Brown, Warren spar in second debate
October 1st, 2012
10:55 PM ET
2 years ago

Brown, Warren spar in second debate

(CNN) – In their second debate in the Massachusetts Senate race, Republican Sen. Scott Brown on Monday sought to cement his image as an independent fighter, while Democratic opponent Elizabeth Warren attempted to tie the senator to the conservative base of the Republican Party.

"I vote about 50 percent with my party and about 50 percent with the Democratic Party," Brown said at the debate, held at the University of Massachusetts-Lowell. "That's a lot different than what Professor Warren would do."

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

– Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.

The Republican senator, who's running in a typically blue state, in particular sought to portray himself as an outsider to what he described as "dysfunctional" Washington. Brown won his Senate seat in a 2010 special election held to replace the late Ted Kennedy.

"I don't work for anybody. I don't work for President Obama or Mitt Romney or Mitch McConnell or Harry Reid," he said. "I work for the people of Massachusetts. That's what being an independent is all about."

While many Republicans spend their time blasting President Barack Obama on the campaign trail, the senator said he "was honored" to work with the president on certain pieces of legislation.

"Of course, I'm going to be proud to stand with the president," Brown said. "He is our president."

Pressed on whether Brown was trying to distance himself from Romney, who served as a Republican governor of Massachusetts, the senator said he lined up with the GOP nominee on economic issues–but said they didn't agree on everything.

"We're two different people," he said. Brown, however, attributed his lack of appearances with Romney to the presidential candidate's grueling schedule.

Sitting next to Brown at a table on stage, Warren took issue with the senator's self-portrayal as a bipartisan lawmaker.

Asked, however, whether she felt she could work with any current Republican members of the Senate, Warren named only retiring Sen. Dick Lugar of Indiana, who lost his seat in a heated primary battle earlier this year.

Pressed further, the Harvard law professor said it would "depend on the issue" and pointed to her experience "working across the aisle" when she served as Obama's adviser during the formation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

"At the end of the day, the reason I'm in this race is not about partisanship; it's about working families. I will work with anyone," she said.

Turning the tables back on Brown, Warren said the senator may talk a big game on his bipartisan credentials but argued the Republican makes a different case behind closed doors. Warren said Brown raises money by assuring donors he could help the GOP retake the Senate majority.

Furthermore, Warren said she "absolutely" believes Brown and the Republican Party aim to obstruct the president's agenda on economic issues, citing the senator's vote against jobs bills backed by Democrats.

"What Sen. Brown doesn't want to talk about is he has signed an extremist, right-wing pledge never to raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires," Warren added, referring to anti-tax heavyweight Grover Norquist's no-new-taxes pledge.

Bringing up an April vote in the Senate on the so-called Buffett Rule, a measure that would raise taxes on the very wealthy, Warren said, "Scott Brown, along with every other Republican, voted no."

She later added: "When it comes down to it in the hard votes, he stands with the millionaires. He stands with the billionaires….He's not there for people who are out of work."

The Republican senator countered, saying the Buffett Rule would only fund the government "for a day."

"We've been taxed enough, regulated enough, and the only person sitting at this table who's a fiscal conservative is me," he said, emphasizing his stance against raising tax rates.

The debate came one day after a new poll released Sunday indicated 43% of likely voters back Warren, while 38% support Brown. The five-point difference, however, falls within the survey's sampling error, meaning the two candidates are statistically tied.

The new survey marks the latest in a string of polls putting Warren ahead of Brown since the Democratic National Convention, where Warren delivered a high-profile speech. However, a University of Massachusetts/Boston Herald survey last week indicated Brown was up by four points.

A recent scandal surrounding Warren's claim to Native American roots also came up during Monday's debate, one week after both campaigns released dueling television commercials on the issue. Brown's campaign has been pounding Warren for citing Native American heritage in faculty directories at Harvard, something Warren says she did in order to meet people with similar backgrounds.

