CNN's GUT CHECK | for October 17, 2012 | 5 p.m.
– n. a pause to assess the state, progress or condition of the political news cycle
THE DAY AFTER: BOTH CANDIDATES CLAIM VICTORY…
– Obama: The choice is a ‘sketchy’ one –
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AT A CAMPAIGN EVENT IN IOWA: “Let's recap what we learned last night. His tax plan doesn't add up. His jobs plan doesn't create jobs. His deficit reduction plan adds to the deficit. So Iowa – everybody here has heard of the New Deal, you've heard of the Fair Deal, you've heard of the square deal – Mitt Romney is trying to sell you a sketchy deal.”
– Romney: Obama has one more debate to find a Plan for the Next Four Years –
MITT ROMNEY AT A CAMPAIGN EVENT IN VIRGINIA: “I think it is interesting that the president still doesn't have an agenda for a second term. Don’t you think that it is time for him to finally put together a vision of what he would do over the next four years if he were elected? I mean he has got to come up with that over this weekend because there is only one debate left on Monday. I just think the American people had expected that the president of the United States would be able to describe what he is going to do in the next four years. But he can't. He can't even explain what he has done in the last four years.”
LESS TALK, MORE WORDS: Although Mitt Romney spoke 3 minutes and 14 seconds less than President Obama, he delivered 478 more words overall in Tuesday night’s debate:
Obama: 44:04 – 7506 words
Romney: 40:50 – 7984 words
This also happened in the first presidential debate – Obama spoke for a longer period of time, while Romney said more words:
Obama: 42:50 – 7294 words
Romney: 38:32 – 7802 words
On this day in history, Jimmy Carter restored citizenship rights to which American?
The co-existent power and frivolity of social media has caught our eye and frustrated our news instincts, as a compelling debate over women’s pay turned into a comedy competition online.
The study of how Mitt Romney’s answer about equal pay turned into a social media bonanza reveals the simultaneous frustration and amusement with our current news environment.
The fact that this water cooler bonanza over “binders of women” originated from the question of a 24-year-old female pre-K teacher from Floral Park, New York, makes the resulting ricochet more staggering.
Katherine Fenton stood up last night to ask, “In what new ways do you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72% of what their male counterparts earn?”
When it was Romney’s turn to answer, he talked about his experience of having difficulty recruiting female candidates as governor of Massachusetts:
ROMNEY: “We took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet.
“I went to a number of women's groups and said, ‘Can you help us find folks,’ and they brought us whole binders full of women. … Now one of the reasons I was able to get so many good women to be part of that team was because of our recruiting effort. But No. 2, because I recognized that if you're going to have women in the workforce that sometimes you need to be more flexible. My chief of staff, for instance, had two kids that were still in school.
“She said, I can't be here until 7 or 8 o'clock at night. I need to be able to get home at 5 o'clock so I can be there for making dinner for my kids and being with them when they get home from school. So we said fine. Let's have a flexible schedule so you can have hours that work for you.”
Romney’s answer touched on something more complex than equal pay: the struggle to get a diverse applicant pool interested in public service as well as providing flexible work arrangements for recruitment and retention. That answer was interesting not just because of public policy, but because it is a current, active debate in corporate – and suburban - America.
However, that debate, which was well-received by our CNN focus group, was overshadowed by the fact that Romney used the term “binders full of women” – a phrase that jumped 214,000% on Facebook within an hour of the debate. Instead of being frustrated – or intimidated - by the viral message shift, the Obama campaign and its allies jumped on the meme, creating hashtags, websites and videos around the theme; co-opting the humor to fit their political story line. This afternoon, the DNC organized a conference call with Lilly Ledbetter and Cecile Richards to discuss Romney’s “referring to women as resumes in binders.”
Just as Bill Clinton and his saxophone did with MTV and late-night talk shows in 1992, the Obama campaign has nurtured a different audience with its embrace of social media.
What is left to be seen is how the women voters like Katherine Fenton react. She told her local paper she didn’t get the answer to her question. Perhaps she has solace that two weeks ago, people looking for answers about the role and size of government were overwhelmed by Big Bird.
Did you miss it?
Leading CNNPolitics: Analysis: Romney whiffs on some easy pitches
Ahead of Tuesday night's debate in Hempstead, New York, people wondered whether the town hall format, in which voters tend to place a premium on the appearance of civility, might limit the opportunity for attacks. But niceness isn't an attribute that tends to top the priority list for most New Yorkers; it was clear from the first moments of the debate that both men came ready to brawl. – Rebecca Sinderbrand
Leading Drudge: Gallup: R 51% O 45%
Leading HuffPo: Binder Brouhaha
Vice President Joe Biden and GOP vice-presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) disagreed over Mitt Romney's remark in the presidential debate Tuesday that he asked women's groups to bring him "binders full of women" to fill cabinet positions as governor of Massachusetts. – Luke Johnson
Leading Politico: Obama fights back
He showed up. An animated and aggressive Barack Obama clawed back Tuesday from his somnambulant first debate — and an often defensive Mitt Romney battled moderator Candy Crowley of CNN nearly as often as he went after the president. – Glenn Thrush
Leading The New York Times: Debate Moves Women to Fore in Race for the White House
President Obama charged that Mitt Romney’s policies are economically threatening to women, as the candidates in their second presidential debate on Tuesday night clashed repeatedly over who would best serve the interests of the country’s largest and most critical constituency. – Michael Shear
The political bites of the day
– The running mates react to the second presidential debate –
VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN ON NBC: “I think President Obama was absolutely at the top of his game last night, and I also think that he was able to clearly draw a picture between a future under Obama and a future under Romney. And the thing that amazed me the most was even after three debates, his two and my one, there is still not a single specific in the Romney $5 trillion tax plan. I mean, everything, everything is sketchy.”
