Washington (CNN) - Swing state television airwaves are already saturated with ads, and now - with early voting soon to be underway in several states - mailboxes are starting to fill up as well.
Voters in Virginia this week received a glossy mailer from Planned Parenthood Action Fund warning that Republican nominee Mitt Romney would "turn back the clock" for women if elected.
– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker
– Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.
The two-sided mail piece portrays Romney inside a primitive 1950s-looking television set and highlights his proposal to eliminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood and his support for overturning Roe vs. Wade.
"Mitt Romney would go too far and interfere in a woman's personal medical decisions," reads the mailer, provided to CNN by a voter in the Richmond area who received it.
It's a potent message in Virginia, where a recent Washington Post poll showed President Obama holding a nearly 20-point advantage over Romney among women.
Romney spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg responded to the mailers, saying women "can't afford" four more years of Obama.
“More false and dishonest attacks from President Obama’s allies can’t hide his failed record," Henneberg said. "President Obama’s policies have made it more difficult for women to start businesses, keep more money in the bank, or see their children graduate with good jobs on the horizon."
Read the mail piece here and here.
I guess all the Fox watchers like Billy Bob Barefoot down in Dogpatch really believe the nonsense Mitt is spewing. Give Mitt a couple of more days and he'll be on the side of Planned Parenthood if he thinks he can garner a couple of votes.
This one should be on the airwaves, this is a very good ad!
So Planned Parenthood, are our federal tax dollars now being used in this political campaign to support the people who send you hundreds of millions of tax dollars? The Democrats.
This will pretty much sink whatever chance Mitt had to get a female vote or two. Sad that he had to trash his former beliefs in this regard in order to make it through the primary process. His mother was pro-choice, and he spoke elequently back in the 90's about why he was too. But he bowed to the Tea Party types to secure the nomination.......which tells me he is sorely lacking in leadership and integrity. Presidential material? Not hardly.
Dang Mittens cannot catch a break....his approval rating is gionna be 5%
More lies from the left. No, it DOESN'T mean women will be denied these services. It means that Planned Parenthood won't be the ones receiving federal dollars to perform them. Planned Parenthood is lying and scaring women to protect THEIR FEDERAL INCOME STREAM.
"So Planned Parenthood, are our federal tax dollars now being used in this political campaign to support the people who send you hundreds of millions of tax dollars? The Democrats."
Would you like us to investigate whether the Kochs are using energy industry subsidies to donate millions and millions of dollars to Mittens and Crossroads and its own PACs? Stifle yourself. PP segregates the money very very clearly.
You think that some GOP doctor will give these services for free??? No, you think the GOP cares about women NO!!! These are services for the women of America. Just who do you think will perform these services???
"More lies from the left. No, it DOESN'T mean women will be denied these services. It means that Planned Parenthood won't be the ones receiving federal dollars to perform them."
So, the situation is that there's essentially one apple tree on the planet and Mittens wants to stop watering it....and YOU claim that everyone will still be able to get apples. FACT: those federal dollars make much of what PP does (aside from abortions, which are done via segreated funding) possible in the first place and they are the only game in town in the vast VAST majority of areas across the country. Taking away PP federal funding would indeed be functionally equivalent to taking away those services for thousands of women.
I say all us Virginia's just find a central location and just drop all the pamphlets off & send them back. I don't want that JUNK mail coming to my house. Maybe send them to Sandra Fluke!
LOL....as someone in the medical field...there is no way access will be denied....birth control will still be available..just not through planned parenthood...low income women will still be given the care they need and deserve- believe me I see it everyday. Plannned parenthood is funded largely through the federal government, and many people who don't believe that abortion is right do not want thier tax dollars being spent on something they view as immoral. This is a scare tactic...pandering to those who buy this load of nonsense that there is a war on women. I am a well educated, hard working woman and I don't feel a war....the only battle I feel is commen sense versus nonsense.
@truth hurts,more unfactual comments as usual, you're just crying to a deaf audience pal,try another avenue for your rants, its getting way too predictable!!And if they were federal dollars why'd you be upset,is it with your familys being upset because the contraceptives they gave your mother obviously didn't work did they,you're your mothers little "MISTAKE" aren't ya,truth does hurt doesn't it!!
isn't their name a deception? shouldn't it be planned abortion?
and as a southerner, a woman, graduate student and a conservative I resent being called "Billy Bob Barefoot" or that I am from Dogpatch.....don't lower yourself to name calling...don't be so naive as to believe the sterotype...it makes your look bad...but then again conservatives are bad in your eyes either way...we are all either backwoods hilbillies or wealthy greedy pigs...at the end of the day we are all Americans with hopes and dreams and goals for this great nation and our own familes....lets just cut the crap and talk with respect
Pete..so mature...way to represent ..I was what you so lovingly called a "mistake"..and I was adopted, by a wonderfer family....so yes, I stand with prolife.....and name calling and being nasty is just low and does not get your point across any better..and @truth hurts is not on a rant..just stating a fact...yes PP does not want thier Federal funding drying up...and they are fighting for what they want...as would any group..I don't blame them...but I don't agree with them using federal tax dollars to fund abortions...its not right.
If Planned Parenthood cared soooo much about providing all of these services and taking hundreds of million of tax dollars every year, why don't they just spin off the abortion mill business into an entirely seperate operation? Real companies do this all the time.
Of course they won't because the fact is that federal money IS funneled into the abortion side of the shop.
and this yoyo really has to question WHY 47% of Americans DISLIKE him so. Stupid is as STUPID does.
and to go back to dear pete asking us to go to another audience for these "rants", you should be happy we are looking at all media outlets...not just conservative...I make a point of it
Republicans do not like any agency that will help women. According to right wingnuts, any government money spent that does not help the wealthy and big oil is wasted.
"I don't agree with them using federal tax dollars to fund abortions...its not right'
They don't. What's not right is your understanding. More reading, less talky.
I think cancer treatement for the poor is immoral ... I do not want my tax dollars going to help those low income cancer patients
Willard, Scott Rigell & George Allen will lose Virginia behind THIS issue. They all have Gov. Ultrasound backing them. So you can kiss the womens vote goodbye!
"Of course they won't because the fact is that federal money IS funneled into the abortion side of the shop."
Your assumption is meritless. If it were true, the GOP-controlled House would have forced investigations and hearings and obliterated the entire PP organization. They didn't. Wanna guess why?
oh...my post is listed under anonymous above..sorry...I did not put in my name before hitting post..my bad :)
its not about that...its about doing something with tax dollars that ends up KILLING a human being? why is it, if scientists find a single cell(they haven't yet) on a planet it will be called LIFE, but a collection of cells in a woman's body is not life? confused? Funding compassionate cancer care is the right thing to do, I am for that, funding the killing of an innocent life, I am against..quit twisting words