..... Romney's Secret Service name should be "Pinocchio". One, for the constant lying, and two, because his actions are sometimes so lifelike that you forget he's not a real boy.

    July 23, 2012 09:18 pm at 9:18 pm |
  21. glorydays

    How the hell much more carnage will it take? The NRA is guilty of mass murder.

    July 23, 2012 09:19 pm at 9:19 pm |
  22. apple pie

    This argument that "the guy could have used bombs just as easily and killed more people more easily so why ban guns" is just plain stupid. If so, why didn't he? He obviously liked guns, his preferred weapon.

    July 23, 2012 09:19 pm at 9:19 pm |
  23. andrew

    People kill people. Guns let them do it more efficiently. Why should we let these acts of insanity happen. All guns should be banned.

    July 23, 2012 09:20 pm at 9:20 pm |
  24. Doyle Wiley, MI

    Romney, what an idiot.

    July 23, 2012 09:21 pm at 9:21 pm |
  25. Gurgyl

    Why did you ban assault weapons in Massachuttes while you were governor mr. Flip-flop??????obama12.

    July 23, 2012 09:22 pm at 9:22 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8