December 21st, 2012
01:42 PM ET
2 years ago

NRA comments draw swift opposition in reactions

(CNN) – In the hours after the much-anticipated remarks Friday morning by the National Rifle Association responding to last week's deadly shooting at a Connecticut school, political figures weighed in, largely disagreeing with the organization's comments.

NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre spoke to reporters without taking questions and pointed to the no-weapons policies at schools that put children's lives at risk, calling for armed officers at every school.

– Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

Former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele called the NRA's remarks "very haunting and very disturbing."

"I don't even know where to begin," Steele said on MSNBC after the NRA's statement. "As a supporter of the Second Amendment and a supporter of the NRA, even though I'm not a member of the NRA, I just found it very haunting and very disturbing that our country now that are talking about arming our teachers and our principals in classrooms. I do not believe that's where the American people want to go."

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie told reporters in Newark Friday morning he doesn't agree that placing armed guards in schools would effectively deter violence, according to a Bergen Record report.

"In general I don't think that the solution to safety in schools is putting an armed guard because for it to be really effective in my view, from a law enforcement perspective, you have to have an armed guard at every classroom," he said. "Because if you just have an armed guard at the front door then what if this guy had gone around to the side door? There's many doors in and out of schools."

Christie said his comments were not specific to the NRA's proposal as he had not yet seen the statement.

Outspoken gun-control advocate New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the statement "a shameful evasion of the crisis facing our country."

"Instead of offering solutions to a problem they have helped create, they offered a paranoid, dystopian vision of a more dangerous and violent America where everyone is armed and no place is safe," he said. "Enough. As a country, we must rise above special interest politics."

Democratic congressman and senator-elect Chris Murphy, whose congressional district includes Newtown, tweeted a sharp reaction from Connecticut after the group's comments: "Walking out of another funeral and was handed the NRA transcript. The most revolting, tone deaf statement I've ever seen."

At a House Democratic press conference on Capitol Hill after the NRA's statement, leader Nancy Pelosi read Murphy's tweet, adding the NRA's proposal of armed officers in schools "just doesn't make sense." House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer said he doesn't believe the NRA's views are representative of the organization's members, and Rep. Joseph Crowley from New York called the group's proposal "irrational."

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, a Democrat from New York, whose husband was one of six killed and her son seriously injured in the 1993 Long Island Rail Road shooting, said she was "saddened by what I saw today."

"The NRA's leadership had an opportunity to help unite the nation behind efforts to reduce gun violence and avert massacres like the one at Sandy Hook Elementary School but it instead showed a disconnect between it and the majority of the American people," she said in a statement.

In statements following LaPierre's comments, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a Democrat from New Jersey, called LaPierre's comments "reckless." And Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat from California, said in assigning blame to others, LaPierre "showed himself to be completely out of touch by ignoring the proliferation of weapons of war on our streets."

Mark Kelly, a retired astronaut and husband to former Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords who was seriously injured in a shooting in Tuscon last year, expressed disappointment in the NRA's remarks in a post to his Facebook page.

"The NRA could have chosen to be a voice for the vast majority of its own members who want common sense, reasonable safeguards on deadly firearms, but instead it chose to defend extreme pro-gun positions that aren't even popular among the law abiding gun owners it represents," Kelly said.

Twenty children and six adults died after a gunman opened fire at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, sparking grief, shock and calls for a renewed look at U.S. gun laws.

President Barack Obama said Wednesday that Vice President Joe Biden will lead an administration effort to develop recommendations no later than January for preventing another tragedy like last week's school shooting.

Until Friday, the NRA refrained from commenting in the week following the shooting out of respect for the families and victims of the tragedy, according to LaPierre and the organization. The NRA called on former U.S. congressman Asa Hutchinson to lead the proposed National Model School Shield Program.


Filed under: 2012 • Gun rights • NRA
soundoff (904 Responses)
  1. bp

    We've seen this dance before; the NRA has the drill down cold on obstructing and delaying the passage of new regulations by Congress until the public has moved on to another topic, then killing those efforts quietly in committee. Nothing will change. Repeat sequence after next massacre.

    "We think it is poor form for a politician or a special interest group to try to push a legislative agenda on the back of any tragedy."
    - NRA, after 2008 Northern Illinois shootings

    "Now is not the time to debate politics or discuss policy."
    - NRA, after 2009 Binghampton massacre

    "At this time, anything other than prayers for the victims and their families would be inappropriate."
    - NRA, after 2011 shooting spree that wounded Gabrielle Giffords

    "There will be an appropriate time down the road to engage in political and policy discussions."
    - NRA, after 2012 Aurora massacre

    December 22, 2012 03:23 pm at 3:23 pm |
  2. HCX

    What about our playgrounds, pre-schools, day-care centers, rec centers, community pools, movie theatres, malls, etc etc etc??? Should they get armed guards too? The NRA solution is a problem. Our children should be safe where ever they go.

    December 22, 2012 03:44 pm at 3:44 pm |
  3. NRA=BS

    If we start putting armed guards at the schools will we also see armed guards at all malls at all parks at all public places? Will this country be considered SAFE because there are guns every where? This situation needs a proactive clear solution not some poor delusional response. More of something that is dangerous doesn't make sense. No one knows when the "Good Guy" will turn. Power is a funny thing that not everyone can handle. Do regular policeman travel with these type of rifles? If the answer is no than why does an indivial need these type of guns. I heard a pro gun say they need it in case they miss but I argue that if you are a gun owner is it not likely that you practice shooting and therefore missing a target is unlikely? When I think of a person protecting themselves I imagine a break into their home not against an army of bad guys. If some one is being rush into their home by a few bad guns with rifles I am figuring the home owner is a bad guy themselves?

    December 22, 2012 03:52 pm at 3:52 pm |
  4. NRA=BS

    Slowly aren't we turning into one of those horrible eastern countries. What with the last election and the right talking crazy things against women's rights, using strong religious views to right their actions, and now planning to enforce the idea of empowering guns at every public space.... What's next? I know when we rise to question these type of actions we are called liberals as a way to shut us up because they offer no common sense response.

    December 22, 2012 04:02 pm at 4:02 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37