Holder, Michelle Obama weigh in on voting rights at DC dinner
September 23rd, 2012
12:16 AM ET
2 years ago

Holder, Michelle Obama weigh in on voting rights at DC dinner

Washington (CNN) - Attorney General Eric Holder and first lady Michelle Obama weighed in Saturday on a battleground in the 2012 election: voting rights.

Speaking at the Congressional Black Caucus Gala, Holder said voting rights are more than a partisan issue, while Obama recalled the pains many withstood in the civil rights struggle. The right to cast a ballot, she said, is significant, important, and should be protected.

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

– Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.

Holder said he pledged to "not allow the arc of American history, which has always been about expanding the electorate, to be halted.

"Following in the tradition of Democratic and Republican attorneys general, we will not stand by and allow the voting rights of American citizens to be impinged by specious arguments and by those who seek naked political advantage," he continued. "This is not a political issue."

Rather, Holder said, "This is an American issue and goes to the heart of who we say we are as a nation. The right to vote will be protected."

Fourteen states have restrictions currently in effect which “have the potential to impact the 2012 election,” according to a review of laws and executive orders by The Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. Its September 7 analysis said additional laws are pending in six states.

Some Republicans have pressured Holder to stop Justice Department investigations and lawsuits into voting-related practices in several states. At a Congressional hearing this summer, Rep. Steve King, a Republican from Iowa, said "We are seeing voter registration fraud and we're seeing voter fraud."

Rep. Trent Franks, a Republican from Arizona, described the Justice Department's efforts as "seeking headlines opposing voter ID laws that an overwhelming majority of Americans support."

The National Conference of State Legislatures characterizes the voter identification laws in five states as "strict photo" ID and says two additional states could join that rank this fall. Six other states have less stringent photo identification laws, the organization says.

Holder was at the ceremony receiving an award, and the first lady's comments came during her keynote address.

Recalling the civil rights struggle, Michelle Obama said, "The connection between our laws and our lives isn't always as obvious as it was 50 or 150 years ago. And as a result, it's sometimes easy to assume that the battles in our courts and our legislatures have all been won. "

Voting, she suggested, is taken for granted by too many who do not appreciate what "so many folks sacrificed so much so that we could make our voices heard."

"Today, how many of us have asked someone whether they're going to vote, and they say, 'No, I'm too busy - and besides, I voted last time,' or, 'Nah, it's not like my vote is going to make a difference,'" Obama said.

"So when it comes to casting our ballots, it cannot just be 'we the people' who had time to spare on Election Day,” she added. “Can't just be 'we the people' who really care about politics, or 'we the people' who happened to drive by a polling place on the way home from work. It must be all of us."

She did not specifically address voting laws, but stressed the importance of registering people to vote, calling it "the movement of our era."

"We cannot let anyone discourage us from casting our ballots," Obama said. "We cannot let anyone make us feel unwelcome in the voting booth. It is up to us to make sure that in every election, every voice is heard and every vote is counted."

The first lady specifically recalled the effort made by a founding Congressional Black Caucus member, Georgia Rep. John Lewis.

At a civil rights march, Lewis, she said, "faced down that row of billy clubs on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, risking his life so we could one day cast our ballots."

The congressman recalled extraordinary measures once employed to keep people away from the polls - such as pass a "so-called literacy test, pay a poll tax" - in a passionate speech this year at the Democratic National Convention.

"Today," he continued in that speech, "it is unbelievable that there are Republican officials who are trying to stop some people from voting."

Among the states that have enacted or are pursuing changes to their voting laws are Florida, which this summer began an effort to remove ineligible voters; Ohio, which scrapped several days of pre-election in-person voting for most voters; and New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Texas, which have passed photo identification laws.

Several states considering changes to their procedures are required to submit plans to the Justice Department for approval, under a law affecting states with a history of discrimination.

– CNN's Carol Cratty, Steve Brusk, and Shirley Henry contributed to this report

Also see:

– Rubio tweets his airline woes

– Ryan 'very comfortable' as Romney's V.P. candidate

– Litigating Capitol Hill recess in weekly addresses

– Gingrich to Romney: Do to Obama what you did to me

– Biden: Romney tape, demeanor shows he 'does not understand' middle class

soundoff (31 Responses)
  1. clarke

    If a person does not cast a vote, then they no right to voice how the feel about who is running the country, or there State. Never give up your right to vote, it does make a difference. If the right to vote was taken from you, all the non voters would be the first in line to protest.

    September 23, 2012 09:17 am at 9:17 am |
  2. Mike Texoma

    I hear about having to have an ID to buy beer, and so what is wrong with requiring an ID in order to vote? Last time I checked, the right to buy beer is not guaranteed by the constitution. Big difference. The right to vote is or should be sacrosanct in America. So, if a state wants to require an ID it must do two things: First, it must make IDs available to e
    veryone who is legally entitled to vote. Second, it must deliver each ID to each voter. without cost to that voter.
    If a state has a real problem with fraud, its fix must meet those criteria.

    September 23, 2012 09:18 am at 9:18 am |
  3. Duane

    whats hard be understand is why asking for an ID is holding the poor from. voting??? I don't see it....you need ID to get your food stamps and your unemployment check, you need it to buy beer....heck you needed it to get into. the Democrtic convention they just had but for some nutty reason you don't think we need to to pick the leader of the free world. why some may ask? because any and all fraud benefits the left. the illegals that are here want free stuff so let them vote right libs!

    September 23, 2012 09:24 am at 9:24 am |
  4. Triple A

    Hehe, Them two talking about voting rights is funny. They both think it is not a right but that any yahoo should be able to vote.

    September 23, 2012 09:34 am at 9:34 am |
  5. blaster34

    SCOTUS has ruled. States can require a picture ID in order to vote. 30 plus sates already require picture ID's to vote so why does Holder continue suing states? What doesn't Holder understand about that ruling? What is the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over.............

    September 23, 2012 09:37 am at 9:37 am |
  6. Denny

    Did she mention that people need a picture ID to get into any Democrat event including fundraisers and conventions? Hmm.

    September 23, 2012 09:44 am at 9:44 am |
1 2