REP. PAUL RYAN ON NBC: “Well, he clearly changed his tactic. They said that he would change his tactic but his answers didn't change. He didn't offer new idea about how the next four years would be any different than the last four years. The reason why I think Mitt Romney won this debate is because he gave the country a very clear choice and a very clear vision for about how we have a leader that will create jobs, grow the economy and get people back to work.”
– Candy: ‘I was trying to move this along because the question was Benghazi’ -
CNN’s CANDY CROWLEY, MIODERATOR OF THE SECOND PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE, IN AN INTERVIEW ON CNN: “I was trying to move this along because the question was Benghazi. There is no question that the administration is quite vulnerable on this topic. That they did take weeks to go ‘Well actually there really wasn’t a protest and actually didn’t have anything to do with the tape.’ That took a long time. That’s where he was going. That was [Romney’s] first answer. … Then we got hung up on this: ‘Yes he said - no I didn’t - I said terror - you didn’t say terror.’
“And there was this point where they both kind of looked at me. … And what I wanted to do was move this along. … So I said, (Obama) did say ‘acts of terror.’ … But Gov. Romney, you are perfectly right, that it took weeks for them to get past the tape.”
– Portman stresses early voting in Ohio –
SEN. ROB PORTMAN AT A CAMPAIGN RALLY IN OHIO: “You can actually go down to the Board of Elections and you can vote right after this rally. They're open eight to five every day this week including today. Will you vote early? We want to bank those votes. If you vote early, you know what happens? You're then free on Election Day to get other people to the polls.”
– Biden references Binders in campaign speech –
VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN AT A CAMPAIGN EVENT IN COLORADO: “You heard the debate last night. When Gov. Romney was asked a direct question about equal pay he started talking about binders. Oh!! The idea that he had to ask where a qualified woman was - he just should have come to my house. He didn’t need a binder. He didn’t need a binder! And I mean it.”
What stopped us in 140 characters or less
Debate 1: "Big Bird" Debate 2: "Binders Full of Women" And there you have the net results.—
Rob Frankel (@brandingexpert) October 17, 2012
My friend Joe Trippi says that if Obama had performed in the first debate like he did last night, the election would have been over by now.—
Howard Fineman (@howardfineman) October 17, 2012
Obama isn't just deporting "gang bangers" and it was misleading for him to suggest so motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/o…—
(@AdamSerwer) October 17, 2012
Gallup: Romney 51, Obama 45 weeklystandard.com/blogs/gallup-r… This doesn't capture last night. Poll taken Oct. 10 through 16. VP debate was Oct. 11—
John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) October 17, 2012
In 2000, Gallup showed a 24 point swing to Gore over 5 weeks. Swings this year have actually been pretty tame. gallup.com/poll/154559/US…—
Nate Silver (@fivethirtyeight) October 17, 2012
CNN Natl Security (@natlsecuritycnn) October 17, 2012
Talk show icon Larry King agrees to moderate debate of 3rd party presidential hopefuls: m.washingtonpost.com/politics/talk-…—
Joel Palmer (@PoliticalLogic) October 17, 2012
One hundred and thirteen years after the civil war ended, then-President Jimmy Carter posthumously restored “the full rights of citizenship to Jefferson Davis,” the former president of the Confederate State of America.
With the establishment of the confederacy, Davis’ citizenship in the United States (he was born in Kentucky) was revoked. After being captured on May 10, 1865, Davis was tried for treason and his rights to run for office were revoked.
“Our Nation needs to clear away the guilts and enmities and recriminations of the past, to finally set at rest the divisions that threatened to destroy our Nation and to discredit the principles on which it was founded,” the bill restoring Davis’ citizenship said. “Our people need to turn their attention to the important tasks that still lie before us in establishing those principles for all people.”
All confederate generals were stripped of their citizenship following the Civil War. Robert E. Lee’s citizenship was posthumously restored two years earlier – in 1976.
GUT CHECK WINNER’S CIRCLE
(why aren’t you in it)
Steve Liguori (@SteveL3877) tweeted the first answer, but boxer Muhammad Ali was not correct. Congratulations to Matthew Gilbertson (@MattRGilbertson) for being the first to correctly answer Gut Check Trivia.
Our inbox awaits: firstname.lastname@example.org
Anyone can sign up for Gut Check by emailing email@example.com
Tips or comments? Send them to Michelle; send complaints to Preston, because he is already in a bad mood. We also want to give a shout out to Dan Merica, who runs our Twitter account @gutCheckCNN and enriches this product every single day.