Warren on Monday reiterated that her mother told her she had such ancestry in her blood. The Democrat has long maintained that she never used her Native American claim to advance her career.

While the senator said it was not a disqualifying factor, he argued she has nonetheless been misleading to voters.

"No one's questioning about what our parents tell us as we grow up, but as you get older, she has an affirmative obligation to check," Brown said.

Hitting back, Warren faulted Brown for attacking her over the situation. "To try to turn this into something bigger is just wrong."

In a commercial last week, Warren responded directly to the jabs.

"As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage," Warren said in the spot. "What kid would? But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so they had to elope."

"Let me be clear. I never asked for or never got any benefit because of my heritage," she continued. "The people who hired me have all said they didn't even know about it."


Filed under: 2012 • Elizabeth Warren • Massachusetts • Scott Brown • Senate
soundoff (11 Responses)
  1. AK_steve

    Massachusetts is one of the only states left where you can win election by being bi-partisan. God forbid you talk about voting 50-50 with your own party and the opposition. They lynch people in Texas for that.

    October 1, 2012 11:16 pm at 11:16 pm |
  2. Joe D

    I think we need more native American Indians like Elizabeth Warren in the US senate. Good honest ones like her!

    October 1, 2012 11:34 pm at 11:34 pm |
  3. DENNA

    "I vote about 50 percent with my party and about 50 percent with the Democratic Party," Brown said at the debate, held at the University of Massachusetts-Lowell. "That's a lot different than what Professor Warren would do."
    ==================================================================================
    Really, Scottie? So how do you decide each time how to vote, tarot cards, ouiji board, coin toss? LOL You are too funny.

    October 2, 2012 12:11 am at 12:11 am |
  4. Donkey Party

    Brown thinks he can tell Warren isn't Native American by looking at her, ok, fine. I can tell Brown is a complete idiot just by looking at him.

    October 2, 2012 12:21 am at 12:21 am |
  5. fire0bama

    Go Sen. Brown!

    We do not want to the cheating professor and socialist Warrent o represent us!

    October 2, 2012 12:30 am at 12:30 am |
  6. HendersonNV

    Wow Brown seems to make both sides angry.............Sounds like what we need more of. Less dividers.

    I have a Senator in my state that wont bring anything up for Senate vote, makes up stories about his "sources" on the Senate floor (instead of doing his job), represents many fundamental policies that contradict his LDS religion yet says Romney "sullied" their religion? Reid was a boxer, now he is just the punching bag...

    October 2, 2012 12:56 am at 12:56 am |
  7. Erich Snider

    I guess when she marked the box" "Native American",no one looked at it and it really served no purpose???? So, with that logic,why would a minority even bother to check the box if no one looks at it at the universities???

    October 2, 2012 01:33 am at 1:33 am |
  8. GI Joe

    Brown showed his butt again.

    I hope Ms. Warren is elected. Brown IS wall street's favorite senator - they voted on it last year.

    October 2, 2012 06:24 am at 6:24 am |
  9. Marie MD

    The daughter pimp has nothing left but personal attacks on Warren. He seemed very surprised when one of his comments received jeers and boos from the audience.
    Go WARREN!

    October 2, 2012 06:29 am at 6:29 am |
  10. Gurgyl

    Mass–if you are educated-get rid off all these GOP cult thugs–nation benefits-you too. Manufacturing comes back. Obama12. Watch 47 percent comment on YouTube and google.

    October 2, 2012 06:54 am at 6:54 am |
  11. johnmenacherjr

    This guy is a total republican partisan. No matter what he says he signed a pledge to do what Norquist wants and NOT what the country needs to have for the future. He and his freinds the other partisans in the Senate and the house need to go GroverNorquist should not have their loyalties the country of America should. Question is look at who represents you We have a noprquist partisan here name of Reid Riobble he too like therest need to be gone. Get rid of all of those Norquist partisans!

    October 2, 2012 06:58 am at 6:58 am |