(CNN) – The Washington Post announced in an editorial Thursday their endorsement of President Barack Obama.
The Post, which also endorsed then-Illinois Sen. Obama in 2008, said that while much of the campaign for the White House has "dwelt on the past," Obama is in a better position to lead in the challenges that lie ahead.
– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker
– Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.
The Washington-based newspaper, whose editorial page leans left, said their endorsement comes recognizing disappointments in Obama's first term but said the president "is committed to the only approach that can succeed: a balance of entitlement reform and revenue increases."
The editorial contrasts this with what it said is Republican nominee Mitt Romney's future - "one in which an ever-greater share of the nation's wealth resides with the nation's wealthy, at a time when inequality already is growing."
The Post notes dissatisfaction that Obama failed to reach a fiscal deal with Congress in 2011, the president's isolation "inside a tight White House circle" as well as his attitude toward business as an "obstacle rather than a partner."
However, Obama's accomplishments are rendered more impressive considering tough economic times and “uncompromising opposition,” the paper wrote.
The editorial points to Obama's successes - the stimulus plans put in place when he stepped into office in 2009 in overwhelmingly poor economic times; the Chrysler and General Motors auto bailout; and Obama's signature healthcare imitative, the Affordable Care Act.
The Post said abroad, Obama has had both successes - the killing of Osama bin Laden and support of the popular uprising in Libya - and failures - the lack of involvement in the Syria and "ambivalence regarding Afghanistan."
Romney, on the other hand, "hardly differs" from Obama on foreign policy and has not made the case for himself as president. The Post wrote, there's no way to tell how Romney would govern as president, ticking off a series of contradictory stances the Republican candidate has taken while vying for the White House and his time as the governor of Massachusetts.
Michael Dahm, did you say you are making 30K a year? So it is Obama's fault? What did you make before or during the Bush administration? As a farmer you know that the president has no control over the draught this country is facing. You are looking for someone to blame for the fact that you choose the occupation of a farmer, with long hard hours. Maybe you would be better off, to get an education and change your occupation; as Obama has made it easier than ever for people to join the twentieth century in their education, and even learn the advance in technology for farming.
Michael I have time to further digest you comment. I am not sure what you want the president to do. Do you feel the president owes you or others in the country a living. I do taxes and as a farmer you already get more breaks than the average person. You get paid not to farm. So, I cannot figure out exactly what it is the president can do for farmers? Please, tell me, I really would like to know?
The winner of the US Presidential vote for 2012 is Barack Obama and still the peoples President for second term