March 26th, 2013
04:00 PM ET
1 year ago

CNN Poll: 56% say federal govt. should recognize same-sex marriages

Washington (CNN) – A majority of Americans say that same-sex marriages performed in states where they are legal should also be recognized as valid by the federal government, according to a new national survey.

But a CNN/ORC International poll also indicates wide partisan, generational, and geographical divides on the question.

The CNN survey was released Tuesday, one day before the Supreme Court was scheduled to hear arguments on the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as only between a man and a woman, forbids the recognition of same-sex marriages nationwide, and bars married gay and lesbian couples from receiving federal benefits. And on the same day the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a related case regarding California's same-sex marriage ban, known as Proposition 8.

According to the poll, 56% of the public says the federal government should also legally recognize same-sex marriages, with 43% disagreeing.

"Not surprisingly, there is a wide partisan divide on this issue, with three-quarters of Democrats - and only a quarter of all Republicans - calling for the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages conducted in states that allow them," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

Fifty-six percent of independents say that the federal government should recognize such marriages.

The survey also highlights generational, gender and geographic divides.

"Opposition to federal recognition of same-sex marriage comes mostly from men, senior citizens and rural Americans; support is highest among women, 18-to-34 year olds, and urban residents," adds Holland.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the appeal of lower court decisions that struck down provisions in DOMA. The Obama administration declined to defend the law in court, but congressional Republicans, operating officially as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, took over the role normally filled by the Justice Department's solicitor general.

The marriages of an estimated 120,000 gay and lesbian couples in the nine states and the District of Columbia that allow same-sex marriage are not recognized by the federal government as military spouses, social security beneficiaries or for other purposes.

Congress passed the measure and President Bill Clinton signed it into law in 1996. Clinton recently renounced the law as "incompatible with our Constitution," saying "it was a very different time" when he put his signature on it.

The poll was conducted March 15-17 for CNN by ORC International, with 1,021 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's overall sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points.

– CNN Political Editor Paul Steinhauser and Supreme Court producer Bill Mears contributed to this report.

soundoff (30 Responses)
  1. GOP = Greed Over People

    Color me quizzical, but if this involves the inequities of paying Federal taxes, how can this be a "states rights" issue?

    March 26, 2013 05:22 pm at 5:22 pm |
  2. Matt

    The way I see it...marriage is the union between the man and a woman because they can naturally and biologically create offspring. The marriage of the two parents is a vow to keep children and families together so they can grow up to be greater individuals...it's that simple. Over-thinking things results in greater confusion and animosity.

    March 26, 2013 05:25 pm at 5:25 pm |
  3. Mennoknight

    Marriage is the union of a man and a woman.

    March 26, 2013 05:29 pm at 5:29 pm |
  4. Whoknowsthetruth

    I used to be live and let live! Until they started redefining words and attacking the Boy Scouts or anybody else that defines Marriage as between a man and woman, now I am for boycotting anybody that does not agree with me!

    March 26, 2013 05:41 pm at 5:41 pm |
  5. Amanda

    "The way I see it...marriage is the union between the man and a woman because they can naturally and biologically create offspring. The marriage of the two parents is a vow to keep children and families together so they can grow up to be greater individuals...it's that simple. Over-thinking things results in greater confusion and animosity."

    So people that have no intentions or are physically unable to have children shouldn't be allowed to marry? I guess we need to have an age limit on marriage. This might be one of the most asinine things I've ever heard!

    March 26, 2013 05:46 pm at 5:46 pm |
1 2